Why do leftits and (((them))) believe making Japan a multicultural shithole will improve their "problem" (if you can even call it that)?
http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/re/k-rsc/lcs/kiyou/18-3/RitsIILCS_18.3pp.45-57Takaya.pdf
>>135070426
that is fagutland you martsharter
>>135070426
That's New Zealand, slick.
>inb4 hurr yu took the bait!
>>135070426
Who the fuck even made this? It's New Zealand, but bizarrely, the cities are actually somewhat in their respective positions, if you were to overlay Japan, over New Zealand.
>>135070426
Mate, wrong end of the pacific, our island is on the lower end of the Pacific not the top end.
>>135071168
>>135071527
That's just weird. Thanks for the sauce.
>>135071628
Haha, yeah your comment just reminded me of this mill I used to drive past everytime I went up to see the relatives up the coast.
Seems they're doing lots of stuff with the Chinese now so this logo stopped being used back in 2013 as far as I can tell
>>135070426
they know that if japan ever gets back on their feet and becomes ultra-nationalist then they will pose a serious threat to the globalist agenda.
if (((they))) can fill japan up with shitskin subhumans then within a couple generations the japs will be outbred and overrun, then japan will pose no threat to anyone.
>>135070426
They don't reproduce enough and that means they need assistance from 70 IQ Swahili rappers and gangstas
>>135070426
Because they preach for global world order and want the entire world to have no borders and conform to their hippy dippy multiculti agenda as one world government.
Anti- #WhiteGenocide activists have pointed out for years that nobody expects Japan to become multicultural---and almost immediately the SJWs went began floating the idea of the genocide of the Asian to make themselves look not guilty.
This came about only AFTER we pointed it out.
Also, notice how every article advocating for multiculturalism in Japan is almost always written by a Jew.
>>135070426
thats middle earth you faggot
>>135073010
Fucking Balrogs.
ʎlɐʇI uʍop ǝpisdn uɐ ʇsnɾ si puɐlɐǝZ ʍǝN 'ʇɔɐɟ unℲ
>>135070426
>their "problem" (if you can even call it that)
I think that's the true core of this argument - is population reduction really even a bad thing? There's exactly one """""downside""""", and that is a lower GDP and everything that goes with it, which only really negatively affects (((bankers))) and government.
On the flipside, you get:
>lower housing prices
>less crowding
>less noise pollution
>larger housing
>less unemployment
>higher wages
And that's just off the top of my head.
If it wasn't for the mass third world migration coming into the first world, the low birth rates would be a blessing that I would celebrate.