How accurate is this website? Seems to me that when in doubt

File: Capture d’écran (43).png (318KB, 790x753px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 790x753px

>>134204573
It's pretty accurate...check this out

>>134204899
kek that proves my point
when it goes 'idk wtf this is' goes heavily to hispanic

>>134204573
Bullshit and varies between results drastically for the same people

File: Capture d’écran (44).png (191KB, 824x764px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 824x764px

>>134204899

>>134205764
fuck

File: 1500203912670.png (863KB, 714x802px) Image search: [Google]

863KB, 714x802px

>>134205764

File: 596f954898c85.jpg (91KB, 440x440px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 440x440px

>>134205933
Same baby , different result from a distance...
Doesn't detect negroid facial features the same way for some reason

Not that great. I tried it, and even though I know there are no hispanics in my family tree, it said I was 60% Hispanic.

It gave me 100% white on one photo & 99% on another and I'm a brown haired brown eyed Anglo .

File: b912463b1e50add56be73a6a9713bd92a54892cb.png (96KB, 440x440px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 440x440px

>>134204573

Tried several photos of, all said 100% white. (((DNA tests))) backed this up.
> mfw my pure white genes are going to waste in leafland
feels bad man

File: 596fa0d46ae55.jpg (144KB, 440x440px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 440x440px

>>134205764
i dont even know anymore what the fuck it is

>>134210808
Funny. Asians are paedomorphic relative to whites and both are paedomorphic relative to blacks. That's where k-selected traits come from. It makes sense that it would identify a baby as Asian.

>>134211030
it should identify as other as this thing is not remotely human