STOP TROLLING KURT EICHENWALD ABOUT TENTACLE PORN

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-22 at 10.30.43 PM.png (863KB, 796x720px) Image search: [Google]

863KB, 796x720px

Made this last night

y-you too

>>134682017
>Eichenwald in 2005 obtained and used administrative sign-on privileges to explore a commercial porn website containing images of a 14-year-old boy masturbating

See, this is where I have to clear something up for you people, as always
>Puberty: The process of sexual development of children that makes them into adolescents capable of reproducing sexually (i.e., making babies through sexual intercourse), and makes them have secondary sex characteristics.

>Secondary sex characteristics are features that appear during puberty in humans, and at sexual maturity in other animals.

>They are believed to be the product of sexual selection for traits which display fitness, giving an individual an advantage over its rivals in courtship.

When I see a woman with perfectly round D-cup tits, that's nature's way of saying "Look at these fucking things, perfect for making babies, go put your dick inside her." There's a reason some countries have their age of consent around 13-15 rather than the retarded 18 that the US has for the most part.

I'm all for hunting pedophiles, but the definition of pedophilia is being attracted to pre-pubescent people, people who haven't entered puberty yet, people who don't have secondary sexual characteristics. Wanting to execute men for liking tits is retarded.

All that being said, Mr. Eichenwald is apparently also hella gay, so that's another story. Dude's a creep.

>>134685163
>fucking sweden

>>134682017
He could have said "Yeah I like tentacle porn, big deal" and all of this would have gone away

>>134685813
You're damn right. Age of consent here is 15, and who would I be if I didn't exercise my right to enjoy horny, tight, willing teenagers?

>>134686040
just because it's legal doesn't make it any less creepy or pathetic.

File: star_angry2.png (489KB, 520x486px) Image search: [Google]

489KB, 520x486px

>>134685163
I'm usually very progressive, but I can't stand for this. Paedophilia is attraction to anyone under 16, and should not be tolerated in any society.

There's nothing "right" about finding middle-schoolers attractive.

>>134686136
You don't choose what you find attractive, retard. It's a biological function when you see a partner who would be good to birth with your body gives off certain signals. It's how you control yourself that counts.

>>134686629
go back to San Fransisco, faggot

>>134686136
Oh, hi, a fellow Swede. Wait, so you're a pedophile if you're attracted to a 15 year old, but it's also legal to have sex with one in our country? That's interesting. Do you reckon the age of consent should be increased by a year or two?

>>134686119
Wanting to fuck someone with fully developed secondary sexual characteristics is just as creepy or pathetic as seeing a piece of well-prepared delicious meat and wanting to eat it. It's a biological instinct. And I mean sure, those aren't absolute, you can argue about the morals of it. For example, I think that it is immoral to kill people, but not immoral to fuck 15 year olds or eat meat. A lot of people think all three of those things are immoral. It's definitely up for debate.

Also, I should clarify that while I think it's fine and normal to lust after these little things, I wouldn't recommend trying to have a relationship with them. The dilemma with women is that they rarely seem to take the time to develop any intellect worth mentioning until their 40's, when they're sterile. It's rare to find someone that is fitting both as someone to fuck and as an intellectual sparring partner. That's why I personally think your best bet is to keep the intellectual sparring to your fellow men and enjoy a dumb, cute 15-25 year old casually every now and then.

https://twitter.com/natimbruglia

For Pic Sauce

>>134687188
15 year old girls that look like fully developed grown women are by far the outliers. Regardless of how they look, that doesn't make it right to fuck them.

>>134687301
don't post my wife's twitter

>>134687438
Maybe they are, maybe they aren't, I doubt anyone has kept any statistics on that, and if they have, I doubt either of us have ever seen them. My personal experience is that most of them look a lot more like adults than they look like children.

It's a lot like the traps are gay thing. You see a cute little thing with a massive pair of supple tits, you get attracted, nothing wrong or weird with that. When you learn that that person happens to have a dick or be 14, on could definitely argue that you probably shouldn't hit that. But claiming that you didn't feel the attraction in the first place and that anyone who does is a monster sounds a lot like a holier than thou moralist afraid of his own biology.

>>134688120
>most of them look a lot more like adults than they look like children.
How old are you? Maybe that's skewing your perception slightly

>>134687188
Lol

>>134688628
25. I've thought about that too, it's very possible that I'll feel differently when I'm 45. As much as I like their tits, I'm painfully aware of how outrageously retarded they usually are compared to 20-25 year old women. And that's saying a lot, because 20-25 year old women are pretty damn dense in their own right.

>>134689365
Once you hit 30 you'll think 15 year olds look like children.