Archive meme

>>135107521
archived

>>135107680

god's work, anon.

>>135107680
opps xDD
https://archive.is/BKgDQ

You're either new or retarded
>Archive the page, if anything changes it can be traced back
>Sites still get traffic even with ad blocker

>>135107521
some sites get revenue for clicks

>>135107680
based archive poster.

>>135107752
Listen to the jew, OP.

>>135107752
Based jew is right.

>>135107752
Ad agencies don't accept the site's internal traffic log as a hit since it can be corroborated by third-party trackers.

If you use ad blocker, they also block third-party audience trackers, so as far as ad revenue calculation goes, the site received no hit, no money, but spent money on bandwidth.

If you use the archive link, the site doesn't end up losing money on bandwidth, the operator of archive.is does.

>>135107971
*since it can't be fully corroborated

>>135107521
It keeps an archived copy of the original piece. This way articles can't just be changed in the future. Also it stops them from getting ads and traffic.

File: 14586755672331.jpg (149KB, 800x820px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 800x820px

>>135107521
too new to not even know or understand the importance of archiving let alone know about based nordbot

>>135107752

>Archive the page, if anything changes it can be traced back

oh fuck they backtraced it

we done goofed /pol/

>>135107680
blasphemer.

>>135107521
It goes beyond ads. Make them drop in Alexa rankings too. Anything to deflate the media. Besides, if you're only using an adblocker and not a javascript blocker too, these sites are still collecting your information, most likely to sell to others. It's best to archive regardless. I used to post screenshots of articles for just that reason before the archive site was being used.

Watch this. http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_597960bde4b02a8434b3d993?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009

>>135108365
>>135108128
4chan is also where a lot of viral content begins its life cycle. When you share a link it might end up being copypasted to hundreds of twitters with millions of followers. Journalists and bloggers also copy links verbatim I've noticed (which is why it's often random whether a certain writer links to a site or its archived version in the final article). A lot of those demographics don't have ad blockers.

>>135107521
fuck off CNN

>I'm too stupid to understand the point of internet archives

Stop being dumb OP

File: IMG_2910.jpg (28KB, 406x438px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 406x438px

>>135107521

>>135108916
I like to think of us as the boiler room of the meme express/alternative media

>>135107752
this

OP is a summerfag

>>135107971
>Ad agencies don't accept the site's internal traffic log as a hit since it can't be corroborated by third-party trackers
Except it can.

But let's assume you're right for a moment, it still gives them negotiating power with advertising agencies.