Morality is based upon the conception of man as a free agent who, just because he is free, binds himself through his reason to prescriptive judgments of justice, rights, and welfare pertaining to how people ought to relate to each other, it stands in need neither of the idea of another Being over him, for him to apprehend his duty, nor of an incentive other than the law itself, for him to do his duty. At least it is man’s own fault if he is subject to such a need; and if he is, this need can be relieved through nothing outside himself: for whatever does not originate in himself and his own freedom in no way compensates for the deficiency of his morality. So far as Believers must subordinate their will to God. This lack of freedom goes very deep. It is not simply that they know what God can pinnish them cruelly for disobeying his will. This would imply that thay have wills of their own, that thay can do think about whether it is prudent or right to obey God. The truth is that beliver has no will. For him morality is a matter of external regulation. Belivers do not forming their own moral judgements about right or wrong. Hence belivers have no morality.
>>135624158
>Belivers do not forming their own moral judgements about right or wrong. Hence belivers have no morality
So an atheist autistic person trying to ironically take the moral high ground by saying
>actually believers aren't MORAL
While ignoring the fact that many religion believe in something called choices, in which people can willingly follow the religion, or at least try to improve themselves at minimum.