North Korea

Tf you mean EMP? I'd be surprised if norks had a working microwave

Why would you attack the American west coast from north korea's west coast. Their ICBM can only go about 8km max, let alone accurately and mounted with a nuke. And why would they fire just one? Knowing that the US and allies would strike back with all of their might?

It's just gonna be another test.

>>135108041
Carpet bomb them with nukes. Do the same to China is they try to stop us.

>>135108041
I definitely support a preemptive strike on the US

File: 452544bf2e4608e795cbe7f66ade8a65.jpg (123KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1024x1024px

>>135108041
We can't attack Best Korea. No matter what happens there is a 100% chance of Seoul, SK being reduced to rubble by artillery alone, not to mention they've proven they have nukes and are willing to use chemical warfare include VX gas.

The world waited too long to deal with North Korea and now they can't be stopped without paying too high a price. They've earned a seat at the negotiating table.

>>135108999
This
Also trips

We should wait until after they nuke California then destroy them.
Win win

>>135108603
in their last test could reach Alaska.. Cali ain't that far off and accuracy isn't as important as altitude with EMP. There could also be other players like Iran ready to strike the U.S. and her allies once our communication is down.

>>135108041

If they're going to hit anything it's going to be Pearl Harbor or Japan, most likely the former.

So I'll die in my sleep probably.

Night gents.

>>135108886
Agreed

>>135108041
>Any one got anything to say about North Korea's potential ICBM launch in the next couple hours?
Literally ZERO chance of then getting in a successful strike against America.

>>135109135
>They've earned a seat at the negotiating table.
Fuck off, shill.

>>135109534
Goodnight, Sleep Tight and Ignore the blinding light when the nuke hits.

File: SHIP_SSBN_Ohio_Class_Tubes_Open_and_Full_lg.jpg (89KB, 568x852px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 568x852px

>>135109424
>once our communication is down
Impossible. We have resources spread all over the world, over 800 military bases outside of the U.S. not to mention a single one of our Ohio class submarines could wipe out most countries.

An attack on the mainland United States is suicide.

>>135109424
Stop with this LARP nonsense. There are goddamn protocols for communication breakdown and the military has backup energy. There's also no evidence that a) the NKs have been working on an EMP, and b) an EMP in the far, far north west would disable the entire grid.
Not to mention the idea of NK working with Iran to destroy the US is retarded, and totally forgets the fact that there would still be powered US military installations all over the world, notably in Japan, South Korea, Australia, and the general Pacific. Not to mention the fact that we have allies.
Stop with this shit

>>135109894
Yeah, those al-qaeda got suicided in an instant after 9/11

>>135108041
It'll be a emp from their satellite. Best Korea is the most advanced military in the world. It's a meme that they're backwards and in the stone age technologically.

>>135109811

It's okay, some random ass chime chord coming from my smoke alarm will probably wake me up at 3:30 am again.

>>135109778
That's really going to be the only way out of this. There's no military option.

>>135110128
Kek, good one.

We have been balls deep in the middle East for 16 years over that one.

>>135109894
>800 military bases

(citation needed)

>>135109135
>They've earned a seat at the negotiating table.
This is why people make fun of AnCaps.

>>135109778
You underestimate Best Korea. There was plans to nuke them during the Korean war but their mountanious terrain would have rendered it largely ineffective.

Not even the u.s. has ever attacked a country that possessed nukes and ICBMS. It's just too risky and Kim knows it.

>>135110128
that wasnt an attack on the mainland? its a very clearly defined island

>>135109997
Why is it retarded to think NK and Iran could be working together? It seems like a natural alliance. And if Russia or China still support them financially while we are at war It definitely wouldn't be an easy war to win for the U.S.

>>135110469
people make fun of ancaps because the truth of missing out on something like bitcoin is too brutal to confront and must be suppressed with projective ridicule

>>135110821

Iran is NK's only true ally atm.

SK is the last country NK wants to attack (but they will if their backs are against the wall and there is no survival).

Is USINT even aware of all the statues and shit norks sold?

>>135110842
>>135110842
>Because the truth of missing out on something like bitcoin
You mean being the guinea pigs for the trial run for one world currency? Yeah, you sure got me bud. You got duped by a controlled opposition ideology literally created by and for kikes.

>>135108041
China will shoot it down.

>>135108041
>Any one got anything to say about North Korea's potential ICBM launch in the next couple hours?
It might hit a ZOG

>I definitely support a preemptive strike on North Korea.
Good goy

File: IMG_2919.jpg (20KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 250x250px

>>135110821
>seems like a natural alliance
What the hell are you smoking senpai

>>135110821
It's retarded to think that the relationship between Iran and Nk is anything other than teaching each other how to build nukes.
>And if Russia or China still support them during war
Why would either state support NK, a politically and economically puny nation, over the US

I don't see much room for negotiation at this point. Didn't NK just scoff at a chance for peace talks with SK?

>>135108041
yah, I got something to say : Goodbye California. .

>>135111452
well i don't know why don't we look at history and see if there was anytime either supported north Korea against the USA?

