Brit/pol/ - (((AMW))) is a cuck edition

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MN6sfJ1qFQg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6R8GCX_wSs

Lads I'm making a bitching good video meant to depress people on the same level as the "The Present is a Foreign Country" and I can't decide between the tracks above. Which would be best as a backing track for a short video dispensing redpills on how utterly shit our current situation is?

>>134540415
2nd

Wouldn't a gay guy like to have the lesbian mafia in charge of UKIP?

welcome back lads

>>134540415
make sure neither will be blocked upon uploading lad, some music doesn't fly even if you see other videos from normal people using it

(just upload the song to your account and see if it gets blocked worldwide)

what are you going to put in the video?

>>134540415
A warm place is meant to be reminiscient of a better time. Use the second. A lot more forboding.

Nice taste though.

>>134540415

Pls no, that video is crushing enough without NIN added on top

>>134540728
>A warm place is meant to be reminiscient of a better time
I was planning on interlacing the video with footage like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHhuBZEZESU for contrast.

Thanks

File: 1500606683681.jpg (1MB, 5000x5000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 5000x5000px

>AoC is 16
>You need to be 18 to watch porn or record porn

>You can get married at 16
>...but only with parental consent (excl. Scotland)

Why is British law so muddled and fucked up? Let's have another legislation discussion.

>>134540415
Just beat box over it with your velvety smooth voice.

>>134540792
It's better this way

>>134540358
Holy shit, are you that dense you retarded fuck?

>>134540916
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_klo07-SKU

File: NatCon.jpg (25KB, 604x210px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 604x210px

Also Nth for High Tory Monarchism.

>>134540922
Maybe, but can it be better?

For a start, how do we combat the degenerate alcohol culture in the UK?

ymca guy here so I'm gonna go to the council on monday,what should I expect?

>>134540415
Better option:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXTweurVzlA

>>134541087
shaming people, especially women

>>134540792
>animenonce
>complaining about AoC
Figures

>His computers and USB devices were seized, which were found to contain 1684 images and 20 videos of child exploitation material.
>The majority were in anime or other cartoon styles and depicted children engaging in sexual acts with adults.
http://www.bendigoadvertiser.com.au/story/4730201/bendigo-sex-offender-stalked-15-year-old-girl/
>He said Bretnall recorded the incident on his phone. Bretnall told deputies he and his friend were recreating a Japanese anime character as the one teen charged after her.
http://wspa.com/2017/05/12/teen-pretends-to-be-anime-character-chases-girl-gets-arrested/
>Ballen also found a CD containing images of child abuse and illegal comics and anime depicting underage sex and child abuse. She turned it all over to police.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/feb/27/i-just-burst-into-tears-partners-men-commit-child-abuse-crimes
>A former counsellor with the handicapped in Greater Sudbury who was found a year ago with a large amount of child pornography movies and pictures, including anime images, will be sentenced in early February.
http://www.thesudburystar.com/2017/01/17/sentence-looms-in-child-porn-case

>>134541198
Archived it for you
>https://theguardian com/australia-news/2017/feb/27/i-just-burst-into-tears-partners-men-commit-child-abuse-crimes
https://archive.is/yHRjy

File: no jews_allowed.gif (28KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 300x300px

>>134541054

fuck's sake rightly you've got me listening to nine inch nails now

>>134541226
Shut up you dense cunt.

File: IMG_3578.jpg (438KB, 1200x956px) Image search: [Google]

438KB, 1200x956px

>>134541054

>"Oh, please, oh, please! Trample all over me, you lucky, lovely poshies!"

Nonsense. No political system which restricts - or, for that matter, doesn't positively encourage - the expansion of individual greatness is rotten and redundant.

>>134541148
Tell them you are 18 and have been sleeping in a tent in the woods.

>>134540415
use this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnrGMHhnqrw

>>134541337
Alright I will do that they will not arrest me or anything for that right? afaik thats not legal

>>134541309
>Nonsense. No political system which restricts - or, for that matter, doesn't positively encourage - the expansion of individual greatness is rotten and redundant.
You mean the last 1000 years of our own system which evolved beyond that point in 1200 AD?

Stop associating monarchism with 20th century dictators, especially our own monarchical system you maggot. We were the first people in the world to develop division of power between monarchs and public assemblies. Our entire system is centered around a monarch at the top.

File: 325346545.jpg (174KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 1200x800px

>He still doesn't have a SSBBW gf
Explain this beta streak of yours.

File: eddd9b380c3dbd840c6545e0ca0b561f1aec4b6fbb4ab5a226e757de14765370.jpg (37KB, 469x526px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 469x526px

Last girl who I went out with has changed her gender on kikebook to 'Male'.

What the fuck lads.

>>134541416
No anon, they should give you emergency temporary housing and put you on the list for council housing

>>134541481
you're such a fag you turned her into a man

>>134541481

that's rough lad, is your arse aching with the memories?

File: 1481002508235.png (29KB, 741x568px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 741x568px

>>134541468
How can she reach round to wipe her arse properly?

>>134541517
>>134541416
>>134541337
I wouldn't do this. If you end up being found out, and you might, you could get kicked out of your housing.

>>134541354
Might be okay without the vocal (like a lot of songs) but it sounds kinda faggy.

>>134541517
thank you so much you are a wonderful human being

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHlYLt7Vt2c

This isn't bad, I know it's coldplay but as I said before it would be even better without the vocals.

>>134541576
They don't. It's nigh impossible for them to wipe thoroughly.

>>134540377
Guys I forgot to pay my council tax and now I have to pay all £960 of it for the year in 7 days time

What do ?

File: 1445206368138[1].jpg (101KB, 1024x904px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1024x904px

People still read and reply to tripfag posts?

Utter cretins.

File: 1493399157866.png (15KB, 240x304px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 240x304px

>>134541706
I hope everything works out for you anon

>>134541431

The expansion of individual opportunity and liberty has been, at the same time, the story of our monarchy's decline into insignificance and, ultimately, ornament.

Disengage it from history altogether (since you seem to imagine that nobody could take exception to monarchy without focusing exclusively on the twentieth century). In principle alone, how could any ordinary person - such as yourself - wish to belittle themselves by enlarging another who has achieved nothing other than extending a lineage. Is that sort of arbitrariness really desirable? Particularly when it inevitably requires that the subject diminishes himself and his spirit.

We've outgrown the need of monarchy. Your desire for it reflects your ignorance of it.

File: 1497003717383.png (44KB, 710x577px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 710x577px

>>134541763

>>134541793
Pay it

>>134541832

there will always be tripfags, at least the current crop don't sit on here starting arguments for attention or just spamming shite 24/7. brit/pol/ is pretty comfy at the moment

>>134541793
I'm sure asking a Korean stain glass forum for financial and legal advice is a better thing to do than visiting https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/

File: when mummys speech kicks in.jpg (23KB, 413x472px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 413x472px

>>134541832
Rightly and Rimmer posts are better than 99% of all Anonymous garbage

>>134541898
me too and thank you again

>>134541606
found out for what

File: bahco-logo.png (8KB, 364x166px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 364x166px

work bought me new tools lads

>>134542050
If you lie about your age.

File: tumblr_inline_n19za9FbMw1rwnjjz.jpg (11KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 500x500px

Anyone else loved the latest Nine Inch Nails EP, "Add Violence"?

File: 1494715837140.jpg (35KB, 369x387px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 369x387px

>>134542014

>AMW
>a cuck

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC4_reqVkTc

Farage is *literally* pro-Islam.

>>134540415
Don't use yank music you silly twat.

>>134542080
I'm actually 18 and I can prove it with my passport

File: 1484585699585.jpg (270KB, 800x601px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 800x601px

>tfw not a bingbong

>>134541984
>>134542014
This is why I don't come to cuckchan /pol/ anymore desu. Its like /b/ circa 2007.

