Circumcision

>>134290732
source?

>>134290811
for what reason ?

File: 1376445145812.jpg (346KB, 1017x1600px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 1017x1600px

>>134290978

>>134291184
>tfw you're baby penis skin was probably put on someone's face

File: wtf.gif-c200.gif (842KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

842KB, 200x200px

>>134291184

what the actual fuck

>>134290732
I made that edit after getting banned for posting CP...
Really fries the fruitloops that one!

File: brian morris likes circumsexual pride.png (446KB, 1035x762px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 1035x762px

>>134291976

That's just the tip of the iceberg. Ever heard of the "circumsexual" sucbculture?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djiTpV__qR4

http://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk/upper-norwood-circumcision-fetishist-jailed/story-23040107-detail/story.html

>>134290732
So the trauma changes parts of the brain that are associated with reasoning, perception and emotion. In what way? I would really like to know what changes exactly are happening to the affected regions of the brain and how this likely effects mental development.

>>134293074

These might be of interest to you.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9057731

http://www.circumstitions.com/Docs/KNMG-policy.pdf

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4530408/

http://www.mensstudies.info/OJS/index.php/IJMH/article/viewFile/614/pdf_225

File: apligraf-informed-consent-guidelines.png (450KB, 798x816px) Image search: [Google]

450KB, 798x816px

>>134290978
>>134290732
>>134291184
>>134291334
>>134291976
>>134292908
>y tho
also for skin grafts for fat baby boomers rotting out of their own skin

File: 1479886115617.jpg (15KB, 170x179px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 170x179px

>>134290732
lok what they did to MJ, those fuckers go scorched earth on anyone who goes against them.

>>134293428
Neat, thanks. I guess I got some reading to do.

>>134293428
So, I came across this part in the third article:
>The procedural pain associated with neonatal circumcision is plausibly more severe and the postoperative pain of longer duration than in older children and adults, because the foreskin of most neonates must be forcefully separated from the glans to which it is fused before it can be cut off
And I had to wonder. If this is, how circucision was intended to be done, shouldn't the children have died en masse by infection, back in the bronze age? But it turns out, the current method of cicumcision only dates back to the second century AD, according to this article:
http://www.cirp.org/library/history/peron2/

Specifically:
>The original Biblical circumcision of Abraham's time was a relatively minor ritual circumcision procedure in which only the redundant end of the foreskin extending beyond the tip of the glans was removed. This was called "Milah".
>No other feature was added to the religious ritual until about 140 AD
>After performing "milah" [...] a second step, periah was then performed. Periah consists of tearing and stripping back the remaining inner mucosal lining of the foreskin from the glans and then, by use of a sharp finger nail or implement, removing all of the inner mucosal tissue, including the excising and removal of the frenulum from the underside of the glans.
>Its introduction has a bizarre history. The rabbinate sought to put an end to the practice of youths desiring to appear uncircumcised by stretching the remainding foreskin for social economic benefits and for sports competitions. By introducing the painful and debilitating "Periah" they would obliterate the foreskin completely such that proper circumcised Jew could not disguise "the seal of the covenant". From this point in Jewish history, the male's glans is directly affected by the circumcision procedure, and the denuded glans and traumatized infant will heal with considerable nerve damage and loss of sensitivity.

>>134296080

Oh, look, it's Brian "Circumsexual Pride" Morris again.

>>134296379
Look at the face of the bastard. This evil spawn must be lynched.

>>134290857
if I will have ever have a male child I'd let his foreskin stay since you can allways circumsize whenever you want if you dislike it later

File: 1357173412070.jpg (267KB, 1008x780px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 1008x780px

Spread the word

>>134297480

This is how it should be, always. Traumatizing your kid and letting jewish doctors fuck up his member and causing severe self-esteem problems in adolescence is fucking retarded and barbaric. I will murder any jew in sight before they even get close to my baby boy.

i cicumsized my sons so they will be clean and healthy and attracted to women.
why anyone would listen to memeflags and europoors is beyond my comprehension.

File: IMG_2016.jpg (166KB, 800x869px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 800x869px

>>134299876

Kill yourself jew

>>134300233
>less than 5.3 million
seems legit

>another 6M
Kek

File: 1350842662001.jpg (597KB, 1165x3348px) Image search: [Google]

597KB, 1165x3348px

>>134300233
Too bad jews are mongrels and don't need to keep themselves pure. That's why there exist ashkenazim who bred with europeans, also other types. You can't keep dirt pure, by breeding out they are just plaguing genepool with garbage.

