Why exactly is Tinder and modern social dynamics bad? Before

Casual sex is degenerate. It weakens personal bonding capacity, it spreads STIs, it results in unwed pregnancy.

Also, women would need agency to have will. They just act out according to their emotions and base instincts, and newsflash: we didn't build a civilization off women's emotions and base instincts.

There are ways to harness the power of modern communication to improve both men's and women's access to the best possible mating pool without encouraging the degenerate behavior that Tinder and the rest of the triple-parentheses social forces enable.

>>135401462
This. women were brutally suppressed during our entire constant upward spiral as a species. Just over a century of their leadership role in a society and we as a race are getting wiped out, while the world IQ drops off a cliff.

>>135401037
Because women used to select for survivability, good traits like intelligence. They're no longer doing that - they're splitting it both ways, having the sexually attractive traits while they have theirs, and not even looking sideways at anybody else until all their assets are gone.

It sounds like such an angry, lonely thing to say. I should mention I'm a married man.

This is why women sexually selecting on their own is bad. Women are too smart for their own good.

>>135401037
Because arranged marriaged created an estable, society truly progressive society.
Modern social dynamics where the woman chooses her partners is bad because woman`s criteria is terrible, women choose solely based on looks or another superficial traits, that have nothing to do with a real productive member of society.

>>135401037


Tinder is a good thing. It allows betas to comfortably approach women from a distance. I mean yeah, while she's getting to know the beta slowly, she's fucking the big dick chads that are also talking to her. When shes had her fun with fuckboys, she will settle down for a good guy.

File: reddit spacing.jpg (189KB, 1141x656px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 1141x656px

>>135401037
>>135401462
>>135403042
>>135403070

>>135403102
'Reddit spacing' was a 4chan thing long before reddit, newfriend. Lurk more.

>>135401037

>real tradition

No, it's a return to animalistic, brute nature. "Tradition" is the safeguard against such behavior; the social forces (customs, taboos, obligations, etc.) that maintain society AGAINST the degradation of such base activities.

>durr fucking like animals like before civilization existed is "real" tradition

Huh, so I guess the communist way nomads lived is also "real" tradition too

We're talking about the same time period

You fucking disgusting kike piece of shit retard

File: 280px-Jew_trigglypuff_protest_placard.png (116KB, 280x357px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 280x357px

>install tinder
>match with a cute chubby girl
>like chubby so I'm down
>plan meetup at local park that night
>exchange sexts all day, tell her to wear a dress and no panties for meetup
>get to planned park at 11 and see lone car parked in corner near path
>walk towards can and notice slight lisp in small car
>get to window and greeted by monster
apparently Instagram filters do wonders
>look for escape as I small talk to her through window
>about to make a run for it when the monster says "anon, I'm not wearing panties, like you requested"
>dick betrays me and corrupts my mind
>start making out with monster and fighting her thighs to get at pussy
>so so wet
>she rolls out of car and we make her way down path into the woods
>only make it about 20 feet before I lift up her skirt, bend her over and start licking her pussy and asshole
>licked her asshole for longer than I should have before plunging me large cock into her
>she wailing as I ram her hard and as deep as I could, def bottoming out
>she is full on crying from the pain and trying to push me away but I don't care and vow to finish the job
>cum to the power of 100 all in the monsters pussy and she falls to the ground sobbing
>gather myself, say thanks and head to the car
>watch the monster struggle to her feet as I'm driving away
>go to McDonald's and get shit off the dollar menu
>about 30 min later get a text from monster
>it's a video of her masturbating on toilet while pushing my cum out
>block number, destroyed all evidence and uninstalled TINDER

seriously fuck Tinder, that shit is cancer.
Pic semi-related. She was shaped my trigglypuff

>>135401037
Tinder is inherently a hook-up app. No mate selection occur, the pool of potential sex partners for any given woman are significantly larger than the pool of potential husbands.
Most guys are horny af, they will fuck everything that moves if they can get away with it. A 100 kg ugly chick with a flat chest, no problem!
Nothing is free in this world, there is always a price you pay.. You pay for this "free board", with being exposed to the shitty commercials at the end of the pages or by collecting of data.
It is well known that the amount of sex partners have an inverse correlation with the chance of at some point being in a stable long term relationship.

I have nothing against dating-sites or the likes, when it come to partner selection. Then competition is nice, but the hookup culture that is intertwined with these online-dating sites are despicable.

>>135401037
Nothing wrong with it /pol/ is just retarded and stuck to ideology.

>>135401037
You should be hung from the neck degenerate trash OP.

>>135401037
Beta bucks and alpha fucks is a real phenomenon, but it stretches even further than that.

