Claim your economics master.

I claim Hayek. The freer the market the freer the people.

>>134288452
Well, there is a point at which more freedom isn't better.
Like, I don't want to see 90% of parks disappear, and the rest get an entrance fee. Or buildings not having to construct a parking, thus hiking up parking tickets.
So the freer (to a point) the market, the better. Now where that point sits is up to some debate.

But I definitely think the long term is important, and I'd be willing to suffer in my generation, so that future generations will be more secure if thats what it takes to fix it.
I want the human project to work out more than I want my own life to work out.

First person to invent time travel should put at least entire 30 round 7.62 mag into Keynes' fucking skull just to be sure.
I did econ at uni and they fucking SHILLED for that cunt.

File: IMG_20170710_WA0002.jpg (84KB, 1080x1346px)

84KB, 1080x1346px

Keynes has been proven correct some times in history / or have been successfully applied.
Though, I dont think that bail outs are good.

Pro spending (to some degree)
Pro government stimulus (")
Contra bail out (fully)

>>134288767
I agree with you. It is only freer to a point. There should be some regulations by the state but very few and it's only to make the people freer.

>>134288184
>people are rational

ok I believe the opposite of that

>>134288826
You can't base your global economy on the sole basis of constant growth and endless resources you twat, he is the fucking reason you get a global crash every ten years and jews net the profit.
Quite literally every time a middle class white man was shafted is thanks to Keynes' retarded policies.

Keynes is shit

Putting Keynesianism and Austrianism on the same level is bulshit, Austrianism acceptance is very narrow. Keynesianism vs Neoliberalism/Monetarism is a much more relevant discussion.

File: 1379011991881.gif (2MB, 319x250px)

2MB, 319x250px

>>134288184
Hayek
>Like "high explosives"

>>134289439
Austrian is fashionable on /pol/, and this is a thread on /pol/. Such discussion can be had here.
If I were making such a thread on a business forum, I'd adjust accordingly.

What are the other economics trains of thought? surely there has to be one that has combined the positive aspects of both?

File: 50ed275b0e562422355e459aba528deb.gif (582KB, 623x389px)

582KB, 623x389px

>>134288184
Korwin Mikke

>>134289663
They are opposites, you can't combine opposites.
You can take turns between them, and this is called a mixed economy. Also known as Keynsian economy, since that tends to overpower.

Its like the ridiculous one drop of black blood rule, one drop of Kaynes is enough to dirty the pure Hayek waters for most.

>>134288184
Both were wrong

>>134289618
if you are retarded in australia, you are retarded in siberia

>>134289818
Isn't he pro-austrian?

https://youtu.be/GTQnarzmTOc?t=5m37s
hayek dropping absolute fire nigger

>>134290367
yes

Friedrich List
Gottfried Feder

>people are rational
This is objectively wrong

File: ok.jpg (9KB, 265x190px)

9KB, 265x190px

>>134288184
>keynesianism

>>134288956 >>134291947
I think the important thing to know is that some are. Men in general are more logical. Did you know women spend 80% of money in US? Consumers are chaotic, while rich/entrepreneurs are rational.

>>134292425
Logical != rational
Humans are emotional creatures, women moreso than men. The frontal cortex drives the shortbus of a brain but it's still the shortbus

So how about instead of saying ">keynes" or ">rational" you'd actually post some fucking arguments and discuss with each other, you fucking niggers?

>>134288184

>using one ideology as absolute

yeah no, that's exactly why we are never making any progress

>>134292563
No, women are emotional, men are rational. Sure, there's also herd mentality and feelings affecting everyone, but men can shove them away to decide using logic.

File: IMG_7605.jpg (27KB, 480x540px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 480x540px

>>134293437
You fail to address the original point:
Logical != rational

>>134288184
I am with Hayek, but agree that people have chaotic animal spirit...
...which is why the government should not be too powerful