>Now it is estimated that realistic sex robots will become more common within a decade.
>It's a disappointing reflection of the way women are portrayed in society - Ma’s clever three dimensional creation is about as one dimensional as you can get.
Is all this cause for concern? Of course. Because right now more money is being spent on making these things than thinking about the ethical and societal ramifications. We already know porn provides a terrifying reflection on how society views women, which can manifest itself in real life
>There's also a real worry that people will abuse robots assigned human traits - whether it be in a sexual or physical way. Whitby thinks it's a legitimate concern: “Will people mistreat robots? Oh yes, I’m sure. The reason I’m sure is because they already do. The way people first meet artificial intelligence is in a character in a video game that they’re shooting at.”
http://archive.is/6lnGT
What will happen to women once sexbots become a reality? Also, who will /pol/ model their robo wife after?
>>135189713
I think that when the gynoids will be in the market, the women will lost the UNIQUE value they have, that means all kind of wimin associations asking violently to forbidden or worse, demanding rights for bots. I hope all this shit will fail and everyone can enjoy sex without problems.
>>135189713
Posting best ve-ne zuel-a since someone will post that robo-slut.
>>135190441
>and everyone can enjoy sex without problems.
but if men are fucking their sexbots then who are women fucking? each other?
>inb4 male sexbots
women could never competently build something to satisfy themselves
>>135189713
>What will happen to women once sexbots become a reality
They'll die off.
>who will /pol/ model their robo wife after?
I'm going to get a robit based on my little cousin.
>>135191760
Jesus christ, how terrifying.
>>135192043
once vaginas start to be human reproductive organs instead of wallets, like the old days, balance will be found in the birth rate once again.
sex bots will be the thing you pay for, pussy will be what you get with your female peers for freeeeeeeeeeeee. and that scares them, since right now a snapper means free money.
>>135191760
the uncanny valley is strong with this one
>>135189713
It's not about the pussy, it's about the conquest. To understand this is to understand all.
But no, lad, I'm sure everyone is going to line up and tell you how cool you are for bringing your sex bot on holiday with you
>>135192043
I dont know. But if the man make dolls for fuck is cuz the man thinks the women is not a propertly sex parthner. I dont want to be demanded for a slut that i just fucked once while we are drunk
>>135189713
If the sexbot participles on the war against the liberals, then yes they can be given rights.
>>135189713
If I haven't gotten an actual wife by the time I'm 40 and sex robots are actually a thing, then absolutely I will get a robot.
I wouldn't care anymore at that point. I'd just want someone in my life I can love and care for.
>and fuck the shit out of
>>135194242
We cannot give rights to bots since they are make for serve us. Think like you were a white burguer from 1850 in Missisipi, you cannot give to your slaves rights.