What we're seeing now is women actively splitting their bonding dynamics between multiple figures, it's not uncommon for emotional support to come from a more balanced, less aggressive male while sexual satisfaction comes from the high aggressiveness, low stability alphas.
This is leading to a break down of traditional relationships where a balance between both is required. In turn we have a stratification of male personalities where people begin to drift into one of the two categories. People in the emotional support category get angry and tired over time and will do one of two things.

A) Give up (MGTOW)
B) Attempt to make themselves more like the low stability alpha camp

It's causing the death of healthy social dynamics, and it's only going to get worse from here.

>>135403102
>people who write in complete sentences and legible paragraphs must be from reddit
You're right, though, this behavior isn't typical of the average 4chan user.

>>135404035
Spotted the landwhale

>>135404916
Any studies to back up your claims? This is the only decent reply.

Also the word degenerate is fueled by resentment from a Nietzschean POV, not everyone can be a degenerate because of their physiology and heavy requirements (good looks, big dick etc), it's likely that people who utter it are beta males, much like leftist betas on the left who cry exploitation because they can't compete in the market.

>>135405448
Spotted the degenerate
Jesus, people

File: 1496627235814.jpg (212KB, 800x500px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 800x500px

>>135401037
Why is it that leftists are so eager for humans to regress away from civilization and back towards a primitive animalistic state?

Civilization is good. Living in a state of nature is bad. It's obvious right?

Right wingers tune their moral sensibility towards the behavior that will improve the stability and functionality of civilization because civilization is good and precious.

File: 6f7be5b4c388aa4d090f154fac7f7fc9--black-fathers-dad-baby.jpg (58KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 612x612px

>>135401037
>nature (manifested through the will of women) can do it's part in selecting that which is good


Top kek

You do realize that if you give women complete control of the mating process, they end up choosing guys like pic related

Imagine a whole society filled with thugs and whores, that is what this leads to

A balanced process gives both men and women choice, that leads to a good society

When you give women complete control, society degenerates into madness

>>135401037

arranged marriages is the best, you don't know what you are talking about.

File: 1489364993621.jpg (9KB, 256x223px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 256x223px

>>135403750
I learned my lesson about the fatty picture angle trick but it didn't devolve into the horrific degenerate odyssey like the one you've described (assuming it's real)

File: Lauren -.png (318KB, 455x540px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 455x540px

>>135401037

>>135405448
https://youtu.be/BhPnxmw4xNA?t=1m27s

We need to understand a few things about human sexuality dynamics.

1) Women are the selectors
2) The primal female sex fantasy is "Civilizing an uncivil man"
3) Women go across and up the male dominance hierarchy for sexual partners
4) Men will fuck damn near anything if possible

What does this result in? Point 1 means a decent looking woman can have -as much sex as she wants-. This in conjunction with Point 4 means that if women want to sex it up, there is literally nothing stopping them. Point 2 indicates that women will seek out "bad boys" marked by aggressiveness as the stereotype goes, as their drive is to civilize the uncivil. So we have a group of hyper sexual women who can go after aggressive males with no immediate penalty. And because males are the pursuers, women can find a less aggressive male to fulfill her emotional needs on the side.

Point 3 is the most pernicious point, men on a unconscious level know that women define the dominance hierarchy. So when men see women en mass selecting for aggressiveness, they understand that as "aggressiveness defines the dominance hierarchy." They will then seek to become more aggressive to compete, the downside being this destabilizes society as a whole.

tl;dr Women's sexual desire for the uncivilized results in the destruction of civilization to fulfill it

>>135403750
>this is a true story
To Hell with this, I'm going back to /ptg/.

>>135405691
The thoughts I presented lean towards the right, I embrace competition and dominance hierarchies, I'm simply not convinced that in general (100 IQ +) women choose poorly and that resentful betas crying degenerate is a marxist-like outcry.

The nobility de maistre supported were also "degenerate", males had tons of mistresses/lovers etc.

>>135405691
This

OP has fallen for the naturalistic fallacy, but it's not even natural - in nature men are given mating choices and murder each other over mates

In modern society men basically have zero choice, cannot even compete with violence, mate guarding is outlawed, completely unnatural.

File: Screenshot_20170303-124344.png (1MB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1920px

>>135403750
I got catfished multiple times already, but sometimes you gotta just bust a nut.

>>135403064
That's how men choose. Looks are more important than most traits. I'd kill myself if I had to marry based on finances

>>135406150
Peterson supports my point, work on yourself and compete. This is what he thinks man should do, people who want to change structures instead of competing are pathetic weasels as he called MGTOWers once. It's not the evil system, it's you.

