Men are just as mentally weak as women

What girls?

I don't know any.

>femanon here
100% sure what you posted also applies to (You)

File: 1497912687850.png (572KB, 694x550px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 694x550px

>>134193479
>femanon here

You have two options.

>>134193479
You aren't a woman, they use far more emotion in their wording, and prefer simpler words, with more social shaming.
You're not half bad at faking it though, keep up the good work. You deserve this (you)

>>134193479
Tits and time stamp or GTFO

men get shit on plenty around here.In fact we shit on men way more than women. looks like you are the only one with a fragile ego because all you saw was hate against women.

File: 05b4b44f25f4415ea8a28f4a08c8551a.png (137KB, 1920x1636px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1920x1636px

>>134193479
I've been here for a half year. nice to meet someone else like me. mostly came to get aquainted with my friends sexism, why are you here?

>>134193934
actually theres only one option. we post and you deal with it
>falling for the tits and get the fuck out meme in 2017

>>134195338
you really don't. you shit on minorities or individuals, not men as a group. there is some admission of men's probablems I'll admit, but no widespread attitudes like the ones here about women.

>>134193479
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0To8NmwJ8Mk

>>134195600
And what are some problems of men? We have well documented knowledge of how and why woman fuck up, but what about guys?

>>134193479
Psychotic violence is like a million times more satisfying than women.

>>134193479
1 post by this ID. TITS or GTFO.

SAGE

Men get so much hate here it has been simplified to 3 letters. If you are male: KYS

If you are female, just stop being a stupid slut

>>134195600
>not men as a group.

how foolish. when we aren't shitting on women the only thing left to shit on are men because there are only 2 genders. so i would say more then half of the time we are shitting on men because for the most part women are insignificant so there is not relevance in shitting on women all day long.

men's shortcomings are well documented here and the fact that you would shift that on minorities proves that you are too left for this place.

File: 1310566055019.jpg (41KB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 600x338px

>>134195780
no, you really don't. you have cherry picked documented knowledge. as for me providing evidence, I hate redpill bullshit. if you want evidence you're better off reading studies and they don't come cheap.
>http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0148405
heres just one journal. but let me go off on an aside here and explain where I am coming from.
Pol is absolutely full of stupid behavior. post after post insists we are inferior and need to be controlled, all along side history denial, assertions of greed over wanting the same thing they enjoy, (how dare anyone achieve what you get to have), complete misunderstanding of evolution and gender, climate science, and even things like political systems or what house wives actually did. Hell, many people who bragged about having a high IQ wouldnt even explain what different IQ scores they have, as though theyre either lying or too stupid to understand IQ is an aggregation of several different scores. even the redpills refuse to acknowledge the scientific counter arguements for female intelligence, your beliefs are more important than the truth.

They are rarely able to handle their own hypocracy, are unwilling and even delusional half the time when it comes to how damaging their policies on women would be for us, regardless of how it helps them as a whole. and show a general lack of willingness to confront the consiquences of their ideals and prejudices, some even chosing to state women are somehow equal because they have some kind of untouchable emotional IQ.

These aren't the actions of my superior, and I've only known one man not under the thrall of them. hes a close friend and he is sexist. If men where my betters I would expect far different behavior than I see. Instead i see only more men hating that women have something they want, and their only solution is enslave us so we give them everything, and maybe lie to ourselves about us being happy with it.

File: 1499478504765.jpg (72KB, 750x600px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 750x600px

>>134193479

>>134197601
>>134196834
>we are shitting on a man or some men
this is what you are doing
for it to be equal this is what it would have to be
>shit on all men as a group.

theres no album for men's shortcomings as a whole here
>>134184529
just women.

>putting forward slashes on post links
jesus christ i need breakfast

>>134195535
stop replying to these threads fucking newfags. sage

Post tits or GTFO.

File: dull-looking-females.jpg (23KB, 540x303px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 540x303px

>>134193479
>Femanon here
(You) are here for (You)s.

>>134193479
>1 post by ID
Most def not a fem.

>>134193479
You mean muslims?

>>134197262
Thanks for the crazy rant and all, but it had nothing to do with what I said, so I don't really understand the point.
Anyway. As for cherry picked examples... after thousands and thousands of examples, of the same and similar things happening again and again, don't you think there might be some correlation? I'm not even one of the faggots that hates woman, But you can't deny that a significant portion of woman, are provably, horrible people. I am asking for similar evidence of this, in men. Of course, men are not exempt from people horrible people, but I have seen far far less evidence if it, than I have women. I am not going to find evidence for you, the burden of proof lies with the accuser. you telling me to find it for you, just means you have none to find.

File: Captura.png (80KB, 1024x285px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1024x285px

>>134193479
Well who woul have guessed. Sage.

File: 1482562179590.jpg (124KB, 882x731px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 882x731px

>>134193479
>femanon here
hmmmmmmmmm

File: Screenshot_2015_09_05_16_51_56_1.png (1MB, 1433x1166px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1433x1166px

>>134193479
(Can someone start a thread for me with the following it won't let me from my tablet for some reason)

So I've been lurking for a while now (about 6 months) and I feel confident that I am redpilled and understand all the fundamentals that I need to, they already aligned with my traditional values anyway, but there is one thing I don't understand.

You talk of the coming race war, day of the rope etc, and you also talk about securing a future for white children, but why is talk all you do? I along with many of my friends have traditional values and want white husbands, but what overrides that is a desire to back the winning side. We are hardwired to look for strength and security in a mate. I want a fighter, someone who will fight for our race and our CHILDREN but I don't ever see it. Black men look like the fighters and if a race war is coming it looks like they will win, especially if all you guys do is talk and meme.

Why don't you realise that we're all waiting for you to make the difference? Make us feel safe and secure in a white future, that you can fight and win the damn race war, instead of looking like fucking cowards.

You're losing us to them because you won't fight for us.

>>134197262
>>134193479
50 something married father of three here. I lurk for insight into this other world. I'm well read and very insightful. All in all I have to say, wow /pol/ you guys are really getting your arse handed to you here.

>>134193479
>I'm a girl, validate me!!!
Gr8 b8 m8

>>134193479
"As a mother..."

Your title or status carries no weight here, why even bother emitting you are a woman? If you believe what you say is true then there would be no reason for it.

>>134198211
>australia.
Cmon man, you come from a long line of proud shitposters, you can do better than that bro,Make your ancestors proud.

>>134193479
>99.9% of crime committed by my kind

How'd you know I was black op?

>>134198181
Women have put themselves into a position in which we as men need to compete with them now. We can't fight for them if we have to actually fight them in order to make our claim in this world.

>>134193479
Wtf happened to pol? Tits or gtfo

>>134197907
So you're going on your impressions then? That's the whole point. You can't claim matters of fact on the basis of impressions. All you can do is give opinions. Sometimes called hand waving. It's intellectual dishonesty.

>>134198211
The truth is they're on to something.

File: maleattractivenesschart.png (60KB, 600x413px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 600x413px

Men can do everything perfectly and most women will still think 'he's pretty good but I can do better'

>>134198537
See now that's better, you almost made me think you weren't a shitposter. unfortunately, you already screwed it up with your horrid first post.

