Thread replies: 4
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Sorry to make this thread again,
We have described race as the Human race which is true, everyone with Human DNA is human. However within that there are many different ethnicity and differences between different peoples. We are the Same, yet different.
We have described Gender as a social construct of what makes a man a man and woman a woman. To say Gender does not exist is to deny the evolutionary and biological differences between man and woman and masculinity and femininity. Gender which came from Gender roles describes what makes a man a man and what makes a woman, these attributions are inherent in nature. These biological and evolutionary traits and differences between man and woman are objective so why is the definition of Gender been systematically made subjective?
The problem people are facing is to think that we create these objective attributions, we do not and cannot. For society to say that gender is a social construct and not the inherent objective gender roles created by nature is to essentially, deny nature. It is instead a point of arrogance to think that we define or chose in which ways gender is true or not true, nature is the definer and has decided that for us, it is built in to us. A man acting like a woman who considers himself woman is to simply have a Man acting like a woman and who Identifies as a woman, this Does not change objective reality of Gender and Gender roles. He would be biologically and sexually a male which would make his traits naturally and objectively more masculine.
Cont 1/2
>>
However the Subjective meaning of Gender which we have adopted could be made to mean that despite the objective reality he could "identify" or assume himself part of the female gender. and would by societies own definition fall under the female gender. That is fine anyone who challenges or gets upset by his subjective decision is stupid because people should know that it has nothing to do with the objective(Real) world and to challenge anything that is subjective is ultimately pointless. Does saying or thinking he is a woman make him a woman, Why not? Objectively and scientifically it is not true but subjectively who are we to judge. If he thinks he is a woman who are we to tell him he is not, in a subjective arena. So by societies own definition they think they get to pick or override the fundamental natural definition of what makes a man a man and what makes a woman a woman. They are trying to become the creator instead of the creation, there is to be no wonder of why they are confused.
If indeed gender is a social construct which allows for you to go against the natural intent the word is utterly meaningless and destroys any objective definition of what it has meant or does mean. It goes on to destroy or reject the very objective the very real and distinct natural order. But it does not mean shit, in the realm of subjectivity in which this "argument" mostly lies. Man and Woman are equal, the same, but Different. People are equal the same but different. To deny any one part of the whole picture or to be one sided is to miss the fundamental truth.
2/2
>>
>>135282648
Tl;dr
Men are men
Women are women
>>
>>135283059
Thanks for the addition and true
Thread posts: 4
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1