>Can't compete in the market system?
>Cry and try to change it (marxist thought)

>Can't compete in the social market?
>Cry and try to change it (again a marxist thought pattern)

It's all the same psychological mechanism propelling trash people being bitter.

>>135406710
I agree that the goal is to become a better version of yourself, and I'm not laying blame on any particular party. I'm doing pretty well for myself right now actually.

What I sought to do with that post is explain why we're seeing what we're seeing today with dating dynamics. Calm down my dude

>>135406212
I'm not advocating maistre as a paragon of morality or right wingedness, I just wanted to make the point about the state of nature being bad.

The question of whether women pick good or bad mates in some vague evolutionary sense is irrelevant. Good for what? Bad for what?
You will never be able to nail down a test for such tautological nonsense. You're appealing to nature as good... but the state of nature is not good.

On the other hand, we can talk sensibly about the stability of society. We can talk about qualities that are conducive to a stable society. Mates which are not conducive to a stable society are bad.

>>135403064
>i'd sure like to have that poor guys kids

which women said that?

>>135403750
You really did a number on that story. But don't worry we all regrets.

File: civilization and marriage.jpg (917KB, 2405x917px) Image search: [Google]

917KB, 2405x917px

>>135401037
because it is an attack on civilization itself.

>>135404916
or you just have a normal relationship with people because you aren't autistic

that actually happens too

>>135401037
If you want to live like a caveman tribe then go right ahead. Men will eventually get tired of feeding single mothers via the state, they'll either revert to the natural state of beta male - unrpdocutive lazing piece of shit (like in nature) or start raping the women (like in nature).
if you want an actual civilization then you need to bring back monogamous culture.

>>135407662

Societal level dynamics =/= personal level dynamics

You can be a functional decent individual and understand the systems you lives in at the same time, you know.

>>135401037
>marriage is dysgenic
>the social institutions through which all of human civilization developed are dysgenic
>humanity was better when we were caveman niggers breeding freely in tribes with no concept of inheritance or property

No, you nigger

>>135405691
it's usually the rightists that want us to return to 'the natural order' which is why they promote social hierarchy and big strong men.

>>135408400
traditional != natural
try again.

>>135401037
manlets will be purged. it will be glorious

>>135408400
No. That is a caricature you were told by cenk ugur.

The right promotes the idea of men being big and strong so that they can protect their wives and children.
The nuclear family relies on the men being protectors and providers.

It's one of the moral responsibilities laid at the feet of men so that society can function.

>>135406931
I used the words natural order, which implies some sort of order arising spontaneously. Schopenhauer argued for polygsmy in his On Women article, and also condemned women's "freedom", it's not black and white but modern societal norms are simply better for individual genes.

And yes, looks and height positively correlate with intelligence (IQ) so there. If women select based on looks, height, and a masculine temperament...why is this bad?

>>135401462
Fpbp

Casual sex leads to single mothers. It also results in fewer men father children to a greater range of women thereby reducing the gene pool. The Chads who breed are typically les intelligent as women tend toward alpha trends when picking up a one night stand.

>>135408741
>modern societal norms are simply better for individual genes.
unprovable; nonsense claim. "better for individual genes" implies that genes have interests.

>And yes, looks and height positively correlate with intelligence (IQ) so there. If women select based on looks, height, and a masculine temperament...why is this bad?
You're shifting the discussion.

If women select according to qualities that are good for society that is good.
If they select for qualities that are bad for society, that's bad.

>>135401037
Hypergamous mating may be the mammal way of doing things, but civilization requires patriarchy. It sacrifices a small amount of genetic fitness in exchange for the productivity of all men in society

>>135409369
Genes do have interest, it's called the gene centric view of evolution, Dawkins even wrote a book on it called The Selfish Gene.

>>135410350
>Genes do have interest

No they don't.
Dawkins would think you a moron for espousing this thought and would be ashamed that his book were used as corroboration of it.

In any case I think you've seen the error of your ways.

So OP, can I assume that you're against the age of consent laws as they stand?
After all, they artificially limit the availability of potential mates, which is the antithesis of a free market.
Wouldn't you agree that the AoC should be whenever a man or woman hits puberty?

>>135405448
>studies

Dude social sciences is the field of leftist trash communist retards

They would not stand for the "patriarchy" looking for reasons to "oppress" women

>>135401037
Divorce rates and single mothers at an all time high.
That's all I need to say

>>135406212
That bullshit can only exist because of leftist policy you fucking dense kike shill

>durr it's capitalism that we force men to pay women for their own irrelivance so that only men at the top get laid

You will be fucking hung

>>135406710
Without leftist policy none of this shit would be happening and women would be fucking grateful for a single husband in their entire lives

You're stupid as fuck

File: Waiting Feels.jpg (35KB, 484x497px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 484x497px

>>135407662
>Too many feels.

