Philosophy test

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-31 at 1.26.09 AM.png (95KB, 733x413px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 733x413px

>>135606418
are you me?

File: whothefuckisaugustine.png (56KB, 748x415px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 748x415px

>>135606418
>>135607294

File: saintaugustine1.jpg (39KB, 620x400px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 620x400px

>>135607603
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustine_of_Hippo

File: 2017-07-31_01-41-51.png (62KB, 710x431px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 710x431px

hrm

>>135606418
Kant is first.

File: asdasdasdas.png (11KB, 202x333px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 202x333px

>>135606418

Your quiz is shit.

File: Screenshot_2017-07-31-07-29-30.jpg (194KB, 984x769px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 984x769px

>>135606418

File: FireShot Screen Capture #199 - 'Ask about my Which famous philosopher do you most agree with_ top result__' - www_selectsmart_com_FREE_freeResults_php.jpg (51KB, 751x412px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 751x412px

>>135606418

File: results.png (217KB, 1873x1021px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1873x1021px

>>135606418
We wuz Greeks n shiiiieeet

>>135606418
>>135607294
>>135607603
>>135608386
Aristotle > Plato?

anyone who didn't get Nietzsche 100% needs to fuck off back to plebbit

Kant - 100%
Nietzsche - 0%
everyone else 50-70%

whats this mean idk who kant is

>>135606418
>datamining yourself

File: retarded.jpg (80KB, 743x415px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 743x415px

>>135606418
completely retarded questions, literally 80% of them are ambiguous
also, who the fuck can even interpret the results

>>135616965
Means you're probably an intellectual who sucks cock.

File: wew lad.png (231KB, 1454x836px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 1454x836px

Really makes you think

File: philosophy.png (68KB, 746x406px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 746x406px

>>135608386

File: Screenshot_2017-07-31-04-22-36.png (470KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

470KB, 720x1280px

Rate?

>>135616965
>>135617447
Kant is basically the pinnicle of Enlightenment thought. It means you have been brainwashed hook line and sinker by traditional Liberalism (pre-WWII).

>>135617375
I have never read Augustine, but know a little about his views. I am not surprised most scored so highly on agreement with him. I have not read Nietzsche, but need to. Aquinas is a surprise. Aristotle is about what I thought it would be. I am not surprised by the Hume and Kant ratings, both of whom I have read, and both of whom are brilliant. I knew I disagreed with them. I don't know about the others.

I would score highly on Later Wittgenstein, Foucault, Richard Rorty, and Kuhn. And no, I am not a lefty at all.

Richard Rorty's Achieving our Country is a great read if you want to understand liberalism and its inherent contradictions.

File: muh philosophy.png (51KB, 704x394px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 704x394px

>>135606418

>>135606418
In the following order:

Kant (100%)
Aquinas (88%)
Aristote (88%)
Plato (88%)
Augustine (50%)
Nietzsche (50%)
Hume (38%)
Protagoras (13%)
Sextus Empiricus (0%)

>>135606418
>http://www.selectsmart.com/FREE/select.php?client=PhilosophyGuys


Kant (100%)
Aquinas (61%)
Protagoras (57%)
Sextus Empiricus (52%)
Aristotle (45%)
Augustine (44%)
Hume (44%)
Plato (16%)
Nietzsche (0%)

File: result philosophy.png (51KB, 735x422px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 735x422px

>>135620608
>>135620284
>>135619669
>>135619176
>>135618155
>>135618133
>>135617599
>>135617434
>>135617039
>>135616965
>>135616211
>>135615853
>>135613428
>>135612044
>>135611502
>>135609448
>>135609011
>>135608645
>>135608386
>>135607603
>>135607294
>>135606418
Y'all niggas need to read thus spoke Zarathustra. Becoming the overman is the ultimate redpill.

File: IMG_20170731_044644.jpg (63KB, 721x408px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 721x408px

>>135606418
I've never really read about any philosophies, I guess I should start with this Augustine guy. Do any anons have any recommended phi-books?

>>135622589
I have yet to read this, but heard this one is good:
>Marcus Aurelius: Meditations

File: ph.png (51KB, 703x345px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 703x345px

>>135606418
What my results mean?

File: 2017-07-31_13-14-02.png (13KB, 373x331px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 373x331px

>>135606418

File: Bez názvu.png (68KB, 720x414px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 720x414px

>this thread
>muh objective reality & morality

File: oobermans.png (55KB, 750x422px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 750x422px

>>135606418

Aristotle (100%)
Kant (98%)
Plato (89%)
Aquinas (84%)
Augustine (84%)
Hume (82%)
Sextus Empiricus (35%)
Protagoras (33%)
Nietzsche (0%)

Dems are getting your IP addresses from these silly ass quizzes

Nietzsche (100%)
Kant (86%)
Protagoras (86%)
Sextus Empiricus (86%)
Augustine (58%)
Hume (43%)
Aristotle (29%)
Aquinas (15%)
Plato (0%

File: dolan.png (94KB, 500x304px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 500x304px

>>135606418
Augustine (100%)
Kant (100%)
Aquinas (88%)
Hume (88%)

I didn't know you could get 100% with two philosophers. Perhaps I have truly ascended above you plebs.

