APOLOGIZE TO REINCE!!!

>>135190623
The leak is that Mooch is worth $85 million.

How do I know that, if there was no leak?

>>135190623
In b4 archive fags http://archive.is/57h9w

File: 1492392809860.png (15KB, 240x304px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 240x304px

>>135190623
i'm lost explain things to me

My favorite trick of the libs and media is stating a lie as if it's an irrefutable, proven truth that you'd be an idiot to dispute. Gotta laugh every time.

File: You_Doodle_2017-07-23T22_59_29Z.jpg (939KB, 1717x1313px) Image search: [Google]

939KB, 1717x1313px

>>135190754
I dunno. I just screen capped headline for fake news side by side like (pic related) when the leaks are proven.

>>135191037
They wish to assert themselves as the voice of truth but, like pottery, it always blows up in their faggot face's.

>>135190888
Scar believes Reince is the leaker, he most likely is. http://www.newyorker.com/news/ryan-lizza/anthony-scaramucci-called-me-to-unload-about-white-house-leakers-reince-priebus-and-steve-bannon/amp

>>135191311
Checked. Please archive or screenshot.
https://archive.is/GLgTh

>>135191311
Try to keep up.
https://twitter.com/Scaramucci/status/890433477337915393

>>135191311
he's gonna fucking kill the leakers

>>135190888

WHAnon said watch twitter yesterday for something big. Mooch boldly and publicly called out Rience for leaking.

Today, fake news is saying "there was no leak"

It's the same thing we have seen time and time again. Think of Trump's "wiretapping" claims. Fake New went mad saying "There was no wire tapping!!!"

1. Make brief bold claim that appears unsubstantiated.
2. Media and political puppets go nuts in opposition for days/weeks
3. Once he lets (((them))) paint (((themselves)) into a corner, he will reveal the evidence.
4. (((They))) go into damage control and spin mode.
5. POTUS laughs and keeps doing his thing
6. MSM loses more credibility
7. (((Their))) jimmies get even more rustled
8. Repeat


Are we the only ones that see this?

File: scar(6).png (50KB, 569x676px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 569x676px

>>135191650
hes fucking baiting
check second paragrph

>>135190754
Yes and no.

I think this is where the trap is laid.....

I believe he never specified his financials are the leak he was referring to. All the normie fucks are making that assumption.

All leaks are on the table as beating what he was tweeting about.