>>134541431

>he thinks cucked Whig "monarchism" is a legit form of monarchism

sure and if a man chops his cock off then he is a woman too, right

File: 1485313200016.jpg (72KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 499x499px

>>134542209
OBSESSED
B
S
E
S
S
E
D

>>134542209
Plus you'll get done for copyright with modern music.

>>134542255

>this is why I don't come here

looks like you are here and having a little whinge m9, you sure about that?

File: 1487625819278.png (664KB, 797x601px) Image search: [Google]

664KB, 797x601px

>>134542230
>tfw

File: 6a5.gif (2MB, 512x338px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 512x338px

>>134542195
Even Nuttalls manifesto was harder on immigration that amw, she's a dyke kike shill.

>>134541922
>The expansion of individual opportunity and liberty has been, at the same time, the story of our monarchy's decline into insignificance and, ultimately, ornament.
I see it as the complete opposite. Only since parliament has became an absolute assembly has this country declined into its current state. This is because a collection of 3 assemblies pass law. We have theoretical Royal Assent which is signed on ministerial advice and we can't, realistically, expect a refusal. So parliament knows damn well, and have for a century now, they're an absolute establishment who's only power checks are each other.

>The expansion of individual opportunity and liberty has been, at the same time, the story of our monarchy's decline into insignificance and, ultimately, ornament.
To say nothing of the fact that every reigning monarch in history has more to their name than the two of us combined, unless you in particular are extraordinarily talented (perhaps a statesman yourself), I believe the sole fact that the monarch was born and raised for the role gives them enough legitimacy to rule in our system. This is because neither me nor our system is absolutist. Even when our system did work, parliament was still entirely responsible for passing law, but did so knowing that refusal was on the table. Parliament acted, knowing dissolution was a possible outcome of failure. Ministers performed within the confines of their roles, because their roles were temporary, not permanent. An electorate alone hasn't been enough to keep our MPs in check, clearly. They aren't answerable to an electorate, of whom so many vote purely based off tradition. For example, regardless of MP, Labour will always win the North East.

>We've outgrown the need of monarchy. Your desire for it reflects your ignorance of it.
How did you put this together? Seeing as our system is still 100% reliant on the monarch.

>>134541922
Who are we, after thousands of years of monarchy that served us well in establishing a society that has enough to help others, to throw away a benign toy that future generations may want to play with?

>>134542393
>using yank music in a video about how shit Britain has become partly due to the import of Yank 'culture'
Utter state of him.

>>134541922
>We've outgrown the need of monarchy

"We have outgrown the need for borders, laws against murder, and a desire to not be demographically replaced. These things are primitive tribal holdovers from a bygone era! We are the masters of reality now and none of our actions have consequences! We don't need leaders with skin in the game! We can bring in niggers and suit them up and they will be just the same as us! Reality doesn't exist!"

This is your brain on anti-monarchism.

>>134540415
Not NIN.

>>134542308
Absolutist monarchism is not in the British tradition, sorry. We've been a Constitutional monarchy since 1200 AD.

Constitutional does not = useless though. What we have now is neither a constitutional nor an absolutist monarchy, its a farce.

I share your passion though friend. Whether absolutist or constitutional, a monarch would be a step above what we have now.

>>134542465

they're both hard on immigration, faggot

if it's not AMW it will be some cucked CIVIC drone too scared to take on Islam

>>134542539
Ironic isn't it? All anti-monarchists seem to be taking their knowledge of monarchism from 20th century Dictators or fairy tales where the King comes and steals the princess.

File: pilky01.jpg (46KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 500x500px

>>134542255
I don't care what you do

>>134542423
Its the car crash thing my lad. I'd rather not look, but I still occasionally do.

File: RIP-in-peace-1.jpg (130KB, 500x614px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 500x614px

>>134542607

You are the same people who committed regicide with your other leftist friends 350 years ago. You need to be put to the sword.

"Constitutional" monarch *isn't* monarchy. It's like saying alcohol free beer is beer. You're either a monarch or you're not. You're either sovereign or not.

Lads you know how Ubisoft put "this work of fiction was made by multicultural team of various faiths and beliefs" in their games

I thought it was just a safety cos they had fictional muslims

But the latest one says "various beliefs, sexual orientations and gender identities"

Fuck vidya man

>>134542687

There is ZERO right-wing anti-monarchical stance. The only reasons to be anti-monarchy are because you're a leftist who hates his betters or if you've been duped by intellectual liberalism into the idea that decaying sovereignty by castrating monarchs and cutting off their balls somehow leads to more responsible or stable government. tl;dr it doesn't and anybody who thinks this has been tricked by whigs.

File: joe.png (539KB, 595x399px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 595x399px

>>134542612
One wanted zero net migration, the other says wanting to close your border is extreme

ukips policies are better than hers, she'd be an actual step back and that's not even factoring in the fact she's cancer related to shit like the EDL/Pegida/Tommy Robinson etc

she's civic as fuck, a queer who doesn't like Tyson Fury and complains about muh antisemitism. as civic as it gets, just cries about islam because it's bad for degenerate women like her

>>134542705
Doesn't surprise me at all. Some creatures are quite content to roll around in their own shit.

My top quality posts used to prop up /brit/ to be perhaps the most respectable generals on the site. You'll get no more posts from me. I'm out.

>>134542939
Don't let the door hit you on your way out.

File: 1499720732723.jpg (47KB, 620x387px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 620x387px

>>134542939
See ya

>>134542687
While British monarchy took a step back after 1918 (gee guys, better change our ways or we'll end up like the Tzar's family) - it's anachronistic. There's essentially no need for it, at is plays a negligible role in governance or representation.

But it's not worth wasting your time thinking about it. At some point in the future, some Royal will go - no point in this anymore, and that's when they'll stop it.

>>134542779
Then how do we balance between constitutionalism and absolutism? I'm a patriot in the sense I think the system that Britain created is truly the best in the world. But we've never given kings or queens absolute and free rule. Since Alfred the Great's reformations, to the Magna Carta, Provisions of Oxford, Provisions of Westminister, etc. We've established some basis for a monarch not ruling like a Roman Emperor. The concept of liberty comes from the British Isles after all.

File: 1487833310977.jpg (30KB, 640x425px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 640x425px

>>134542488

>So parliament knows damn well, and have for a century now, they're an absolute establishment who's only power checks are each other

>How did you put this together? Seeing as our system is still 100% reliant on the monarch.

You see the contradiction in your posts here, don't you?

>every reigning monarch in history has more to their name than the two of us combined

Of course so. They've been artificially inflated into positions of excessive authority. In such cases, the question obviously isn't 'have they done more than you or I' it's 'could you or I have done a better job than some, many, or most of the monarchs who've reigned throughout history'. I'll yet you be the judge of that, but - personally - I tend to think that nobody who'd accept such power is worthy or wise enough to wield it.

>so many vote purely based off tradition

The 'soft' pull of tradition among the electorate is much less worrying than the iron-clad tradition which illegitimately sustained monarchism and other forms of absolutism for centuries.

>>134542933

From your pic I can see that you are an intransigent BNP shill who wants to inject their history of failed political incursions and bad advice into the UKIP project for the sake of purity signalling.

The type of politics you want cannot be achieved democratically.

>>134542939
>/brit/
Yeah get the fuck out faggot

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/21/william-kate-poland-nationalism-royal-brexit

>reeeee why won't Polish people just behave themselves and be nice liberals
>reeee how dare they commemorate their own war dead instead of pretending only jews copped it in the war
>why won't they just get on the script

I know PiS have their faults but it's so fucking satisfying watching libs piss their knickers over them

>>134542939
Can you get a trip so I can filter you please?

