Meritocracy

>>134406209
k but no jews allowed

>>134406209
A meritocracy is in place at all times

You Germans underestimate how much better off Europe would have been had Hitler won the war. Just saying...

>>134406280
smart answer

>>134406280
Depends on your definition. For instance might is right is not a philosophy but a universal law. Those with influence/power to do something and the desire to do so are capable of doing said thing. It's so obvious that it sounds retarded. This isn't meritocracy though. Accruing the power to nepotistically place your tribe in important positions is not meritocracy, because meritocracy implies they are the best for the job and not the best at getting the job. So someone who is really good at interviews might not be best for a job but gets hired anyway. Meritocracy is a specific system and not a general term like you are probably thinking.

>>134406280
Yeah. Because Tyrone Gibbz always votes for the best candidate

>>134406280

What we have now is in no way a meritocracy.

>>134406209

>should be installed

by whom?

governments install themselves

and that's meritocracy

>>134407310

That's like saying western civilization is following survival of the fittest.

It's not.

>>134406209
>muh egalitarianism

Shut the fuck up and get back in line peasant

>>134406517
Thanks for schooling me, my dear Starbucks barista. I happen to know that Meritocracy is a specific system, although I deny its validity as such. Specific systems are little more than brainfarts. In that sense, I can only accept meritocracy as survival of the fittest, if we are to talk about it at all.