Why does /pol/ hate liberals so much?

Definitions change my nigga

>>135318051
What part of "politically incorrect" do you not understand?

>>135318051
/pol/ doesn't hate liberals
/pol/ hates leftists

progressives and SJWs have gone so far left that liberals are now center-right compared to those crazy assholes

>>135318051
We don't hate what liberals once stood for. The classic liberal. They hijacked the movement in the early 20th century. They are, today, kinda a mix of fascism, communism and socialism. Funny mix it is but that's how I see it. I see them more a Statist. And they are degenerat by nature thus making then regressive. I feel most of them have some sort of mental disorder. I have my theory on that but that is for another time.

>>135318051
Classical liberalism is fine

The problem is people who call themselves "liberals" in the US 99% of the time are far left and have almost no actual liberal values

>>135318051
Hypocrisy on Islam and their hatred of the nation state.

>>135318051
Economically liberal is not the same as socially liberal. Not paying attention to this distinction is purposefully misleading and points to your fallacy.

/pol/ rightfully is against the second kind.

Reasons? Inconsequence; irrational and damaging attitudes and decisions; a system of values that benefits the weak, unskilled and unfit -- to name a few.

>>135318051
liberals are total "do gooders" and they come in a bundle package of all the stupid stuff

>>135318051
Burger liberal != classic liberal my dog blowing friend. Classic liberal is more akin to libertarian...

>>135318051
Liberalism is a mental disorder most grow out of eventually. The only elder Libs are really sick or absolute corruption. Anyone who thinks through any issue figures out with ease that the Liberal argument is great on feelings but very short on reality.

File: 1491599917230.png (265KB, 620x558px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 620x558px

>>135318051

>>135318051

So what you're saying is that you don't understand the use of the word "liberal" in the context of modern American political discourse?

>>135318051
You're either intentionally or woefully ignorant.

Guess what, that means you're a leaf.

>>135324270
>The problem is people who call themselves "liberals" in the US 99% of the time are far left and have almost no actual liberal values
/thread

File: 4bf.png (180KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 625x626px

>>135318051
>burger meme

>>135318051
We don't hate people that are socially liberal, we hate leftists. Libertarians are often socially liberal, but unlike leftists we don't try to take away people's rights.

File: 1479084610384.png (152KB, 1200x1620px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1200x1620px

>>135318051

Because they don't understand themselves.

File: 1494421378612.jpg (60KB, 797x822px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 797x822px

>>135318051
Fuck you cunt. Show your tits. Suck white cock. KYS.
In that order. Saged.

Fuck yourself you degenerate faggot leaf. America is doing what is right by stomping out the rampant erosion of rationality. You will be thanking us

File: 32321123981.png (646KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

646KB, 1920x1080px

>>135318051
I think the problem is immaturity and lack of humility that personal setbacks in life will teach you. Many young people these days hold kinda "hard values" when it comes to economics, social issues etc. When they age they'll understand that things aren't usually so black and white. It is easy to be bold when you're in your prime.

Also liberalism is pretty much stolen by globalists and too much associated with economy.

>>135318051
Mostly because of their irrational desire to invite brown people. Other than that I'd mostly align with them.

>>135328054
liberals are also social workers and participation reward givers. That's not essentially leftist, but it's totally liberal.

"my post is retarded so i need to upload a picture of an attractive female as bait"

File: STAHP.jpg (81KB, 416x431px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 416x431px

>>135329209
>>135320737

File: IMG_0803.jpg (63KB, 385x414px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 385x414px

>>135318051
Liberals want to ban robowaifus, I will not allow that

>>135318051
i would stab them to death with a rusty screwdriver if I was allowed to and it would not bother me one bit.

File: blown_gasket.png (90KB, 1317x310px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1317x310px

>>135318051
it's the brainwashed commie cultists who are the problem, shitskin. those are neither "Liberals" nor "liberals."
if you'd lurked like you were supposed to you'd know this.

File: trigler_durden.jpg (113KB, 900x863px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 900x863px

can't really blame /pol/ for hating what the term actually means rather than what it was supposed to

I have mostly liberal views myself, but 99% of modern self-proclaimed 'liberals' are disgusting

>>135331239
UCF are turbo pussys. Nothing to see here.

>>135318051

Yea well you liberals up in leaf land made damn sure you didn't even have free speech. Bunch of cucks.

>>135318051
So commies now believe in freedom. What a wonderful world we live in.

>>135318051
Maybe it's the total lack of self-awareness?

File: consummation of the empire.jpg (199KB, 1200x815px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1200x815px

You flabdicked shiteater, OP. The kinds of people we refer to with the term "liberals" aren't much like what others might distinguish as libertarian or classic liberal. They're neoliberals. Social justice, progressivism and a marxist ideal of equity is what they stand for, roughly speaking. Scientism, atheism and transhumanism often signifies the ones not quite as dim as the rest. The vast majority of the rabble (here conservatives, by all means, are guilty of the same) are willing to sacrifice freedoms from in favor of freedoms to. True liberty demands both, however. Their socialist tendencies are second nature. Intellectually squalid neolibs will falsely think that true liberty can be without a liberal market, but the slightly quicker ones will give you three fucking scoops of shitflavored ice cream with an academic coating and claim that equality as well as liberal markets can co-exist. It can't. I know the market isnt the sole determinant in the society game, but its extremely significant in affecting what activities the governments and states can engage in. Some of the more radical leftists (that many would call liberals) are totalitarian autocrats without even realizing it.

>>135331999
up is down, right is wrong.
It's 2017 anon

>>135327604
What's with burgers greentexting 'burger meme' all the time? What are you even trying to imply?

>>135327604
>>135333599
Basically a desperate attempt at defending their country's integrity, image and reputation. It's okay anon, we know you're not ALL (just most) basically 2nd worlders, and if you aren't, all the best. However. The US as a collective entity is nothing to admire or look up to.

>>135333599
It's probably a response to whatever the fuck "burger" is supposed to mean.
If you live here, you know the people who abuse food like burgers are all in the South.
They're hicks, the type to fuck their daughters and cousins, and basically the stupidest "god and guns" type that couldn't hold a coherent 2-post conversation on /pol/.

>>135331761
Not like anyone was seriously concerned with this in the first place.

My guess would be they still are only brave enough to 'fight' parked cars and storefronts. If anything, the training should make them less of a threat in case they hurt themselves during it

File: hoppe-velka-upr-4a34b37121e6e.jpg (69KB, 449x299px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 449x299px

>>135318051
Society breeds weakness. That weakness manifests itself as liberalism, a phenomenon not found in nature. There's fascism in nature, there's conservatism in nature, but not liberalism. Why is that? Because nature has selected liberals for death. What do you think happens to sheep who think "wolf lives matter"? They don't live very long. For society to function, and remain strong, this weakness must be removed.