I am a junior scientist involved in a pedophilia study at Oxford

>>135279365
In what sense do you think it doesn't exist

How was the study performed? How many men are pedophiles as a %?

>>135279365
How about you elaborate instead of just posting some vague shit

Pics for reference

6yo neighbour is my waifu!

File: 1500929475392.jpg (57KB, 805x1024px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 805x1024px

>>135279365
What about this, anon? Or is it too risky to put the truth between homosexuality, and child abuse?

>>135279365
are we talking about pedo as in prepubescent girls or as in "omg, you're attracted to teens in their prime instead of my used up, wrinkly old cooch? you pedo!"

>>135279823
It doesn't exist in that there are men who are attracted to girls at any age, as long as they are feminine. These are what I have recognized as the "waifuists"; attracted to femininity ONLY.

>>135280274
Homosexuals are almost all in the abuser class.

>>135280866
What do you define as 'feminine'?

>>135279365
How about you give us some proofs first, you LARPing pedo?

>>135279365
it does exist and its documented. Its a form of perversion with a fetishist nature. The object of fetish is the undevelopped body. very early children and babies are the targets. I will not even talk about teens (up to 14 is open to debate, those girls are curious and full of desire) But we have laws and they must be followed. I agree that there is no much difference between a rapist and a pedofile, in a sense that both are trying to get a political advantage or submit another to their desire. But (excuse my judgment) pedophiles are the lowest of the low when they target children that cant even defend themselves. rapists that target only woman can be shot in the process if the woman carry a gun, if she is smart she can fight back or screem. children cant.

>>135280821
No, the study was on prepubescent. I interpret the results as that man can recognize genetic quality based even as early as pubescent children.

>>135281147
Feminine looks at any age: long hair, feminine clothing, etc

>>135280866
>checked
It seems to me that it's natural to acknowledge a well-developed 15 year old girl as attractive while at the same time recognizing my responsibility to not attempt to fuck her because she's a child.
I find no sexual attraction to girls without sexually mature features, but I can also recognize that a pretty 10 year old will most likely one day become a sexy 20 year old.
There is nothing controversial about this.

>>135281416
how many men are 'waifuists'?

How did you measure sexual attraction

>>135281654
15´s are in a gray area. not legally in the USA obviously, but in brazil if the underage 15 says he or she wanted it, its not considered rape nor even pedophilia, but a crime with lower consequences.

>>135279365
What percentage of the population is dangerous for prepubescent kids to be around?

>>135281873
100%

>>135279365
>>135279823
shariablue threads are uninteresting.
this is not a subject thats of political discourse value
you are filth and should be hanged, you cannot study a disease, that is what homosexuals and pedophiles are.
there is a reason after thousands of years everyone still dislikes your kind. you can stop writing now. there is no counterargument or concentric stance around the subject.

>>135279365
What bullet caliber would you recommend to fix a pedophile?

>>135280866
also your conclusion works both ways and can be exploited by SJW and feminists :
>It doesn't exist in that there are men who are attracted to girls at any age, as long as they are feminine. These are what I have recognized as the "waifuists"; attracted to femininity ONLY.

therefore one can say :
"all man are potential pedophiles" as in : man makes no distiction between a girl and a woman.

>>135281819
Brazil has got to be more relaxed with this shit than the US though, what with all the bunda.
How's Brazil doing these days huebro

>>135279365
>Ask me what you want
why dont you just fucking explain to us what you found out

>>135281370
I agree with you. This is my point. There are two types: people who want to abuse the weak (what the media wants to shill as your typical chris hanson "pedophiles") and "waifuists" who are attracted to pure genetic potential.

>>135281656
Depends who are honest with themselves. This is an impossible metric to measure at this point. 20-30% wouldn't surprise me.

>>135281873
The homo rate is pretty accurate. "Waifuists" dont generally abuse.

File: 1394169404822.jpg (83KB, 600x750px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 600x750px

>>135281654
>It seems to me that it's natural to acknowledge a well-developed 15 year old girl as attractive while at the same time recognizing my responsibility to not attempt to fuck her because she's a child.

>There is nothing controversial about this.

Retardedly it's actually wildly controversial, anon

>>135281416
What about traps? They're 'feminine' looking and make straight men do a double-take.

>>135279365
if it has two parts of a whole, that whole still exists

fucking women

>>135279365

That is not the body of a little girl.

