Muh Diversity

>>135129558
Clearly Nolan is a right wing fascist. So I might go see this film.

>>135129558
>"They weren't large in number, maybe a few hundred among hundreds of thousands, but their appearance in the film would have provided a good reminder of how utterly central the role of the Indian Army was in the war," he told Slate.

So show one or two indian soldiers in the film?

Diversity is just a code word for anti-white.
>Not enough black people in a movie about white people!
Seems like they're trying to discourage white people from seeing any form of unification in the media,

>>135129941

>They weren't large in number, maybe a few hundred among hundreds of thousands

>would have provided a good reminder of how utterly central the role of the Indian Army was in the war

These fuckers running around with the captain america serum?, how the fuck can 1000+ out of 400k+ be any more beneficial. Jesus the guy that wrote that article is stupid.

>>135130856
Do you have problems with reading comprehension?


>would have provided a good reminder of how utterly central the role of the Indian Army was in the war
>the war

India raised nearly 2.5 million troops during the war and contributed heavily to the North African and middle eastern campaigns. They then fought the Japanese in Burma etc.
They lost nearly 90,000 men over the war, basically 25% of the overall British Empire (incl. the UK) losses.

Education in this country has gone to pot.

You can be a nationalist and have pride in your nation, but I don't know why you can't learn to read a book once in a while. It would improve your reading comprehension skills at the very least.

numpty.

File: paki_sugadaddy.png (915KB, 1068x1191px) Image search: [Google]

915KB, 1068x1191px

>>135129558

> Historian John Broich says the Indian soldiers in Dunkirk were "particularly cool under fire and well organised during the retreat".
"They weren't large in number, maybe a few hundred among hundreds of thousands, but their appearance in the film would have provided a good reminder of how utterly central the role of the Indian Army was in the war," he told Slate.

drop the poo pajeet

>>135133040
But they weren't at *DUNKIRK* so why put a fuck load of Indian extras in and make the film look ridiculous?

>>135133040
NOT AT DUNKIRK, YOU DUMB NIGGER.

If the Indians want to remind people of their role in Dunkirk they can make their own fucking movie about it.

>>135133040
Not in the campaign in Europe you retarded dumbfuck poo paki nigger.