circumcision as entry redpill?

you really gonna risk it all talking about hypothetical baby dick?

>>134285476
You can also throw in other redpills about (((them))) like how half of them are in the 1% and how the Soviets were very Jewish.

>>134285613
Women take hypothetical shit very seriously.

File: jewish_genital_mutilation.jpg (540KB, 1008x1580px) Image search: [Google]

540KB, 1008x1580px

>>134285476

>>134285613
what risk are you referring to? she is all in on getting married and having kids with me, it is much riskier not to be open about ideas with someone that will become so important. the risk to me is not commnicating and getting on the same page on whatever we can , such as realizing scams and pressure put on nearly every couple so we can protect our family and lead in the proper direction

>>134285860
>doesn't change after a month
>"must be permanent then"

>>134285476
You could also say no to circumcision because he's your own son and I assume you would love him.

>>134285476
either way it doesn't really matter.

people cut the outer skin off back in the dumb ages because you would bath once a month if lucky.

Dicks use to get rank and it was safer to get cut then risk some cyst or dick infection costing you your entire dick.

At some point that practice got mixed in with culture and religion.

And there's also potential health consequences even today to leave it on. Like having to stretch your kids dick skin.

>>134285476
how about telling her that genital mutilation is a practice of barbaric cultures and let her ask followup questions on why the jews are barbarians

>>134285476
stop being an edgy rebellious faggot
honor your father and your ancestors as well as tradition and get your son circumcised
I'm going to just for tradition's sake plus women across the globe prefer it's aesthetics (due to American porn being everywhere)
do you REALLY want your son to have a dog penis?

Tell her you don't like when parents perform non-medical modifications on their children, whether it is piercings or tattoos or circumcision. Tell her that you believe consent is important regardless of circumstances. If your hypothetical son wants to modify his body he can do it when he's 18 years old and after he's researched everything on the issue.

>>134286245
you're a retarded kike lmao

>>134285476
i don't want to make you feel bad about your penis, but any research would tell you its not worth it.

>smegma!
hopefully your child is intelligent enough to wash if he or his partner thinks he has a smelly dick
>lower HIV transmission!
hopefully your son is not raping and fucking with stds in subsaharan africa
you need access to bloodstream, so must be microtears or sores - tight foreskin raping a dry pussy? syphilis sores? (thats how they think it got around in leopoldville in congo, all the prostitutes had it... or no one wants to admit it was all the bumsex because that is the main way to transfer it, receiving anal because it would cause tears in the mucosa of the rectum)

I dont really have a redpills other than, the whole ramble about consenting and choosing what to do with your own body. But let me give you some insights.

I started dating a canadian girl and at first she didnt realise what was "wrong" with my dick. It came clear to her later that im uncut beacuse and she never had seen one.

After dating 2 years she has completely changed he mind on cutting to her it was "normal and everyone does it" but after being with a normal dick she says shes likes it better uncut.

>>134285971
yes merchant
the levels of neuroplasticity and neuromotricity exhibited by an infant's brain are more than sufficient to repair or evolve past any developmental disturbance within a month
it's actually a pretty known fact in neurology that if it's there after a month it's there forever
now go get your shekels for this post, you've failed miserably

>>134286079
I had phimosis as a kid. It doesn't take long to treat yourself and circumcision should only be seen as a medical necessity in the most extreme of cases.
If you don't teach your son(s) to pull the skin back when they pee, you are a failure of a father.

>>134286245
You truly are our greatest ally merchant, go hang at the end of a rope kike.

File: 342.png (9KB, 235x236px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 235x236px

>>134286245

File: old jewish man blows an infant.jpg (53KB, 565x375px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 565x375px

>>134285476
why not just show her pics of this

>>134286079
except ancient cultures like Egypt, China, Japan Rome, Greece, Jews etc all bathed commonly only did some places like medieval europe and modern India did they rarely bathe
and I'm pretty sure the Israelites invented circumcision

>>134285476
Just start by stating the obvious. That chopping a boy's penis without consent is unethical.

>>134285613
Cuck.

>>134286438
Every single woman I've had sex with was born and raised in Canada and I've never had a single complaint about my foreskin, nor the cleanliness of it. Hell, my last GF would basically spend the entire time she had her periods giving me BJ's while I fondled her breasts.

>>134285476
You can say you don't want to with naming the Jew. Keep your boy's penis intact unless medically necessary. That's all I would say. If she pressed me I'd start dropping red pills about how they use foreskins in beauty products.