>>135401037
There is nothing wrong with women selecting mates. What's bad is low birth rates, and feminism programs where men must pay for these whores children, while providing nothing of value in exchange.

We need women to have more children and also select mutually beneficial relationships. Which is not what women are currently doing.

>>135401037
>natural order of things
Civilization is the opposite of this. Fuck you roastie.

File: spider jew.jpg (20KB, 241x227px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 241x227px

>>135401037

If you consider Brain-Wasing, Mind-Pattern-Programming, Mnd-Control & Hypnosis...

"Modern Social Dynamics" you should probably re-think your position.

In reality you are likely the Sock-Puppet of the Jew.

File: 1493843610153.jpg (24KB, 641x530px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 641x530px

>>135407426
Fuggggq. This.

>>135405838
god she is so fucking hot in this pic
why the fuck would she dye her hair?

>>135403102
the "reddit spacing" meme is pure cancer and is mostly used to derail threads and ignore opinions that you don't like because 'muh rebbit shpecin'
people have been writing like that on 4chan long before reddit was even a thing

consider suicide faggot

>>135405838
she looks so much better in jewess mode

>>135401037
Tinder/okcupid is for losers to meet up, and an std cess pit. I look down on people who use tinder for their sheer desperation for attention, they usually are very involved with social media as well.

>>135401037
>birth control
>state gives women power
>natural

>>135401037
Yeah, let's have a society where only 20% of men get sexual access to women. That's surely good for civilization and won't lead to the other 80% dropping out and not giving a fuck.

>>135401037
no heres real tradition
>see a hot female
>rape her
women never had a choice. them having chocie now is a first in the history books

>>135401462
first post probably the best post i don't see the need to read the rest of the thread to find out

>>135401037
Don't know.
It just looks like everybody in the world is using an app, and from what I seem to understand, you meet and fuck all day, on that shit.

Sounds degenerate to me.

>>135416073
Just installed Tinder because I moved to a new city and need to spread my seed.

I don't use social media.

>>135401037

>We can only choose between 10th century style arranged marriages or sluts taking dicks every night of the week with some rando she met on a mobile app

There is a happy medium you fuckin queer. Take the 1910s-1950s for example. Arranged marriages didn't happen. You'd marry your high school sweetheart and you'd be each others first.

>>135401037
>The people who have something against it usually harbour resentment much like the leftists who can't compete in a free market thus running towards marxism and other traps.

Woke. But I'm afraid /pol isn't ready for your message. People here just can't come to terms with their own inadequacy

>>135406710
>>135406913
The reason why men should better themselves should not be for pussy. If the average man realizes that he's only doing these things for pussy and not for some higher human ideal he'll reach the conclusion that man is just an animal (he's already halfway there with the acceptance of evolution). If you agree men are just animals why even maintain society or even worse treat men like animals, use them to gain power and kill/remove any of the animals that are in your way. idk I remember in an interview Soros saying he doesn't believe in God or a higher morality and I think that's something that informed his behavior

>>135406212
You're stupid. For every white woman that makes the right choice and marries a white man, there are 10 degenerates, 2 that get a sexy career and some cats, 6 that suck every cock in town, and two single moms, one of whom is a disgusting mudshark raising a half niglet after the nigger runs away guaranteed. It is degenerate as fuck.

File: 1501090978668.jpg (36KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 800x600px

>>135407426
redpilled

There is nothing dysgenic about arranged marriages lol.

>>135406212
You're fucking moron or a troll if you think women, in general, don't choose poorly.

>>135416667
>spread my seed
This is what retards tell themselves to justify participating in society destroying Jewish lies, before they put on a condom and make sure the bitch is on birth control. You aren't spreading shit except STDs and decay.

>>135417533
u mad conservacuck?

You loathe yourself so much you won't even give in to base needs.

Real spooky kid.

Can someone bubble the OP's pic?

>>135401037
Who's the girl on the left? I matched with her on Tinder but dropped her when she told me she fucked black guys.

>giving women power
>ever

kys my dude

Reading this thread, I'm reminded to the huge extent that right-wing politcs are driven by the inability to compete in the sexual marketplace. Same with left-wing politics and inability to compete in other arenas.

That's why libertarianism is the only sane choice for us ubermenschen.

