What the fuck is a neo liberal anyway?

>>134615918

An insult.

>>134615918
Liberal but the chosen one with bright blue and green lights attached to their foreheads.

Obviously

>>134616217
Thats neoN, guy

A banker's preferred bottom bitch. Basically a neoconservative without trad LARPing. Instead, they opt for an even more anti-white, anti-western, suicidal form of rhetoric and beliefs. These beliefs aren't really beliefs, but fragile, emotionally formed notions based on archaic or legitimately delusional concepts. They also tend to begrudgingly pro-free market, to the detriment of literally fucking everything, especially the market. It's a modified anti-nationalist and baseless form of cultural Marxism. It stands for nothing liberal and nothing new, except being shittier than everything that has come before it. Well, except maybe neoconservatism.

>>134616840
how in the fuck is worshipping the free market anything remotely close to cultural marxism you absolute cretin

>>134615918
Where the fuck did TayTay get tits from?

>>134615918
a liberal who gets a paycheck from a corrupt system they depend on. a neocon that is slightly more out of the closet

A reformed liberal who is now for globalization and endless war. Same with neocons, but in the other direction coming from isolationism to wanting endless war.

>>134616967
I didn't say they worshiped the free market, and you seem to not understand what cultural Marxism is you fucking simpleton.

>>134616967

because marxist belief infects the culture they inhabit, except for the state, where they are capitalist hatchetmen

NeoLiberals are socialists that have been forced to admit that free market ideals and military intervention are more effective forms of forwarding policy initiatives than state run economies and popular uprisings.

>>134616967
Cultural Marxism =/= actual marxism

Modern-day cultural Marxism has no logistical connection to Marx, it's just a continuation of the social destruction that Jewish Marxists started.

>>134617105
Neocons never supported isolation. From Irving Kristol to Ben Shapiro, neocons have their ethnic interests in mind always, especially when they can sacrifice a few country boys from flyover country for the sake of greater israel.

>>134617242
>coming from
>from

File: 23158392405_d3e3b60cb8_o[1].jpg (536KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

536KB, 2048x1365px

>>134615918

Extreme social liberal, economic corporatist.

>>134617190
You need to reread Das Kapital my dude. CM is Marxism with currency/monetary concerns stripped away.

>>134615918
free trade + degeneracy - borders

>>134615918

Who's the girl in the picture?

>>134617268
Yeah like obama, trudeau, and clinton right?

>>134617260
Perhaps I don't understand what you're saying. American liberals never supported isolation either. They may have been anti-war when it was politically convenient. Some turn of the century (20th century) American nationalists could be defined as liberals or progressives, but they have literally no similarity to the contemporary political spectrum.

File: Sf_LRNu6F6_tOFgAvtgGjM5VGTVxL27uh7tk0zwbaMg.jpg (36KB, 320x326px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 320x326px

>>134617398

>>134617405
Ed Zachary

Read Wilson's 14 points; the public birth of NeoLiberalism.

>>134617314
So... nothing like Marxism at all? Marxism is about economy, cultural marxist are often pro-capitalism

>>134617492
>American liberals never supported isolation either.
So you are saying that unions have always wanted competition for their members?

>Bernie Sanders: “There is a reason why Wall Street and all of corporate America likes immigration reform, and it is not, in my view, that they’re staying up nights worrying about undocumented workers in this country. What I think they are interested in is seeing a process by which we can bring low-wage labor of all levels into this country to depress wages for Americans, and I strongly disagree with that.”

>>134615918
neoliberal is someone that is globalist / pro open borders / pro free market / pro one world government and massive superstates

>>134617541
Again, reread Das Kapital as well as Communist Manifesto.

>>134616217
fuckin kek'd

>>134617709
>So you are saying that unions have always wanted competition for their members?

No, not at all. And that's a good point. The labor movement in this country used to be almost white nationalist. When I think about isolationism and shit of that nature, I think more about the last 50 years of insane globalist policy that has done a lot of really fucked up things, and how people would moralize about the 6 million and why we needed to police the world. I was just framing my argument around that I guess, because the left has been very open to intervention in the past few decades that we've made that shift away from minding our own business.

File: Bannon-Evan-VucciAP[1].jpg (63KB, 639x480px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 639x480px

>>134617405
Yes, like Trudeau and the DNC.

Their marxist roots give them a disiniclination towards national sovereignty in the first place, which was exacerbated when they were co-opted by international financial corporations.

Neoliberalism is an acceptance that Leninist centralized market management is not feasible, and that Marxist ideals could be achieved through quasi-free market principles.

Only one man fights against it.

/ourguy/

>>134617821
I did.

I was in the Communist party during my liberal phase.

