Thread replies: 3
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: IMG_8824.png (142KB, 3200x3200px) Image search:
[Google]
142KB, 3200x3200px
Just wondering what you all think.
So /pol, in my opinion when it comes to economics, Workers should own the means of production, they should cooperatively decide the way in which goods/services are produced and distributed, and there should not be hierarchy in our economic model. So I would advocate for a communist economy. HOWEVER, as I understand it, cultural Marxism has caused societal degradation. Whether it's the transgender agenda, African reparations, mass immigration, etc. I cant seem to agree with other modern so-called 'communists' on many social issues. So where does this put me? Is this 'national bolshevism'? When I research that it seems to be Russia centric, and im not completely in agreement with the few policies I've found. Should I not be looking for a label/party to align myself with or is there something I'm missing?
Thanks for any help!
>>
>>135606065
>there should not be hierarchy in our economic model
Every species of ape ever observed have self organized into heirarchal groups. There is every reason to believe humans evolved along the same lines. There is no reason to believe communism could ever work, given the scientific observations we've made.
>>
>>135606266
I definitely agree that we instinctually organize into heirchies, but I mostly see this happening on a personal/family level, where the father and mother have specific roles and there is obviously physical evidence to support these roles. When it's scaled to a community however I notice historically we've organized into tribes where each member contributes to the whole benefit of the tribe. Hence why I think communism could be compatible with human nature.
Thread posts: 3
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1