Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
File: Groupthink.png (68KB, 1151x469px) Image search:
[Google]
68KB, 1151x469px
The easiest and most effective way we can redpill the masses is with Wikipedia. Tens of thousands of people read even the minor pages every year and treat its word like gospel, yet often only one or two editors will have actually made any significant recent contributions.
Lots of easy redpilling to be done. Some examples:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fake_news_websites
Add any page to that list and it is permanently discredited, especially as other sources cite that list.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority
Liberals NEED to argue from authority and always resort to this, since currently (((authorities))) largely side with them. It's no coincidence that college is a Liberal-producing factory. Make the page portray these sorts of arguments in a more negative light and we begin subtly redpilling many
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Golden_Age
What all cucks link to to defend Islam. If it could be changed to "Arab" Golden Age or something similar, we could further lessen bluepill conditioning
Those are just my suggested pages to start with, open to any others
>>
Could get Arab golden age by an appeal to being inclusive; use their own ways against them
>>
File: Screenshot_3.png (28KB, 1616x105px) Image search:
[Google]
28KB, 1616x105px
>>135207498
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fake_news_websites
DUDE WHAT
ALEX JONES IS FAKE NEWS?
>>
File: 1500831679415.gif (2MB, 320x240px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 320x240px
>>135207498
No hope, they are too biased already. It's all in what they consider acceptable sources.
>>
File: @[email protected] (16KB, 468x241px) Image search:
[Google]
16KB, 468x241px
>>135208544
It's only that sort of thinking that's allowed cucks to dominate
The ones that rule a page are the ones that edit it the most
>>
>>135208544
this, it's pretty much hopeless. wikipedia has been utterly colonized with marxists the same way universities are, they are in positions of power and can shut down dissent easily. If you had a huge inundation of new people dropping redpills maybe you'd get through and make a difference but it'd have to be a massive effort.
Starting a new site would also be pretty difficult. If someone could take a snapshot of all wikipedia content, reupload it on a different wiki site, put in some sane management and editing policies, and somehow draw a lot of attention to it, that might be a better choice
Thread posts: 6
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4