Was he right?

>>134726903
He didn't go far enough

/thread

>>134726903
You're essentially asking the question- "Can propaganda be useful?"
yes, but it shouldn't have to be.

>>134726903
100%

>>134726903
>Was he right?
...about Commyannitz everywhere?
He was a paranoid schizo nutcase.

>>134726903
>commies, jews and fags have infiltrated our gov't
It was worse than he could have imagined

File: 1499214842249.jpg (102KB, 768x960px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 768x960px

>>134728798
Much, much worse. If he had any idea what the future marxist dystopia would be.....

>>134726903
yes

100% hero

>>134728676

Post soviet documents show he was entirely correct in his accusations.

File: 1467076860809.jpg (208KB, 1511x553px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1511x553px

>>134726903
100000000000000%

Almost entirely. He most certainly did fuck over some innocent people, but in the name of rooting out the communist threat, it would've been justified.

File: murrow.jpg (7KB, 228x200px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 228x200px

>>134726903
He was a cunt and Murrow buried his dumb ass.

> you will never beat the press

Cry more, bitch ass tiny-dick white commie boi.

>(((Julius Rosenberg))) and (((Ethel Rosenberg))) were United States citizens who were executed on June 19, 1953 after being convicted of committing espionage for the Soviet Union. They were accused of transmitting nuclear weapon designs to the Soviet Union; at that time the United States was the only country with nuclear weapons. They also provided top-secret information about radar, sonar, and jet propulsion engines to the USSR.
>Other convicted co-conspirators were imprisoned (((David Greenglass))), who supplied documents from Los Alamos to Julius and who served 10 years of his 15-year sentence; (((Harry Gold))), who identified Greenglass and served 15 years in Federal prison as the courier for Greenglass.

Of course McCarthy was right.

>>134731631
>Rockwell holding sign naming the Jew. jpg

>>134726903
Yes. America was full of communist infiltrators and sympathizers.

>>134726903
Yes

>>134732280
Not much has changed. Who will be the new McCarthy and end it for good this time?

File: Joseph-McCarthy-Pic.jpg (23KB, 377x500px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 377x500px

>>134726903
Looking at what's going on now and what we've got being taught in higher education, yes i think he may have been on to something. War hero both literally and figuratively. But mainstream schools always make him out to be paranoid. But in a way i think he had a point.

>>134732825
Me

>>134732280
>was

Yes and No.

Was there large scale espionage in the US government YES.

Did Mcarthy or his secret list know about these individuals or came close to targeting them NO.

When it came to general sentiments he was very correct, but very very wrong when it came to specifics - and even lied about them which is why his activity was limited to harassing a few academics and Hollywood types rather than the literal spies identifyed in the Verona Papers.