File: philo test.png (51KB, 711x415px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 711x415px

>Agree with the Aryan only 20%
>Agree with the Eternal Anglo 100%

NOOOOOOOOO

File: miracleexaminer.jpg (58KB, 500x766px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 500x766px

>>135622589
With Augustine, start with his biography, Confessions. After that read his magnum opus, The City of God Against the Pagans.

>>135606418
Did i win?

File: my res.png (65KB, 907x511px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 907x511px

Aquinas was 100% based, so I agree, but I would predict more on Nietzsche

To everyone who didn't get Hume: What's it like having a low IQ?

File: Screenshot_20170731-215411.png (2MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x2560px

>>135629301
Fuck didn't post

100% Aquinas reporting

File: Screenshot_20170731-150445.png (860KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

860KB, 1080x1920px

>>135606418
Dont know anything about the top guys.

>>135629964
Also it is bullshit moust of the questions are asked in a way that there meanings are questionable.
Philosophy cant be sumed up in one short question.

File: Χωρίς τίτλο.jpg (87KB, 728x420px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 728x420px

kant team

File: dddd.png (64KB, 731x428px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 731x428px

>>135606418
Don't even know who the fuck Augustine is

File: dsgdgsd.png (13KB, 342x333px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 342x333px

This is probably mostly bullshit.

Aquinas, as expected

File: Augustine.jpg (19KB, 199x334px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 199x334px

>>135606418
I guess I should check him out.

File: 20170731_071807.png (106KB, 1080x894px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1080x894px

>>135606418
These questions were kind of weird. Especially the ones directly about philosophy as a field. I gave those "No preference" because philosophy isn't a real field of study.

File: wealthyshekelmerchant.png (13KB, 382x379px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 382x379px

>>135630561
>philosophy isn't a real field of study.
Good goy, don't hurt your head thinking about moral issues at all, just keep producing new consumer goods for our markets.

>>135630362
Catholic philosopher. Superior to Aquinas.

Boils down to provable morality of actions (opposite of moral relativism).

Even if you're a Darwinist you believe in objective mortality too because there are objectively superior survival strategies.

File: result.png (54KB, 741x411px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 741x411px

>>135606418
I don't know any philosophers, tell me something about my result.

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-31 at 13.28.56.png (105KB, 751x441px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 751x441px

Don't even know who this kant is

File: 1472115223800.png (51KB, 727x424px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 727x424px

>>135606418
I now realize I know very little about philosophers and can't interpret my results

>>135606418
Schopenhauer ... where ?

File: Res.jpg (81KB, 752x413px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 752x413px

>>135631868
Alzo.

File: Philos.jpg (143KB, 1085x617px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 1085x617px

>>135606418

>>135631153
But I know that some morality systems where murder is okay and stealing is fine (gypsies) exist
I just think they're utter garabge

>>135631545
They teach Kant in highschool...

>>135630963
Yes, moral issues exist and one can have ideas about what is and is not moral but its not a field of study like a science or mathematics. "I thought something so I wrote about it", well, okay. Doesn't make you a real scholar like a mathematician.

File: prott.jpg (91KB, 806x420px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 806x420px

someone else?

File: Screenshot_1.png (23KB, 410x399px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 410x399px

Very brutal huh?

>>135618181
Wrong Kant himself described (((them))) as vampires of society.

>>135632038
No action is independent from the context. Which is why moral relativism has such a nasty purchase.

Gypsies are a blight which is why they were forcibly expelled so often. Game theory, Gypsies and Jews are parasites, they are successful only when the cooperative majority ignores their gnawing.

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-31 at 5.49.34 AM.png (96KB, 731x421px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 731x421px

Not sure if this is good.

I can't wait to see all the high school students in philosophy class talking about how Nietzsche is red pill. In reality they just trying to copy Matthew McConaughey in True Detective cause they are too dumb to have and self philosophy.

>>135632826
anyone who has les than 70 percent on nietzsche should be considered subhuman pest..

>>135633103
>tfw 0% Nietzsche
I don't really like his stuff.

File: ss+(2017-07-31+at+06.52.45).png (52KB, 707x412px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 707x412px

Is Nietzche good?

>>135632364
Mathematics is applied philosophy. You build mathematical (formal) systems by agreeing to certain premises (there are different systems out there, which system you arrive at depends on your axioms). Axioms can't be proofen, therefore you just can show the (mathematical) "beauty" and the "usefullness" of agreeing to certian premises.

why is Everyone getting Augustine?