>>134197661
>theres no album for men's shortcomings as a whole here
there is an album for men's shortcomings. its called history. The only reason that we had to compile one for women on this site is because society teaches us the exact opposite of the true nature of women.

in every facet of life and education the savagery ,barbarism, and ignorance of man is highlighted. We already know the dark side of man is egotistical, cruel, controlling, imperialistic and any other negative word that can be thought of. Women are rightfully taught this since childhood to help protect them against savage men that could kill them in an instant.

little boys, however, are taught a fairy tale about women since birth so we try to expose the true nature of women here. Not to be bitter and say "fuck women" but to see things as they are, level the playing field, and hopefully if you are a real man you accept all of the fucked up things women do and still love them by forgiving their shitty ways. Just as women forgive our many flaws and still love us.

I will never post my body parts online. You will just have to digi-trust that I am a red pilled female. A good looking one, too.
If you posted a basic math problem and asked me to solve it, you will see that in fact I am a female. Deal with it.

>>134193479
You are not a "femanon", idiot.

>>134193479
Whether or not OP is larping, this is mostly truth. Men have been fucking destroyed by modernity. The only problem thing is, OP, the neutered mindfucked boys are NOT the violent ones, generally, if they fixed themselves and became Men again the culture would be more accepting of violence, not less.
its easy to say shit like "Men need to be less violent", I can just as easily say "Women need to be less attracted to violence". Neither is going to happen. Somehow overtly patriarchal places like Victorian Britain managed to basically eliminate crime though.

>>134198211
/pol is an echo chamber genius, that dumb broad may as well be talking to her reflection in the mirror. For a 50 something lurker your not too bright. You have no power here in the abyss.

>>134193479
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kmQe1tWVBk8

>>134198730
I meant them both. First person authentic. But it is pretty late here. Work that one out. Then you'll be beyond pilled.

>>134193479
>Femanon here
Tits or GTFO

Men are honestly the fucking worst especially under 35 men these faggots will cause the death of Western civilization and the white race and then blame it on women (who will still get incorporated into Islam while men get killed off)

>>134193479
(You)
I didn't even bother reading your post.
You're probably overweight,

>>134198435
You wouldn't have to fight us if you fought for us. It's male jews pushing most of the feminist cancer. All you gotta do is start the war and fight for us instead of being cucks, it's really not that hard to understand.

>>134198920
And yet you replied. My guess is you aren't lost in the abyss either.

File: 1500227055642.jpg (98KB, 680x709px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 680x709px

>>134193479
>Secondly, please admit you have a psychotic violence problem. 99.9% of violent crimes are committed by your kind

No, you're think of black people.

>>134193479
Tits or GTFO

>>134193479
Oh wow another woman with no insight, bullshit data, and coming in swinging with insults because she assumes she's correct from the beginning with no discussion.

What a stimulating discussion this will be.

Here, allow me to retort. Kill yourself.

File: 1500237935983.png (70KB, 288x288px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 288x288px

>Y-yeah women have problems which make them unattractive but it is your fault and your ego is to blame

Flawless thinking lady.

>>134199073
Stabbing with probability. You're probably undereducated.

>>134199089
Honestly this is some fucked up shit. Men and woman are supposed to worked together, supposed to be a team. But now woman are actively fighting against men, and in doing so, ruining their lives.

File: 1469328590993.jpg (21KB, 399x295px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 399x295px

>>134197907
honestly no need for me to prove it. This is what I mean when I say you don't fucking listen. I find your redpill bullshit contemptable. Thousands of examples are meaningless. science is the only thing that matters to me, not your acrued anecdotes. if that shit worked christian science would be real. they have more than thousands of their own examples of prayer healing working. don't you think there MUST be SOME kind of correlation?

The point of all that shit i said is that it shows the kind of evidence you value and how you react to it shows you're no better than the people you criticize at making logical decisions.

I will wait for the science to prove things one way or the other, and I would recommend anyone interested in the real answers would read up on those studies instead of redpilled info graphs for their facts on women. the only thing science proves right now is that its a very interesting field that is still emerging that no one here gives a fuck about other than how they can use bits and pieces of it to prop up their ideologies

>>134198920
no one posts on pol to change minds, thats just the lie I tell myself to get (you)s, just like all of you.

>>134193479
Women belong in kitchens not on the internet.

File: 1489283653145.jpg (51KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 625x626px

>>134193479
Could've been better

File: e770518f72bf33d7c5fb73f6f5f5aab0--comment-memes-funny-memes.jpg (24KB, 625x625px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 625x625px

>>134195600
We shit on male KEKS endlessly.
Stop whining cunt and unless you are in the kitchen shitposting while the food is warming up for your 3+ white babies you are just as useless as the rest of the white thots

File: Because+it+s+degenerate+and+wrong+seriously+are+_bdda087522191741af08e30aa8e961a7.jpg (14KB, 326x244px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 326x244px

>>134193479

What is psychological projection, OP?

men are weak beta faggots who play with toys well into their 20's and live with their parents they don't fight they don't want to struggle and they are filled with autism and only voice controversial opinions on the internet 80% of men are fucking useless and can be killed off with little consequence the draft needs to be re-enstated and porn and video games should be banned

>>134199516
the burden of PROOF, lies with the ACCUSER.
YES. you do need to prove it.

>>134193479
Men are domesticated nowadays, this is true.

>>134199568
>we shit on male :adjectives:
are you illiterate or just dumb.
you have to shit on MEN for it to be equal
not lefty men, not black men, not kekistan losers (does anyone even care? nobody fell for leftypols retarded ploy to give us ideology flags to divide pol, everything is the same as it was before), not chads and not christfags or pagans. men

Just men.

>>134199377
yep it's true of some women. some of those are probably getting even for something that a man or men did to them. Not a good solution. The mistake misogynists and misandrists make is generalising. That's it right there.

>>134199098
Its not that we are lost in the abyss old man, we are the abyss. Her post remains meaningless here for everyone but herself.

>>134199568
Roastie btfo

>>134199335
>"Men are just as mentally weak as women"
>"the cancers known as liberalism and feminism. I agree with most of what is being said."
>WHAT THE FUCK WHY IS SHE BLAMING THIS ALL ON MEN1>:?!>??!!?!?!?!?!

lmao at how unironically no memes fragile the male ego is

it is literally a massive struggle to find a modern man who so much as has a job because you are all arrested development little boys

inb4 LMAO U R LE SLUIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am a virgin at age 26 because it is literally not possible to find an available functioning adult man

File: 1499832239379.jpg (49KB, 424x416px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 424x416px

>>134199776
>I want an answer!
>No that appropiate answer is incorrect because I say so

K.

>>134199712
indeed, and you haven't proved it, you've just cherry picked.
I've said it before, I'll say it again. this is the third time you've ignored it and that will be a big lie.

You don't grasp for every worthless shred of evidence to prove something, you get the good evidence and then prove it. something pol refuses to answer to. still peddling around richard lynn's discredited (but not inherently worthless) study as if it doesn't very obviously need modern revision and isn't severely lacking in the whole repeatability arguement. Time after time pol satisfies itself. they show no curiosity, only how they can vindicate their hated of women. Why would anyone insist I need to find proof men are just as bad? you don't even have insurmountable proof that we're that bad for it to be worth it yet.

>>134193479
>99.9% of violent crimes

le b8

File: civilisation&society.png (37KB, 908x471px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 908x471px

>>134193479
>Femanon here
Well, lick my dick.

You don't deserve the courtesy of addressing your points since 1) you've lied that you've been lurking here as most of them have been addressed already countless times, 2) they're flawed (see no.1) and 3) you're not looking for answers, only to shift the blame.

>>134199843
Abyss is too strong a metaphor for you then. I've seen the degenerates that are in that space. I'm betting you aren't.

>>134200129
Pic unrelated.

