Moon Landing

>>134418350
Also, 'the moon landing was faked' is a russian conspiracy to try and delegitimize the civtory of the US over the USSR

>>134418350
>Short exposure images
>Sunlight
>They were
>Why wouldn't the russians call out them faking it when they didn't see a rocket flying to moon on their radars
>Not an argument

>>134418543
Also no stars because of it being day and sunlight reflecting off the moon's surface on that part of the moon when the pictures were taken.

>>134418350
We probably did yeah.

File: Screenshot_20170721-034442.jpg (978KB, 1440x1415px) Image search: [Google]

978KB, 1440x1415px

>>134418350
You seriously think this shit wouldn't come off exiting orbit?

Moon landing didn't happen and has been debunked a million times. It's easy to ridicule 'conspiracy wackos' and it appeals to educated peoples egos to think 'oh yeah I'm not like those gullible uneducated conspiracy fools, I believe in science and I listen to what Nasa, the authority in this case, tells me to believe'.

Didn't happen. It's a complete fairytale and you'd have to be a retard to believe it.

>>134419647

So NASA built a functional rocket that took off, orbited the Earth for a bit, then (partially) returned. At the same time, they put together a film crew to mock up the footage. Then, they paid off everyone who ever worked on it to never reveal the details.

Does it not seem like going to the moon would actually be simpler?

>>134418350
no america never went to the moon . the old craft that landed and space suits had no shielding for radiation. leaving earth would have been a death sentence under such conditions

now think about how small that actual craft was. 3 men inside for a trip thats longer than 3 weeks. food and oxygen are required and the craft can allegedly leave the moon and the moon has some gravity so it needs fuel for the return trip

lets assume that everything wasnt hardwired and there were no sensors for the sake of allowing more space and the 3 men were in coffins with a tube in their ass and dicks so they didnt have to move to handle relieving themselves and that dumped into space

they would only have enough for the trip there at best and be malnourished when they get there with the space nasa says they had

>>134420164
>Longer than 3 weeks

It took them 3 days to get to the moon.

>>134419406
why should it?
there's no drag

>>134418350
>>134419406
>>134419647
>>134420164

RURAL and SUBURBAN retards at works gentlemen.

>>134418350
oh cmon, i mean /pol could do better both baiting and redpilling.

>>134418350
If you anything about photography and video making, you'd know we didn't have the technology back then to FAKE a moon landing. We did have however the technology to go to the moon.

File: moonLandingHoax.jpg (116KB, 1005x244px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1005x244px

>>134418350
CIA trolling anons
posted by a (((1)))
>pic related

>>134420493
The Apollo missions were about two weeks duration in space.