>Occupy Democrats is the least trusted news source Is there

reminder that the economist is literally owned by the Rothschilds directly

File: so it seems.jpg (69KB, 600x752px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 600x752px

>>135414453
what isn't anon?

>Guardian and BBC that high

Fucking why is my country so retarded.

Isn't Economist lefty-biased as well?
Why can't we just have unbiased news sources for fuck's sake.

>>135415169
>>Economist
>> lefty-biased

shoot me now gook

>>135415252
Didn't mean lefty in its true sense. I meant SocJus stuff.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2017/07/transgressive-tweets
This is the first one I found, I've seen many like these through years.

File: yrshrbO7TAJkoD4XB77gV4yKQjnZ33tkHaa7HHKZtE.jpg (107KB, 788x708px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 788x708px

>>135413942
>Trump

Kek.

>>135415686
I usually skip economist, like financial times a lot more.

>>OG Martin Wolf

Also FT has locked articles, hid behind the pay wall. But you can see the title, you just google the title of the article. Click the first link and you can read that article for free.

>>135415694
I doubt that Bernie said that

>>135415694
CNN is fake news. Trump didn't make any cuts, he simply didn't expand it which counts as a cut to liberals.

>>135415694
They call not spending more on things 'cuts', nowadays.

Maybe if they actually fucking cut the thing people wouldn't get so overcharged on everything.
At some point people are going to start taking these debts and just ignoring them, though.

This is clearly a right wing biased poll. How is Rush Limbaugh of all people more trusted than HuffPo?