>>134200033
>you obsess and treat women differently as a group
>hol up dats not true we wuz hating on some leftie betacucks and shieeet
>thats not the same as generalizing all women as inferior or shit
>nuh uh cause i say so
you're the we wuz kangs of this arguement.

>>134193479
>femanon here

Stopped reading there. Shut up bitch

>>134200050
Listen bitch, if you actually spent time on /pol/ you would have seen my evidence. where is yours? because I may be cherry picking examples, but you don't even have examples to cherry pick. that alone, defaults to me being correct.

>>134199992
The post literally concludes with how men's ego is fragile for no reason at all, after a reluctant agreement on personal behaviour patterns of women. I'm saying it's a dumb conclusion. Where'd you get the rest of your post you dumb larper.

>>134199516
>Thousands of examples are meaningless. science is the only thing that matters to me

why is it that people who say this are the least scientific people? Anyone who truly understands science would never say anything like this. You speak too difinitively on science as if you know even a fraction of it (no one person does) and you speak vaguely on evertyhing else.

>>134193479
Women are more likely to kill children, baby killer.

P.s. Obligatory tits or gtfo

>>134200274
You are the one arguing things aren't true, I ain't denying anything. Stop being a triggered doofus,

File: IMG_1372.png (147KB, 760x566px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 760x566px

>>134199992

What exactly do you mean by functioning? I agree with most of what you're saying about the double standards here. I am not one to pop off about gender because I have had girlfriends and have suffered failures at the hand of my own shitty behavior.

I work 28 hours a week to pay the bills and play a bit of video games but have finally hit a psychological wall where I can't enjoy them as much since I am 26 now and just feel guilty playing. So I'm teaching myself development skills.

My brother runs a carpentry outfit and works like 50 hours a week at least, has two kids. Gives me some serious imposter syndrome let me tell you. I wouldn't say the guys here are any better or worse than normies though, the guys I work with, despite having jobs, are for the most part apathetic, drunkard, hippie man children.

>>134198181
Whites will win any kind of race war even if outnumbered 10,000:1

You're a fucking idiot if you don't know that and I sure hope you go with the nigs so you can get a traitor's reward.

>>134193479
>Femanon here.

You fucking newfag, post your tits or get the fuck out.

>>134193479
>femanon here
Already broke one of the rules. Post tits or gtfo.

>>134200300
you want evidence like in op. I'm telling you that evidence is just as hard to come by as real uncontested evidence you have on women.
Believe it or not, research takes time. I already gave you a nice study to look over, while 80% of every woman thread is unironically tumblr caps and richard lynn.

if you actually want arguements against women being inferior, theyre a fucking google search and wikipedia article away.
the standing consensus is "measuring intelligence is like quantum mechanics, we need more time and more people"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_intelligence
If you are interested in the bare minimum of a topic the least you could do is show awareness that the most minimal fucking research could have shown you, but you can't even put that effort in.

>>134199089
Most girls I meet are hard pressed in making their own way, if they choose to do so thats fine by me they're going face the same trials men do. My guess is that in time the pendulum will swing and society will correct itself. You give me 'male jews' as the target of these problems however that is incredibly vague. You need exact companies, think-tanks etc that are perpetuating current dogma throughout society like women=men in terms of working capabilities. I dont believe in collective punishment so just steam rolling all jews is something a marxist would do. I know jewish guys who are fun to hang out and work with, but dont get me wrong they practice a lot of nepotism (main reason why pol hates them or should hate them)

>>134193479
Show us your cunt you fat slag.

>>134199776
Why are you so hard pressed on collective guilt?

>>134200469
>why is it that people who say this are the least scientific people?
why is it that people who say this are the least scientific people
anyone who says something like that to the reply i posted would never understand that science needs control of variables and peer review for it to be science.

>I speak definitively on science
I do because enough discussion on pol has shown me most of you don't even know the fundamentals an 8th grader would be aware of. shame the one eyed woman is queen in the eye of the blind. It's almost like everyone here is insisting they have two eyes to my one but they never bother opening them.

>>134200733
I don't want arguments on woman being inferior though, because that isn't true. What I want is your evidence that......
>>134196834
>men's shortcomings are well documented
I would like this documentation.

>>134200513
arguing what isn't true? I'm arguing your evidence is shit on a completely different topic than the one i replied to when i replied to that post. goal post shifting doesn't make the fact that pol doesn't have 5-15 "muh men are stupid" threads on the catalog at any given time.

>>134193479
>woman goes straight to 'no mate' card

wow whoda thunk it's almost like you're incapable of consideration outside of that subject

>>134198800
>Good looking one too
No one would say this, it's clearly a fucking shill
If you don't want to post it online, email

>>134201059
Look at my ID you dumbcunt, I'm just pointing out argumentetive fallacies, now hush

File: 1387346736677.gif (776KB, 368x212px) Image search: [Google]

776KB, 368x212px

>>134193479

Tits or GTFO

>>134193479
> 99.9% of violence.
You must of pulled that statistic straight out of your ass. Dude yeah beta males are a huge problem. But they will vanish and go right back to the little faggots they are meant to be as soon as we stop feeding the cancer that is feminism.

>>134193479
>femanon here, I know what some girls are told to do by society isn't fair BUT THE REAL PROBLEM IS YOU MEN
Go eat a bag of skittles.

>>134200469
She just craves attention. It's simple. I got a problem with women, so I experimented. I found:
>they all cheat if you give them attention at the right moment.
>background, beliefs... don't matter that much.
>they feed on the illusion that you are the best they will ever get and they are lucky to have you. If this is dispelled they will cheat.
>if they cheat they will rationalize it and blame someone else 99% of the time.
> if they don't blame someone else they will say dumb shit like "I fucked him but I love you. Why can't you understand?"
I am not proud of it, but I broke lots of couples. Different races, traditional, religious... you name it. I regret nothing. This red pilled me harder than anything I could ever see here. Women are to be kept under your spell. If not they're heartless bitches. I am 8/10 at most and so far every single one of them wanted the D after I learned their patterns. I felt so disgusted I didn't even fuck some of them.

File: cha05_std.png (554KB, 524x641px) Image search: [Google]

554KB, 524x641px

>>134200972
then you should maybe ask that person to provide it instead of myself. That person literally made that statement to attack me. I've been busy this whole time wondering what the fuck the idiots here saying pol spends a ton of time just generally bitching about men are talking about.

File: download.jpg (3KB, 168x168px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 168x168px

>>134197262
What was the purpose of this journal?
>male students have higher rates of being outspoken and scoring well as well as being the 'class celebrity'.
>assumes that being male is a pre-requisite for 'class celebrity' status instead of further analysis.
>doesn't distinguish between multiple types of outspoken, opting to use a vague qualitative label instead.

>>134201209
>i'm pointing out arguementitive fallacies
no you aren';t. because I'm not making any. pol does not have general "why are men so x" and "how do we fix men" and "how do we get men back under control" threads filling up a tenth of the board

>>134193479
>wants to ask women out after 3years of no dating and only personal improvements
>Find out that women don't want to be in couple anymore before going on the cockroussel, got high probability of cheating on you and will ruin you if they get bored with you.

>decide it would be easier to just empty my balls in the toilet and keep trying to figure out if there is still non-degenerate women

There is little reward for alot of effort, while fapping to porn will offer biological relief for little effort.
Also can women be original in what they like? It's either highly stereotypical stuff related to their appearance or ''going outside/travelling/any sport''.

>>134193479
This desu.