>>134540792
It's not worth the fuss to push these things back

File: dughet.jpg (77KB, 800x599px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 800x599px

>>134542539

>"We have outgrown the need for borders, laws against murder, and a desire to not be demographically replaced. These things are primitive tribal holdovers from a bygone era! We are the masters of reality now and none of our actions have consequences! We don't need leaders with skin in the game! We can bring in niggers and suit them up and they will be just the same as us! Reality doesn't exist!"

What a rotten argument. Not everyone who sees the value in moral absolutes and other forms of traditionalism necessarily embraces the self-effacing yoke of monarchism.

>>134543020
>Then how do we balance between constitutionalism and absolutism?

That's like saying how do we balance between cutting your dick off and not cutting it off. Cutting only half of it off? There is no comparison between them. One is monarchy and one is rule by whigs who interpret the constitution. Government by whigs always leads to uniformly worse outcomes than does monarchical rule.

>Since Alfred the Great's reformations, to the Magna Carta, Provisions of Oxford, Provisions of Westminister, etc.

You that Orwell line about how if you control the past you control the present? Well your picture of the past here has been interpreted for you intentionally by Democratic parliamentarians and whigs designed to make the present seem like an inevitable progression culminating in liberal (Whig run) system of government. There is no reason to interpret the past in this way. You think Henry Tudor was a weak constitutional faggot who obeyed parliament?

>>134543009
The Tzars were closer to absolutist than our monarchy had been since the 14th century. The monarch taking a step back is what f'ed up our system permanently. Our system is centered on the monarch holding that Head of State title, holding Prerogative, Dismissal and Assent powers over all ELECTED officials. The monarch "taking a step back" was 1. illegal and unconstitutional 2. led to a disaster. There is nothing irrelevant about our monarchy friend.

>You see the contradiction in your posts here, don't you?
No, it makes sense, because the Monarchs role is completely essential to 1000 years worth of legislation which went into creating the British Constitution. There's a reason we don't operate solely off some entrenched laws, and our system is centered on precedent. And the system we established, based solely off trial and error, 100% requires a monarch to hold the top seat.

>The 'soft' pull of tradition among the electorate is much less worrying than the iron-clad tradition which illegitimately sustained monarchism and other forms of absolutism for centuries.
Again though, we haven't been absolutist since the 14th century.

>>134543336
>>134543079

File: Nige shitposting.jpg (67KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 960x720px

>>134543095
Why would I support UKIP if that's the case friendo?

I'm saying their policies are already better and she'd regress them. If you want someone who's more of a soft touch and is affiliated with some of the most cancerous, unpopular groups in British politics (EDL, Pegida & TR) then by all means, vote for the Jewish backed dyke.

>>134543295

You either support the king or you're a commie, now which is it boy

>>134543477

>Tommy Robinson
>cancer

can't tell if serious or not. what brand of shill even are you

I love every single one of you

>>134540415
>copying Adam Curtis

Try harder .

>>134543003
>>134543007
>>134543098
>>134543158
Shan't be reading these.

I might ask the SSBBW gf to sit on my face while I reminisce about the times when /pol/ wasn't indistinguishable from /b/. Perhaps after I will head over to a chan that isn't cluttered up with twelvies so I can have intelligent discussions about current events with people who aren't mentally stunted. If you weren't of such low intellect you would mourn the day that you lost my contributions. /b/ye /b/ye to you all.

>>134543664
He doesn't have a monopoly on NIN you cunt.

>>134543333
>Well your picture of the past here has been interpreted for you intentionally by Democratic parliamentarians and whigs designed to make the present seem like an inevitable progression culminating in liberal (Whig run) system of government. There is no reason to interpret the past in this way. You think Henry Tudor was a weak constitutional faggot who obeyed parliament?
Well, this resonates with me as it describes how the vast majority think, but when facing an absolute assembly (parliament) that is now operating on tyrannical terms (e.g, with no oversight), the solution certainly isn't to discredit the experiences of our ancestors, who had faced forms of tyrannical monarchs. The solution, initially, was to both divide this power with theories of political hegemony and splits of power between, the people, the military, the government, and the monarch. Thus, we established the greatest system known to man kind, where the Monarch is Head of State, holds Prerogative, Assent, Dismissal and Appointment powers, is able to override both ministers & parliament, command the Armed Forces, but is also able to be removed from their seat by the people (Rex v Rex in common law) should they act contrary to law.

Things such as right to bear arms, freedom of speech in assembly, laws against inhumane/cruel punishment, excessive bail conditions, land rights, property rights, etc, all come from the English concept of liberty, which wasn't at all anti-monarch (despite being interpreted that way because of the American Revolution).

File: basedtommy.png (2MB, 1502x1629px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1502x1629px

>>134543619
Fuck off, Tommy is 100% kike CO.

>>134540377
>>Cabinet 'united' over EU transitional deal (including ongoing free movement)
Stab in the back Mark II. Its over unless we march lads

>>134543691

You sound like a right boring cunt

File: 1497789074937.jpg (100KB, 688x456px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 688x456px

>>134543844

Great post!

>>134543846
I don't even think marching would make a difference at this point, they just don't give a shit.

File: edc4201e38567e204b4d55f04f62c636ca55bb260149b113b0f9baf5d63a8a7e.png (3MB, 2142x1266px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2142x1266px

>>134543915
If someone throws a stone at you, do you attack the stone? No, you attack he who threw the stone. Fuck off jew.

>>134543832
>using the same music as a documentarist renowned for using it on montages and depressing sections of his work in the exact same manner

lmao dude yeah you're totally not copying xD

>>134543976
tbf Kev Macdonald and Spencer probably don't have a fucking clue about (((Tommy)))

>>134544050
Fuck off you bore.

>>134544155
Why am I a bore for pointing out that someone would be just imitating the work of someone else?

Do you feel the need to leap to the defence of other tripcode users?

File: gettyimages-167815101.jpg (395KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

395KB, 1280x800px

>>134543915
>Tommy "multiculturalism hasn't failed, islam has" Robinson
>pro white
>spends all his time talking about his black mates
>always bangs on about leaving the BNP after trying to take his pet niggers to a meeting with him
>says he'd be a liberal who'd vote labour
>islam isn't a race
>what have I ever said that's racist
>pro white

holy shit lad I think you're just trolling us, fair play you got me.

>>134544050
He uses it not just for depressing moments but a lot of moments, and my video won't sounds like wikpedia binge full of lots of non-sequitur tangents.

>>134544256
It's just nitpicking irrelevant details when somebody is actually trying to contribute something.

File: Canaletto_-_Bucentaur's_return_to_the_pier_by_the_Palazzo_Ducale_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg (365KB, 1280x890px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 1280x890px

>>134543976

>The right is filled with useful idiots and its preoccupation is reacting to the soulless, thoughtless animals of the left and their chest-thumping

The right should be primarily concerned with providing a substantive alternative to the vacuousness of contemporary society. The elevation of the common man toward lives of spiritual and aesthetic aristocracy. And, yes, it's absolutely essential to regain and maintain our cultural unity before improving it.

Stop immigration, seek radical alternatives to the cheapening and commercialisation of the individual spirit, preserve and expand our cultural and natural heritage.

Just found a Jersey pound lads, got a picture of a schooner on it.

That's a Jersey pound and a Gibraltar pound I have now. All these shit, common pounds being removed from circulation has been a god send.

File: fe78f214650e9ae678513de7629f1b448b3b05a4cf1e97fe285281f50afd4cd0.png (489KB, 831x465px) Image search: [Google]

489KB, 831x465px

>>134544525
Got meself a Falklands pound the other day lad.

File: 1500198295982.gif (912KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

912KB, 500x281px

good evening anons

>>134544560
Nice one, m8.

Captcha: Aspy Queens

File: 1411876075916.jpg (276KB, 1206x675px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 1206x675px

>>134543833
>absolute assembly parliament operating on tyrannical terms

The idea that whigs are not in control and that somebody else retains sovereignty is considered tyrannical to you because you are their pawn. We can't have somebody other than us ruling! That's tyranny!

