>pro-family
>small government
>pro-small business
>protectionist
>tight knit communities
>prevents communism
>anti-materialism
Bamp
But I am
>>135474417
because is sounds retarded
>>135474417
Cause a Jew worshipper supports it, count me out
>>135474417
>small government
Because it never stays small.
You fucking idiot.
>>135474417
So basically National Socialism minus the Big Government? Seems almost oxymoronic.
>>135474417
It's interesting for sure. Is it purely a Catholic thing, or can it be applied in a secular manner?
>>135476377
It's designed to eliminate the working class in favor of turning society into almost all business owners.
>>135478156
The system itself says nothing about what role religion should play in society, it just happened to be created by a religious man so for some reason everyone assumes it's gonna be a theocracy. It's perfectly capable of being secular.
I didn't read this module
what are the new rules, classes, weapons, spells, and saving throws?
>>135478217
So basically Minarchism and Mutualism had a baby?
>>135478324
Alright. It sounds like something to look into, I'm not that familiar with it. It may be something I'd agree with. If not, it's something to at least know about
"The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of the Conservatives is to prevent the mistakes from being corrected."
G.K. Chesterton
Astute man lol
>>135476155
The irony of your post, but it's /po/l so I'll let you pass through the gas chamber without pressing the button.
>>135480106
>“Merely having an open mind is nothing. The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.”
The guy was a quote machine. I'm not even Catholic but I'm a huge fan of his.
>>135474417
never heard of it, but I like the positions it has.
>>135474417
Can I get a quick rundown?
>>135481201
Look at the pic in >>135478217
it's shit when implemented
>abolishing enforcement of interest rate contracts
Distributism confirmed for pure retarded
>>135481707
How so?
>>135482682
>supporting usury
Because that's worked out well for us so far, right?