We Wuz Anglos n shit!

AY YO HOL UP

>>135549146
*SMACKS LIPS*

>>135549226
SO YOU BE SAYIN

SO YOU WUZ SAYIN
O

Y
O
U

W
U
Z

S
A
Y
I
N

>>135548969
ok at this point they can't use the "muh romans were ethnically diverse" excuse

like come the fuck on

>>135548969
>not available in your country
filty kikes

>>135549366
SOME EDOMITE SMALL DIK WHITE GOI

File: bbcbitearchive.jpg (145KB, 956x444px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 956x444px

BBC is utter cancer. Their educational pages on Crusades and Islamic conquest for kids are sickening.

File: 1500676002293.jpg (56KB, 521x564px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 521x564px

WE

WUZ

BRITS

>>135549507
MUH DICK HAHA LMAO DAMN SON XD

>>135548969
So, what are (((they))) trying to do here. Show Britain was always diverse and multiracial even though that isn't true? Why is there a nigger in every thumbnail about ancient Britain? This shit is all fantasy.

>>135549580
that's pretty fucking measured honestly

the crusades were far more brutal than "thousands of lives were lost"

>>135549580
>it's OK if Muslims conquer and kill people

File: kang arthur.jpg (120KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1280x720px

>>135549591
SHEEEIT NIGGER WE WUZ KANG ARTAR and sheeit

>>135548969
>>135549580
why is this allowed?
don't you guys pay taxes for this shit?

>>135549366
Oh dear bong, they'll go along the lines of "These were the times of the ancient advanced empires of Kangz. But everything changed when the evil racist whitey came out of their caves and stole it from the blacks".

>>135548969
Yo, Merlin ! gimme da Excaliba !
Gunna waste sum mofos

>>135548969
WE WUZ

>>135550274
Yo dawg I wood but I left it with mah papers naw sayin. Sheeeit what can I use to make a bong...

>>135549580
>>135550046
>>135549864
>>135549828
It makes sense. If you're going to have a lot of Muslims in your Christian country you NEED to whitewash history, so they feel included and not disconnected.

Imagine Muslim kids in France being taught about how Charles Martel repelled the Muslim invasion at Tours. Imagine Christian kids learning the same thing. It'd make it like Muslims were never meant to belong for the Muslim kids, and that their country failed and was invaded for Christian kids.

So the Arabs just "raided" France. It wasn't about spreading Islam, but just wealth. They were testing the waters so to speak. The Franks defeated some raiders and that's it.

>>135550674
This makes me fucking pissed

>>135548969
>Iron age
>niggers are common place

>>135550674
It's best to hide the Truth, is that what you're saying?

>>135549828
it says on the page "the Crusaders were invading a foreign country, and many Crusaders committed what we would regard today as criminal atrocities."

the islamic invasion however is presented as nothing but a positive; "Muslims were going to beauty parlours, using deodorants and drinking from glasses, at a time when English books of behaviour were still telling page-boys not to pick their nose over their food, spit on the table, or throw uneaten food onto the floor."

do they use this rationale to justify the colonisation of africa? do they fuck.

>>135550674
>So the Arabs just "raided" France

yeah quite funny... the vikings raided, the arabs conquered, shit Spain was under Islamic rule for 700 years or so.

>>135551309
If your native population is being outbred by foreigners who clearly struggle to integrate, the last thing you want is tension between them. GDP gotta keep rising after all.

I'm not sure European leaders REALLY want more immigrants, they kinda seem to see it doesn't work. So they try to make it work with what's in place.

>>135551528
I know it's BS. I was just giving a REAL example. I'm serious, this is what the French learn.

File: 1488250528208.gif (2MB, 270x138px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 270x138px

>>135548969
The video may not be available, but the dislike button sure is.

File: 1499796680586.gif (949KB, 500x282px) Image search: [Google]

949KB, 500x282px

>>135551911
hmmmm ... is that so?

>>135549580
They always leave out what started the crusades.

What started the crusades? Bonus points for avoiding "MUH CHRIST"

Cmon, at least a few of you know what really kicked off the biggest chimping out of white people in history.

>>135549580
what fucking horse shit! Are they going to ignore the sacking of Constantinople or Charlemagne saving the Iberian peninsula from the fucking Moors?! Or will they say Charlemagne was an evil white devil that should have taken in Moor refugees?

Britain is beyond cucked!

>>135551488
>it says on the page "the Crusaders were invading a foreign country, and many Crusaders committed what we would regard today as criminal atrocities."
which is true, the crusaders respected no rules of war
>the islamic invasion however is presented as nothing but a positive; "Muslims were going to beauty parlours, using deodorants and drinking from glasses, at a time when English books of behaviour were still telling page-boys not to pick their nose over their food, spit on the table, or throw uneaten food onto the floor."
doesn't sound like the article is about islamic invasions then

>>135551740
well yeah, nothing against you.

I really don't want to look in a current day history book of middle schoolers, what shit they teach here.

>>135552136
the pope? lots of nobles with nothing better to do?

File: 1424320630442.gif (2MB, 465x280px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 465x280px

>>135552122
Indeed, it is.