>both divide this power with theories of political hegemony and splits of power between, the people, the military, the government, and the monarch

This is called leftism. When you destroy power split it up and hand it out to your clients. This process of sovereign disintegration has been taking place until 1688 at least. When nobody is in charge, nobody is responsible for anything. This is the reason there is nobody to point to responsible for flooding our countries with third-worlders. Because your "superior" system removed anybody from being in a position of having to answer for it. It's fairly crude but pic related is the visual representation of what happens when you decapitate the leadership of your country. This is what you support and you *only* support it because these were the lies the Whigs used to worm their way into perpetual power. They have been destroying this country for the last 200 years.

>we established the greatest system known to man kind

No, actually you *destroyed* the greatest system, monarchy, known to man and replaced it with something that is now literally murdering and replacing your people.

>where the Monarch [..]is able to override both ministers & parliament

She is not able to do this and you know it. You keep confusing symbols with reality. You keep thinking if you say something is true then it is. Our monarch is the head of government! That's why if she tried to stop anything she would be removed immediately.

>[rights] not at all anti-monarch

This could not be more wrong. Those things you mention specifically derive from the 1689 Bill of Rights put in place after the anti-monarchical coup of 1688 by the Whig puppet William.

>>134544646

>Aspy Queens

“We, ignorant of ourselves,
Beg often our own harms,
which the wise powers
Deny us for our good; so find we profit
By losing of our prayers.”

>>134544299
But you're still clearly (deliberately or not) choosing that music because you've watched it one of his works.

Why not find something else that hasn't been done to almost the same style of video as you're going to try to create? I imagine a lot of people in this thread have watched some of Curtis' works, and using the same music screams a lack of imagination. You might as well use Undercover Vampire Policeman or Lux Aeterna or something else we'll recognise from another person doing YouTube videos.

>>134544409
Except it's not, I'm saying that it's not an original idea and that another piece of music would be better. I'm not entirely sure why you felt the need to give me a (You) since I wasn't even talking to you.

File: no exit.gif (410KB, 221x196px) Image search: [Google]

410KB, 221x196px

Got asked out on a date by a woman, lads

Can't go because of my rampant crippling anxiety making me unable to go further than a mile away

File: e0f855b5eb7c135b5d8f657e7247f68d7245ae3206b25da08a1352de7665528d.jpg (234KB, 960x1000px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 960x1000px

>>134544724
>Carlyle
Based

>>134544285
>>134543976

Keep attacking the only people even slightly allied to your beliefs, what a great and thoughtful pragmatic strategy. This is sure to pay off in the long term!

File: compressed-IceCream.webm (2MB, 480x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x720px

>>134544819
Have a couple of pints beforehand lad

File: DSC0283.jpg (231KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 720x1280px

>>134544859
>Juden
>even slightly allied to your beliefs
Think again, bucko.

File: needless to say.jpg (30KB, 528x481px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 528x481px

>>134544819
>I know that feel
Post a photo of her.

>>134544772
>using the same music screams a lack of imagination
No it doesn't. Almost all good and gripping ambient music has already been popularised in some form.

>>134544927
Muh dick.

>>134542488
>T. Someone who has read Burke but has failed to realise our government has 5% of the power it did in the 19th century.

The only thing that really matters in the 21st Century is improving personal responsibility by continuing to empower citizens and their communities. The attitude os monarchists runs counter to this is thinking these born to rule pony fuckers will save us with their historic power and traditions.

>>134545049
Like pregnant women anon?

Go and impregnate one

>>134545006

If Tommy is a Jew why is he hated by normies and lefties unreservedly? If he is doing no damage to them why do they shut his talks down? You deserve to lose if you're going to be this retarded.

>>134545091
Fuck that. I'll just masturbate instead.

It's free and I don't have to leave the house.

What is wrong with AMW?

>>134545127
What part of 'controlled opposition' do you not understand? Do you think they'd let National Action on GMTV?

>>134544724
>The idea that whigs are not in control and that somebody else retains sovereignty is considered tyrannical to you because you are their pawn. We can't have somebody other than us ruling! That's tyranny!
The Monarch is the oversight of the British system, for the monarch not to hold that hold (which she doesn't any more in practice, only in theory) is both tyrannical (on parliaments behalf) and unconstitutional. Without the Monarch serving as the oversight to our system, everything parliament does is tyrannical.


>This is called leftism. When you destroy power split it up and hand it out to your clients. This process of sovereign disintegration has been taking place until 1688 at least.
But the power wasn't split up amongst "clients" unless you're referencing Cromwell's acts himself. In 1689, when parliament first reconvened, the powers that were established in the Bill of Rights 1689 were split between public assemblies (who had fought against each other the year earlier) and the monarch (who they had successfully removed at one point). So to say power was divided amongst their clients is "leftism" or even the statement alone.

>When nobody is in charge, nobody is responsible for anything.
This is completely modern though. In the British system, it is extremely well established who is in charge. It is the monarch. Again, theoretically, this is displayed through the powers of the Crown. Need I mention again, these powers being stripped are tyrannical?

>This is the reason there is nobody to point to responsible for flooding our countries with third-worlders.
Parliament. What are you talking about? We ABSOLUTELY blame Parliament. The Queen's roles are completely overshadowed, as all monarchs have been since World War 1, and arguably throughout Victoria's entire reign. Of course we'd blame Parliament, the sole lawmakers, over the Queen's (now) almost non-existent Assent powers to pass law.

(will continue)

>>134545206
If elected as UKIP leader Clarkson and May will have to find someone else.

>>134542488
>our system is still 100% reliant on the monarch

No mention that this "monarch" could literally be a knitted hat and everything would keep on going as it did before.

File: autumn_landscape_wallpaper_86e1b.jpg (574KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

574KB, 1920x1200px

>>134545051

Correct. He seems like the kind of guy who doesn't realise 'Dulce Et Decorum Est' is satirical.

>>134545206
She's a hardcore socialist, former Labour candidate, and lifelong LGBT rights campaigner.

Just Corbyn but doesn't like muslims. Not conseravtive or nationalistic

>>134544525
I used to collect all the odd coins from the till at work, you get all sorts of shit. Manx, Channel Island, Gibraltar, Falklands, and the New Zealand dollars look identical to our pounds too.

NZ and Canadian and other Commonwealth coins are always odd, seems peculiar to see the Queen on another country's money.

>>134545031
>No it doesn't. Almost all good and gripping ambient music has already been popularised in some form.

You're either misunderstanding or misrepresenting what I'm saying, so I'll repeat it really simply:

It screams a lack of imagination if you use the exact same music that someone else has done (multiple times) on famous documentaries over montages and subject matter that will be in a very similar tone to what you wish to do.

Not only that, but you've said that you've actually watched these works, so you're also very aware of the fact that you're copying the use of those tracks.

It's really simple: use your own imagination and find some other interesting ambient tracks, or you're simply just copying what someone else has done.

File: 1500511740095.jpg (102KB, 605x1140px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 605x1140px

Just spent the last hour crying and eating a whole packet of Haribo Tangfastics.

>>134545361
>Not conseravtive or nationalistic

Are any of the UKIP candidates in this election, though?

Rees-Evans as far as I'm aware is simply a libertarian reformer who doesn't appear to have many distinctive outward policies.

>>134545206

Another degenerate chav.

>>134544724
>This is what you support and you *only* support it because these were the lies the Whigs used to worm their way into perpetual power. They have been destroying this country for the last 200 years.
I've made it perfectly clear what I support and that is what's laid out the Magna Carta, the Provisions of Oxford, the Provisions of Westminister, the Habeus Corpus Act, the Bill of Rights 1689, etc. British constitutionalism is what I support.