>>135401037
>where nature (manifested through the will of women) can do it's part in selecting that which is good
What a retard. Woman is much weaker and dumber than man and can easily be subdued and used by its biological purpose. Your natural selection is another man that can fight you and take your female by force, female itself is not a subject in it, but object. This is what nature intended.
So the only things this accomplishes is bringing back infighting within population of which people managed to get rid of through monogamy. And result of that will be only defeat at the hands of those who do not cannibalize each other, such as jews. They can do what they want with self-cannibalizing goyim like you even now, but at least you have good genes(not), huh?

>>135401037
Spreads STDs, enourages degernerates to have random offspring. So obvious that it's not even worth discussing. Sage this alt light shill thread.

>>135401037
Over 60% of divorces are initiated by women, which reflects poorly on female judgment. When left to their own devices, the majority of women choose to have sex before they are even women, and postpone marriage until after having multiple sexual encounters. Sorry, but the patriarchy is the natural order. The strength of women is their ability to be nurturing and fill supportive roles, not planning for the future.

>>135401037
Because natural isn't necessarily good.

Marriage is a strong institution in any agricultural society. The reason is that the higher the male population that is utilized, the more productive and defensible the civilization is. Matriarchal societies don't exist within agricultural societies. Why? Because they would be overtaken by societies that had higher amounts of utilized men.

>So what?

Our society is based on monogamy. So, we want as effective as possible 1 to 1 pairing to maximize utilized men. If our society depends on this structure, and it cannot maintain it due to social changes, then it is doomed to collapse under its weight.

>>135417820
>you loathe yourself
I loathe kikes destroying Western countries, and bottom of the barrel degenerate scum (You) that is the literal manifestation of the rot.

Women make choices which are terrible for society though. They're naturally attracted to manipulative sociopaths and the danger that comes with it. They're self-destructive, petty and not particularly intelligent.

If you can't find a partner, you weren't meant to breed. Same argument as y'all fuckers argument for healthcare, where having weak genes means you deserve to die

>but muh beta males

Monogamy in the past was necessary to keep society intact, but modern technology has progressed to a point where you don't need every member of society to be productive in order to function. Of Japan's working-age males, something like 30% of then have never fucked, but you don't see their country crumbling

>>135403064
Partly disagree. We choose mainly on looks, women choose mainly on social status and income level. That's why you'll see attractive 20 year olds with fat, balding, middle aged men. There are multiple ways to get into a woman's heart, but they are different based on the woman, and often whimsical and rooted in the present rather than planning for the future.

>>135418456
Well said. I would also add that some Native American cultures were matriarchal, and they never invented basic things like the wheel, writing, or metal working. As a result, they had the type of culture that a woman would create; focused mainly on enjoying the present, destructive egalitarianism, and teaming up against whoever was the strongest and most successful just because they were the strongest and most successful

>>135419926
Most patriarchal cultures never invented those independently either, bit of a silly statement.

The wheel was invented maybe in two different locations in Eurasia, writing in 3-4, metal-working in 2-3.

>>135419297
Is to function the simple ultimate goal of society or is it to prosper? If the west drops monogamy and it's' competition does not, then it will simply be out-competed.

>Why does this matter?
Because weak states bend to stronger states. The reason the west is monogamous rather than polygamous is because of Rome's influence. All the previous marriage structures folded to the dominant one of the day. Japan was polygamous until 1945 when it fell under the domain of the United States, a nation with a Rome influenced marriage system.

>But Japan!
Japan was fucking terrified. It's now starting to recover, but it's a long road.

>Healthcare bullshit
Very few people seriously would use that argument. The argument usually is whether or not it is permissible to be forced to buy something that is then run inefficiently... and of course where this would end.

>If you're voting against section 8 you really just want people who can't survive winters to die
>If you're voting against food stamps, you really want people who need food to live to die
>You don't want taxes to pay for free clothing? Fucking social darwinist.

>>135401037

>natural order of things
>basically women have all the power of choosing what the future of humanity is and looks like
>leaving the future of the world in the hands of women
>of fucking irrational whores

Gee I wonder why we're seeing a rise of fucking idiots who think rioting is the logical thing to do. The world will fucking burn because they have bred stupidity

>>135405618
that dumb mouth is very accurate. she does that when she speaks...

>>135403070
this. tinder is generally ugly or low tier girls. hot and high status women dont get on an online app saturated with betas that need to hide behind the comfort of an app to talk to women

File: fbbf42c09641c459ca607b7a0aadc533--drunk-party-party-party.jpg (39KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 480x360px

>manifested through the will of women
OP is a fag
A return to nature is a return to animalistic behavior. One of the cornerstones of our society is monogamy.

>>135420805
This

It's not like this is the first time this has happened, it just never happened at such a large scale

>>135415771
I doubt that's her. I don't see the fucked up teeth here.

Tinder is a boon for Herpes.