This test is a joke

>>135633039
wut, normies really don't understand True Detective.

>>135633432
Objective morality.

>>135606418
tfw some of these questions are actually reminding me of things I've read. I forget if it was in Aristotles ethics, or a different book, but I think question 22 was basically straight out lf the book.

>>135606418
Kant (100%)
Nietzsche (92%)
Aristotle (67%)

File: Screenshot (49).png (61KB, 765x637px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 765x637px

>>135633699
here is my pic

>>135633251
no

>>135633622
Flawed test and questions, not enough data

>>135606418
>augustine
>aquino
not surprised at all but everyone seem be a conservative

File: masterace.png (48KB, 729x345px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 729x345px

deus vult

File: Capture.jpg (30KB, 611x406px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 611x406px

>>135606418
masterrace reporting in

>>135633251
Nietzche is peachy

>>135633931
Care to give me a quick summary of their main ideas?

All I seem to remember about them is that they founded two orders of catholic monks

>>135633251
No, it means you are rudderless.

File: results.png (154KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1366x768px

>>135606418

Not a surprise: i predicted my results, too.

>>135634396
wiki say they just perpetuated catholicism power relating it to the "knowledge" of those times

File: uh.png (62KB, 820x832px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 820x832px

>fuck, I'm awesome.

>>135606418

Augustine (100%)
Aquinas (89%)
Plato (53%)
Aristotle (46%)
Hume (22%)
Protagoras (20%)
Kant (18%)
Sextus Empiricus (16%)
Nietzsche (0%)


Not really suprised I guess. Ive read none of Aquinas and only Confessions from Augustine, but I still use Christianity (baptist denomination) as my rule of philosophy so..

>>135634396

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholasticism

File: Screenshot_2017-07-31-15-26-43-1.png (129KB, 1023x606px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1023x606px

G-guys? Is this worrying?

Reminder that a priori is a trap. All a priori concepts must be tested and verified.

>>135635143
>editing DOM

File: 51lx1cDRtTL.jpg (35KB, 329x500px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 329x500px

>>135635321
>All a priori concepts must be tested and verified.

Silly empiricists...

philosophy is the world's most useless major

fucking hilarious that out of the 2000 or so years modern civilzation has been around there has only been NINE philosophers worth giving a shit about

>>135635321
tell me something

is there ANY synthetic truth that is known a priori?

>>135635795
>is there ANY synthetic truth that is known a priori?
OP is a fag

File: wew.png (57KB, 707x407px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 707x407px

>>135606418

>>135606418
Kant (100%)
Nietzsche (67%)
Hume (48%)
Aristotle (45%)
Aquinas (31%)
Augustine (16%)
Sextus Empiricus (7%)
Plato (0%)
Protagoras (0%)

>>135635973
>OP is a fag
That assertion is proven true every thread it is not a priori.

>>135635795
>is there ANY synthetic truth that is known a priori?
no, only predicted.

>>135635552
>make up bullshit
>I don't have to support my bullshit by anything
that thinking is why we have satanic elites who believe we live in a simulation.

>>135636259
>that thinking is why we have satanic elites who believe we live in a simulation

has nothing to do with that, has everything to do with rich people not being experienced with philosophy. right now, we live in the age of stupid

the only countries that still legitimately practice real philosophy lie in asia

and of course, it's difficult for students to learn and pick up philosophy at least in my country because college is so expensive, and NOBODY would major in philosophy because it has NO JOBS. Not even the president wants anything to do with it, he's about to destroy the ethics bureau at the white house.

western philosophy is just in a bad spot right now. we need rich people who practice it.

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-31 at 08.41.03.png (88KB, 736x421px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 736x421px

ok

>>135636115
I thought a prior was without prior knowledge
People should know OP is a fag even before accessing 4chan for the first time
Though it quickly becomes based on experience

>>135633251

he was an opium addict who couldnt get laid and fucked prostitutes

>>135636553
but you couldn't understand that OP is a fag until you're accumulated tons of threads worth of experience of OP being a fag until you can rightfully conclude that OP is a fag

File: pipilosophy.png (12KB, 494x334px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 494x334px

Anything from this Aquinas guy?

>>135622252
overman sounds like a stupid superman, just call it Übermensch, it's where the word comes from

File: eggrt.png (61KB, 790x416px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 790x416px

>>135606418

Looks like everyone here is a Kant.

File: derps.png (20KB, 491x412px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 491x412px

I'm 100% Kant

>>135637435
and I'm surprised there are so few with nietzsche on this "redpilled" board

I've got Nietzsche 100% and Kant 68%, just about what I expected

>>135636259
>>make up bullshit
>>I don't have to support my bullshit by anything

>completely misrepresents the concept

herr derr i can't know that 6x7=42 without finding seven sets of six of an object and counting all of them. Oh, i have to test counting before I can know it to be certain. I have to test knowing before i can know. I have to test testing before I can test....