>She is not able to do this and you know it. You keep confusing symbols with reality. You keep thinking if you say something is true then it is. Our monarch is the head of government! That's why if she tried to stop anything she would be removed immediately.
I've spent my entire point saying this. The monarch has NONE of the powers in practice, of what she holds in theory. Her ministers approve law through Royal Assent, her powers of Prerogative would likely cause a constitutional crisis, the appointment of Prime Ministers are done via the electorate solely or again, on advice from ministers and power of dismissal would cause yet another constitutional crisis. The Queen's role in politics being overshadowed is what I've spoken against this entire time.

>Those things you mention specifically derive from the 1689 Bill of Rights put in place after the anti-monarchical coup of 1688 by the Whig puppet William.
The right to bear arms dates to the Assize of Arms 1181, the rest were in the Bill of Rights 1689. Something I'm a supporter of. It's the Act of the Union 1700 which oversteps the boundary. I'm a firm believer the BoR 1689 is reasonable.

>>134545127
>why is he hated by normies and lefties unreservedly?
That's the problem. (((Controlled Opposition))) shits all over any chance of someone genuine coming along and convincing the population to their ideas

>>134545051
>not even an argument
I don't even like Burke you brain stormer.

>>134545006
Polite reminder to everyone that ballots in UK elections are NOT secret and that under a court order a judge can permit the police to identify you through it.

If you have shit candidates running then just write none of the above, not edgy swastikas and shit.

>>134545284
That's true but I think we've both acknowledged this.

File: prince-charles.jpg (55KB, 431x500px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 431x500px

>>134545562
>Don't worry chaps, let me deal with being chancellor and running education, industry, military and all other departments!

>>134545480
Rees-Evans is pretty Conservative. Supports the right to bear arms, wants to reintroduce the death penalty, got mad because a "homosexual donkey" tried to rape his horse.

Plus he has a fortified compound in Bulgaria complete with an armoury and firing range.

>>134545737
When has an English monarch ever solely governed without advice or counsel?

>>134545680
>ballots in UK elections are NOT secret and that under a court order a judge can permit the police to identify you through it

You fucking what? Bit too much Alex Jones mate, how are they going to find out who drew on a bit of paper in pencil?

File: 62611-004-8B9A7668.jpg (25KB, 385x450px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 385x450px

>>134545737

>>134545737
That's not even the beginning of what my point is. The other guy is the one arguing in favour of absolutism you mong.

>>134545841
1100 AD mate. These people view monarchism as out of a fairy tale or as 20th century dictators like I said. The type of absolutism that existed in 20th century Russia was stomped out in England in 1100 AD.

>>134545376
Name one piece of good ambient music that hasn't been popularised in some way or already used by someone else.

He also used https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFV1JNgJA7s

Does that mean that he copied its use from the 2002 episode of Futurama Leela's Homeworld in his 2011 work All Watched Over By Machines Of Loving Grace? Or did he copy A Warm Place from it's use in the film Stigmata? Does that mean he is being unimaginative? No it doesn't. It's a piece of well known music.

>>134545854
I've worked as a Poll Clerk in elections.

Ballot papers have a unique identifying number on each one.

You, as a registered voter, have a unique voter ID number.

When you walk into a polling station and are given a ballot paper, the poll clerks job is to record the ballot number given to you alongside your voter ID on a piece of paper called a Corresponding Numbers List.

The CNL is kept securely following the election and unavailable for anyone to view, but under the rule of a judge may be made available to view for police.

>>134546007
>using music from something you've seen that is totally unrelated is the same as using music from something that is very much related and in the same tone and style of what I want to do

You're being dense.

>>134545240

No, they just proscribe them and shut them down. Hence the need for types like AMW to make in-roads into the mainstream.

>Without the Monarch serving as the oversight to our system, everything parliament does is tyrannical.

Why do you believe this fucking horseshit and Whig lies mate? Why? It is political nonsense designed to perpetuate power among parliamentarians. The monarch is the symbol they use to hide where the real power lies because they DON'T WANT TO BE PUBLICLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN DECISIONS. WHICH IS AN *EXTREMELY* BAD SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT. THEY CAN CREATE ROTHERHAMS AND GET AWAY WITH IT BECAUSE THEY HAVE UNCOUPLED POLITICAL DECISION MAKING FROM HAVING TO FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF IT.

> it is extremely well established who is in charge. It is the monarch.

I'm not even sure what level of reality you're operating on. Name one political decision that our "monarch" made herself. A single one. They were all done by Whig fucking shits on her behalf and they hide behind her. This is like saying if you wear a mask of someone and commit a murder then according to you the face of the person on the mask was the one who actually did it. Do you understand that these are just lies and nothing at all to do with how power actually works? What is the point in believing in these nonsense theories that do not accurately describe the world we live in and how it functions?

>theoretically

Exactly, mate. Theoretically this system is great, in reality it is a social catastrophe.

>Parliament. What are you talking about? We ABSOLUTELY blame Parliament

but Parliament changes every few years and they are technically at the whim of the people who vote them out, Democracy has passed the buck of responsibility from the sovereign to the Rousseaian will of the "people" - another complete nonsense. as a result none of these parliamentarians have any skin in the game. None of them own the country or have a vested interest in improving their property.

>>134545932

No, you think we're arguing against some sort of anachronistic straw-man conception of absolutist monarchy, whereas - as I've written several times now - I'm opposed to it in principle. A nostalgic, or cyclical, notion of history leads you to wish for a re-enlargement of monarchical power, as if our contemporary issues will be solved by a retreat or regression, whereas they are - in fact - totally new and totally in need of new solutions. Society has changed immeasurably and now we need to redefine government in a way which consolidates and enhances the improves to individual life which have been made over the last thousand years.

>>134545515

You've made it perfectly clear you are a bitch to regicidal weak chinned parliamentarian troglodytes.

>The monarch has NONE of the powers in practice

Stop calling them "powers" and stop calling her a "monarch" then, please! Reality actually matters!

>>134546121
Bullshit, he used Ennio Morricone's The Thing music in the same way it was originally used. As he has done with plenty of other music.

I'll say it again since you didn't respond. Name one piece of good/gripping ambient music that hasn't already been popularised.

>>134545859
You're trying to argue that monarchy has any substantial use. Like most people we're not arguing to kick Lizzy out, she has been an okay Queen. But as soon as Charles takes the throne they will be exposed for belonging to a bygone era. They can take ceremonial roles and give up all current funding, that is fine. The problem is the message it sends to society that every citizen is beneath them in law.

>>134546420

Baskinski's Disintegration Loops.

>>134546321
>as if our contemporary issues will be solved by a retreat or regression

A retreat from a decline is an ascent.

>Society has changed immeasurably

Reality hasn't actually changed since 400 years ago. Our universe and the men in it are still subject to the same laws they were back then. All that has changed is that we removed one previously working system (monarch) with a chaotic fusion of liberal nonsense based on universalised abstractions which has resulted in the dramatic loss of our territory and the collapse of our societies into social catastrophe.

>>134546420
I don't see how it's relevant to ask me to name a piece of ambient music and I don't feel the need to whatsoever, so I'm not going to.

>>134546420
So he's copied too, then, if you're actually correct, but that doesn't mean you won't be copying his use of that music for your ebin YouTube video.

Christ it's really simple, just find something else rather than pick something out of the soundtrack to Curtis' documentaries that you've heard.

>>134546321
You were arguing for Tory Monarchism and have waffled on in trying to define what that actually means. You've yet to move past a hypothetical argument. Lay out details of how the Tories and the Monarchy will help "society".

girl on my facebook posts pictures of her lizard with captions like "he's (((angry))) today" meaning to be an exclamation but I keep seeing it as her implying the Jews made the lizard angry

>>134546165
Every point on that are things I've addressed in regards to constitutionalism vs absolutism which we clearly won't agree on besides these ones

>Exactly, mate. Theoretically this system is great, in reality it is a social catastrophe.
In reality, it was none of those things until the Queen's powers truly were theoretical which wasn't the case until Edward's reign at the absolute earliest. One could assign that to Victoria, but it was her who assigned ministers to the act of signing Royal Assent in person. Probably out of sheer laziness.