>>134200963
Funfact, I am in fact a certified scientist. (well chemist) and you are super duper wrong. As the great Jamie Hyneman once said, "the only difference between science, and screwing around, is writing it down." And for the most part it is true. When preforming a experiment, the most basic of basic steps is. 1. write down, your expectations for the experiment.2. record the information, from said experiment,3 Derive your hypothesis, and decide whether or not your original one was correct.
Peer reviews, are nice, but not required, and variables exist in pretty much all of existence so they aren't really JUST science.

File: 1499134594936.jpg (19KB, 222x293px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 222x293px

>>134198181
>Black men look like the fighters and if a race war is coming it looks like they will win
Assuming this isn't bait, which it probably is: Blacks are historically and currently the least frightening enemies you could ever ask for in a war. There will be no race war, its just a fantasy for some.

>someone who will fight for our race and our CHILDREN
So not blacks then? They abandon their families like crazy.

>>134193479
tits or gtfo
sage

>>134201608
>Peer reviews, are nice, but not required.
let me know what journals you publish in then so I can avoid it like herpes

jesus christ what a moron.

>>134201383
Rip me, mistook that for a different post while glancing through to find yours. this is the one.
>>134195600

>>134201654
I dont think thats the point that fag was trying to make, even if it was a dumb point

>>134193479
Whore

>>134197667
>>134195535
Roach is right. And been here for half a year ? You probably came because your gender studies professor told you to shill here for a grade after Trump won, yes? Fuck off from this board. Sage.

>>134193479
Kike shill post detected. Do not reply to these threads! If you do, sage!

>using the word toxic to refer to anything other than nuclear waste
>implying women are less violent by nature, and not cause they're weak

OP, don't worry sweetie, there's someone to impregnate you yet. In the meantime, remember, your opinion is invalid, also tits or GTFO.

>>134201608
You're right about the screwing around and peer reviews, partially. At some point you have to get some nice repeatable, reliable, valid evidence. And having you're work contested by peers is good for circumspection, self-checking and such.

File: tmp_287214.jpg.cf1526393595.jpg (30KB, 400x600px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 400x600px

>>134195338
No you don't, you hold white men as the pinnacle of everything who can do no wrong, everyone else just needs to get their shit together.

Even though you have fucking NEETs and other assorted consumerist trash representing you.

Seriously, I get we are on 4chan, but if you are at all serious with your beliefs, how can you believe for example any loser on this site is the pinnacle master race? Unless the pinnacle is sitting in the basement with vidya, anime, and cumstains

>PS - if you at all relate to this video, tell me how you are at all different from a nigger:

https://youtu.be/06ioSRwzFGg

>>134201799
Wow, I like how you completely sidestepped my entire post to point out the one thing you understood out of it, and mistakenly believe you are correct about.
Science is science, you don't need to publish shit, to do science, nor do you need peer reviewed study. it's nice and all, but certainly not necessary to preform science. Want to know what I do for fun? mix up little batches of shitty powdered explosives, shove them in coke cans, and record how large the explosions are.

File: 0RATwVz.jpg (377KB, 2500x2501px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 2500x2501px

>>134201833
if you are literally asking me this then I've already answered it.
type in " men" without quotes into the catalog search and count how many threads you see about pol bitching about men in general. I couldnt find a single one except possibly the "alpha" thread. a quarter of the results where just the women threads slipping in.

theres your proof that pol does no widespread obsession like the 5-15 at any given time bitching about women having rights threads

>>134202172
>"""""science""""

>>134193479
even on /pol/ you cant get away with attention whores. kys. sage.

>>134201864
If the point was that white men look weak then she should look for different white men. They certainly do exist, and in large numbers. Admittedly too many have fallen for the gaymer guy meme.

File: 1472740736671.jpg (29KB, 340x395px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 340x395px

>>134202002
no i came here because about half a year ago my best friend admitted to me he didn't think I should have voting rights and wanted to know more about what goes on in the communities my friend hangs out in and what kind of board culture it has.

I'm a long time poster on /ck/, /tg/, and /mlp/, pol is just not my home board

>>134201525
On the contrary, you asked for an answer, which aptly talked about negative aspects like the ideological and emotive types of men which are dumb.

What you're asking for is basically for someone to make an appeal to your feelings, when /pol/ criticizes women, they are devoting it towards negative types of women. Just because criticism of a popualce exists, doesn't mean they outright deny an exception to the rule.

If you had a set of brains you'd realize the same women they're criticising mostly act like their counterparts in the other sex.

>>134202207
This is why I asked you to post things to bitch about men, we can easily bitch about women, we have excessive evidence of the things we bitch about. We do not have such evidence to bitch about men, although every so often /v/ will laugh at anthony burch, and DSP, and angry joe, although I'm not certain that counts.

>>134193479
tits or gtfo

>>134193479
>gaze over your eyes
stopped reading
get the fuck back in the kitchen
unless you send tits

File: 1500042193862.jpg (60KB, 400x420px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 400x420px

>>134193479

I didn't ask for your opinion, learn your place.

>>134202172
yes actually you do, because its what keeps the science from being bullshit. it's like saying you don't need any gardening equipment or water to have a nice lawn. feel free to let weeds grow, I'm sure that wont come back to bite you in the ass where the analogy breaks down; basing your research on the "proven" bullshit.

what a stench, its women.

>>134201383
>That person literally made that statement to attack me

I wouldn't call my reply's to you an "attack". lets not play victims here.

>>134201371
>She just craves attention. It's simple.

perhaps you are right, because of this ill advised statement...
>>134200963
>science needs control of variables and peer review for it to be science.

science needs to be correct and work for it to be considered science. peer review and variables are simply to make sure it does actually work. It's funny that you use science as the objective truth but cite the most subjective and easily politicized part of the whole process (peer review) as the most important part.

>>134200972
>I would like this documentation.
I'm not trying to be cute, quippy, or vague but literally pick up any fucking book.Especially history and philosophy. Hell, even fiction. All of literature is mostly about the shortcomings of men. a plot can't exist without it.

>>134193479

Female incarceration is rising from it's projected plotting line, dumbass.

>>134202430
>This is why I asked you to post things to bitch about men,
what part of not listening eludes you. I don't care for your redpill bullshit. I think anecdotes and cherry picked studies are a stupid way to form opinions.

Ask someone else if you want that kind of shit. I'm sure tumblr can doctor up some "bleu pills" for your consumption. I'm only interested in peer reviewed research when it comes to women and men and our strengths and weaknesses.

Why do females get so triggered by videogames? They don't bat an eye if you watch a movie, which can take over two hours, but if you spend the same amount of time playing vidya, it's the end of the world.

>>134202628
Not really actually, it's more like saying you don't need fertilizer. Yes it is a useful thing to have, but it isn't required for gardening,

>>134193479

Sage

hahahahahaha

ya'll are getting so triggered!!! I love it!!!

See what it feels like to be lumped into one generalization?

I don't need to insert meme stats. it's common sense guys commit all the violent crimes. It's probably closer to 99.99999999%

File: tmp_28897-14895965924381355151789.jpg (72KB, 640x641px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 640x641px

>>134193479

>>134202761
>in a fight
>not attacking your opponent
lose the projecting, this isn't tumblr.

>science needs to be correct and work for it to be considered science.
something that is damn near impossible to discern if you refuse to allow review and don't have a control. The old earth centric models of the universe "worked" too, they just stopped working when people needed more precise results. just because something looks "true" doesn't mean it is. thats the whole point of control and review.

