What is your stance on democracy?

>>134649015

>I often see people on here wanting a strong leader (like Trump?) to sort things out instead of the whole democratic process, even calling it a Jewish plot.

The end of every democracy is eventual dictatorship. Democracy is shit as it values everyone's vote as the same. As we can see in the present in a system like this you'll eventually brought to a dicatatorship, or a civil war as one side slowly drains the other side from it's parasitism. Democracy enables the worst in people in that once they figure out they can vote for free shit, they'll no longer work for it. It took us less than 4 generations to forget we're a republic and not a democracy.

Democracy doesnt exist.

>>134649015
Always listen carefully to (((politicians))) and the (((msm))) because they will always call the US "our democracy."

It was extremely telling when Trump started saying "our republic" in speeches and at rallies.

>>134649376
I understand your point about democracy enabling parasitism. But is the whole democracy ends in dictatorship part supposed to be bad? If yes, then what system is the best?

>>134649015
I think so. IF my political movement was in charge. And by that I mean: purge muslims, fags. Niggers with extreme prejudice.

>>134649606
Another question for those against democracy: would you be willing to give up your right to vote?

>>134649606

>If yes, then what system is the best?

A republic, because it's a system of laws.

>But is the whole democracy ends in dictatorship part supposed to be bad?

Yes, for the same reason that once a body is completely riddled with cancer, and is on a death bed bad. Don't confuse a dictatorship for a monarchy. A dictatorship is what happens when society can no longer function in a free manner.

Take for instance N Korea, zero degeneracy right - but at what cost? Starvation, mass deaths, zero freedom.

>>134649015
Democracy benefits ((( them ))) really good. They have slightly higher IQ but average goy is not so bright . HHH "democracy god that failed has it right" if you add red pill on JQ. It is most horid system thier is. Add in plutocracy and you have full blown disaster. Democarcy not even once. For "muh constitution" cuck Republic does not work either as it slides to democracy.

>>134649686
Yes.

>>134649686

Yes, I think voting should be determined by tax paying status - showing that you paid what you owed, and that you own land. Why we ever deviated from that is beyond me. Equality is horseshit.

Democracy is dangerous and is nothing more than mob rule. The masses will always vote for a welfare state and will never accept responsibility when that system falls apart. We need a one party National Socialist country where the party nominates multiple candidates with each candidate having the same political mindset, but each having a different agenda for their time in office and the public can vote on that. For example, one might want to focus on infrastructure, another building up our military, etc. This way the masses will have some limited control over what happens, but not enough to eventually destroy the country itself.

>>134650973
For voting itself, it should be determined by a basic test on how the government itself operates as well as other related material. The politically ignorant should not be allowed to participate.

>>134650556
I would take it further.
You have to be net tax payer plus to serve in military for while.

>>134649491
/thread