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-31 at 10.04.41 AM.png (81KB, 758x418px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 758x418px

>>135627969
100% x 3

File: Unbenannt.png (59KB, 776x470px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 776x470px

I predicted it because I chose a philosopher that is probably the most conservative and that can only be a medieval monk

>>135636553
A Priori is a trap. You use your experience and logic to make a prediction.

But it remains a mere prediction until you test it. Too many fuckers mistake definitions for truth.
>All bachelors are unmarried men
duh, because you define it as so. You didn't do anything but define a word. There is no importance because you already had the concept of an unmarried man that you relabeled.

I know you fuckers like Jordan Peterson. His thesis is that Religion and Philosophy tell you how to act. They do not tell you what the world is, they tell you how to live in the world.

File: 1488415762733.png (425KB, 680x986px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 680x986px

>>135637917
I am defeated!

>>135635158

Aquinas (100%)
Augustine (79%)
Plato (68%)
Aristotle (62%)
Kant (46%)
Nietzsche (9%)
Hume (7%)
Protagoras (0%)
Sextus Empiricus (0%)

Yo same, go to a Baptist Church too.

File: screenshot-www.selectsmart.com-2017-07-31-15-11-30.png (115KB, 862x454px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 862x454px

the test is wrong, there's no way this is right, Nietzsche is my nigger.
Anyone know of a better test?

>>135635795
there's space and there's time, because without space nothing could exist and without time there wouldn't be any relations because nothing came before or after the other and whatever it is that we're experiencing it must be in time and space, whether the time is linear or the space is what we think it is doesn't matter.

You could also put in Déscartes "I think therefore I am" - because if you can think you must exist in one form or another. There is somethig and not nothing. Although i don't think thinking is happening after free will or anything, as nothing is, because determinism is a red pill.

Since you're talking about a priori you just might look at kants ontology too.

>>135638489
If you're religious Nietzsche is most definetly not your nigger

>>135638489
or if you believe in a collective

>>135638679
I'm not religious at all, I think the questions are too vague

>>135638748
>collective
pff no, I'm all about the individual 0% Nietzsche my ass

>>135606418

Kant (100%)
Hume (69%)
Aristotle (59%)
Plato (57%)
Nietzsche (24%)
Augustine (20%)
Aquinas (18%)
Sextus Empiricus (16%)
Protagoras (0%)

I am quite happy with that.

File: Untitled.png (71KB, 909x581px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 909x581px

>>135606418
I just kan't.

File: 1367628341798.png (50KB, 1323x184px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1323x184px

>>135638489
>>135638762
/pol/ philosophy is about the restoration of a healthy community (whatever that means to you). It goes against the edgy shit of Nietzsche where nothing really matters.

Sextus Empiricus - 100%
Hume - 80%
Aristotle - 60%
Kant - 60%
Protagoras - 60%
Augustine - 20%
Plato - 20%
Aquinas - 0%
Nietzsche - 0%

File: 27cbeed49b9129eb4d3f268a4597086e.png (14KB, 511x336px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 511x336px

>>135606418
How are these results?

File: Capture d’écran (69).png (26KB, 510x406px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 510x406px

>>135606418
Nietzche , Aristotle...I"m familar with.
But i've never bothered reading anything from Hume or Kant if i'm being honest. I guess that will have to change very soon. These results have peaked my curiosity.

>>135638762
the questions are way too vague
one book of nietzsche is literally called beyond good and evil and there are superficial questions about those evil wrongdoings

File: neat.jpg (61KB, 736x424px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 736x424px

>>135606418
Neat.

>>135639203
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/

Kant is pretty awesome. Philosophy grounded in both objective morality and realism. If something is moral you should be able to explain why or why not it was moral by the results of the action.

>>135631493
I've noticed that the majority tend to have Aquinas at 100%.
You're the first 100% Hume i've stumbled upon.

>>135639022
>nietzsche
>nothing really matters

have you read ANYTHING from nietzsche you dumb cunt? he came up with the term nihilism to describe the direction the world is moving to, he is absolutely pro activity and nothing is worse than nihilism, the übermensch is über (beyond) nihilism and accepted determinism as a fact.

If one philosopher is optimistic and pro-active it's nietzsche

>>135606418

Hume (100%)
Kant (100%)
Aristotle (83%)
Nietzsche (79%)
Augustine (65%)
Protagoras (65%)
Aquinas (43%)
Sextus Empiricus (15%)
Plato (0%)

File: selectsmart_com.png (71KB, 699x414px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 699x414px

>>135606418
Kant never left Königsberg and wrote about the world.
I never left the basement and shitpost the world.

>>135639488
Thanks for the link.