>>134202803
Same reason your parents, peers, coworkers and etcetra judge you for it while also lounging and doing jack shit. It's rhetoric to make themselves feel better then the bloke who plays games in their spare time whike they're watching a re--run or refreshing their facebook to feel noticed.

>>134202792
But I'm not really redpilled, Hell for the most part I prolly don't belong on /pol/. I personally despise hitler because he was a inept fool, and set back politics for at least a hundred years.
You are under the delusion that /pol/ is one person, which it isn't.
if you are, as you say " I'm only interested in peer reviewed research when it comes to women and men and our strengths and weaknesses." then produce some, I would love to read them, it would be fascinating.

>>134202808
no it isn't you dumb shit. fertalizer helps things grow faster, bad research breeds more bad research.

File: 1500467824658.jpg (21KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 225x225px

>>134202995
Okay? I mean it is common sense blokes are violent. Literally no one would disagree unless they're trying to be revisionists.

File: 1500178488979.png (337KB, 399x490px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 399x490px

>>134202792
Ok then. Off of that basis, if you are someone who reads scientific studies and are somehow an unbiased human, which is not likely, what do you think? Which views does pol hold that are provably wrong? Tell us, and many of us will change our views if you can prove yourself correct.

>>134203118
But fertilizer is not necessary,Likewise with science, being peer reviewed is nice, and useful, but not necessary to perform it.

>>134197262
This "scientific journal" was little more then a list of correlations rather then causations... As for your rant... Nice text wall. Sure plenty of the men here are bitter and angry but you cant say this proof of "male superiority" is cherry picked. (I quoted this for use of sarcasm... Obviously men aren't superior we are simply better at somethings then women... Just like women are better at somethings then men).

There is a vast amount of information documenting the differences between sexes. Men and women are supposed to have a symbiotic relationship but then people like you always make it a competition. If anyone needs to look at there own ego it's you. Your refusals to even look at the information provided and further research it yourself are proof of this. Not mention you can't seem to do anything other then shift the burden and accusations on others without anything other then that pitiful anecdotal evidence and some finger pointing.

I agree/disagree. Love is a drug in my opinion. Your brainchemicals go off and you get addicted just like any other drug. We now have computers, phones, VR and more fun crazy shit you can get addicted to. We became a dulture any 90s baby has it the worst. We grew up on courage the cowardly dog and love movies everywhere. Cartoons today HAVE YOU SEEN THEM! Theyre all about getting outside and eating healthy. The American dream is alive but barely. Theres just a generation of addiction and laziness that comes with techniolgy. Its just how drugs work. Women should be equal. If you want women to be servants get a wife explain to her your beliefs and how women should stay home. Im pretty sure that lazy fuck would love it. Id rather see women working than them being aat home all day "doing a womans job." Having kids is a different story legally you have to take care of them lol. But if you dont get to work girl.

>>134193479
Blow air into my foreskin with your mouth so it looks like a frog. Croak croak lol.

/pol/ BTFO

>>134202792
>I'm only interested in my particular brand of peer reviewed bullshit
The fact that they've haven't so much cherry picked as they've pulled it the entire goddamn tree should have tipped you off.
You've yet to counter anything that's been said, so either you're a complete retard, which is entirely possible since you said you're a woman, or just fishing for (you)'s. Either way, you're wrong.

>>134198699
Yeah this is one of the worst aspects of it all but it is mainly because "doing better" is based upon superficial standards that women claim they don't fucking have. This concept confuses boys growing up so fucking much and sure as hell confused me until I became a young adult

>>134203093
>entire thread about generalizations
>"but why are you generalizing us back when we generalize you"
I kid of course, since you "aren't" among pol as you say.
>why don't you post actual research i'd love to read some
>>134197262
I did here
>>134200733
and here.

If you want me to pick a specific one,
https://www.academia.edu/17282932/Recruitment_modeling_An_analysis_and_an_application_to_the_study_of_male_female_differences_in_intelligence
this one is the one I think is most important because it highlights the hurdles to further research that must be accounted for to determine the voracity of any further studies on sex differences in intelligence.

>>134200927
>collective guilt
I'm not hard pressed on anything, I am stating that you making a false equivelance doesn't mean pol feels the same about men as they do about women.

>>134193479
yeah, you're right, men need to not be degenerate scum and so do women. it goes both ways.

>>134203710
But I wasn't generalizing, nor asking you to generalize back, I was asking for information on the subject, as well as what you would consider to be proper "peer reviewed" research into this.
Your first link consisted more or less, entirely of correlations, believing them to be fact. the second, was a link to a motherfucking WIKIPEDIA article, which is not peer reviewed in any way, nor scientific, so I'm not sure why you chose this.

>>134203605
>cherry picked as pulled out the goddamn tree
jesus christ do you even know what cherry picking means? I.. I no. I'm not justifying this, have a you.
>>134203225
yes it is, or you get things that aren't science mixed in with the science.

>>134203242
>Obviously men aren't superior we are simply better at somethings then women... Just like women are better at somethings then men)
name any, I'd love to hear some that you think are big enough to matter.

>There is a vast amount of information documenting the differences between sexes. Men and women are supposed to have a symbiotic relationship but then people like you always make it a competition. If anyone needs to look at there own ego it's you. Your refusals to even look at the information provided and further research it yourself are proof of this. Not mention you can't seem to do anything other then shift the burden and accusations on others without anything other then that pitiful anecdotal evidence and some finger pointing.
no, thats basically you. I'm well aware of your evidence. Its got its strong points but it is cherry picked because you only show the evidence that agrees with you, not the evidence that doesn't. not the flaws in lynn's research and the lack of repeatability of his studies.,

>>134193479
You are right, but don't forget that many of the hate threads are done by shills.

Dividing men and women, and thus destroying the family, is one of their fundamental objectives. You'd be better off pointing this out instead of further playing into the division.

File: women money.jpg (129KB, 430x597px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 430x597px

>>134193479
>Get off of your phones and ask a girl out in real life.
I tried and failed. Now she is a crazy old cat lady without a partner.
>99.9% of violent crimes are committed by your kind. Get ahold of yourselves, stop blaming women for your fragile ego problems.
Well, at some point violence becomes inevitable when you deny men sex. It's not like men want to become violent but women leave them no choice.

>>134204143
>durrr where are da science in wikipedia
jesus christ i'm done with you. you are too stupid to even look up the sources. This is unbridled willing ignorance

>>134203036
>>in a fight
>>not attacking your opponent
>lose the projecting, this isn't tumblr.

what are you even saying?

>>134203036
>damn near impossible to discern if you refuse to allow review and don't have a control.

so science isn't science unless multiple people say it's true. got it.
In the future,try to separate your own ego from what the true definition of science actually is. observation and experimentation is critical for sure, but they are a means to an end. that end is the true nature of reality and the physical world. not our interpretations. it is an unreachable goal, therefore, it is dangerous to ignore "cherry picked" anecdotal evidence because that is all any man or woman has to go on. including your almighty peer reviewed scientists.

>>134204154
>yes it is, or you get things that aren't science mixed in with the science.
WOT.
Do......you understand the things that you are saying? The biggest criticism of peer reviewed studies, is the fact that things like politics and bribes influence them, it's a fucking HUGE problem.

>>134204210
The goal, (unworkable as it is,) seems to be to push you back from believing we will ever unite in a family where you rule us.

