Major Flaw in Nazi Ideology

>>134743404
Goebbels was kicked out for being a degenerate. Either we'll do what China does and educate people to lead, or what Hitler did and hand pick the new leaders.

Setting the best man at the head of the State—that's the most difficult problem in the world to solve. In a republic in which the whole people is called upon to elect the chief of the State, it's possible, with money and publicity, to bring the meagrest of puppets to power. In a republic in which the reins of power are in the hands of a clique made up of a few families, the State takes on the aspect of a trust, in which the shareholders have an interest in electing a weakling as President, so that they may play an important part themselves. A hereditary monarchy is a biological blunder, for a man of action regularly chooses a wife with essentially feminine qualities, and the son inherits his mother's mildness and passive disposition. In a republic that sets at its head a chief elected for life, there's the risk that he will pursue a policy of personal selfinterest. In a republic where the Chief of State changes every five or ten years, the stability of the government is never assured, and the execution of long-term plans, exceeding the duration of a lifetime, is thereby compromised. If one sets at the head of the State an old man who has withdrawn from all worldly considerations, he is only a puppet, and inevitably it's other men who rule in his name. Thinking over all that, I've arrived at the following conclusions :

1. The chances of not setting a complete idiot at the head of the State are better under the system of free elections than in the opposite case. The giants who were the elected German Emperors are the best proof of this. There was not one of them of whom it can truly be said that he was an imbecile. In the hereditary monarchies, on the other hand, there were at least eight kings out of ten who, if they'd been ordinary citizens, would not have been capable of successfully running a grocery. 2. In choosing a Chief of State, one must call upon a personality who, as far as human beings can judge, guarantees a certain stability in the exercise of power for a longish while. This is a necessary condition, not only so that public affairs can be successfully administered, but in order to make possible the realisation of great projects. 3. Care must be taken that the Chief of State will not succumb to the influence of the plutocracy, and cannot be forced to certain decisions by any pressure of that sort. That's why it's important that he should be supported by a political organisation whose strength has its roots in the people, and which can have the upper hand over private interests.

In the course of history, two constitutions have proved themselves : (a) The papacy, despite numerous crises—the gravest of which, as it happens, were settled by German emperors—and although it is based on a literally crazy doctrine. But as an organisation on the material level, the Church is a magnificent edifice. (b) The constitution of Venice, which, thanks to the organisation of its Government, enabled a little city-republic to rule the whole eastern Mediterranean. The constitution of Venice proved itself effective as long as the Venetian Republic endured—that is to say, for nine hundred and sixty years.

As regards the government of Germany, I've come to the following conclusions:
1. The Retch must be a republic, having at its head an elected chief who shall be endowed with an absolute authority.

2. An agency representing the people must, nevertheless, exist by way of corrective. Its rôle is to support the Chief of State, but it must be able to intervene in case of need.

3. The task of choosing the Chief shall be entrusted, not to the people's assembly, but to a Senate. It is, however, important that the powers of the Senate shall be limited. Its composition must not be permanent. Moreover, its members shall be appointed with reference to their occupation and not individuals. These Senators must, by their training, be steeped in the idea that power may in no case be delegated to a weakling, and that the elected Fuehrer must always be the best man.

>>134743404
>NatSoc seemed like a pretty sound ideology, but recently I discovered a major flaw
Is it the bit about socialism?

>>134743600
He was kicked out? I remember Goebbels wife telling Hitler that he raped some actresses and Hitler scolded him severely for it, but I don't recall him ever being kicked out.
Actually, he served as chancellor for one day in accordance with Hitler's will after his death, and then shortly after killed himself.

4. The election of the Chief must not take place in public, but in camera. On the occasion of the election of a pope, the people does not know what is happening behind the scenes. A case is reported in which the cardinals exchanged blows. Since then, the cardinals have been deprived of all contact with the outside world, for the duration of the conclave! This is a principle that is also to be observed for the election of the Fuehrer: all conversation between (? with) the electors will be forbidden throughout operations.

5. The Party, the Army and the body of officials must take an oath of allegiance to the new Chief within the three hours following the election.

6. The most rigorous separation between the legislative and executive organs of the State must be the supreme law for the new Chief. Just as, in the Party, the SA and the SS are merely the sword to which is entrusted the carrying-out of the decisions taken by the competent organs, in the same way the executive agents of the State are not to concern themselves with politics. They must confine themselves exclusively to ensuring the application of laws issued by the legislative power, making appeal to the sword, in case of need.

Although a State founded on such principles can lay no claim to eternity, it might last for eight to nine centuries. The thousand-year-old organisation of the Church is a proof of this—and yet this entire organisation is founded on nonsense. What I have said should a fortiori be true of an organisation founded on reason.

>>134743404
There are many flaws in natsoc and this is a minor one. Being literally a socialist ideology is another.

>>134743848
>>134743793
>>134743773
>>134743738
>>134743717
Hitler's Table talks pages
385-389

You don't know anything about National Socialism, I'm not a fucking stormfag and even I know this shit lmao

>>134743913
Well another point was that Hitler's youth was created.A patriotic,militarised and well educated generation that would become the polictical and military leaders of the Reich after the war(if they would've won).
The greatest issue with any authritarian system is>>134743404,how you appoint a new leader,and a new competent one.
For example the soviet union,after Stalin came manny mediocre leaders that lead to the downfall and Putin today,what guarantee does Russia have that the new multiblionare chosen by its oligrachs will be just as capable.

Hitler thoght the best ssytem would be one similar to the Holy Roman Emperor's election....

>>134743908
>>134743804
Noice memes.

>>134743404
Real men don't sit around on the internet being skinny and gossiping about ideas, they test their ideas in combat. I know 3 styles of martial arts, I powerlift and do 3 hours of cardio a day. I am also very well read, I've read Marx, Engels, Hegel, Lenin, Stirner, ALL the commie propaganda and destroyed the ideas by countering them with Sowell, Hayek, Rand, Hitler and Nietzsche. Debating me will not be easy, what books have YOU read? What styles do YOU know? How much can YOU lift? Do you do any cardio? More than 3 hours? These are the questions you need to ask yourself if you're serious about throwing down with me.

>>134744492
Damn easy there autismo./pol/ is aplace for discussing policical ideas if he wants to learn martial arts and work out you should go outside more often.

It's hilarious how you neckbeards larp as nazis, your lifestyle would not be tolerated under a nazi regime, the internet would be a place that you access only for information provided by the almighty state, all your activity would be monitored and spending more time than absolutely necessary on the computer would be a criminal offense.

>>134744687
Kekusor da e adevarat dar sub un astfel de sistem poate ati avea si voi in Moldova ceva de mancare.....heh.

>>134744687
Good

>>134744492
dude what the fuck are you talking about you retarded aspie troglodyte

>>134744976
M-as supara dar ai dreptate, tara asta e patetica.