>>134290732
FUCKING JEWS

>stay mad stinky frenchies and europoors
This is actually given out on little cards with numbers in u.s. Hospitals.
(I work at one, its shit)
Stop feeling upset at other dudes dicks
http://m.kidshealth.org/en/parents/circumcision.html?WT.ac=

>>134304216

>Boys are born with a hood of skin, called the foreskin, covering the head (also called the glans) of the penis.

It's not a "hood of skin". Most of it isn't even made of skin; the outer part is skin, the middle part is muscle, the inner part is mucosa, and the transition from inner to outer area is highly specialized mucocutaneous tissue.

Fucking liars.

>>134304216
Pain and all that is bullshit. Try crawling out of vag. no cutfag wimpers or complains. Its only foreskin flappers trying to make everyone just like them. Itll be a never ending war if yall keep giving a fuck. Also inb4 404

>>134304216
>>134304374

Also, no mention of how removing it got popular to punish boys who were caught masturbating.

No mention of its erotogenic function or the fact that it is proven to be the most sensitive part of the penis and histological analysis has shown that it is far more specialized sensory tissue than the glans.

this is medical fraud and the administrators of the hospital you work for should be ashamed.

File: 1500438438546.png (188KB, 452x576px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 452x576px

>>134304374
We got a .phd over here! Go ahead and email whatever doctors you need to. I mean who would spill these NASTY LIES?!

>>134304634

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1034.x/abstract

BTFO.

File: 1498855342600.jpg (26KB, 506x960px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 506x960px

>>134304459
>torture
>looks great and doctors recommend it
Ahahahahahaha
i guess you just have to kill yourself.

>>134304885
Yeah nice link. Thats exactly where doctors send the expecting mommies to learn about their soon to be newborn. Maybe you should just stand outside hospitals with a sign and some links and try and stop this comfortable, educated plague of evil.

>>134305271

Why do you care so much about what other peoples' dicks look like, to the extent that you'll support forcing your preferences onto people before they can choose for themselves?

Isn't this really about the fact that if you really took an objective look at your own circumcision and even considered the fact that maybe it would have been better if you'd been left intact, it would psychologically destroy you, so you have to keep running from it?

>>134305411

The doctors could simply say that the foreskin is a highly specialized sensory structure. That would be simple to understand, and it would be true.

Calling it a hood of skin is a lie.

File: 1492822809539s.jpg (3KB, 125x121px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 125x121px

>>134290732
>>134290857
>>134291184
>>134299098
>>134301412

>>134305461
>forcing your preferences
>on people
They are your kids! But then again thats how you became the gender queer snowflake you are today! If you read the article its all up to the parents, and the reason is to look like members in the family.

>>134305939

>They are your kids!

So cutting your daughter's prepuce off is fine?

>Nooo, thaaatt'ssss differrreennnttttt

Every. Time.

File: 1500240642404.jpg (75KB, 604x603px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 604x603px

>>134305547
You are wayyy to attached too your foreskin (even though most people call it a hood cause it looks like one) You know i have mine re attachable with magnets just in case i get sad and want to play with it while i work at my desk

File: 1499916205949.jpg (47KB, 458x438px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 458x438px

>>134299876

File: J392E.png (299KB, 880x778px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 880x778px

>>134305939
>>134306101

Related.

In cultures that cut off the clitoral hood (yeah, they exist--the western narrative that FGM always involves cutting off the glans clitoris and sewing up the vagina is a lie to sweep the discussion of male circumcision under the rug) women who want their foreskins back are made fun of, considered "crazy" ---

>"it's just a flap of skin"

>"muh traditions"

>"muh hygiene"

tfw their no better than the sand niggers with the genital mutilation

File: Sorrells-et.-al_Sensitivity_Study.jpg (88KB, 960x496px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 960x496px

>>134292908
aka circumfetishists. They're psychopathic pedophiles.

Circumcision trauma is real. It encodes in the brain. I suspect most circumfetishists were mutilated themselves.

>>134306132

Shaming tactics. come back with an argument.

>inb4 you bring back bullshit from Brian Morris

>>134290732
>starting your life with a kike blood ritual

every

last

one

needs

to

hang

or

burn

>>134290732
There's no benefit to keeping your foreskin

>>134306378

The foreskin is the primary sensory structure of the penis.