>>134193479
me in the middle

>>134204317
You fucking trust Wikipedia? If anyone in my classes used wikipedia as a source, they would get fucking laughed out of the room. wikipedia is horrendous garbage, written by people who think that because they have a cursory basic knowledge of a subject, they know everything about it, and refuse to allow anyone who actually knows about it, to change the page because it would mean they were wrong.

File: 1499208817998.jpg (92KB, 760x760px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 760x760px

>>134204426
>How do I stand out from the crowd /pol/ generalizes women into being a part of?

>I know, I'm going to go play as a progressive type and prove their assumptions right

Okay then.

>>134204154
Men:
>better soldiers
>more geniuses
>better at 3D thought

Women:
>can into motherhood
>mature faster+fewer idiots means they dominate colleges in terms of numbers
>discern color better

>>134204349
>so science isn't science unless multiple people say it's true. got it.
no, science isn't a science unless its repeatable and has a control so that the conclusions are more accurate, and has a community to vet things so science that is wrong doesn't get unchallenged. typical retards like you don't seem to understand what the impact of these words
>science needs to be correct and work
>work
science works, IE it produces results and those have benefits. science that doesn't. doesn't. the group pruning has much less reason to prune something that works than something that doesn't. because iof it works its repeatable and will just come back

>>134204426
Resting through your comments. Watching you get BTFO by multiple other arguments and then just say
>I'm done with you.
Bruh I see you post constantly and honestly your the type of person that drove me to this ocean of piss. You will probably be tapping away at your keyboard later today with those Cheeto dust ladened fingers about how you totally stuck it to the patriarchy. Go outside and fight for your cause if you believe in it so vehemently. Because I guarantee one day I will be standing across from you and happily spit in your direction. Your the one with an ego. Stop fishing for (You)'s

what if all of the girls are chavy degenerate cunts with whom I have nothing in common?

femsluts always find a way to blame men, fucking cunts the lot of yas

>>134204828
>durr what is a source
wikipedia isn't a source you moron, its the paper you wrote that you where expected to find sources for. It lists the most common sources on a topic and explains it and the current scientific consensus from multiple view points. it's a glorified babbies first science and you are trying to imply that you are above it while not demonstrating any awareness of what studies and consensuses contain.

If you still believe wikipedia is horrendous garbage that shouldn't be trusted, I'd have to ask why pol keeps blowing richard lynn when he very clearly shows up with his research shown to be decent enough that it deserves recognition instead of outright dismissal or ignoring.

either all of the studies are bullshit because muh wikipedia, or none of them are.

>>134204903
>can into motherhood
single parenthood seems to suggest we are not good at this at all.

>>134204828
this isn't 3rd grade. click the little blue numbers next to statements in the wikipedia article for actual sources, YOU DUMB FUCKING NIGGER

>>134204936
>no, science isn't a science unless its repeatable and has a control so that the conclusions are more accurate
Here you are correct.
>and has a community to vet things so science that is wrong doesn't get unchallenged.
And here is naive idealism. Yes, it is a good idea on paper, but in practice it gets bogged down in politics, and bribery, becoming the thing it stood to fight against. even then, it isn't a requirement, it would be nice yes, but it isn't needed.
However I'm curious as to your ardent belief as such. are you studying to become a scientist? what is your major?

>>134204842
>>How do I stand out from the crowd /pol/ generalizes women into being a part of?
theyre not trying to get exception status, theyre trying to get you to realize that they wont bow down to you just because theyre flawed. a stupid notion of course. people bow because they are afraid

You don't understand men at all

>>134198520
It let Ottoman gypsies in.

>>134205402
>>134205332
I don't fucking care yo, anything that wikipedia thinks is a fucking source is almost guaranteed to be a goddamn mess.

>>134205006
>durrr why do women want yous, i should get the yous
kay, nice to know you think standing outside with a sign is going to do anything.

>>134205643
and yet you you want me to provide a bunch of different bullshit in response to pol's material, which is all based on the same bullshit you hate. why don't you stop trying to bitch that I'm not competeing with morons effectively at being moronic if you actually consider their actions to be that of the blind leading the blind?

File: 1498096693976.png (140KB, 207x284px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 207x284px

>>134205464
Mabye I'm a bit confused since it's 3AM. I got gist you were progressive posting but reading back you're just making an enquiry into why there's no man hate threads while still admitting female faults. This shitposter may need some sleep,

>>134201525
You clearly do not belong here. There are threads about "how do we fix men" or "how do WE stop being degenerate".

>>134195535
I came here because my brother showed me it. It has been strange ever since then.

>>134205790
But i'm not. all I want, is a good, peer reviewed study in your opinion on the faults of men, that you seem to believe exist.

>>134205810
I'm not even making an enquiry there. but rather pol responded to this thread stating that they do spend alot of their time doing hate threads on men when they objectively dont. the inquiry is supposed to be rhetorical, because we both know they don't have anywhere near the same level of presence on this board, which substantiates that complaning about someone that has a penis isn't the same as complaining about all the people who have penises.

>>134204936
>control so that the conclusions are more accurate, and has a community to vet things

if you read what I've said carefully you will see that I'm not arguing against that. I'm arguing something more fundamental and basic which you can't seem to wrap your thick skull around. science isn't something invented by man. it is all there waiting to be discovered and harnessed.
You are placing the man-made institutions of science above the fucking natural world which is the whole purpose of science.

you are waiting around for some fuck in a lab coat with a degree to tell you things you should already be plainly able to observe.

No one is arguing against the need for "peer review and controls" you keep idiotically harping on about.

>>134195117
This

>>134193479
>please admit you have a psychotic violence problem
So do women, we're just stronger so we cause more damage.

File: 41098_shutterstock_192458738.jpg (78KB, 768x768px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 768x768px

>>134205332
Stop debating what science is and what a source is. It sidetracked this thread into oblivion.

>can into motherhood
>single parenthood seems to suggest we are not good at this at all.

Alright sure, I'll concede that. Was really saying that women can actually physically have children, but either interpretation works. Do you then agree that the other traits listed have merit? If so, those things are significant things.

Also, if you're going to tell the 4chins that they're dumb and try to educate people, you need to focus on a single point. Not REEEE you don't understand science. Give us one point of science we don't understand and show us why.

>>134205950
>You clearly do not belong here. There are threads about "how do we fix men" or "how do WE stop being degenerate".
i said filling up a tenth of the board, generally its not about how men are dumb and need to be stopped either.
>>134206071
>but i'm not
>Anyway. As for cherry picked examples... after thousands and thousands of examples, of the same and similar things happening again and again, don't you think there might be some correlation? I'm not even one of the faggots that hates woman, But you can't deny that a significant portion of woman, are provably, horrible people. I am asking for similar evidence of this, in men.
you are asking for similar evidence in men, I unironically gave you similar evidence. stop denying you take your superiority in morality as fact when you continue to ask for extenseive evidence to compare to something you presume i've forgotten that you believe in.

>>134206191
>I'm arguing something more fundamental and basic which you can't seem to wrap your thick skull around. science isn't something invented by man. it is all there waiting to be discovered and harnessed.
>You are placing the man-made institutions of science above the fucking natural world which is the whole purpose of science.
yes, because unfortunately thanks to this world called reality we inhabit, all of your perceptions of that science are suspect and can easily be falsified by any number of biases and factors. you cannot navigate without peer review anymore than you can triangulate with a single line.

>>134206071
Men commit almost all violent crime and are responsible for pretty much every war.

>>134193479
Honestly I can't fault you for thinking like this. Most modern men and mentally weak faggots with no discipline.