>>135282129
its not even a brazilian thing. Im a psychologist myself and i belive sexuality is present even in children. it is documented that masturbation shows up in early ages, they normally dont cum but they get pleasure from it. Its advised that the parents make them stop (and they usually do). So if we need to talk about pedophilia, we need to understand that children have sexuality, but its not developed, and having sex with a child can lead to psychological traumas (not allways and i dont have statistics). Some children that were abused become normal people, but some of them does not have the repertoire to digest the act of sex. We could compare making sex with a child with blowing up a person next to a child its as confusing as that.

>>135282392
>it's actually wildly controversial
Amongst who?

>>135281819
Reasonable.
I.e. It's a crime, lesser than rape but still a crime.

>>135279365
Scratch this thread and make two others. One about the non-existence of pedophilia (and this time say wtf you mean up front), the other about why the UK is a fucking joke.

>>135282129
>How's Brazil doing these days huebro
its shit beyond measure poitically. Economy seems to start to on track. but we are in a political turmoil, we have like 300 politicians under investigation even the actual president. the market does not respond well to that.We have 14 million unemployed now.

>>135282475
the next generation of traps with all the hormone suppressors since young is going to be incredible.
My casual observation of life makes me agree with OP feminity is the key and testosterone is the enemy of it.

>>135282627
>We could compare making sex with a child with blowing up a person next to a child its as confusing as that.
I agree with you on childhood sexuality and I think you made a good point with the greentext above
a child cannot reconcile an adult's sexual needs and its obscene to push that on an undeveloped mind

>>135279365
in which country do you live where scientific research about pedophilia is legal?

File: 1498941943337.jpg (261KB, 634x637px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 634x637px

>>135282941
That is because you're a defective faggot. You couldn't be more of a loser if you tried, spic of Europe.

>>135279365

The fact that you didn't list the different classifications and just use the blanket category of pedophilia that everyone is labeled as even up to the age of 17 lays suspect on the claim that you are not who you claim to be.

Pedophilia - ages 1-10
Hebephilia - ages 11-14
Ephebophilia - ages 15-19

>>135279365
Loving the new twist of pedo-normalizing.
How about you post some proof to back up your statements.
E.g., a study of random sample of, let's say 1000, men and women.
Each is shown a hundred or more images of scantily dressed individuals of the opposite sex from ages of 1 to 100. To detect their sexual arousal you would obviously have to measure it with anything from here
http://io9.gizmodo.com/5214130/seven-mostly-scientific-devices-for-measuring-sexual-arousal
then post the proof of your studies.
Also, be sure to include demographics so we get a better idea of what races and ages are more likely to be attracted to young people.

Shouldn't be a problem since you've already come to the conclusion that pedophilia doesn't exist, meaning you already have all the proof anyone could ever ask for.

>>135282763
Agree

>>135279365
I would actually agree. Women are taught that in their 20's they no longer need to be feminine. Instead, they just need to be sluts. This is why you have a few Chad abuser types fucking all the girls. Women think they can not be feminine and are entitled to their cash nerd when they hit their 30's.

The whole system is off the rails right now.
Men are rejecting work because they don't want to be looked at as a cash cow. So they are rejecting masculinity as well. So you have guys acting like girls, and girls acting like guys.

>>135283063
and why do you think conducting research on any subject have to be illegal ? conducting research on marijuana in brazil is illegal, but im able to interview users and check their blood for exemple.

>>135282046
>therefore one can say :
>"all man are potential pedophiles" as in : man makes no distiction between a girl and a woman.
Yes, but that claim is much harder to market.

>Anyone still living in this place needs to move out ASAP before God destroys this abortion of a country.

I live in a nice white town, and im wealthy. But deep down I know that in 20-30 years time the town won't be white anymore. I can see the signs have already begun - wealthy brown people start to move in because its a nice white affluent area with no crime.

Why can't people just leave us whites alone. I know living near us is glorious, but you ruin everything.

>>135281370

>if the woman carry a gun

Not in UK. Hopefully the girl is lucky though and is carrying a spare bike wheel to defend herself.

>>135279365
This thread is a pedophilia normalization thread. Prove me wrong.

>>135283565
Because we do nothing about it. You prove it by being (((wealthy))) and not putting it into the cause.

>wah wah I just wanna be left alone an sheeit

Fucking do something about it then, you lazy cunt.

