Which one?
>>135316225
US pre-1900, Hong Kong pre-1980.
Kowloon Walled City during its existence.
>>135316392
Oh, I forgot to mention, I asked for countries that exist now. So I could move there.
>>135316392
Kowloon is an interesting thing. Sadly it was controlled by mafia so it doesn't count as libertarian. No liberty there.
>>135317137
If I recall correctly there are some special economic zones being set up on the British Hong Kong model in South America, but I don't recall how far along that is.
The socialists are buttmad about it, so it probably won't happen.
I suppose HK is still the most Libertarian place you could realistically live in.
>>135316225
Definitely not this shit hole I live in.
>>135317677
http://www.alternet.org/world/nightmare-libertarian-project-push-one-central-american-country-through-massive-privitization
>>135317824
Archived it for you
https://archive.is/XBP0I
>>135316392
Kowloon looked like shit but you have to remember, people chose to live there
They weren't imprisoned, they could always just walk out if they wanted
But they didn't. There must have been a reason
>>135317706
You didn't specify it's name.
>>135316749
>So I could move there
I got you, familija.
>>135318833
Totally misinformed joke.
Taxes and government are good when they provide law obedience in the country, NAP. Somalia doesn't have this. Also, nigs and islam.
>>135318833
I also hate niggers, tho.
>>135316225
Ukraine.
>>135318833
Regulation ? Pisslam is a regulation several in fact. Try living there without it.
>>135319934
You apparently have never been to Ukraine.
So libertarians are like communists now? Libertarian state doesn't exist nowadays?
>>135321734
The nature of government is to expand and entrench. There are no new territories to conquer, no place to set up such a society.
Pretty much every country is some flavor of socialism now, and will pretty much permanently be so, because human nature is to sell you life for gibs.
>>135322857
Thats sad.
Maybe every country is socialist now because libertarianism doesn't work? Or it simply can't compete with other systems, while still being superior for the citizens?
>>135324529
Libertarianism can't compete with the siren song of gibs.
This doesn't mean that welfare is better than libertarianism, it must means that people would rather live poor and have a shitty, broken safety net than prosper yet live with risk.
>>135318833
>inviting cockhole
Somalia
>>135316225
Somalia
>>135316225
Naples is ancapistan