>>135401037
>Soviets had first helicopter, first rockets into space, developed cybernetics long before America, most powerful nuclear weapons, first dishwasher, far superior metro system, better arts, architecture, and culture, first satellites, etc. all while having a major population and material disadvantage
>can't compete with free market

File: 1498918467950.png (58KB, 844x1157px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 844x1157px

>>135401037
there goes my no fap for the day
tfw: you realize ur a leaf degenerate

>>135403750
>say thanks

>>135420805
This. Plus OP assumes that humans are bonobo-like and give females all the power. When in reality it's the opposite and we are more chimp like. Chimps are superior to bonobos. They would absolutely destroy bonobos, if they ever came in contact.

Why can't we have both monogamy and tribal conditions. Think ancient germania. Some of the germanic tribes were monogamous and retained they're primal attitude towards defense and hunting, etc.

>>135401037
>Before we had dysgenic crap like arranged marriages, now we are returning back to a natural order of things where nature (manifested through the will of women) can do it's part in selecting that which is good.

Arranged marriages weren't dysgenic. It was families planning who best to breed together.

Tinder doesn't have anything to do with "nature" or natural selection. You're looking at artificial photoshopped skewed images of people who will be wearing tons of makeup and selected fashion in person in order to have sex that doesn't produce children. Nothing natural about it.

>>135401037

Because too many options means people are reluctant to settle down and are always trying to trade up. There is more to producing good offspring than just having 2 people with pretty faces fuck each other. If neither of those pretty faces can work together to raise a child worth a damn, you are going to have a pretty faced homeless person who sucks dick for crack.

>>135401462
This. Casual sex is degenerate and produces a worse outcome for procreative potential, not a better one.

>>135406150
>1) Women are the selectors
women haven't been selectors for nearly 7000 years idiot. only recently have we gotten the right to decide who we marry.

>>135417944
>you

>>135406710
>>Can't compete in the social market?
>>Cry and try to change it (again a marxist thought pattern)
you are not wrong! the whole concept of denying women the right to vote, have careers, and otherwise have rights, is a bid to once again give men a complete monopoly on our ability to be safe. with no alternatives, men can withhold safety at their whim again and force compliance.

File: 1494393691854.png (595KB, 1500x3719px) Image search: [Google]

595KB, 1500x3719px

>>135402468
their "suppression" wasnt even brutal and it doesnt need to be. that would be like calling it brutal when a parent makes their kid behave. maybe some brutality would be required if women could actually get shit done enough to maybe fight for their rights, but all they can do is bitch and complain, therefore force is hardly necessary

>>135403750
You should be a fiction writer

>>135419926
you're a fucking idiot. it doesn't matter if you are matriarchal or not, you need domestic animals to create a material culture like that.

>>135403750

m8

>>135401037
>>135405302
>>135405618
>>135405838
>>135406105
>literal coal burner
kys, cuck.

File: 1487810313724.jpg (916KB, 1389x454px) Image search: [Google]

916KB, 1389x454px

>>135401037
>Why exactly is Tinder and modern social dynamics bad?
Because the highs of human civilization were achieved when "dysgenic crap" like arranged marriages were celebrated.

>>135407662
Rarely does tinder lead to a normal relationship, dudebro.

The will of women is always bad

File: goyim propaganda r cleaned.png (39KB, 346x207px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 346x207px

>>135406105

What does a Jew Propagandist do exactly, after a full-day of Bull-Queer, Mongrel-Theism, and Jewing?

Some ritual Blood-Sacrifice perhaps?

Or just some usual and ordinary Lesbian Action?
.
.

File: 1501291353601.gif (204KB, 281x260px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 281x260px

>>135403750
Fug, here's my fatty story

>Be on tinder
>Get catfished by those stupid angled shots and lighting.
>Realize its a girl from highschool
>Fuck it meet up I knew she liked me in highschool
>Meet at park near house late at night
>Talk a while, in person discover she's huge and it ain't due to the shadows
>Trying to stall
>Start making out somehow with fatty
>Fingerbang her, the huge waist is straining my for arm bones and wrist
>Realize what I'm doing, finish her off and leave before more damage can be done
>Drive home, hand smells like feet, old shoes, and socks
>Delete everything
>Talk online with cute redhead girl I knew from home that I like and wanted to date
>FATTY KNOWS HER
>TELLS HER EVERY THING
>How in love fatty is with me
>Red head laughs at me at how I could be so desperate
>Ruined
>Embarrassed
>Haven't used an internet dating app or site since


Tinder can do far more damage than you think.