File: 1493885361234m.jpg (71KB, 1024x528px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1024x528px

>>135279365

File: 1495059637774.png (286KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 900x900px

>>135283800
but bruh its okay because while I think that 10 year old is smoking hot I would never fuck her. This mentality makes me not a pedo and disproves that pedos exist

File: o-SOCKS-570.jpg (142KB, 570x985px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 570x985px

>>135279365
>those shoes
Fuck this noise.
>>135279847
>How many men are pedophiles as a %?
100%. There hasn't been a man that wouldn't like to do a little girl.
>>135281986
Pedo hysteria is a very modern phenomenon.

File: pizza1.gif (4MB, 7000x5893px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 7000x5893px

>>135279365

File: ae95662439e0d16c6fcbfa6a68046681.jpg (773KB, 730x1110px) Image search: [Google]

773KB, 730x1110px

>>135283800
Pedophillia is normal. Its only recently when the socialists/feminists were allowed power that it was demonized

>>135284076
Just means you're a pedo in denial and/or with self control.
Using yourself as the sample and the proof is just as retarded as most of the garbage produced by Freud with those very same methods.

>>135279365
>junior scientist
Does that mean your diploma is signed in crayon?

>>135283114
>15-19

So literally every single male to ever walk this earth. Why is that even a category?

>>135284127
>100%. There hasn't been a man that wouldn't like to do a little girl.

Ugh what world do you live in? If she doesn't have boobs and bleeds for breeding, there's simply no attraction.

>>Pedo hysteria is a very modern phenomenon.

Actually disusing the category Ephebophilia and claim everyone is a pedo from 15 up to legal consent age is a modern phenomenon.

>>135284127
>>135284436

Disgusting Slavic monkey I hope Putin takes over your country just to purge degenerates like yout

>>135284693
>Actually disusing the category Ephebophilia and claim everyone is a pedo from 15 up to legal consent age is a modern phenomenon.

Kek my female colleague called the father of her friend a pedophile, because he was 50 year old and hunting 18-yo pussy on tinder.

Remember, "x doesn't exist" is a fucking retarded meme argument that immediately discredit any point or opinion you were clumsily trying to communicate.

>>135284648
>Why is that even a category?

Humans have this anal fixation of categorizing everything.

>>135279365
>Anyone still living in this place needs to move out ASAP
WHERE?

>>135280866
>It doesn't exist in that there are men who are attracted to girls at any age, as long as they are feminine.

How are little girls feminine if they haven't developed boobs or hips?

You're clearly a pedophile shill.

>>135284509
>Using yourself as the sample and the proof is just as retarded
Which is I why I really hate this thread. Disgusting comments of people saying that because they don't fuck them it makes them not a pedo.

>>135285117

Since he's at Oxford I will hazard a guess Oxford. Both the city and college share the same name. Unless he meant it as a blanket statement for all of England.

>>135279365
What differs a 16+ rapist from child rapist?

>>135282627
I experimented a lot with girls since I was 7 years old. The girls all seem fine. Well, one smokes cigarettes and fucks niggers, another has a kid, another fucks niggers, and the last also fucks niggers, so something wasn't right from the start. For me I have an unending obsession with lolis despite trying for so long to break it, and I'm also abstaining from sex until marriage just because I don't feel right with someone I couldn't trust, not to say I could trust a potential wife either, but I'm just fucked from that and it was all mutual, consensual, all that shit, between the girls and I.
What's your opinion on it, Huebro?

>>135285265
just by being cute and feminine, wearing dresses...

>>135284127
>100%. There hasn't been a man that wouldn't like to do a little girl.

nah... this is a very wild theory

>>135285654
Los niños también actuan lindo por lo mismo que son niños y en la antigüedad los hombres utilizaban falda.

So again, how the hell is that feminine?

>>135285761
I would want to cuddle and kiss cause SHE'S A CHILD NOT THAT I WANT TO FUCK IT!
YOU SICK BASTARDS!

>>135282298

Cheers.

>>135284127
>>135281945

I am certainly not attracted to little girls in any conscious way that I can understand. And can't see myself being dangerous to them in any way of form. So it is not 100%, even if I am the only non-pedophile in existence. Also..

>>135285310

Hey, sometimes I 've gotten so angry that momentarily I wanted to kill people, but never did and never will (war aside). Am I a murderer?

>>135285474
>First things first: The UK is a fucking joke. Anyone still living in this place needs to move out
>First things first: The UK is a fucking joke.
>The UK

Can Americans read English?

File: milla_jovovich_nude_maxim_photos6.jpg (71KB, 425x591px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 425x591px

>>135285761
>They're small and cute and friendly.

