Are there any Feminist arguments you agree with, /pol/?
>>134456883
We should kill everyone we disagree with.
men are the niggers of gender, and if men didn't exist, we'd be living in more peace
we'd create civilisation slower, but it would be peace
men are just fucking dumb, and can't plan ahead
"egalitarian" type feminists' issues with the school system and how it punishes boys for being boys and makes girls useless
>>134458024
t. Retard
Women are incapable of following anything beyond emotion and pleasure seeking, meaning they inherently suck at long term planning and are also completely unable to make hard decisions that are emotionally troubling.
>>134456883
Only one I agree with is that Porn is shit but probably for different reasons. And this >>134457569
classical feminism was righteous. they have achieved their general goal, with only increasingly petty issues to be upset over. things have actually turned the other way, to where generally men are the ones treated worse as a matter of law.
>>134458152
What the actual fuck is that flag?
>>134458347
Classical feminism was never righteous and is what started all of this bullshit. Women's suffrage was the single greatest political mistake of 20th century America.
>>134458273
like I said, it'd be slower, but we'd get there, and it would be more peace. in the long run we'd get to the stars before you do.
also ''le emotions'' is a meme. there are plentiful of women in decent positions in this world. all you need is a handful to succeed. just like partiarchy only needed a handful of intellects to proceed.
we now have AI and artificial soon, which will leave men obsolete,m why we only breed more and more women.
muslims can go fuck themsevles if they want to stop us
Ivanka2024
>>134458902
>AI
Women rely far more on men than men on women. Men only require for women to perform a relatively small amount of functions, meaning outsourcing women to AI is way easier. Make a bot that can cook and clean, raise children and have an artificial womb capable of birthing children and women instantly become completely obsolete. Compare this to what you'd need to recreate from males; money, social status, charisma, just the right amount of alpha behavior. It's much more difficult. Of course you can try to create them, but females will be irrelevant and long obsolete far before it happens.
>>134458902
What about when all the men die out and women, statistically, end up taking up only social jobs, becoming incapable of maintain any computer the AI would be stored on?
Woop, looks like all your circuits burned up.
>>134458347
>classical feminism was righteous
t. moron that hasn't researched a single thing on early feminism
>>134456883
maternal benefits
>>134457569
this
basically nothing else.
>>134456883
That women are ridiculously oversexualised in the media. Of course, we disagree on who's behind it and why they're doing it.
>>134456883
gender roles are far from perfect
''you have to pursue, protect and provide for women and all you get in return is someone to cook for you and occasionally clean the house (and in 2017 they don't really know how to do either)''
is this a fair trade? am i missing something here?