>>135111454
Really just for show, and SK's diplomacy is still worth pursuing. Any kind of communication could deescalate the situationm
They also don't give a shit about SK, they want the US to make promises first.

>>135111611
Russia and China haven't been communist in fucking decades dude.

File: 82c.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>135111454
There's nothing to negotiate. S.K. and the U.S. both want North Korea to stop building/testing weapons and North Korea has refused.

Trump is in a really fucked position as far as that situation. North Korea is definitely going to be capable of hitting the mainland United States with a nuke within 4 years and it's up to him to decide if it's worth engaging in the bloodiest war since ww2 is worth it to stop them.

>>135109424

They're not going to strike California. This is just to guard off regime change and get gibs

>>135111859
>>135111859
so you're saying that both would be OK with an invasion of North Korea because they aren't communists anymore?

well then, i'm sold, begin the invasion and lets find out. my money is on them saying NOPE, not okay with having the US right on our borders.

>>135108603
>Their ICBM can only go about 8km max
you're a dullard

i hope he nukes commiefornia

File: pr46img1.jpg (215KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 600x600px

>>135111436
The good stuff ;)

>>135112156
>Russia and China won't like the US attacking NK
>therefore they'll support NK against the US
Laughable. Of course they wouldn't like it, but they'd resort to hard diplomacy, not war. China relies on the western market for its survival.

>>135112331
It's a typo dude. 8000km.

>>135110615
I get the joke, but the Pentagon would disagree.

>>135111452
I don't know why China and Russia do what they do. Its retarded to think that there isn't something more going on with NK and Iran.

>>135112587
either way you're a dullard
>omits 3 extra digits
>"typo"

>>135112587

well, that's the calculated decision MacArthur made as well. we can argue about what will happen but the fact is none of us know. im on the side of the fence that thinks China would commit to propping up NK in the event of a US invasion, Russia? not sure.

China has survived without the western market before and same with Russia. They aren't democracies, they can and will suppress civil disobedience.

>>135112474
>tobacco in a beef jerky bag
you are what's wrong with america

>>135108041

I hope you are drafted and sent to the front lines to be killed first faggot.

The US is the clear aggressor here. When is the last time NK invaded anyone?

File: 1494619139315.jpg (120KB, 700x830px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 700x830px

I'm coasting on mulled apple cider and dream pop, bring on the nukes, this is how I'd wanna go out anyways

>>135112884
I don't think China or Russia would waste money "propping up" North Korea. While there would be an incredibly high body count, it would be over quickly. There's no chance of them "holding back" the u.s. military this time around.

>>135112587
The western market is in control of our Gov not the other way around. Company's will most likely still want to trade with China as they do right now regardless of who China backs in war and these company's will pay our Congressmen to block any sanctions placed against china by Trump. China has nothing to lose. Russia Has nothing to lose.

>>135112856
>autistic enough to care about typos on 4chan
Wew

>>135112843
China wants NK to go away without having to deal with refugees and the US on its doorstep. It also wants to keep trade with the US and control over the China Sea.

Russia also doesn't want the US on its doorstep in SE Asia, and basically likes to subvert the US whenever it can for influence. NK is no exception, but they'd never risk war.

>>135112884
They survived when their markets didn't depend on the west. The Russian market is less integrated than the Chinese, but were all western/us trade to suddenly stop tomorrow, the Chinese economy would crash and burn harder than anyone has ever seen in history.
And >>135113239

>>135113167
Keep sucking Kim's cock, Ong.

>>135113089
Its cheaper that way lol

File: C1I29UaUcAA7T2l.jpg large.jpg (160KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 1080x1080px

>>135113219
That's a cute kitty. :3

>>135112884
At the time China overtly supported fledgling communist governments. Times have changed.

>>135113239
you guys can't stomach high casualties. that's why you pulled out of Vietnam. whose government do you think is more suited for war? one that has to bow to political pressure from democracy? or an authoritarian government that can and will violently suppress dissent?

im sure all scenarios have been accounted for by both the USA and China, the fact that we are still in this stalemate means the USA really isn't certain that China would not be drawn into a wider conflict.

>>135111553
Bye

>>135113239
China should want NK to be nuked it turn into a land grab with china grabbing most of north Korea's natural reasources in the north, south korea would do the same and be there to dissolve any NK into it.

>>135109997
um...yeah, you do know that a nuke detonating releases an EMP right? lol you dont have to target shit, just get somewhere close to who you want to hit.

>>135109424
>Alaska
Shit, they're gonna hit us where it hurts...RIP dog sled teams and alcoholic natives

>>135113294
i'm not going to be so confidant that the Chinese market would crash without the USA. Both economies would inevitably suffer but both would survive.

>>135113465

yes times have changed, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't still be drawn into a conflict into NK. not being communist doesn't mean you give up national interests.

>>135113167
US can only be considered the aggressor if they attack.

File: 1499614657808.jpg (469KB, 1280x853px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 1280x853px

>>135108170
Don't be naive, Tyler. Norks can easily purchase the materials needed.
>>135111183
AnCaps completely and utterly btfo