>>134306101
Ahahahaha
>uhm.. I know i was expecting a boy, but i got a girl. So me and my wife(yeah right) agreed to cut her labia
>doctor
We dont do this... No one does this... Get out.

File: 6764764.png (284KB, 479x483px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 479x483px

>>134306632

>no one does this

Actually millions of people do. But it's currently considered illegal in the US and some doctors who did it are getting prosecuted, even though there is ZERO evidence that what they did to those girls is any more damaging than what is done to boys every day and is somehow considered legal.

http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2017/06/female_genital_circumcision_ex.html

You can't look at this issue objectively, and your posts demonstrate this. Something is blocking you.

>>134306632
>>134306853

Also you changed the subject.

It was "they are your kids!"

This implies cutting off parts of a kid's genitals is okay, as long as it's your kid.

The counter example was, "so what about cutting a girl?"

Now you're segueing into something else "it's okay if a doctor approves it"

But now that I showed you that actually some doctors do approve it, it's going to segue into yet another thing.

And on, and on, and on, because you won't actually debate this honestly, in good faith.

>>134306463
Wrongo

>>134306853
Male circumcision isnt as harmful as female circumcision and the basis for my argument is the amount of cutfags who will argue that their female approved penis is better thsn you "trunk dicks"

the fuck is a foreskin?

>>134307031
>reddit spacing
Just swap to the kekistani flag as well

File: Rhesus-Monkey-&-Human-Penis.gif (19KB, 546x397px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 546x397px

>>134293074
From that MRI study it said that the limbic system, frontol and temporal lobes were most affected.

If you search online you can find the studies linking MGM to learning, emotional, and behavioural problems such as: Alexithymia, Autism/Aspergers, ADD/ADHD, Hyperkenetic disorder, Phobias, and of course PTSD.

>>134307106
A vestigial part of the body. Your people taught us how to remove the unneeded skin

File: image.jpg (85KB, 800x522px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 800x522px

>>134307174

>>134307225
well g-d told us to

>>134307099

>Male circumcision isnt as harmful as female circumcision

Removal of the male prepuce is much worse than removal of the female prepuce.

The male prepuce is 15 square inches of erogenous tissue. The female prepuce is the size of a pea.

You mistakenly think there are no cultures that remove the female prepuce but don't remove the clit.

>>134290732
Why must Jews always involve ritualistic mutilation and sacrifice in all their practices? Truly vile people, Luciferian if you will.

>>134307075

You think it's the glans, right?

You're dead wrong about that.

File: feminists on circumcision.png (43KB, 884x578px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 884x578px

>>134293074
Dunno, but the nation that brought us circumcision also brought us BLACKED and pretty much every other form of cuckoldry and degeneracy. It is also curious how feminists will defend it to the last.

>>134307349
>reddit spacing
>muh sexytimes zones
Foreskin isnt neccessary to create a child. You trunk dicks only ever have one argument and thats "muh good feews"

>>134307225

If the human foreskin is vestigial, why is it so much more specialized than the foreskin of other primates?

Other primates have their specialized nerve endings in the glans. Yet humans have virtually no specialized nerve endings in the glans, and almost all of them in the foreskin.

>The results of this study demonstrate that the human prepuce is not "vestigial" but is, in fact, an evolutionary advancement over the prepuce of other primates. This is most clearly seen in the evolutionary increase in corpuscular innervation of the human prepuce and the concomitant decrease in corpuscular receptors of the human glans relative to the innervation of the prepuce and glans of lower primates.

http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/cold-mcgrath/

>>134307476
HIS BODY
HER CHOICE
Reminder that women have final say in circumciosion because they know their sons future gf doesnt want to get a faceful of dick cheese

>>134290732
Soon I pray they will have whats coming to them I hope they get hanged.

>>134307557

Shaming tactics.

Pro-child-mutilators have nothing else.

File: image.jpg (41KB, 540x360px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 540x360px

>>134307749
>wanting kids to grow up with freak penises

>>134307879

Thanks for continuing to prove my point.