>>135552280
You fail, go kill yourself by watching more BBC Le'monjello Al-Londoni.

Who else?

>>135552155
Charles Martel. Not Charlemagne. My bad.

>>135549580
>Middle East was more advanced

That's true at least from a medicinal standpoint. That all changed during the Renaissance, though.

>>135552338
made-up stories of muslim aggression?

>>135552523
>made-up

>>135552191
you can't talk about the crusades without giving the context why it happened.

>>135548969
>not available in your country
Bin that freedom!

>>135552404
The real savior of the Iberian peninsula (a small part of it at least) was Pelagius of Asturias, not Charlemagne.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pelagius_of_Asturias

>>135552523
>made-up

You have to go back.

>>135550674
>you NEED to whitewash history, so they feel included and not disconnected

It's not only that, but also an assimilation thing. You can't be British and be Muslim because the two aren't connected in any way. You can't be assimilated while praying X many times a day and having a meme beard simply because that isn't British. Just like me living in Saudi Arabia and acting like a Western degenerate (>implying I wouldn't be immediately executed anyway) doesn't make me an assimilated Saudi Arabia just because I've lived there X many years, but don't follow any of their customs.
So how do you say they have assimilated when they haven't? Change the history to fit the current generation because the current generation don't fit the history. In doing so you're changing what assimilation is and basically redefining something that's already established in order to fit what you want people to believe which is a wholly (((______))) trait.

>>135552626
>>135552701
they were though, at best you can say that they kept attacking constantinople (guess who later sacked constantinople btw)
>>135552632
there is no context that excuses the sheer brutality of what the crusaders did

telling populations they would be spared if they surrendered and then butchering every last man, woman and child

this is what their own chroniclers said btw, they were actually proud of it

>>135552825
You can integrate Muslims. The Poles did it with Lipka Tatars, so did the Russians. It took centuries and it happened centuries ago though.

Today's situation is very different, because despite having lived many decades in France and England, Muslims show little signs of integration. And people who are in charge of solving this are HIDING this, which is the WORST thing you could ever do.

>>135553020
>at best you can say that they kept attacking constantinople

Just gonna leave out the piracy and enslavement of the southern french? Gonna leave out the invasion of Andalusia?

Gonna leave out the conquest of Sicily?

Gonna leave out the rape of Nanking, Le'monjello?

>>135551309
If your objective is to genocide the majority population and replace them with a new population, then yes, it is. Your entire governenment (and mine) is not merely stupid, it is stupid and pure evil. They worship the concept of evil itself.

>>135552929
The only one that is even remotely justifiable is black romans as there were at least some black romans that existed "black people in Rome were largely slave-immigrants or their descendants" but just because there were like 12 black people in rome doesn't mean its okay to potray romans as black, in all the other cases it doesn't make any sense

>>135552489
this isn't really the contentious point. unless on their british empire portal they address how "while britannia was ruling the waves, africans were chasing each other around with sticks and living in structures similar to badger setts", they should not be using medical/technological superiority as justification for invasion.

shit, i'm not even expecting them to have a pro-british bias, that is asking too much in the current year. if they could be balanced, i would settle on that

>>135553490
The Russians "integrated" Muslims by conquering them, letting them have their own largely autonomous territory subject to Russian control, and making it clear that the Muslims don't run Russia. That's an Imperial sort of integration.

File: We Wuz Zulus n Sheit.jpg (148KB, 749x994px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 749x994px

>>135548969
We Wuz Zulus n sheit

>>135548969
i cant watch this ....its not available in my country

>>135549580
>caring about thousands of lives in the middle ages
Genghis Khan would like a word with you

>>135549591
BLACKED

>>135553954
Where did they get blacks from? I mean REAL blacks, not cooked brownies from Arabia or North Africa. From the Sahara route? From Sudan-Ethiopia?

>>135554043
Yeah, you're right. They do have their own autonomous communities so to speak (ghettos) but modern Muslim immigrants absolutely have a role in running the nation. Especially when nation caters to them and doesn't treat them as second-hand citizens unless they convert like the Russians.

>>135553020
>there is no context that excuses the sheer brutality of what the crusaders did

lel how about you look up what the Muslims did to the Christians in the 400 years before the crusades.

What happened during the crusades is childsplay compared to it.

File: White Nationalism BTFO.jpg (147KB, 629x772px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 629x772px

>>135554105
Hypocrites

File: 1455211288648.jpg (19KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 200x200px

>>135552523
kys

File: We Wuz Zulus 7.jpg (10KB, 300x443px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 300x443px

>>135554823
Behold the Zulu king ..lol

File: Screenshot_20170730_234456.png (920KB, 1355x971px) Image search: [Google]

920KB, 1355x971px

HAHAHAHAHAHA
The average British Roman couple right here. Jesus fucking Christ. How on earth are you cucked faggots allowing this to go on? You are spending your tax money on outright lies and propaganda. Some anon should go burn down BBC buildings, wherever they are.

>>135552136
Hiroshima / Nagasaki was the biggest white person chimpout in history

Is this comedy...

Is this comedy...