Take the final redpill on the left. Communism is misanthropic

>>134918418
Still no replies
>saged

>>>134914369

>>134919501
Why is that?
Because /pol/ after drumpf is a low iq shithole of people who want to be edgy retards and not engage in esoteric discussion


bumb

>>134918418
More self bump

>>134918418
I remember Jonathan Bowden that about this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-BZylziBKI

>>134921089
Exactly, finally a good post from a Pole.
/POL/ has gone to shit since trump, no more threads about actual ideas

>>134921089
*talk about this

any way /pol/ turned in to shit,most theards are about women/Nazism

/pol/ is no longer Great

>>134921089
It would be a good introduction for someone I know at university this video. However he mentions the joos so yeah...

File: ffffffffffff spengler.jpg (365KB, 740x2996px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 740x2996px

>>134921336
It's because of the american posters from all those shit sites like the stormer and reddit.
There are still some of us here and some at 4+4 pol. But when is the last time you saw an Oswald Spengler thread? More than a year ago probably

>>134921383
Yeah, Bowden is great and insightful speaker

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aR4MvD9IEAE

>>134918418
>the leaders of communism want to redeem a kind of human that never existed

I don't know how you got here. It is clear that humans are capable of both cooperation and conflict. It is also obvious that we benefit more from cooperation than conflict. Communist leaders reject natural cooperation because leaving it up to people means they can choose whether to cooperate or conflict. But having a system that enforces cooperation, when cooperation is the best benefit, would be the best system.

File: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa5.jpg (181KB, 452x572px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 452x572px

>>134921714
But that's a complete spook you see, to have complete cooperation requires complete violence: What if the proletariat doesn't want to cooperate!? Not to speak of the bourguois. Communism advocates an abstract(never specific) state of existance that has never been evident and which requires you to not be genetic or essentialist but purely the product of social and ofcourse economic constructs.

>>134921714
Are you lefty /pol/ btw?
If that's true it shows /pol/ has truly gone to shit. That only leftists are still interested in this.