>>134206424
>>>134195117
I am not your typical idiot female. Hence, why I lurk frequently.

>>134195600
this is weak ass bait but have another (You), ((you)) faggot. a lot of traditionalist thinking is centered on criticism of modern men and embracing traditional masculinity again.

File: IMG_7978.png (273KB, 600x583px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 600x583px

>>134195788
>this
Come and take my guns away fembitch.

>>134206574
>stop denying you take your superiority in morality as fact
Except I believe that morality doesn't exist. there is no such thing as black in white, only a thousand thousand shades of gray. you seem to ignore a certain part of that quote.
> But you can't deny that a significant portion of woman, are provably, horrible people. I am asking for similar evidence of this, in men.
A significant portion. not all woman, not no, woman, not half of women, simply enough to be noticed and to disprove of. I presume nothing, my question has been the exact same since the beginning.
>I am asking for similar evidence of this, in men.
that is all, over and over I have repeated this, you believe it is so, I wish for your beliefs.

>>134206750
>all of your perceptions of that science are suspect and can easily be falsified by any number of biases and factors.
Interesting, this is why I do not trust peer reviewed studies.

File: 1483960265218.jpg (309KB, 1200x1043px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 1200x1043px

>>134198800
A good looking woman that doesn't want attention? This doesn't add up...

>>134206750
>all of your perceptions of that science are suspect and can easily be falsified by any number of biases and factors

finally! That's what I've been saying this whole fucking time. But in one final act of retardation...

> you cannot navigate without peer review

what makes you think that peer review is not subject to what you just fucking said. You take more things on faith that you believe and yet you think that your observations based on peer reviewed science are less valid than other people's experiences.

>>134206547
and plants can actually be eaten. just because something is necissary and vital doesn't mean it is equal.

>Do you then agree that the other traits listed have merit?
the only real trait I care about is intelligence comparison, since that is generally what pol hopes to use to destroy our voting rights and re-enslave us because "the merit of having children" should be "controlled by us"

>Not REEEE you don't understand science. Give us one point of science we don't understand and show us why.
I already have, people in this very thread don't understand the vital necessity of peer review and scientific control. two vital things to keep science functioning.

and I have done hours of various shitposting arguing with evidence to plenty of others on single topics. where do you think that long list comes from? do you assume I just thrust it at people all at once and when they say no I sperg? I already argued every single point in there with evidence that is at minimum superior to most of the redpill bullshit. the stuff that doesn't have a refutation generally still can be attacked for having terribly unproductive conclusions

>>134206149
>>134206149
I think a lot of the femalr threads highlight that guys generally like women overall on the chans but dislike that they've been corrupted so to day, on the same league of men on the spectrum of politics. The difference is men don't really need to talk to each other about their own failures on the same level they criticize women for their failure because it's a general subconscious understanding between blokes versus something they're trying to agree upon via anecdotes

>responses guaranteed

All these fags taking the bait.

>>134207270
*more valid

>>134207067
>A significant portion. not all woman, not no, woman, not half of women, simply enough to be noticed and to disprove of. I presume nothing, my question has been the exact same since the beginning.
no rather you do presume the evidence you asked for has merit, which is why you are asking for similar evidence. but you've already admitted you think the evidence is shit, so there isn't a need to have any comparible evidence unless you harbor sexism in the way you say you don't.

File: 5dd60ca13f89221426ae370bbf8114bc.jpg (10KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 225x225px

>>134193479
Ok!Ok!
Do you want suck my dick now..?

The purpose of this post was to balance the gender inferiority shitposts. There are so many generalized posts about the downfall of females, many without stats that are purely based on common sense.

pol is a creepy echo chamber of male only neckbeard opinions. If you really want to take a red pill, receive criticism from the group you criticize. I will continue to post these until I think it has received adequate attention.

File: 1499943163074.jpg (230KB, 1080x941px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1080x941px

>ask girl out
>she says no thank you
>gets attention from 10 other dudes all better than me

What am I doing wrong you ask? Well I simply can't compete. In older days you either had help from your parents as they arrange a marriage, or girls had to settle for one guy only or were shamed.

Nowadays, girls can choose all the males without any repercussions (well men can too, but lmao only the top 2% are doing this)

We life in a world where only alpha males can procreate, and we all know that 99% of niggers and refugees are alpha as fuck compared to us crackers.

Betas shunned from society have even less chance to procreate. That's why they become bitter just like fat undesirable women.

t. sociology pro

>>134207270
>what makes you think that peer review is not subject to what you just fucking said.
its less subject to what I said you moron, not completely unsubject, otherwise science could never be wrong since we'd always get it right the first time. peer review isn't a perfect mechanism. I never argued it was. what I argued is that is vital to science in the same way washing your hands after wiping your ass with them is vital to hygene. you wont wash off all the feces, but you will wash off more than you would if you didn't. a significant enough portion with the ammount of water and you wont even get sick. the more the merrier, essential to the process

>>134207479
Women are sexist. They are worse then men. You can't refute this. In your heart you know you are wrong and just want to validate your beliefs. You came here just to show us as bigots and gave no intrest in improving the situation.

>>134207281
I don't disagree, which is why you see the same shit in sjw groups. "baww my eye rape" etc. People as a whole are generally obsessed with others. i guess because humans are social so you can't really be selfish without at some point wanting others involved in some way. two forces of humanity working in deadly concert

>>134207479
The evidence I have seen cretainly has merit, as I have seen it with my own eyes, friends reported to the police for rape, when they where gay, or when they where hanging out with me at the time it supposedly happened. not to mention the things taken straight from the horses mouth. the countless false rape allegations, the countless amounts of vapid whores. yes, this is not all of women, but it is enough to be noticed, which is a problem in itself. Your evidence is shit because all you have posted is some random garbage off wikipedia about how men and woman are just as smart as each other. You have yet to post anything that is a fault in men, while claiming there is, and bitching that we do not bitch about it. I believe in self introspection, and pride myself in being able to look at my actions and beliefs clearly without bias, I wish to see your evidence so I might judge myself against it, to see if there is something about myself I have missed.

>>134207730
>Well I simply can't compete.
Yeah you can, just get better

Work on yourself, get in shape, become interesting

>>134207878
Actually I do have desire to improve the situation, i just am not doing it when I shitpost here. i've accepted that after eons of trying to get pol to understand something as simple as how evolution works at its most microcosmic level.

>Know I am wrong
>heart
my heart doesn't know shit.
I would like to validate my beliefs yes, but not because my beliefs aren't validated, rather, the reason I want them validated by pol is that it would prove they are being less stupid and hopefully that would mean less chance they'll do something increadibly stupid and just become jews mark 2 when the happening hapens

>>134207627
>receive criticism from the group you criticize.
As I and multiple people have repeatedly said in this thread, everyone knows the flaws of men. It is the flaws of women that are frequently glossed over and excused. If women were treated equally to men then all of /pol/'s observations of women would be all over the television, news, and in our education system.
We do not deny men's faults and in reality we know them better then women because men don't lie to themselves as much as women do and have society back them up.

>>134198782
you didn't reply to this. We know men are fucked up. we have known and taught this forever.

>>134208011
>I have seen it with my own eyes
and I have seen this with my own eyes. I already posted plenty of things I saw with my own eyes, but you are only now just posting them. expecting me to somehow provide substantiation further than what you are willing to provide to back up your anecdotes

>>134208393
A article written by some hack nobody, and a fucking wikipedia link are not plenty of things you have seen with your own eyes.