>but Parliament changes every few years and they are technically at the whim of the people who vote them out, Democracy has passed the buck of responsibility from the sovereign to the Rousseaian will of the "people" - another complete nonsense. as a result none of these parliamentarians have any skin in the game. None of them own the country or have a vested interest in improving their property.
Excellent point. Parliament does change every few years, so who do we hold accountable? The answer is nobody. You've beaten me there.

>>134546469
I'm arguing that Liz has extraordinary powers in theory, which she does. I'm also arguing that the fact the Queen has been stripped off these powers in practice is an atrocity. Why do you think I'm differentiating between in practice versus in theory?

But none of this has not existed ever at all. This was common place all through the reign of Queen Victoria, right back to Alfred.

>>134546600
Fair enough.

>>134546647
Why should I pick something else? It's not like I'm copying him, and even if I was, which I am not, then it wouldn't matter, what inspired the use of a piece of music does not change its impact.

File: 1499974873655.jpg (100KB, 782x751px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 782x751px

It doesn't matter what system we have, we just need power concentrated in the hands of one man to be effective. Absolute power, can do many things, quickly, and is a speedy manner. I can't be the only one who was amazed at the speed and marveled at Trump as he slammed through his executive orders for this and that, and all the organs of the state made it happen. Surely that's a case for absolute power? It was the judges who got in the way, who interfered. I would say that 95% of the people in politics, don't need to be there, or are there for the wrong reasons.

One man, who is loyal, and on the ball, give him power and follow him, and change happens for the better. The parlimentary system, democracy, is groups of people all fighting for their own personnal interests, or that of their group, everything moves so slowly, if at all. The result is a fractured nation, and worse, in their pursuit of power they import voters, turning the whole game into a farce.

The ruler should have absolute power in order to be efficient and effective, the question should be what the ruler should have absolute power in. Religious matters? Leave that to the state religion, don't finance divorce, don't give a financial incentive for the breakup of the family. Education? Reading, writing, and arithmatic, and hard sciences and trades only, you want philosophy, join a club.

State security? Yes, they should determine how best to deal with the enemy. But what about those inside who were bought in by the politicians for votes? How much of the security budget is made to deal with them? How much do they cost us? How many laws are passed for all of us, just to keep an eye on them? If they were to disappear, how much more free would we be, without them holding us down?

File: 1431069283408.png (487KB, 692x692px) Image search: [Google]

487KB, 692x692px

>>134546935
>being a statist bootlicker

>>134546928
>Why should I pick something else? It's not like I'm copying him

Because you ARE copying him.

>>134546689
It was me who was arguing for High Toryism. That guy didn't bring it up once. And I don't think that's at all relevant to what I've said. All I've done is argued on absolutism vs constitutionalism.

More than happy to explain why I like High Toryism though.

>>134546935
>pic not related?
Mosley was in favour of balancing power between a Fascist government and the monarch.

http://cnqzu.com/library/Solar%20General/100-questions-about-fascism-oswald-mosley.pdf

File: awesomeman.gif (574KB, 322x322px) Image search: [Google]

574KB, 322x322px

>>134540377
End result of Brexit negotiation is going to be UK has to keep following all EU laws, pays more for access, but gets no say in anything.

It's going to be amazing.

>>134547015
>Not being able to tell the difference between the state that leaves you alone to be free, and the state with it's boot on your neck.

Why?

>>134546629

>universalised abstractions

Abstractions like the notion of the monarch's 'two bodies' which - as Kantorowicz noted - was intellectually necessary to preserve the cultural conception of monarchy? What could be more abstract that the arbitrary designation of an individual as unquestioned 'ruler' over - for example - more capable siblings?

>Reality hasn't actually changed since 400 years ago

Nothing essential, in man or society, has changed. I quite agree. Except, in practice, the ability of the individual man to actualise and expand his potential in society and in solitude has radically expanded. That should always be our primary concern. If you're conceptualising a system which doesn't even aspire to address the spiritual 'smallness' of the majority, what's the point?

>>134547075
But I'm not.

Just for the sake of argument though, in your alternate reality where if I use a piece of well known ambient music to help shape the ambience of a video for something politically related then it matters because Adam Curtis did the same thing - why does it matter and how does it change the experience the viewer of the video has?

File: DNKa1fFW.jpg (32KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 512x512px

>>134540377
Is that Anne Marie Waters?

>>134546935
Mosley Pepe?

I love the internet

>>134547246
>One man in power
>not being forced to suck his cock everyday in fear of being shot for thought crime

kys yourself bootlicka'

>>134546689

Actually, I wrote the first post directly opposing the guy advocating Tory monarchism. Improve your comprehension.

>>134540377
Oh I see the last link. She's actually really strong on immigration policy. I supported her venture into politics since before she was a politician.

File: 1500477388052.jpg (332KB, 900x1079px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 900x1079px

nearly finished reading Abolition of Britain. vastly overrated

>>134547459
If I wanted a fag's opinion I'd have asked your father

Froome in 3

>>134547314
>Not being able to read the later parts of my post.

Try reading the part about the states involvement in what and why, fuckweasel.

>Muh anarchy maaaaan
>Muh democracy maaaan.

these systems are woefully inept, and just shouldn't exist. Like you,

>>134547286
I don't understand how you're so in denial about the fact that you're copying the use of music tracks from well known documentaries to use in your own documentary? You're even using them for the same tonal effect for fuck's sake.

>why does it matter and how does it change the experience the viewer of the video has?

Because if you post the video here then a lot of brit/pol/ will recognise the music as being copied from Curtis' documentaries, since a lot here have watched them and enjoy them.

Go ahead and do it if you want, but it will make whatever you produce look unoriginal and as if you've put less thought into it at best and tacky at worst.

>>134547459
no shit its was made by a guy who thinks weed causes the fall of Britain

File: iMessage (127).jpg (33KB, 337x600px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 337x600px

This girl is after me lads, she's pretty sweet tbqh.

>>134546895
What are these powers? As I said before our governments has so little power now its absurd to make comparisons. We have no industry and any semi-significant infrastructure projects have to be funded by other countries and outsourced to their companies. What is a Monarch going to do in control? I'm guessing do the same thing those evil socialists want to do.

>>134546895

We haven't had a monarch since Charles I, friend. Or probably James.

>Parliament does change every few years, so who do we hold accountable? The answer is nobody

Firstly we need to hold people like you accountable for believing in these fictitious nonsense philosophies invented by Whigs designed entirely to degrade monarchical power and replace it with chaos. The result has been what we see today. Dividing power and stealing it from the sovereign monarch and handing it out is the first seed on the road to complete entropic Democratic power dispersal, nothing stops it from spiralling down like an avalanche at that point. You take power from the king and then you give it to your friends, then landowners, then men of a certain age, then all men, then everybody and then nobody is in charge, nobody has responsible and nobody can answer for anything and the only answer is to shrug your shoulders as your children are raped by the hordes that liberalism imported. It all started with the Whigs. Their subterfuge is the Jenga block which collapses the entire nation.

>>134547199
>Mosley was in favour of balancing power between a Fascist government and the monarch.

I think that would only be a fib in order to endear himself to the public, the public for some reason like to have the appearance of democracy in order to think they can make a difference.

Facism at it's root, is dictatorial. Nothing bad about that, so long as that dictator leaves the common man alone, and makes things better.

>>134547591
She looks middle aged. How old is she?

>>134547591
>This girl is after me lads, she's pretty sweet tbqh.

Does she fuck shitskins? If not, get her pregnant, and don't tolerate her lip.

>>134547459

I was a bit disappointed by it. I was expecting something evidence-based and nuanced. He's eloquent enough to ad lib on television, but the written word requires a great degree of specificity and structure. While I enjoy his talks, his writing is so-so.

