Is healthcare a human right, /pol/?

>>134990040
I checked the user manual. I can't find anything about health care. I did find out I need double A batteries though so not a total loss.
Are double A batteries a human right, desu?

>>134990040
Negativist right, yes.
Positivist right, no.

>>134990040
If you pay someone to take care of your health, then yes.

It should be something our government is willing to provide us with and have a budget for. Therebhs to be a benefit to living in a country and paying taxmm and they should be giving more than the idea thag we are living free.

>>134990040
I hope he dies from somekind of heart attack, really hate this fat cunt and the people that allow him to be this fucking fat by subscribing to his lard ass

>>134990040
as long as there is a government providing healthcare and has the funding too, yes.

I dunno, healthcare, medicare, whatever you want to call it seems a hell of a lot more like a basic human right that our government should be funding than the goddamned USPS these days.

>>134990040
I'd support it if everybody was in a healthy BMI range. 100% health care.

Fatasses who disagree about BMI because MUH ATHLETES WHO ARE IN OBESE RANGE will then take a bodyfat% test. 25%+ instafail

>>134990040
fuck no

File: 20170726_061911.jpg (20KB, 215x115px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 215x115px

>>134991384

a basic healthcare is a human right. extraordinary measures are not. I think thats what people say. wouldn't matter if it didn't cost a house for treatment, but i guess them the breaks.

>>134990040
Social good, yes. Human right? By definition a state program run by taxes cannot be a human right.

2nd amendment doesn't mean you're provided a pistol from the state for free.

Rights are intrinsic to the human experience and exercising them isn't a societal burden.

If the country ran out of money, what happens to your 'right' to health care?

Rights can only be restricted, not given. Ergo, health care, an act of human endeavour, can never technically be a human right.