Is Ethno-communism the true utopia? >everyone in your society

I'll quickly summarise why I disagree and prefer National Socialism.

Humanity has never solved problems individually more effectively than by working together. We work together as a group, completely true. However, we're not an ant colony and so we must also retain our individuality without letting it become a cancer to society.
I don't mean individuality in the sense of material individuality either, that falls back to the issue of degeneracy. But rather individuality in the sense of heroism ("pride and honor are paramount").

tl;dr: Keep free enterprise, but under regulation. Also keep the strong central state. We don't need to outlaw private industry as long as their priority is the sustenance of the people rather than personal profit.

File: ever-heard-of-holodomor-me-neither.jpg (76KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 400x400px

>>135396552

Communism always fails. Whenever it manifests itself, a select few people get extraordinarily wealthy at the despair of millions. True communism has been implemented many times, always leads to pestilence, famine, death, and revolt.

>>135396552
>equality of anything

No. Wtf, Japan.

File: 1498838073985.jpg (33KB, 300x316px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 300x316px

>>135397351
Holodomor wasn't a complete product of communism, it was both a mix of collectivization which comes from communism and rapid industrialization which is from Stalinism so to say Holodomor was because of communism is retarded.
Also, true communism has never been implemented. Communism is supposed to be a stateless, classless, moneyless society now tell me one society which has been like that. Nations such as the USSR were merely socialist states with the intention to form Communism.

>>135396552
>Ethno-communism
And here I thought that we had already achieved maximum stupidity with the anarcho-oxymorons. I guess I was wrong.