>>134307701
>caring about what women want
Gay

>>134307596
Evolved for literally "muh good feels"
If any other species had sex for reasons other than procreation for millennia, I imagine they would have similar evolutions

>>134308009
Tell me more about how you're MGTOW, fag

>>134307401
Glans has more nerve endings. This is anatomical fact (Especially around the coronal glans). All you have in disagreement is a few anecdotal studies. (hot opinions).

The foreskin is important for sexual intercorse, but overstating it's function hurts your credibility.

>>134308038

So you're admitting it isn't vestigial and that you're wrong.

>>134308087
>important for sex
Then how are all these cutfags surviving.
Problycuz its not that important

>>134307879
>the non surgically altered penis is the freaky one
nice one

File: A_Foreskin_Retraction_Series.jpg (84KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1024x768px

>>134305271
>looks great
Being this delusional... Enjoy being branded like cattle because the Torah commands cutting the slaves.

File: MGM Timeline Summary.png (59KB, 966x576px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 966x576px

>>134308087
The frenulum followed by the ridged-bands have the most nerve-endings. The coronal ridge comes in third.
http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/taylor/

>>134308087

>Glans has more nerve endings

Nope. Almost all the nerve endings in the male glans are unspecialized nocioceptive free nerve endings. The glans has virtually no fine touch sensitivity and very few specialized nerve endings.

Objective histological evidence clearly shows that it is the foreskin that has the more specialized pattern of innervation. The male human glans is protopathic. In addition, touch test studies on living subjects show that the glans has the lowest fine touch sensitivity of any part of the penis.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3697758

>The abundance of FNEs in isolated as well as corpuscular form can be correlated with the embryogenesis and known neurophysiologic and psychophysical parameters of sensory function of the glans penis. Finally, the divergence in reported values for the threshold of tactile and painful stimuli when applied to glabrous skin of fingertip and glans penis can be considered as an example of dissociated sensibility. The anatomical basis for this dissociation is the abundance of FNEs and absence of Merkel terminals and typical Meissner corpuscles in the covering of the glans, and the converse in glabrous skin of the digit.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1034.x/abstract

More citations will continue.

>>134307596
>Yet humans have virtually no specialized nerve endings in the glans

This is 100% medically false. The glans is rife with not only free nerve endings, but absolutely unique corpuscular receptors.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0006899386903574?via%3Dihub

>>134308300
That looks fucking disgusting. Steve jobs turtleneck penis

File: IMG_4014.jpg (40KB, 512x409px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 512x409px

>>134291334
>tfw my foreskin had sex before I did

>>134308087
>>134308356

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1034.x/abstract

>The glans penis is primarily innervated by free nerve endings and has primarily protopathic sensitivity [43]. Protopathic sensitivity refers to cruder, poorly localized feelings (including pain, some temperature sensations and certain perceptions of mechanical contact) [44]. In the glans penis, encapsulated end-organs are sparse, and found mainly along the glans corona and the frenulum [43]. The only portion of the body with less fine-touch discrimination than the glans penis is the heel of the foot [45]. In contrast, the male prepuce ridged band (Fig. 7) at the mucocutaneous junction has a high concentration of encapsulated receptors [46]. The innervation difference between the protopathic sensitivity of the glans penis and the corpuscular receptor-rich ridged band of the prepuce is part of the normal complement of penile erogenous tissue.

None of this is "anecdotal"--it's based on objective histological dissection and study of the human penis.

The idea that the glans is the most specialized sensory tissue of the penis, the most sensitive part, etc., etc. is nothing more than a folk theory. The human male glans is a protopathic structure almost entirely innervated with free nerve endings. It is one of the least sensitive parts of the human body to all stimuli except coarse and irritating ones (as FNEs primarily serve to detect noxious stimuli).

File: image.jpg (31KB, 236x296px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 236x296px

>>134308549
>put on someones face
>sex
>sodomy is sex
You have renewed my faith in being a faggot

>>134308300
disgusting penis

File: sorrells 2007.jpg (308KB, 2108x2255px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 2108x2255px

>>134308437

I linked you to Halata and Munger's study already.

They say right in the top, the glans is PROTOPATHIC.

You didn't even read the study.

>The unique corpuscular receptor of the glans penis consists of axon terminals that at an ultrastructural level resemble a tangled skein of FNEs.

...

>The abundance of FNEs in isolated as well as corpuscular form can be correlated with the embryogenesis and known neurophysiologic and psychophysical parameters of sensory function of the glans penis. Finally, the divergence in reported values for the threshold of tactile and painful stimuli when applied to glabrous skin of fingertip and glans penis can be considered as an example of dissociated sensibility.