File: dk.gif (736KB, 451x322px) Image search: [Google]

736KB, 451x322px

I hate this reality. All I wanted was a normal relationship with a normal girl and we build our lives together. All I have to look forward to now is sifting through aging sluts to find the one who has taken the least amount of cocks and has an drop of motherly instinct.

Who's the chick on the right?

>>135406710
Sometimes working on yourself can actually reinforce the system. When I was a lazy NEET, I never got laid. I would fantasize about starting a happy family with a cute virgin girl under the grace of the Christian god. Obviously, that didn't happen.

I got my act together. I threw that piece of shit "god" into the trash and realized that looks, money, and status are what's most important. I became able to lift and study hard out of spite for my previous delusions. I applied to medical school, got in, and have fucked over 300 different girls since.

On the one hand, you have men like me who both realized and advanced what's actually important. We bang hundreds of different women in our lives. On the other hand, you have the betas who cling to shit like religion, tradition, and benevolence who are virgins past 25. This is the world that exists when we depart from monogamy. I wouldn't call it "bad," as few things are truly bad. However, it definitely has its pros and cons.

>>135423388
her younger sister

am installing tindr right now lads

>>135423355
There was an anonymous that calculated how much milage of cock a woman received given average length and number of humps. It was pretty depressing. Like like sluts have had astronomical units worth of dick within them.

>>135401037
>>135406212
>The thoughts I presented lean towards the right

No they aren't, the right is part of authoritarianism based upon morals of society.

>I'm simply not convinced that in general (100 IQ +) women choose poorly
Of course they do, smart people often believe stupid shit because they interpret more data. That and women aren't often logical creatures hence why they always go on about emotional intelligence, they have heavy hormonal imbalances.

You understand that nature never manifested itself through the will of women right? If it was naturalistic we would be able to drag a woman off of the street and rape her. Then we would have a patriarchal society because that is the natural progression.

>>135423430
do they ever lezz out?

File: 1501308847312.jpg (13KB, 332x332px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 332x332px

>>135403750
I once fucked a fatty like that.
>Best shit you can only do is bite that full of fat tittie.
>Worst shit that your dick can't even go full in because of all that fat... and they wash rarely so the smell is brutal.

Overall fat whores are worst shit you can fuck.

>>135422179
Women overwhelmingly vote for left wing parties. 60% of divorces are initiated by women. The female strengths are in nuturing and support positions. This is why women are better with small children and keeping a house in order, but not good at making sound geopolitical decisions. You will definitely not be safe with Mexicans or Muslims as the majority. I lived in a mixed neighborhood once, and the Mexicans followed my wife around in broad daylight. You have no idea what the consequences will be for the things you advocate. You are entirely rooted in the present, and your whims form the basis for your decisions. This is why women should not be in charge.

What would you think about beheading Angela Merkel? Back when men were in charge, rulers who committed such treason would have been beheaded.

I never used Tinder or other dating apps. Some of my friends use it to try to get laid. Occasionally they do. But I find that most women who frequent apps like that aren't exactly quality people. None of the girls I know who have a Tinder profile set up are what you would consider "relationship material".

>>135423537
I would pay Lauren or her sister $25000 to do a facial abuse video.

unfortunately that amount is probably a little cheap for her these days. I wish I could go back in time and offer her the money when she was a poor college whore

File: lauren with sister.jpg (80KB, 640x960px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 640x960px

>>135423537
don't be sick anon

>>135422424
It also never crossed their mind to domesticate animals until they saw the white man doing it. Cows and buffalo are the exact same species, yet our people herded and controlled the cows, whereas the Native Americans followed them around like like wild predators do. This is the female way of thinking, being rooted in the present and instant gratification rather than long term planning. Women are not that different than children, who have a limited capacity for differed gratification. If given the choice between having 1 candy bar right now vs. 2 tomorrow, most children will chose to have the one right now.

>>135424328
leafs are degerates

>>135401037
Wrong. Women only select for animalistic traits such as frame, physical strength, and alpha-ness. This is why women must be suppressed - suppression and patriarchy is the only way that beta, intelligent males get to breed, thus furthering civilization. Arranged marriage may not be natural, but it is the ONLY way that civilization can exist - without it we are nothing more than hairless chimpanzees.

File: 1497327731616_1.gif (591KB, 270x288px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 270x288px

>>135403102
>reddit spacing

Never been to reddit, but that's the college paper standard, so I've always used it.

Should have stayed in school, Jamal.

File: 1492874363018.png (459KB, 609x539px) Image search: [Google]

459KB, 609x539px

>>135401037
Yes it's this. But we are losing the family part.
Which can come back after we gas the jews.