>>135618155
Get an adblocker, adcuck.

File: Screenshot (11).png (398KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 1920x1080px

>>135606418
pretty okay results, op

>>135639635
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nietzsche-moral-political/

I'll admit mistakes because I rely too much on normie interpretation of Nietzsche. Free will bit is pretty obvious. You must act as if people have free will, because the result will be the same if we don't have free will.
>I will stop beating you when you admit that I have the free will to stop

The concepts of "higher men" and lack of realism make his philosophy easy to abuse.

Are the complete works of Plato and Aristotle necessary reads or can some of their writings be skipped?

These questions are retarded. Some aren't specific enough and others are asking about two mutually exclusive things in one.

>>135640497
Better read L.Ron Hubbard. More practical and funny.

>>135640497
Unnecessary question. Reading everything would be ideal, even the mistaken and wrong writings because you can see the mindset and reasoning of the writer and to deduce the errors yourself.

Steel sharpens steel.

File: mhmkrCB.png (71KB, 696x398px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 696x398px

>>135606418
What does that mean?

>>135639635
This

File: Plato.png (64KB, 737x427px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 737x427px

>>135606418
>100% dor both Plato and Arisotle

hmmm

File: Captura.png (59KB, 753x411px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 753x411px

>>135606418
Am i a cuck guys?

File: nietzsche.png (50KB, 704x410px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 704x410px

>all these larping faggots ITT

>>135640679
I agree but if one is just getting into philosophy, would time be spent better reading the complete works first or moving to other things once the "essentials" are read and then coming back to finish the rest?

>>135641806
I dunno. Personally I'd go for whatever interests you and skip around hitting the major works of different philosophies and then come back later to fill in the gaps and refine your understandings.

File: file.png (33KB, 501x410px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 501x410px

Any graphing the results to see which countries follow which school?

>>135641998
True. I like that steel sharpens steel quote. Gonna use it

>>135640324
Nietzsche is the healthy backbone of evolution and the übermensch should look back at us with the same pain and shame as we look at apes, like a retarded form of ourselves. The übermensch is creative, will act logically and is filled with joy unlike some miserable humans on earth that can't think two steps ahead for their own happiness.

Nietzsche is not an Übermensch nor has ever one existed (except if you believe in some aliens maybe) he is the bridge to the übermensch who is beyond wanting free will, religion or similar things that make no logical sense (the rabbit hole goes way deeper) and looks at facts as they are, he is a possible next step in the evolution.

Normies just learn that nietzsche went mad in his last years and assume that he was insane. I've read many philosophy books and I can tell you that he was only insanely intelligent. I always pol kind of knew nietzsches philosophy but it seems that there are many retards here trying to sound intelligent.

File: niet.png (51KB, 702x408px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 702x408px

/pol/ should be a Nietzsche board.

>>135606418
>greentext links
Stop this.
http://www.selectsmart.com/FREE/select.php?client=PhilosophyGuys

>>135618431
Aquinas just interpreted Aristotle s and Augustine.

I'm not surprised you all fall under the pre new world thinkers.

>>135643088
are you me

File: Screenshot_20170731-111852.png (441KB, 2560x1600px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 2560x1600px

>>135606418
Is this redpilled?

>>135643401
>nietzsche
No it's not.

File: PicsArt_07-31-11.20.06.jpg (39KB, 581x545px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 581x545px

Whatever

File: 2afrbShd.jpg (32KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 400x400px

Why isn't Albert Camus on the list?

>>135642458
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeT7MzDcpeg

File: IMG-www.selectsmart.com-2017-07-31-17-19-59.png (56KB, 709x339px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 709x339px

>Kant (100%)
Was this Kraut redpilled? I'm not much into philosophical studies.

Why am I the only one with Hume 100%?????

File: smug.gif (255KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 500x281px

>>135643499
I'm an absurdist. I don't care for many opinions if you are for or against because in view of the universe it is essentially pointless.

I just laugh at those who try to make "their own meaning" of reality. Once you see how truly Absurd we act for "faith" and "legacy" it is marbles compared to the grad scheme of things.

I enjoy the banter and chaos here on /pol/ but I find most of you "redpilled" "nu-wave" thinkers laughable and detestable.

Read a book by Camus and learn what I tell.

File: agustine.png (59KB, 705x418px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 705x418px

>>135607294
We all believe in truth and morality, therefore Augustine. I'm even an atheist and I got him.

File: big long green schlong.jpg (3KB, 374x38px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 374x38px

lol you guys are all pussys

>>135644049
You're a moron.

Even the most nihilistic atheist can't deny Darwinist philosophy. There are those that exist and which no longer exist. Only the living remain, the methods that support continued life will exist in the future. The methods that are neutral towards continued existence might remain as vestigial. Basic logic, basic science, advanced game theory.