They went so far as to refer to the corpuscular receptors of the glans as "free nerve endings in corpuscular form".

File: image.jpg (339KB, 1687x890px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 1687x890px

the pnly people who like uncut cocks are homosexuals. If you are against circumcision, then you are a homosexual
Pic related, faggots

>tfw circumcision in my country is almost non existent
>tfw jewish doctor tricks my parents into mutilating me anyway because muh higiene
>tfw I think everyone's dick is supposed to be like this til im 15 years old

I'm never doing this to my children, I'm so fucking pissed

>>134308356
Merkles are great for fine touch (or stuff like hair or nasal cavitys) ,but the majority of sexual interaction does not involve anatomically fine nerve sensory engagement.

The glans has a 10:1 ratio for FNEs to the entirely unique genital

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00669.x/abstract;jsessionid=DD2FE9E5F14EF0EABC70F524A58F5E8A.f03t04

Foreskin is great for arousal and foreplay, along with being almost needed for lubrication, but is unnecessary for organism and indeed without genital corpuscles, based on female studies involving the nerve, orgasim is much more difficult.

>>134309043
>upset over having a superior penis
Faggot

>>134309282
I can feel your yankness

>>134308854
The issue at hand is sex, not fine touch. Anatomically speaking sex involves course, PROTOPATHIC, action. I am well aware what the munger's study says, they are very clear.

>The abundance of FNEs in isolated as well as corpuscular form can be correlated with the embryogenesis and known neurophysiologic and psychophysical parameters of sensory function of the glans penis

>of sensory function of the glans penis

It's not hard man.

File: image.jpg (42KB, 638x490px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 638x490px

>>134309465
>feel your yankness
That's strange
Because I'm actually
A
FUCKING
LEAF

>>134309143

>Merkles are great for fine touch (or stuff like hair or nasal cavitys) ,but the majority of sexual interaction does not involve anatomically fine nerve sensory engagement.

The corpuscular nerve endings of the foreskin are likely specialized to respond to stretch as well as fine touch, and normal sexual intercourse does involve a great deal of stretching of the foreskin.

>The glans has a 10:1 ratio for FNEs to the entirely unique genital

The corpuscular receptor of the glans penis is essentially a tangled skein of free nerve endings. There's no evidence that it's works much differently than free nerve endings in their normal form.

>Foreskin is great for arousal and foreplay, along with being almost needed for lubrication, but is unnecessary for organism

The glans is also unnecessary for orgasm. Tons of men can have orgasms just from stimulating their foreskins. I would venture more could orgasm from foreskin stimulation alone than glans stimulation alone. The foreskin is a massive amount of tissue compared to the glans, it has a far more specialized pattern of innervation, and half the people don't even realize that the frenulum is part of the foreskin (and a ton of guys will tell you that the frenulum feels better than the glans to play with)

>based on female studies involving the nerve

Studies on females aren't equatable to those of males. Females and males have different patterns of innervation in their genitalia.

>>134309143
>The lateral arcading branches of the DNP provide a sensory pathway on the ventral and lateral penile shaft, and the termination of the fibres at the corpus spongiosum is consistent with pudendal innervation of the penile urethra. The distinct pattern of innervation of the glans emphasizes the role of the glans as a sensory structure

I forgot this exert

>>134309478

>Anatomically speaking sex involves course, PROTOPATHIC, action.

Circumcised sex, maybe.

Intact sex involves a great deal of stretching of the foreskin. Protopathic sensation is not erogenous; it feels like shit if you're flaccid and almost nothing if you're erect.

Try just rubbing your glans, without touching your frenulum, or your circumcision scar. Notice how the glans basically has no underside, so if you're rubbing "the underside of your glans", you're probably actually stimulating your frenulum or what's left of it.

The glans feels like basically nothing, anon. It is a hotbed of pain sensors.

You have been taken in by baseless folk theories.

>>134309564
Yeah m8, that really brightens your situation. Have fun with your dry dicks.

>>134309662

They just say that, but offer no evidence. The pattern of innervation of the glans is essentially FNEs and FNEs in corpuscular form. That may be more distinct than just regular FNEs, but FNEs as corpuscles or FNEs as regular FNEs are still nocioceptors in essence.

