>The Netherlands has been without a government for 129 days

>>134631654
Ha, amateurs

>>134632069
kek, was gonna post something along the lines of aren't the Belgians big on that?

File: 8a4.jpg (30KB, 316x202px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 316x202px

>>134631654
and in the meantime I've been noticing more and more headscarf-clad human trash in my quiet rural area. Get to work Thierry, save us plz

>>134632069
Is Belgium really a country? Why does it exist?

>>134631654
>uk elects post brexit government
>its full of cucks

>>134632664
to grow weed and produce gangsters

I heard countries actually do better without a government

Is that true, Spanish and Belgian bros?

>>134631654
And things are going great.

Specifically: we are paying back our debts at record pace because no new government = no new ways of spending more tax money.

Hope this will last another year or so.

>>134633488
I honestly believe it would be better if we only had a government for 2 years every 6.

ie: give politicians 2 years to make new legislation, then leave us alone for 4 years.

File: 1f1xy6.jpg (8KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 236x236px

>>134631654
i wish i could go there, smoke real weed.
congrats to holand without governament, they still doing pretty ell i supose

>>134633656
>Specifically: we are paying back our debts at record pace because no new government = no new ways of spending more tax money.
Damn, we could use some of that too

>>134634063
i can't go because nobody pays me to take my freaking degree

>>134631654
FUCKING REELECTION WHEN REEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>134634388
We'll have a Christian-right coalition.

I thought this is what /pol/ wanted?

>>134634388
give me a quick rundown what happened

>>134634536
>VVD
>Right
Come one now anon...

And something bad happened?

But who builds the roads?

>>134634549
As is normal here, after elections several parties have to form a coalition to get a majority.

This time it's a little harder than usual because the only options for a majority is with 4 parties (usually it's 2 or 3).

First they tried to form a coalition with VVD, CDA, D66 and GL.
GL literally walked away because they couldn't negotiate enough Ficki-ficki - they demanded mass immigration whereas the other 3 want to reduce immigration.

Now VVD, CDA, D66 and CU are negotiating.
It's not easy because D66 and CU are pretty much exact opposites, but they will probably form a government in a month or so.

>>134634549
Cuck party (VVD) couldn't come to an agreement with ultra-cuck green party (GroenLinks) and now they need another party to make a coalition with. We're probably getting a coalition with CU, who imo are a mixed bag of good ideas and terrible ideas.

>>134634549
The "economic right wing", liberal democrats, and christian "conservatives" do not have enough seats for a majority in Parliament.

If they add Wilders into the mix, they have enough seats, but because every party denounced him before the results were in, they've painted themselves into a corner.

They either:
- Form a minority coalition, which will be rickety as all shit and low functioning.
- The economic right wing wants to work with the Socialist Party to prevent Wilders from getting his way, meaning that the Netherlands officially has no more right wing if that happens.
- They swallow their damn pride and form a coalition with Wilders (which will never happen)

>>134634652
Roads are planned 10-15 years ahead of time here.
They just keep building as planned.

In fact basically everything stays the way it was before.
The old government is still in place, they just aren't allowed to implement big changes.

>>134632664
Because it would be too obvious to have EU-parliament in Germany.

>>134635017
>minority coalition, which will be rickety as all shit and low functioning.

I don't believe that at all.

They could simply do the democratic thing and let parliament decide on a case by case basis.

Big party elites don't want this because they rather negotiate shady deals behind closed doors.
So they spread a lot of FUD.
But for normal people a minority coalition will probably be best, it will also improve trust in the democratic process.

>>134635473
>>134635017
>>134634999
>>134634615
>>134634536
>>134634388
>>134633826
>>134633656
>>134632581

But seriously is there any chance of a re-election?

>>134635017
Wilders doesn't want to be in government.
He wants to stay in the opposition where he can't be judged by his actions.

Everybody knows this so they don't waste time negotiating with him.
He's just a waste of time.

>>134635648
Before forming a coalition - very little.

But there is a good chance they form a coalition only to have it collapse within a year.
In that case we will have new elections.

File: 1496006516933.jpg (11KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 225x225px

>>134635777
What if someone were to commit a bike holocaust?

>>134636139
Already happened when the krauts invaded.

Politicians are useless anyway.