>>134545435
you sound like my niece lad

>>134547617
So in terms of absolutism, how would you bring this back on track? Would the current Royal family remain in power? Replacing them seems to upset the whole divine right thing.

>>134547559
As I have said, I'm not copying him, it's a popular piece of ambient music.

And in this alternate reality situation, you have still been unable to say why it would actually matter to the viewer.

Anyway most of Curtis's work is just him starting out with some narrative and then tries to prop it up with some very selectively picked information. In the most recent one for example he argued that "social media" (that phrase has always irked me, I don't know why, seems too much like a buzzword), had failed in it's high hopes of unifying the world and make it a better place, like for example the failure of to achieve a clean ousting of the dictatorial government in Egypt, and also Syria, but he just glossed over Tunisia, which had actually turned out quite well. Also there can be a massive amount of discourse on websites like facebook, in contrast to the echo chamber he painted it to be.

>>134547272
>What could be more abstract that the arbitrary designation of an individual as unquestioned 'ruler' over - for example - more capable siblings?

>arbitrary

Was it arbitrary that Octavian bested Mark Antony and took over? I should point out here I do not believe in hereditary succession at all, if that's your concern. Hereditary succession is cancer and a monarchy-killer.

>If you're conceptualising a system which doesn't even aspire to address the spiritual 'smallness' of the majority, what's the point?

My primary goal is preventing bad government and rule by whigs. The point you raise is very important to me but also seems orthogonal.

>>134547591
She looks like she has more diseases than Porton Down.

>>134547617

>Fictitious nonsense philosophies

'G...G...Guys, we better listen to this chinless, decadent faggot. His great-great-great grandfather was an opportunist warlord, so he's clearly god's anointed ruler! G...Gee, I sure hope I don't have to eat my sick, illiterate children this year!"

>>134547591
Lmao looks like she rode every cock in her town, good one going after the 30+ lad, i heard they're easier

>>134547605
>What are these powers?
1. The power of Royal Prerogative. To dissolve parliament, fire all ministers and call upon a new election.
2. The power of Royal Assent to approve law. Nowadays it's signed through a 3rd party minister with the Queen having no say in it.
3. The power to appoint. The Queen has the power to appoint PMs. Again, nowadays, this is done purely ceremonially and all selections for Prime Ministers are taken by 1) the previous PM or 2) the Queen's ministers.

Here's a full list: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmpubadm/422/42204.htm

It's important to remember this has been overshadowed by centuries of parliamentary influence. Having a monarch dissolve PM and assume absolute power seems like a splendid idea, but in reality would cause a constitutional crisis of monstrous proportions and probably lead to the full dissolution of the monarchy. Which I believe is absolutely wrong.

>>134548176
>1) the previous PM or 2) the Queen's ministers.
and the electorate obviously.

>>134547915
>Would the current Royal family remain in power? Replacing them seems to upset the whole divine right thing.

We are in extremely crazy territory here and this will never happen but I will reveal my hand in that I believe they are not the rightful monarchs but usurpers from the Whig takeover of 1688 and the true rightful monarchs of these isles, by royal descent, are the House of Liechtenstein, inheritors of the Jacobite crowns of England, Scotland, Ireland and France.

File: fakeandgay.jpg (7KB, 168x300px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 168x300px

>>134547591

File: IMG_20170714_235427_842.jpg (93KB, 720x810px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 720x810px

Death to the subversive left. Britain for the British.

>>134548156
>His great-great-great grandfather was an opportunist warlord

I already said I don't believe in hereditary succession and think it is the monarchy-killer. It should be abolished.

>>134548383

Come on, mate.

File: 1500608357855.jpg (36KB, 353x356px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 353x356px

>>134547505
you can do better than that

File: King Alfred the Great.jpg (32KB, 367x450px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 367x450px

>>134548383
Alfred's lineage should be in control.

>>134547422
her policy is weaker than Nuttalls

Just another shabbos goy obsessed with islam

>>134548452

I wrote that before I'd read your response. To be fair, I think most people would assume hereditary succession was the 'norm', so you should probably have stated that from the offset.

Anyway, out of interest, what system of succession would you recommend instead?

>>134547730
22

>>134547759
afaik she's only had two partners, none nogs

>>134548138
nah

Deep vein trombone

Any Catholics on? How do I join a local Catholic parish? How do I get baptised?

>>134548675

I like the Roman Imperial system of adopting and grooming heirs. Most people are less likely to hate the monarch if they believe that *their* children could be picked and groomed one day and that they are not biologically cut off from power. Heirship encourages meritocracy. Choosing your children as successor should be rightfully regarded as a weak and selfish bitch move.

File: 1500029023514.gif (645KB, 245x180px) Image search: [Google]

645KB, 245x180px

>tfw can now do 8 pull ups in a row and run 15 miles in two hours

Why aren't you improving yourself physically?

File: 23`1.png (19KB, 389x175px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 389x175px

>>134548821
Stop bullshitting you sad mong.

>>134548904

>europe
>miles

Can't even larp properly

WEW
I
L
L
Y

>>134548901
I like the Roman system too, if you don't give the Praetorian Guard any power that is.

>>134548446
Britain is a melting pot of multiracialism and ethnic tolerance. Brits themselves are immigrants from germanic tribes

>>134548901

I'm not sure I'm comfortable with the vague whiff of pederasty surrounding that system ("crier, tell the commoners... I've found my new boy!"). Aside from that, I've no idea how you would even begin to facilitate it outside of a courtly system. Would ambitious, intelligent boys be encouraged to loaf around public piazzas in the hope of catching the monarch's eye? It's all just a bit inconceivable in 2017.

File: 5ce8c5db9699b2c16eff6a1829c269a1.jpg (106KB, 650x975px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 650x975px

>>134548904
im not a smelly fat yank and can already do that

>>134549207
>Britain is a melting pot of multiracialism and ethnic tolerance.

>Some people still think this..

Absolute fib. Murry and Starkey have trashed this numerous times.

File: 1481604385327.jpg (405KB, 2560x1707px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 2560x1707px

>>134547015
>being a liberticuck

Literally why

its the most fedora and vaping level ideology

>>134549207

What races are co-mingling, in that instance? Nords and Germanics?

File: 1446295836611.png (1MB, 1072x736px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1072x736px

>>134548857
Just go into your local Catholic Church and ask, lad.

File: nazicucks.jpg (23KB, 423x267px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 423x267px

>>134549419
>being a statist cuckold,

you literally suck a man's penis just to live, literal cuckolds and traitors

>>134549207
The American Indians were also immigrants, as they originate from central Asia; that doesn't make their displacement not ethnic cleansing.

>>134549325

What is it about the Current Year that makes you incapable of imagining a country not ruled by the rotten carcass of 'Democracy' ?

File: 1500331258396.jpg (167KB, 625x415px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 625x415px

>>134549113
I..it was a slip of the finger as a result of the gallons of test rushing around my system willy-senpai

>>134549533
Alri but whom do I ask? The priest? Should I go to a mass first and ask after? I've found a website for the local parish, I guess I could just send them an e-mail first.

File: cucktholics.png (145KB, 500x1138px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 500x1138px

>cucktholics

>>134549407
British people are immigrants

>>134549453
Romans and Germanic tribe, displaced the native black britons

>>134549659
native americans were born there

File: JP-FACSISM2-master675.jpg (56KB, 675x438px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 675x438px

>>134549653
Libertarians just end up cucking themselves to corporate power, which is far more insidious and oppressive than state power.

State power is infinitely preferable to corporate power, especially because a state has a vested interest in the well-being of its citizens.

File: 1500184870992m.jpg (101KB, 1024x955px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1024x955px

Can England be saved?

>>134549859
They were originally from central Asia.

File: Help helper 33.png (35KB, 868x751px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 868x751px

What are the chances of me getting a council flat or house within the next six months?