>>135644575
>implying
>>135644049

>>135606418
Kant

File: Screenshot (91).png (321KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 1366x768px

>>135606418
damn straight

>>135644049
damn, you are cringy af.

File: Capture.png (13KB, 458x357px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 458x357px

>>135606418
Here you go

File: Lain-Iwakura.jpg (54KB, 1110x720px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 1110x720px

>>135644809
I do submit to Darwinism but it will not outpace the true chaos of our reality in the end.

I highly doubt Darwinism alone can tree together a super intelligence space organic being. I see Darwinism as a flower to release a pollen of super intelligent beings towards the stars.

The Matrioshka Mind Hive is the finale step in synthetic evolution, not natural evolution.

File: oh_fugg.jpg (112KB, 785x482px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 785x482px

im nietzsche apparently............should i concerned

>>135644049
I mostly agree with you, but you're too wrapped up in the aesthetic of your own misery. Try thinking for yourself more and you will develop a more nuanced and less bitter view of the world.

>>135629383
Do people really not have the snipping tool on the task bar?

File: Intresting..png (245KB, 1470x832px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 1470x832px

>>135606418
So what does this actually mean? Anybody an idea?

File: Screenshot from 2017-07-31 08-52-19.png (29KB, 556x404px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 556x404px

Did I break the test?

>>135645968
Fuck the world. Our reality isn't fair or moral or divine. It is raw. Anything that can occur , most likely will.
see >>135645669

>>135646463
You are right, but in your youth you fail to see the inherently unity that exists in all things. Find bliss in the suffering of this world. You're not a good absurdist until you drop the self pitying nihilism and realize that if the world has no inherent meaning, you can create your own meaning. I know you said it's stupid to create your own, but I think you should think more about that before you're so certain.

File: IMG_0484.png (332KB, 2208x1242px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 2208x1242px

>>135606418
good post OP

>>135643613
just very logical and made no assumptions or irrational statements, if you read kant it feels very cold and sober like philosophical mathematics.

File: 1499458331748-pol.png (334KB, 880x720px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 880x720px

>>135646745
1st off: I'm 21/m

2nd:
That is not absurdism. It is about embracing the true ad infinitum of menial tasks and hopelessness of reality in whole.
If you don't understand The Absurd you avoid it through "self building" (which caused a fracture with nihilistic philosophers).

3rd:
I'm not trying to sound high and mighty but even though I seem like I beg for pity, I'm not.

I simply live for nothing. I am here because I am. That is the simplest way to describe The Absurd.

4th:
The only thing I can see for the last vestige of humanity is the adoption of true synthetic evolution.

>>135639635
"God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?”
our boy sent out that SOS

>>135606418
Neo-Platonician Stoic masterrace

>>135647897
c.s. lewis has a good lecture about this
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l_VYCqCexow

File: Capture d’écran (94).png (623KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

623KB, 1600x900px

>>135648190
Here's the image, forgot to post

File: 1485031169619.jpg (40KB, 561x458px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 561x458px

>>135647897
>21 yo
>thinks he knows something, anything, about life at all

>>135606418
>tfw plato

File: god is bread.jpg (15KB, 316x331px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 316x331px

what does it mean? I don't really know anything about Kant.

>>135648337
I understand the power of evolution greater then you ever will. I see the same patterns from men of times past. Men with hopes and dream that turned to dust in the wind.

Your idealistic idea of reality is hopelessly and pitifully menial, and the greater unknown is laughing. We are all going to die playing in the dirt down here.

>>135646134
I got 100% for Kant too.

File: what philosopher am I.png (25KB, 655x473px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 655x473px

>>135606418

Sheit.

File: Screenshot_20170731-102536.jpg (81KB, 923x634px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 923x634px

How should I feel about this?

Kant (100%)
Aristotle (89%)
Aquinas (83%)
Augustine (61%)
Plato (57%)
Hume (32%)
Protagoras (32%)
Nietzsche (2%)
Sextus Empiricus (0%)

who /Kant/ here?

>>135647958
knowledge and the progression of the evolution has killed religion which was once a very good system for human solace and even progress but now we find ourselves with a worse system full of nihilistic atheists and communists (regressive left) without having the strength to believe in ourselves to do great things (ascend to gods) where once the absurd and imaginary as motivation stood in form of the gods that we created. We have one foot out of the feelings and religion territory and one still inside it. Time to make another step if we don't want to fall back or even worse stagnate in this in-between phase of apathy.

>>135650257
i see Nietzsche as this call to move, the man realized where we would be now and got the ball rolling

>>135650257
that also explains the higher iq of people on the left while conservative are still "more right". People on the left aren't true to their human nature (gays, trans, fat people and all other meaningless or destructive degeneracy) but they haven't made the next step either.

>>135650394
most of this philosophy is in "Also sprach Zarathustra" in this kind of autobiography where he understands that he's just the first one to understand while the time comes much later.