So are little boys.

So again.. how the hell is that feminine?

>>135280866
>as long as they are feminine.

So, you consider a little girl's body as something femenine? no, I dont think so...

what about people who likes boys?

>>135285761
I wouldn't.

Girls aren't attractive until middle school minimum.

>>135285761

Sorry but nope. Only if I was the father and showing my child daughter some paternal love.
I can be a degenerate in the bedroom but even I have standards.

>>135285003
47 GENDERS

>>135285925
>Can Americans read English?

I can read but that was many posts ago especially when it comes to memorizing anything about the UK. The UK is simply not worth the precious remaining brain cells.

>>135285917
>I wanted to kill people
Wanting to kill someone is different from being attracted to someone.

>>135281654
Everything you said is true.

OP says there is no pedophilia. I know Oxford isn't as good as it used to be, but is it really this bad now?

>>135279365

Fucking gays and fucking jews.

God hates them both.

>>135281945
This checks out though

>>135286372

Oxford is very forward thinking. They are merely getting ready for the future when Islam takes over.

>>135286367
Very different because of the the most likely, but not guaranteed, fully developed body. The single most important signal of sexual maturity that by nature's design triggers arousal in the other sex.
Deviations from that are exactly that. Defective human beings, just like autists or people with gender dysphoria.

File: Babytard.jpg (29KB, 348x419px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 348x419px

>>135285702
It's the truth. All men know little girls are best. Some just lie about it.
>>135285912
Oh, yes, of course, because that wouldbe bad and you wouldn't do badthink.
>>135285976
>what about people who likes boys?
Fags are vile and should be killed.
>>135286047
Elementary school girls are best.

this fucking thread needs to burn and retards like >>135286645 are gonna burn in eternal hellfire (H bomb will do the trick aswell)

>>135286645
>Elementary school girls are best.
Wrong. Preschool girls are best.

>>135279365
Post your credentials faggot.

ITT Pedos reveal themselves.

>>135286645
>Oh, yes, of course, because that wouldbe bad and you wouldn't do badthink.
WTF is wrong with you sick fucks?!
You fuckers should be sterilized so you never have kids.

>>135286645
>>135285761
>>135284436
>>135284127
>Ukraine Flag
>Ukraine collusion with DNC and HRC campaign
>Pedo shitposter with Ukraine proxy

HELLO JOHN PODESTA.

>>135286896
>not liking fetuses (feti? )

>>135282298
Almost all healthy men would be waifuists..

I mean if a little girl is cute, feminine and attractive one can acknowledge that without wanting to put his dick in her.

I mean maybe marry her and wait till she is 14/15 or whatever

File: 2890E9CA00000578-3077444-Princess_Emily_of_the_Kingdom_of_North_Sudan_said_she_thought_it-a-3_1431389616814.jpg (53KB, 634x423px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 634x423px

>>135286838
Tell me more about how mad you are.
>>135286896
They're good but elementary schoolers are best. Both are better than middle schoolers and that was yhe point.

Basically gays and psychopaths abuse kids

File: get your degree quick!.jpg (63KB, 384x362px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 384x362px

>>135279365
>pedophilia doesnt even exist.
>Modern "pedophilia" is split into 2 variations: predatory rapists and "waifuists"
"Oxford" or the Close-cover-before-striking Institute of Technology?

File: fuckingmasterrace.jpg (78KB, 606x851px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 606x851px

>>135287243
>HELLO JOHN PODESTA.

yup the fucking boy wonder and his jew buddies are in here.

>>135287821
>the boy fucking wonder
ftfy

File: 1501036361237.jpg (7KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 225x225px

What's happening in this "modern" society is very obvious, the next step of this sexual liberation is the pedophile regulation.

I saw a video some days ago, about a 13 yo gay boy talking with a 60 yo gay old man, they were comparing how society was on those days, how being gay was something sick and considered as a philia, the lil faggot was very disgusted and sad, he said that his first love started when he was like 10 yo.

So, If we compare how society advanced in those 50 years....

And they're obvious, now the stupid media liberals are making everyone consider as normal to sexualize a kid...

fuck this NWO

File: piss.png (79KB, 701x161px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 701x161px

>>135288344

>>135288344
You've got it backwards. Pedophillia used to be normal and accepted but for the last hundred years or so leftists have been pushing against it. Now they've succeeded in convining most everyone that something normal and natural is the worst thing ever.