The glans also becomes significantly less sensitive when a guy gets erect. Why would that be the case, if it were supposed to be the primary sensory structure of the penis during intercourse?

>>134309744

Basically nothing good, I mean. It can feel itchy, like sandpaper, if you rub it while you're flaccid.

>>134309605
>There's no evidence that it's works much differently than free nerve endings in their normal form.

OK, you never go full retard

>Observations that penile sexual sensation is higher post circumcision are consistent with greater access of genital corpuscles to sexual stimuli after removal of the prepuce.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498824/

That's like saying the clit works no different than FNEs in the finger.

>The glans is also unnecessary for orgasm

Technically you do not need to physically touch the penis at all for organism. That's not the point. The genital corpuscles, along with the glans, is the primary sexual sensory part of the penis structure.

>>134309787
Im uncut :c

>>134309744
>or your circumcision scar.
That would be impossible in my case, I would go further but...

>>134309934
>They just say that, but offer no evidence.
A shame, I thought I was conversing with an reasonable mind.

Good day sir.

>>134310138

Oh, what a surprise, Brian Morris yet again, this time with his buddy James Badg--I mean Guy Cox.

He's a hack, anon. You are taking the word of nutters deeply involved with the circumsexual subculture.

>>134310317

Not an argument. The pattern of innervation of the glans is FNEs in common form and FNEs in corpuscular form.

FNEs are primarily for detecting noxious stimuli. This is well-established.

>>134310252
A-Anon, why..

>>134307701
>dick cheese
I thought you people were hygienic? I'm uncut and haven't had smegma in a long time. And I can lost forever in bed. Why do cutfags want to bring us all down to their level?

>>134307340
It is debatable whether the current form of circumcision was commanded in the Torah: >>134295953

>>134307476
>Husband is on board

Great, so when is his appointment with the good Rabbi Doctor Shekelstein to have his foreskin removed?

yo burger bros I dare you to tell women your circumsion has fucked you up mentally and actually recieve empathy and respect in return.

TRAPT FAGGOTS

>>134309564
no wonder you're such a flaming homosexual

>>134310998
Women have no empathy, even for their own children. This issue highlights it perfectly

>>134310579
>not an argument

Let me clarify then, you just responded to a published article in a peer reviewed journal by stating "they just say that, they offer no evidence".

That, my friend, is an conversation terminator. It shows you are here not for conversation, but to push a viewpoint, due to unwillingness to accept new, contradictory information. Until you step past this, we cannot go on.

Hence, why I said and will continue to say good day sir.

File: images.png (8KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 225x225px

>>134310601
>>134310601
Fucking leaf behind every shitpost

>>134310138

>That's like saying the clit works no different than FNEs in the finger.

The finger is highly innervated with specialized sensory end organs, not just FNEs, and the clitoral glans has a much more specialized pattern of innervation than the glans penis, but interestingly, during sexual intercourse, stimulation of the clitoral glans is limited. The penis doesn't do that much with it.

And yet no one uses this as an argument that the clitoris is not the primary sensory structure of the vulva. Interesting.

File: wojak.jpg (68KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 633x758px

FUCKING JEWS I WANT MY FORESKIN BACK

File: IMG_1057.png (3MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2048x1536px

lol

>>134311114

>Let me clarify then, you just responded to a published article in a peer reviewed journal by stating "they just say that, they offer no evidence".

>That, my friend, is an conversation terminator.

It really shouldn't be. Peer-reviewed articles contradict each other left and right. Just because a study passed peer review doesn't mean it can't be criticized.

>We need to adjust our expectations about what peer review does. Right now, many people think peer review means, “This paper is great and trustworthy!” In reality, it should mean something like, “A few scientists have looked at this paper and didn’t find anything wrong with it, but that doesn’t mean you should take it as gospel. Only time will tell.”

https://www.vox.com/2015/12/7/9865086/peer-review-science-problems

Do a little research on all the bullshit "peer reviewed" studies that have come out over the years, been subsequently debunked, and so on and so forth.

Brian Morris is a great target for this. His papers are bullshit and have been debunked repeatedly yet he still keeps churning along.

>>134311595
Archive the clickbaiters
https://archive.is/iDQsd

>>134311621
I found you, Archive Nord.