I wonder what he would've thought about natsoc

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-31 at 12.42.48 PM.png (194KB, 1486x684px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1486x684px

>>135606418
Eat shit commie fucks.

>>135650849
could you explain the bit near the end of the book about the higher men to me? I've read it recently and its the only part of the book which it feels like there's something I haven't grasped fully

File: IMG_0485.jpg (317KB, 1242x1561px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 1242x1561px

>>135650849
my todo list is to read all of Nietzsche, except there's no "beginning point" necessarily, since they all have to be read and applied to each other before understanding singularly, much like Jung hah i'm so excited

File: 501519477811.png (108KB, 751x402px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 751x402px

>>135606418
This quiz is boring. I've done more entertaining "which Disney princess do you eat like" quizzes.

File: kantian.jpg (97KB, 926x532px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 926x532px

God-tier ethics coming through.

You faggots need to stop larping as Christians, you aren't impressing anyone.

File: Patrician.png (101KB, 724x417px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 724x417px

>>135606418
Patrician coming through. Although, I don't like any Christian philosophers apart from Kierkegaard. I think Kant is fitting for me though.

>>135650394
exactly. Let's hope the ball gets rolling or humanity was just a comedic trip to a little bit of consciousness without anyone noticing.

Nonetheless it feels good living with Nietzsches philosophy and thinking about it. The minds of people who are not active could just as well never have lived at all if all they do is instinctive and reactionary.

>>135609011
Holy shit that's pretty much what I got >>135651493

>>135606418
LOL you fucking UN faggot kikes are still on this eh?

Crack the magic code yet?

>>135622252
You haven't read it.

>>135651662
Scott M. Peck's book The Road Less Traveled ends with essentially "grow the hell up and take personal responsibility for becoming god"- which i was oh so pleasantly surprised to find, i didn't think a psychology book would actually approach philosophy in such a straightforward way. his book People of the Lie is another good one for explaining all the fucked up people we've got running around

>>135651061
you mean the übermensch? he's in the book from the beginning on isn't he?, It has been a while since i read it but the übermensch is the next being, one of science and logic with a will to power (more power means more possibilities = more real freedom) that doesn't mean we should serve the next human but ourselves

Nietzsche makes so much wordplay it's probably very difficult to understand his true genius. He chooses words very carefully, science in german for example means "knowledgation" or something alike.

File: philos.jpg (29KB, 477x344px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 477x344px

Ya'll niggers need NIETZSCHE, not Aquinas, okay?

>>135651006
plato above aristotle poll invalidated.

File: IMG_0327.jpg (269KB, 1242x741px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 1242x741px

>>135652514

>>135652514
Aristotle was a normie cuck. Literally pop music tier.

>>135606418
What is the high\low priority bar for?

>>135649022
>Kant
You are an asshole

>>135643678
no one can know the cause.

File: augustine.png (66KB, 712x412px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 712x412px

Who the fuck is Augustine?

>>135606418
Anything other than Augustine is objectively wrong and should fuck off /pol/ forever

>>135652860
i'd assume for conflicting beliefs- say Kant and Hume disagree strongly on an issue, and you agree with most of Kant except on this one issue where you side with Hume, the priority comes into play here with how important this one issue is to you, to decide whether you're aligned strongly with Kant or if this one issue is more important to your personal philosophy

Apparently I'm 100% Kant, can someone give me a quick rundown? I'm not well read in philosophy at all.

>>135653014
You should read Confessions by St. Augustine

File: augi.png (97KB, 754x416px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 754x416px

soooo

File: Capture.png (47KB, 672x344px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 672x344px

>>135606418

>>135653383
what are you

>>135653109
To give you a quick snippet, in Kantian ethics is only a sociopath could behave in a truly moral manner because anyone else would only do good because doing so makes them feel good, making the underlying act inherently selfish.

He's also diametrically opposed to the greater good of Utilitarianism, believing instead that any immoral act remains immoral even if good follows from it.

>>135653096
So if i go high or low it would have effects on the answer i give?

>>135653559
if that one issue you ranked High, then it would take away a significant percentage from Kant and add it to Hume- if ranked Low then it would still align you more strongly with Kant, since the disagreement(issue) does not mean much to your overall philosophy. so yeah high or low would mess with your percentages very significantly. might be why most of us align with Aquinas so much, we believe strongly in discoverable truth(god one could say)

>>135653474
Guess I should give it a read because it really sounds like the way I think.

>>135616686

Got 100% Freddy

All these moral fags revealing themselves here is telling

File: Capture.png (16KB, 403x373px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 403x373px

Hmmmmmmmm

File: IMG_0486.png (805KB, 1242x2208px) Image search: [Google]

805KB, 1242x2208px

new molymeme peterson interview for all you righteous anti-moral self-hating animals!