22, single, white male.

I'm in the ESA support group for mental illness so that might go in my favour.

File: abo.jpg (9KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 275x183px

>>134549952
save yourself nigger

>>134549715

What is it that I've said which leads you to believe I think democracy is a great system? I only stated that I think your suggestion is just as bad.

A monarch picking his favourite fawning youth to elevate into leadership? I mean, come on.

File: 1500185765231.jpg (79KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 700x700px

>>134550093

FROOME IS GOING TO WIN THE TDF AGAIN

>>134550045
Do you have a disablity?

Are you homeless?

Where do you currently live?

What constituency?

Do you have any money?

Why do you want a council house so qucik

any other info

>>134550045
>22, single, white male.

0

>>134550045
zero unless you live in a remote area with excess council housing stock

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-22 at 16.34.07.png (32KB, 791x91px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 791x91px

Fuck lads... Found these bookmarks on my brother's laptop.

WHAT DO?

>>134549653
And you suck the dick of the banks, big pharma and other jewish shit just to live. The difference is a statist govt that isnt shit will fuck up degenerates

>>134550045

Get a job, buy a flat. It's amazing to me that a place with a conservative consensus attracts such a high percentage of lazy, entitled welfare drains.

>>134550178

He can put his recommendation before the board of directors and if they approve then succession is settled.

File: 1473761084160.png (19KB, 448x448px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 448x448px

>>134541305

>>134550398

Board of directors? Now I know you're joking.

>>134550339
You're implying there's something wrong.

>>134550221

Social anxiety, depression.
Live with parents
Tyne and Wear
Few grand in the bank
Been wanting my own place for ages

>>134549715
Democracy is fine provided all the people are indoctrinated to love the Monarch and Christian moral values.

If they are all aware to a reasonable extent of what is going on in society, then consultative assemblies are a good idea and I yield to no-one on that point.

>>134550540
Then rent your own place privately you fucking cretin. You aint getting a council house with money in the bank and you have a home

File: 1500656091584.jpg (59KB, 464x794px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 464x794px

>>134550339
that's your laptop isn't it?

>>134550556
Democracy is fucking retarded mob rule

people are fucking retarded. If you accept democracy you accept fucking idiots like cultural marxists, jews and literal nigger retards like Diane Abbot to have the same value as you. You're a cuck if you think democracy is valid

File: 6cm3z6o1bfqy.jpg (164KB, 888x1120px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 888x1120px

>>134549727
Yeah, just go to mass. Then after talk to the priest and explain the situation, and that you're not sure about the logistics of converting and getting baptised, confirmed etc.

>>134550540

You've got social anxiety and depression because you've chosen to live like a giant child, despite have the means to do otherwise. All of your bullshit diagnoses and neuroses will disappear when you force yourself to grow-up and live purposefully and independently.

>>134550741
>literally sucking someones foreskin not to get shot

>statistcucks

File: Snug Pepe 1.jpg (45KB, 409x409px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 409x409px

>>134550669

Implying I'm going to disclose my finances

>>134550741

If you accept aristocracy then you also accept that those people have the same value as you (i.e. "none", rather than "negligible").

>>134550556

You don't need to bother indoctrinating people who don't have the vote in the first place.

The only reason propaganda exists is because Democracy gave peasants power and there was an immediate need to scramble for ways to induce the correct opinions in them. A man who hates the party under a democracy is a threat to their voter base since they rely on his vote to stay in power so his brain must be washed for compliance. A man who hates the king is irrelevant to power since his opinion is completely political inconsequential.

>>134550741
Certain forms of democracy is perfectly valid, the people are vulnerable to oppression without it. The question is what forms it ought to take? I would suggest that the people deserve consultative assemblies that the Sovereign and/or leader is obliged to meet with weekly.

I firmly believe all people are of equivalent worth; worth is an intrinsic property of being human.

>>134542915
>who hates his betters
ha ha, you think Charlie and his retarded offspring are superior? King Tampon is going to be the end of the monarchy in this country

>>134550885
Enjoy getting done for tenancy fraud and losing 5000 pounds in a fine.
they fucking check you CLEAN if you are trying to rent a council house

>>134550860
The fact that you think life in Nazi Germany was like that shows how ignorant and stupid you really are.

Enjoy not being a statist and being free to be swamped with africans and muslims tbqh. I'm sure you'll be very happy

File: Pepe Wink.jpg (6KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 200x200px

>>134550810

I don't have social anxiety and depression though. That's just what they think.

>>134550810
Social anxiety and depression are very real illnesses, and you do yourself no favours by trivialising them.

Lads, I am going abroad for a month in about two weeks. How to make LOADSEMONEY before I go? No one is going to want to take me on for two weeks.

>>134551013

I don't give a shit, man-baby. Grow up.

>>134550982
>worth is an intrinsic property of being human.

Jesus fucking christ the reddit, I can smell it. You're a fucking idiot if you think Diane Abbott is of equivalent worth to Nigel Farage.

>>134550982
>the people are vulnerable to oppression without it.

The people are vulnerable to predation when you replace their effective and responsible government with a 'Democracy' in which nobody is in control.

>>134550993

They aren't monarchs. Read the fucking thread. I want them dissolved.

>>134551004
Hitler loved Muslims and sucked their dicks like you statist cuckolds do.

Nazi germany had a significant amount of its population in poverty apart from the major cities due to literally being built on war bonds.

you are a retarded 14 year old edgy cuck

File: william-blake.jpg (14KB, 620x333px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 620x333px

>>134551039

Shut up, wimp.

>>134550982
>I firmly believe all people are of equivalent worth

You are beyond the grasp of reason and must be physically removed from power.

>>134551127

That's not what he said, you twat. You sound more leddit than him.

>>134550952
Yes you do. People need to have a purpose, else they won't find fulfilment. A fulfilled populace, spiritually, socially, intellectually, monetarily etc. is required for a truly great nation to emerge. Ensuring people are taught to value their culture and further the success of their people is crucial to giving them that purpose.

Consultative assemblies also provide the people with a way to present their concerns to the Sovereign, as any moral system of governance should permit.

File: Snug Pepe 2.jpg (25KB, 670x424px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 670x424px

Bought myself a new pair of shoes today lads.

Gotta spend that NEETbux on something.

>>134551304
>I firmly believe all people are of equivalent worth

direct quote from his post, not edited or paraphrased. All people of equivalent worth. So Diane Abbot of equivalent worth with Nigel Farage.

Learn to read before you try to argue on a text/imageboard please.

>>134551341
How much do you get and what for lad?

>>134550952
You can address this by having a qualified democracy. Citizen service, or some sort of intellectual standard set as a bar to voting. The mistake was universal suffrage. Feudalism was a bit of a shit show for 99.9% of the people involved.

If you haven't moved out (permanently, not into student digs) by the time you're 21 you've failed at adulthood.

>>134551210
Retarded opinion tbqh

>>134542014
Same fagging

All trip cunts need to die, you don't need a trip to make good posts, I'd encourage everybody to block tripfags

How much neetbux do you lads actually get

>>134550999

I know "mentally ill/unstable" people who have been given a house, fully paid for by the council, including all their furniture.

Privately renting is a fools game.

>>134551238
People are of equal worth, by virtue of being born human. I'm not denying people may have different propensities and inclinations, but when you classify people as "inferior" or "superior" you really stray into some pretty indefensible positions.

>>134551216
Deny it all you like, it's a fact.

>>134551521

£500 a month.

But I'm going to put in for PIP which is an extra £200.

>>134551521
Just got about 250 put into my account today. I get that every 2 weeks and pay 200 quid every 4 weeks to my parents to help with things like expenses.

>>134551700
How does PIP do that? T..tell me senpai.

>>134549859
>British people are immigrants
dude true. the original Scots were actually African indigenous scots that crossed the ocean on their Nile fishing boats