File: 334535.gif (2MB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x360px

>>134311408
Thanks for your soul goyim

File: 1499996871934.png (167KB, 833x795px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 833x795px

>>134310998
They wouldn't give a flying fuck who gives a shit bout men amiright? they destroy nations.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNLNzoogBKU

>>134311595
>goes into a diatribe about the inherent shortcomings about the peer review process, in turn misses the entire point.

I'm just about to close the tab, my friend. If you can't accept contradictory evidence we are truly done here. If you simply did not understand the point; I'm sorry I don't have the effort to explain further. Thats my job, you see, and this is my freetime. You understand, hopefully.

File: 1489947559076.jpg (1MB, 2067x993px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2067x993px

Being cut is probably the only thing in my life that haunts the fuck out of me regularly.

The older I get, the more painful erections are and I can't stand the feeling of having zipper ends or rough sheets against the end of my dick and feeling no pain besides feeling dry. I already know that i'm probably going to suffer ED around my early 40's, which is more than likely going to bring me to kill myself and there is nothing I can do about it.

"Restoring" is a meme and inherently useless in my opinion. You aren't regrowing anything, you are just stretching slack skin over the glans, you have no natural retraction and whatever was cut off at birth is gone forever.

That being said, one of the first dudes on a bodybuilding forum who bought a TLC Tugger to "restore" himself explained how when he had worn the TLC for only a week and took it off one day he went out jogging and began to tear up from the sheer physical pain of having his glans get beat around under clothing now that it had started to regain some sensitivity. Let that sink in.

To any intact anons reading this, pull back your foreskin well behind your glans and use tape to keep it there - i.e., allow your glans to be uncovered at all times and see how long you can last with that.

tl;dr, Circumicision is demonic and one of the oldest forms of torture, punishment, and slave marking that still exists. If you truly want to be redpilled on feminism, ZOG and Sharia, you will research the history, institutionalization, and (billion-dollar) business of circumicision.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZTS6iVpSPI

File: 1481198048108.jpg (145KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1080x1080px

>>134301412
Jews are just a tool, an instrument in (((their))) hands, mein froind. Like a hammer. Just robots.
It is silly to hate robots.

>>134312330

Yang and Bradley made the claim that the pattern of innervation of the glans emphasizes its role as a sensory structure. But the glans is almost entirely innervated with FNEs (in free or corpuscular form), which serve to detect potentially noxious stimuli at high sensory thresholds.

Halata and Munger, and many authors before them, noted that the glans is protopathic.

Protopathic means that the organ in question has a low order of sensibility, only able to experience coarse stimuli at high threshold.

Yang and Bradley did not explain WHY the fact that an organ is primarily innervated with high-threshold, unspecialized nerve endings "emphasizes its role as a sensory structure". They simply made the claim.

Parts of the body commonly reckoned as specialized sensory structures are those that are innervated with specialized nerve endings. The glans is protopathic and deficient in specialized nerve endings; the corpuscles of the glans are essentially FNEs, and as been stated repeatedly (in "peer reviewed" studies, no less) is that the glans is protopathic. That is the OPPOSITE of a specialized sensory structure.

Yang and Bradley are mistaken. Their contention is that a pattern of innervation that gives a basis for the organ to have a lower order of sensibility somehow emphasizes its role as a sensory structure. That's doublethink.

>>134290732
they drink the circumsided blood of the babys to stay young and lively, i dont believe this that the fucking chosen race is on charge of spreading the relegion and everything i hate this world

File: 1498907490215.png (575KB, 735x490px) Image search: [Google]

575KB, 735x490px

>>134290732
>kikes in charge of sucking bloody baby dick and getting herpes

Lol maybe its not as bad as some say but that does not change the fact that it is un-natural. How could anyone think it actually improves anything to alter your fully functional normal body? its pretty arrogant to think that you would have superior knowledge compared with millions of years of natural evolution..

File: 1499721723417.png (9KB, 341x357px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 341x357px

>>134305271

>It should be legal to get cosmetic surgery done on your newborn infant.

File: 1490792650772.gif (2MB, 300x233px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x233px

>>134310252
Why are you trolling btw? this is not a laughing matter, I've had some tight & painful erections & my dick is bent to the side due to tightness & I will live knowing this is permanent can never be reversed forever & if I talk out I'd be ridiculed/shamed by society because Dr shekelberg said so & its normalized this is immoral, barbaric archaic tradition needs to stop.

