REAL OR HOAX? The Protocols of the Elders of Zion

File: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.jpg (272KB, 546x732px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 546x732px

I started reading The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Full PDF here: http://xroads.virginia.edu/~MA01/kidd/thesis/pdf/protocols.pdf

It definitely seems to answer the JQ. In terms of authenticity, I'd say the fishiest thing on the face is just on the nose (yup) it is, how everything is so plainly and explicitly spelled out.

Usually, documents written by those who seek to justify their control aren't written in a way that is so overtly sinister. They usually write from a position of "we need to help these people, this is the right thing to do," whereas the tone of the protocols is basically "fuck the GOYIM, they're scum."

The mainstream consensus is that the protocols are a "proven" fabrication, that the text was actually sourced from works that appeared decades before the protocols that weren't even about Jews: Maurice Joly's Dialogue in "Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu" (1864) and "Hermann Goedsche's Biarritz" (1868).

So, what's the deal with the protocols? Are they are fake as they appear? If so, what redpill value do they have other than being fictional works that offer a somewhat accurate view of reality?