If you name the Jew she'll probably not take you seriously and secretly butcher your son anyway

>>134286079
It does matter because the benefits are negligible, there's risk of permanent serious damage and the fact the procedure is done with little/no anesthetic makes circumcision traumatic. The effects of the trauma aren't investigated for its long term effect.
If you have anything but contempt for circumcision and the blind support dick cutters get for selling off newborn biomaterial; you are too dumb for parenting.

>>134286854
>without naming the Jew
Typo

File: 1457701291232.jpg (80KB, 600x534px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 600x534px

>>134286639
disturbing

>>134286854
Do women really give a heck about smearing foreskin puree makeup on their face if it makes them look good?

File: IMG_0690.jpg (33KB, 357x412px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 357x412px

>>134286245
Yes yes good goy honor your tradition

>>134286854
Don't have children if you two can't agree you shouldn't mutilate your childrens' genitals.

>>134285476
>what other info should i throw in?
Show her the jewish ceremonies where the rabbi sucks the baby's dick after mutilating it.

>>134286033
this
>>134285476
if you really love your son you'll leave his penis be like nature intended

>>134287041
Knowing women they either don't know or don't care. It's males who are the victims, anyway

>>134285476
I mean, you know, whatever else you think will destroy your relationship with her.

>>134287073
Agreed. I have never failed to convince a gf in this hypothetical decision, however. Most default to butchering because it's just assumed to be standard procedure. Like taking wisdom teeth out.

You drop red pills about corporate thugs harvesting these foreskins for beauty products and how nerve many nerve endings are lost and how hypocritical it that FGM (even lesser forms) are so reviled and they usually come around.

If she still wants to butcher it would be a deal breaker for me.

>>134286366
>>134286553
>>134286632
>>134287066
I'm a white man that will circumcise his white son just like his father wisely did before him
glad to see you're all triggered though

File: World-Map-Circumcision-Rates-1400x500.png (51KB, 1400x500px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 1400x500px

>>134285476
Wew I was just going to make a thread about circumcision here and this is the first thing I see.
Why are USA and Australia the only civilized countries that still do this? Why is it ok to take away something natural from a child without his permission? Why is female genital mutilation banned but no one stands for males? There are no real health benefits of this procedure.
I frankly believe such a ritual should not be even legal and most only practice it for religious reasons.
Fortunately circumcision rates have been dropping in last years and it's nearly non existent in Europe or Asia.

>>134286661
>Israelites invented circumcision
It was actually Egyptians

File: 1369564240194.jpg (105KB, 358x477px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 358x477px

>>134285476
>he is cut

>>134287540
huh...
well the Egyptians were pretty clean too so my point stands that it wasn't done because they didn't bathe enough

>>134287477
>yugos
what

>>134287477
I feel like even though it says 20%-80% for Australia is would be a lot closer to 20%
Don't know anyone who has been circumcised
Never had a girl say anything to me about being uncut

File: 324165461148864.jpg (316KB, 1774x1074px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1774x1074px

>>134285476
/pol/ has opened my mind.
This is why the middle east is such a shithole. The US sends 4 billion in tax dollars to Isreal every year and for what? How does this go on even with democrats 100%....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bll1iZSth1E

How is the US the only nation to support them? How does this go on even with democrats 100%....

>>134287472
The only person that will be triggered is your son after you willingly mutilate his dick

>>134285476
basically only 70 iq niggers and americans do this, please don't hurt any more children

>>134288007
those are countries with many Muslims

>>134288109
I read it's around 50% there

>>134287472
>wisely

Your father is a good for nothing baby mutilating jew.

>>134288764
actually my father is a wise and red pilled conservative Christian man
and any good Christian man circumcises their son ofc

>>134290281
Do they even mention it in the New Testament?

>>134290281
>and any good Christian man circumcises their son ofc
wrong
only stupid americans do it

>>134286079

Pretty much everything you posted is complete bullshit.

>There is no evidence that ritual or religious circumcision first arose as a hygiene measure. Many primitive cultures carried out a variety of mutilating procedures on different parts of the body, including the genitals of both boys and girls, but the origins and rationale of these practices are obscure and contested, as are the environmental conditions prevailing when and where such customs emerged. Past societies also practised cannibalism, human sacrifice, infanticide, widow-burial, foot-binding and many other traditions not endorsed today. It is a delusion of Marxist anthropology to assume that traditional rites must have a materialist and rational explanation; modern anthropology recognises that such customs emerge from the belief structure or cosmology of the cultures which produced them and do not necessarily have practical significance

http://www.historyofcircumcision.net/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=29