I actually get matches with attractive women but can't do anything because I'm a poor neet

>>135417820

>not being able to channel sexual energy into something productive
>calling the other guy a cuck

no wonder australia is a barren waste land

My tinder game was fucking awful I just cant talk to women through a screen

>>135424756
Kek. So women need to be 'suppressed' (which clearly you've failed at so far) so you can get 'beta white males' (would those be the kind who fail at tasks like keeping females 'suppressed', by chance?) to breed because otherwise they'll have a bitchfit (like you accuse females of) and literally destroy your entire civilization?

And WE'RE the inferior ones? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! Why don't you try wrangling the 'beta' members of your gender into shape before you think about 'suppressing' us, yah?

>>135425019
>after we gas the jews
But you wont. You're to busy competing with other goyim of your race for who is alpha and who is fodder at the bottom of the food chain, while no jew harms other jew, takes advantage of other jew's weakness, abandons other jew in trouble. This is sole reason why they subdued you and free to do whatever they want with you, they never cannibalize their kin like you love to.

Letting women choose is a mistake. In 50 years people will have evolved into a mostly black tall race with low IQs and amazing sports skills.

I looked at tinder out of curiosity. I am disgusted by what I saw.

>TFW you see a slutty picture of a girl online & their profession is listed & you can believe such a being could be a nurse or a teacher

>>135401037

Only reason why I love Tinder is because it leveled the playing field.

Men are allowed to be choosy while woman are being forced to compete with other woman. If anything Tinder made the dating market so brutal for woman that the ones that fucked around too long playing the field soon found themselves completely unmarketable to prospective men. Meanwhile men get to keep fucking women half their age so why bother getting with an aged 30 year old single mom.

>>135425899
I find that kind of hot. Not for wifing but just plowing.

I creampied numerous times the aid to the state district attorney. Didn't meet her by tinder but was just a bar encounter that turned into fuck buddies.

File: 2956427400_3ce20132b1_b.jpg (313KB, 1024x644px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 1024x644px

>>135401462
>it spreads STIs
Fuck yes.

File: tumblr_og4bsz7v3U1uaxri9o1_1280.jpg (264KB, 1280x710px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 1280x710px

>>135401037
because there has never existed a civilization which didn't heavily control female sexuality. The fact is that humans are biologically polygamous. This is supported by studies on hunter-gatherer societies.
The problem is that social organization necessitated by civilization is qualitatively different to those in hunting and gathering. You can look at it like this:
The west has culturally ridden a few centuries on materialism and nominalism, discarding traditional forms of social organization. for example religion dying out is a consequence of this. We simply live in the decadent phase of western civilization. Males letting females revert to our polygamous roots is an absolutely unsustainable course which, unless white men stand up and correct our mistakes, will end our civilization and possibly race.

TL;DR: reverting to social organization suited to hunting and gathering in tribes is not "real" tradition or practical in any sense sense, if civilization is to have any value.

>>135426291
The guys at the top are satisfied, and the guys at the bottom are opting out. There will be no standing up to this system.

>>135425559
Why can't chinkmoot filter ha spam like these to something like lol? It's fucking disgusting seeing posts with it.

>>135421326
>doing it first = doing it best

File: 1467744669213.jpg (675KB, 1200x1750px) Image search: [Google]

675KB, 1200x1750px

>>135426845
As I said, it's unsustainable. Pretty soon these fads like the sexual revolution and "emancipation" of women etc will end. It will likely happen when men have had enough and society cannot hold without the nuclear family structure. Either we see that materialism and nihilism has led us nowhere and we return to religion, natural law and proper social organization or the west is gone.

ITT: Bitter NEETs and larpers assblasted that they can't fuck sluts while young and then settle down with a serious qt in mid twenties.

O I am laffin

>>135426845
By laws of nature goy at the bottom has every reasons to kill top one and seize all his shit by force. Literally no reason not to do that. Right now very few think about it because they are still thinking in a patterns and laws of civilized monogamous society we no longer have, but we'll see it change in our lifetime.

File: collapse.jpg (66KB, 500x527px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 500x527px

>>135423470
I never cared much for relationships before and now it just makes me sad
how is it accepted and normal to have 20 dicks in you before you marry

>>135427583
>he fell for the master v slave Hegel and Marx meme

>>135423405
nigger I know you're lying

>>135427778
Don't underestimate the raw power of spite anon

>>135427747
>concept of fighting for resources that predates any sentient life
>Marx
Are you retarded? Women is as much of resource as food for example. And there is high demand and limited number of them, man programmed by nature to fight hard for one. So you either enact laws and rules that moderate distribution of this resource to avoid infighting, or let men fight until you get fucked by former model which is overwhelmingly stronger in terms of species/populations competition.

>>135428537
Ya, never mind toothpaste.