File: Untitled.png (735KB, 1920x1455px) Image search: [Google]

735KB, 1920x1455px

>>135606418
Religion is for fags. Mainstream ideas are for fags. I am Ubermensch.

File: 2017-07-31.png (259KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 1366x768px

>>135606418

rate plz

>>135654608
Fucking finally someone got hume. Now I'm not alone.

File: Screenshot_20170731-112220.png (538KB, 983x1748px) Image search: [Google]

538KB, 983x1748px

Neat

>>135642817
Looking more like an Augustine board

>>135655542
we should aspire to be a divine ubermensch mixture

File: 20170731_123124.png (129KB, 720x568px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 720x568px

>>135606418

>you can prove god exists
I do not know how to answer that.
You can only prove it to yourself i believe, but not others. wut do?

>>135627571
Cool. Good luck with that.

>>135655662
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l_VYCqCexow
Lewis tackled that dilemma for you

>>135655662
Yes this question is not explained well.
Is it asking if it will ever be possible to prove that god exists.
Or is it asking if it is possible to prove that god exists right now.

>>135655910
It also depends on what you think god is

File: Capture.png (22KB, 490x416px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 490x416px

>>135606418
Aristotelians get out

Aquinas (100%)
Kant (75%)
Aristotle (74%)
Augustine (74%)
Plato (59%)

>>135655662
I was unhappy with that question until I saw the next one.

File: philo.jpg (83KB, 741x422px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 741x422px

>>135606418

File: Screenshot_6.png (47KB, 739x426px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 739x426px

>>135606418
>>135607294
loool
Heil Hitler

>>135655876
Thats pretty good

>>135655876
>youtube philosophy
this is shamefully lazy of you

>>135656738
The next one is equally as though for me to decide.

File: result1.png (98KB, 759x611px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 759x611px

>>135606418
Don't know how much I agree with this as I don't know much about Aquinas

File: 11385119_1665251090374821_374725686_n.jpg (21KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 480x480px

Hume and Kant are considered God tier philosophers. Hume is STILL relevant today. If you are not 100% Hume, you are memeing too hard, and not thinking clearly enough

>>135657552
yeah, but why type all that up when someone already doodled it...
>>135657444
he has a good little lecture called Abolition of Man i would recommend as well!

File: image.png (604KB, 550x550px) Image search: [Google]

604KB, 550x550px

>>135657886
you don't belong here

File: disagree-lowprior.png (52KB, 761x420px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 761x420px

This what you get with disagree and low priority on all questions

File: nopreff.png (51KB, 748x418px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 748x418px

>>135658199
No preference, no priority on all questions

File: ok.png (18KB, 515x417px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 515x417px

>>135606418
whatever this means

File: agreehighprior.png (60KB, 745x418px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 745x418px

>>135658327
And this is agree, high priority on all

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-31 at 1.02.51 PM.png (193KB, 1405x864px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 1405x864px

>>135606418
>Augustine 100%
I should look over his beliefs sometime.

>>135650559

I'm sorry but if you're gay and act on it aren't you being true to your nature?

>>135606418
https://www.whois.com/whois/selectsmart.com

>>135606418

>honeypots
>on /pol/

Since 1995 we've been training people not to click on unknown links or to enter information they don't want to divulge.

>>135616686

Yes goy, nihilism is the way to go. Live a life of hedonism, then kill yourself!

Kant (100%)
Aristotle (70%)
Hume (59%)
Nietzsche (56%)
Aquinas (53%)
Protagoras (48%)
Augustine (34%)
Sextus Empiricus (34%)
Plato (0%)

Kant (100%)
Nietzsche (58%)
Aristotle (48%)
Augustine (30%)
Hume (28%)
Aquinas (23%)
Sextus Empiricus (8%)
Protagoras (3%)
Plato (0%)

Kant is goat

>>135606418
I had a tough time deciding my answer because i do not think most of the questions are good. They assume a lot.
Not sure about how the priority bar works exactly either but here it is, the results

>>135632327
In every country? In every school?

File: 2017-07-31 19.17.33.png (282KB, 1938x1060px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 1938x1060px

>>135660044
Forgot the pic

File: NIETZSCHE BTFO!.png (86KB, 1208x654px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1208x654px

>>135606418
I'm having a threesome brb


>>135606418
>>135607294
>>135607603
>>135607944
>>135608386
>>135608580
>>135608645
>>135609011
>>135609448


Everyone gets Augustine really high. why?

File: Screenshot_20170731-142316.png (298KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 2560x1440px

>>135606418
Meus frater

>>135660356
He's a western philosopher who has Incorporated Eastern philosophical elements

>>135660356
Augustine is /ourphilosopher/

>>135606418
>"Oh boy I wonder who my matches will be?"
>They're all FUCKING WHITE MALES

Dropped.