File: 1491266130707.jpg (8KB, 250x209px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 250x209px

>tfw uncircumcised American

>>134309564
lol its like people in your country have ZERO self awareness...

>>134313023
>Confusing nerve endings with nerve fascicle, missing the entire point of the Yang/Bradley study.

Well, that's that then. Again, I do this every day, so I would rather not in my personal time. Enjoy your last you.

File: Untitled 1.jpg (20KB, 259x385px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 259x385px

>>134308300
This is as far as I can pull back my foreskin. Do I have phimosis? Im still a virging, would it hurt to have sex?

>>134313242
It's worse than that. They suck on the wound for a hit of adrenochrome. It's utterly deplorable.

>>134313872
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2112829-blood-from-human-teens-rejuvenates-body-and-brains-of-old-mice/

>>134306378
It will prevent your head getting chopped off in the future, you don't care about your body anyway.

File: 1493066127068.jpg (62KB, 500x469px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 500x469px

>>134313747
your dick's fine bro if it was halfway & you couldnt pull it back it's phimosis

>>134313693

The fact that the glans is innervated by the dorsal nerve of the penis doesn't prove it's a specialized sensory structure.

Hell, the foreskin is also innervated by the dorsal nerve. So if the argument is that the glans is more sensual than the foreskin because it's innervated by the dorsal nerve, the argument is broken.

File: Worry.png (87KB, 688x448px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 688x448px

>>134292908
>Ever heard of the "circumsexual" sucbculture?

I haven't, and I'm afraid to go down that road by watching that video or doing some research on it.

I already took too many red pills, I don't know if I can take another.

>>134300233
>6 million Jews
this number is like their fucking mantra

File: endit.jpg (45KB, 345x799px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 345x799px

>tfw my foreskin got jewed away from me at birth because my parents fell for some kike propoganda

>>134312420
stay strong anon. and at least feel better that more people are waking up. and its getting better. we know its fucked up bro.

>>134314626
your parents just wanted what was best for you, my mom was so close to crumbling under the pressure the doctors were putting on her to get me circumcised.

File: 1492039006243.jpg (483KB, 1511x1000px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 1511x1000px

>>134290732
>>134290732
>>134290732
>>134290732
>>134290732

>>134293428

Is it due to pain/trauma from lack of anesthesia? Or from actual dick skin being removed.

Also, if an earlobe was cut off w/no anesthesia would the results be the same?


Lazy BioChemist faggot here, so I tend to be skeptical at first glance until I go full autist on not just the original study, but the sauce as well.

>>134306132


But how exactly do magnets work?

>>134314860
>wanted what was best for me
well if only they would have actually looked into the shit and not just listen to some kike doctor before deciding to mutilate my dick.
i cant even fap, i barely get any feeling from it when i try, its just a complete waste of time for me. because of that i have litterally no sex drive.
but how long do you think it will be before foregen will actually work? i hope im not fucking 60 years old before they actually get that shit working.

>>134290732

foreskins are fucking ugly, as a woman i'd never sleep with a guy that has a foreskin, i really don't think i could deal with the dick cheese.

>>134313658
Leafs are emotionally-retarded children. It's no cohencidence that a lot of the male population is mutilated.

>>134314988
It's the agonizing pain and terror. A lot of them go into neurogenic shock, some even have seizures.

>>134315482

Try rubbing your glans. You'll probably notice it feels either like basically nothing, or kind of like sandpaper rubbing against skin. Am I right?

>>134316184
it feels like nothing unless i do it with alot of force then it feels like sandpaper against skin

>>134291392
MOIST

>>134290732
White Anglo here
I'm glad they cut off my foreskin
I don't want my dick to look like a baby mole

>>134315482
this type of information was not around when you were born,

information age


please its not their fault, and if your dad is not circumcised i would blame them less

>>134316397

Yep. The glans is protopathic. It has a very low order of sensibility and the nerve endings in it are crude ones that primarily serve to transmit irritating feelings in response to coarse stimuli.

The primary sensory structure of the penis is the foreskin, as I've been arguing this entire thread. But people are too attached to their bullshit folk theories.

If you look here, you can see how this guy can derive sexual pleasure and mutliple orgasms from stimulating his foreskin, without even touching the glans.

http://www.can-fap.net/preview/fundraiser_preview_multipleforegasm.shtml

>>134315835
Thanks shill you really blended in with that comment.