Cultural Marxism have nothing to do with Das Kapital

I love you taytay

>>134615918

neoliberal meaning has changed. it used to mean someone in favor privatization, low regulation, and pro business policy, pretty much libertarian but with slight government intervention necessary. pinochet and the chicago boys or lee kwan yew of singapore would be considered neoliberal.

now the meaning has changed with a negative connotation. basically it means anyone on the "left-wing" or "liberal" camp who is more pro big business, more pro war and pro globalization than actual leftists and socialists. it may also imply that to create popular appeal, they have to resort to some identity politics or sjw pandering to further their agenda.

File: 1434702640682.jpg (604KB, 1280x1889px) Image search: [Google]

604KB, 1280x1889px

>>134618590

File: tea and crumpets.jpg (1MB, 2596x2576px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2596x2576px

>>134615918
A neo-liberal is a globalist. As you're American, it's the Republican/Democrat illusion of choice.
A 'republican' in UK means an anti monarchist - someone who wants UK to be a republic. NO FUCKING CHANCE!
Watch this. It isn't very long. (9 minutes). John Pilger is a lefty and he describes UKIP as 'odious'.
Well, I vote UKIP, but whatever. He's an Aussie who lives here in England.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anht7KXQHBM

A neo-liberal is a Londoner/New Yorker working in advertising/marketing/media who earns shitloads of coin for producing nothing.
They support 'causes'; amnesty international, oxfam, and international 'charities', because it's virtue signalling.

They are male feminists who embrace degeneracy. They are female feminists who believe that there is a patriarchy.
They buy branded products - iphone, nike shoes, and other shit. They are against tradition.

The prefix 'neo' simply means 'new'. Hence 'neo nazi' etc.
Also neo liberals drink coffee instead of tea. Cunts.

>>134615918

Ironically it's basically a classical liberal, to a degree.

For short hand - Neo-Con's and Neo-Lib's pay lip service to either socially conservative or socially liberal policies (gun rights/gay rights for instance), but both pursue extreme forms of Laissez Faire Capitalism AND government "service" of these capitalist institutions (they do not interfere in suppressing corporate business interests, but do interfere in bolstering them - This is what separates your Bush or Clinton type Neo-Con/Neo-Lib from your Libertarian Ron Paul; A Neo-"x" will allow a banking institution to do as it pleases, with no restraint, BUT, should it fail, they will happily use tax payers incomes to bolster and salvage the business).

This is why you see guys like McCain supporting Clinton; They share a fundamental interest in having open borders and free movement of people and supporting their corporate paymasters business interests via the state aparatus, like the miiltary.

>>134619007
I want to coat her buckteeth with semen.

>>134619405

well for small business, the neolib and neocons certainly don't believe in an actual free market, they believe in regulating them while at the same time they can bolster big business. maybe for the neolibs of the 1980s they would have supported laissez-faire, but not really any more.

>>134616967

They utilize cultural marxism is service a variant of "free market" (the variant being that the market is made free for the Chosen Few - which is why it's often referred to as "Crony Capitalism").

They will utillize Cultural Marxist practices to induce guilt or emotional appeals to allow mass migration - But the ultimate goal is simply a cheaper and more diluted labor force.

Like I said though, you will see many on the left claim that Neo-Libs are simply Free Market Capitalists with liberal social bents, and say the same of their inverse (the Neo-Con) but with conservative social bents.

But this isn't really true - They will often utilize their state power to intervene on behalf of capitalist entitites to save them from financial ruin or bolster their pocket books - See George W. Bush and Dick Cheney's wars as a perfect example, or Obama agreeing to sign off on the Bail Outs. At the end of the day they are basically people who pay lip service to social agendas they don't really care about to help make their oligarchs rich.

>>134619601

>well for small business, the neolib and neocons certainly don't believe in an actual free market

Of course - hence the distinction between them and "real" classical liberals, like Ron Paul. They are all for free, unregulated markets - unless it costs their donors money.

The GFC was the prime example;

>Free market for all (that we approve)!

>Fug, we screwed up

>Governemnt intervention for all (that we approve)!

>>134617398
Taylor swift

File: 8471857185705.jpg (92KB, 750x767px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 750x767px

>>134619007

>>134615918
This is the best short answer:

It is Liberalism (with perversions to the concept) completely subsidised by the tax payer.


Also: This is why you might hear about the "Cloward–Piven strategy"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward%E2%80%93Piven_strategy

Have you also not noticed how they are pushing "inclusivity" in PRIVATE, CORPORATE institutions (which now includes universities but mostly Film and Video Games)? This is advertising (Yay! We did it! We beat the evil white male christian sith lords so now we can have hollywood! Thanks J.J.Abrams!) so that the Universal Basic Income goes back into their money sinks as opposed to elsewhere.