The Maker Movement is anti civilization

>>135459064
>People thinking they can do their hobbies better than others can do their jobs

That's not how it works, leaf. If someone likes cooking as a hobby, it's not someone thinking they're better than a michelin star chef.

OP, what's your thesis? Is having hobbies harmful to the hobbyist or t he person who does that hobby for a profession? Why is 'Maker' shit related to societal collapse, aside from 'Maker' types generally being retarded hippies?

>>135459440
Is the maker's movement deliberately cucked to stop 'dangerous' people from using their effective framework of collaboration?

>>135459064
People can be good at more than one thing

>>135459064
The maker movement is the mark of a society that is productive enough to give people time to pursue their own passions. That's not a bad thing.

Society was built around agriculture and you're average farmer know how to do his own carpentry, fix his own farm equipment, truck's, pumps, well ect., butcher his food, do his own books/records, wheel and deal when selling his product and buying his supplies all while tending his animals and crops.
The more independent a man is the better. The less he needs to spend to just survive the more he has to invest in making his buisiness grow. And that reinvestment of his extra capital is the basis of capitalism.