Traps are the basis of expectation -- therefore...

File: maxresdefault.jpg (280KB, 1600x1045px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 1600x1045px

The circumstances of Schrödinger's Cat apply in regards to one's specific gender as is applied to the calculus of one's Risks worth taking.

If you apply the long term accepted notion that if balls do not infact touch it is ergo not gay. If the Trap is convincing enough without first-hand knowledge of accounts of witnesses to agreement of sex (note; not witnesses to the act of sex itself) it would stand firm in the belief that until the initial revelation of said trap's gender that it would not be gay.

The question remains that if the circumstances of the romantic interest regarding trap and male are not nessicarily gay, would it stand to reason that the premises surrounding the specific group is not inherently homosexual?

Feel free to support or argue this theory.

(Disclaimer; This is not an official position of /pol/ or any board that coincides with this belief let alone 4chan nor myself included. Merely food for thought.)