>>134207755
>less subject to what I said
it's about the same. maybe even more so when you add 3 things. Big money, Politics, and scientists ego to be the biggest smartypants and not have their whole life's work being challenged.

>>134208293
I didn't reply to it because its bullshit. pols statements are that women need to be controlled and obey men. asserting that men themselves are just as flawed would mean that men should not be controlling women.

either way it doesn't matter, this isn't /his/ you don't spend time talking about it, ergo, pol doesn't harp on men because as you delude yourself into thinking "it doesn't need to be"

>>134208614
I already posted them you dumbass. scroll all the way up.

>>134208631
>its about the same
no it isn't.
>muh egos
>muh politics
>muh money
the very fact that there is compeition there is what makes those factors lesson. so not everyone has the same desires and goals.

>>134208742
>pols statements are that women need to be controlled and obey men
>/pol/ is one person
>>134208906
What about the dozens of studies about cigarettes that big tobacco bought off so they're all about how cigarettes are fine, or get bogged down in bullshit?
what about that shity fucking paper that one shitter wrote about how vaccines cause autism that started up all this fucking bullshit about it?
what about all the papers that never got to see the light of day because their peers didn't like that persons political views?
FUCK. PEER. REVIEWS.

>>134208293
Disagree. The flaws the media displays of the sexes is wildly simplified so idiot SJWs can have repeatable soundbites to spew. Everyone does not know the flaws of men. You need to hear the intricate cold hard truths more. Especially on /pol/. Otherwise you're just getting high on your confirmation bias

>>134208742
wasn't talking to you in that post. I already figure you are a lost cause
>>134208742
>women need to be controlled and obey men
i don't think people believe that in their heart of hearts.probably some of the more particularly excitable or bitter people here actually think that. part of being a man is talking shit and exaggerating. however the observations about the nature of women are spot on. I don't personally believe women need to obey men. but to say that we believe men are superior to women and that we are completely unaware of the many flaws of man I don't think is accurate.
we all acknowledged that men have wreaked far more havok than women and caused almost all of the worlds biggest problems.

we are simply saying that women are fucked in the head in different ways than men.

File: 69b55d68fe91607234fb28544149f5108af0a74eea419432225a47816fa8d24b.png (498KB, 999x995px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 999x995px

>>134207276
I have not seen pol want to take away voting rights on grounds that women are downright stupid, but because they tend to vote more liberal and thus for open borders, amnesty, etc. The argument is that women are too empathetic and treat refugees, foreigners, and minorities like children that need to be housed and fixed. These traits make them, according to the argument, a danger to the well-being of the nation if allowed to vote on international issues. If we had a voting system based off intelligence alone than in theory men and women would have an equal vote, because we still have the same average IQ, just differently distributed.

Anyway the argument is largely worthless because white women vote majority conservative as it is. So it really shouldn't matter to pol how women vote, but what women they build the nation out of. Up the white birthrate and the whole issue goes away. However, most of pol is generally just frustrated at their situations and hardly know what they want, so you won't see this argument made. Blaming "the enemy" is an effective way to vent.

I don't understand what you're trying to accomplish anymore. Are you trying to say that science is at odds with pol? That's an interesting one. Maybe so, but pol is more of a logic oriented board than a science oriented one anyway, trusting in soundness of logic over trusting the scientific community.

File: housewood.jpg (1MB, 3872x2592px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3872x2592px

No group of women has ever so much as built a house. Not a cruiseliner, not a skyscraper, just a home, a house, one fucking house.
This is the chasm between the abilities of men and women, yet modern culture has sought to destroy society by pretending women are just as capable as men and handing them the power that we created and we alone are capable of handling.

This the source of a legitimate problem. The equivalent would be if men demanded that 50% of maternity beds in hospitals were allocated for men to give birth, even though we physically can't become pregnant. Imagine the chaos caused by doing this.

This level of chaos is actually real, just the other way round. Yes some men have helped to cause this, but the problems caused by men are open for discussion everywhere at anytime. We are not allowed to blame women for their failures, far from it, society is actively collapsing itself in order to pretend that they are magic geniuses that can do anything we can and even better than us, and women just can't do these things.

>>134193479
t. White knight LARPing as a femanon for (You)'s.

>>134193479
>Get off of your phones and ask a girl out in real life.
t. roastie that hit the wall

>>134193479
>implying pic is a real man

>>134193479
>femanon here
opinion discarded

>>134210486
>Says 227 posts after

If you need the attention so fucking much to be acknowledged as anything other than anon tits and timestamp or get the fuck out.

>>134209642
i also disagree. it seems to me that you are being willfully ignorant because there are so many things that talk about the flaws of men in great detail.

>>Everyone does not know the flaws of men. You need to hear the intricate cold hard truths more.

I don't know how to be any clearer. If you talk to any retard on the street they can tell you a million different ways men specifically are completely fucking crazy.And they usually(correctly) cite biology and evolution. Ask them about women specifically and they will give you general stuff like "crazy" and "emotional" but will say nothing more in polite company.

>>134193479
Weak people are weak, race or sex does not play any part in it

only weakness

File: enough.jpg (19KB, 403x392px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 403x392px

>>134193479
>caused by our toxic culture

hmmm...

>99.9% of violent crimes are committed by your kind

I see... yes...

>stop blaming women for your fragile ego problems

Gaslighting feminist detected.

>>134210758
I don't want to be the first one to show you breasts, little one.

File: averageaussie.jpg (69KB, 634x413px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 634x413px

>>134210120
>The equivalent would be if men demanded that 50% of maternity beds in hospitals were allocated for men to give birth, even though we physically can't become pregnant. Imagine the chaos caused by doing this.

I like this, nice job anon. However...
>No group of women has ever so much as built a house
No group of men has ever so much as given birth either.

Don't get carried away. Women have an incredibly important role that is on par with ours. Modern culture in the form of unquestioned feminism is leading many women to act as thought they are invincible and capable of everything, when no man or woman is. It is guaranteed to end in pain for both sides.

Science girl appears to have left us. Oh well.

>>134210120
my mother designed and built our house

ofc she did not pour the fucking foundation or put up the walls

but she hung more dry wall and put down more clinkers then anyone in our family

she got help obviously but she was the driving force behind everything

i know about about 10 women who work in construction

dont talk out of your ass because just because its loose

Old (37) femanon here. I don't agree with op. This generation of men have been shitted on so much, including as we now see by their own mother's. I don't blame them from being weary of the female species. I tell my younger brothers who are just entering adulthood and my nephews always to remember bitches ain't shit and don't let them cuck you. There are good girls out there but they are unicorns and hard to catch.

File: 1500444516021.jpg (110KB, 720x926px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 720x926px

>>134211228
There was a time when I thought 37 was old...

>>134193479
>dating apps and porn
Sure is projection in here, I'm christian and happily engaged, but I guess this site is full of stupid faggots so I won't say you're wrong but the method is flawed and as a result, so is the conclusion. You tried, but you're a woman so I guess trying to come up with even that mess of twisted logic was a struggle for you. Keep trying.

So on a related note, who's smarter? White women or niggers?

>>134193479
YOU'RE BEING BOSSY

>>134211569
Hahaha I don't feel old but I know for here it's pushing ancient.

>>134211228
Let me clarify. I agree this generation of males are shitted on frequently. Their mind neutering is sad. Just not to the point of their behavior being excusable, however, and most certainly not enough to the point where it should not be mocked on /pol/

>>134193479

I agree

File: house.jpg (72KB, 740x493px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 740x493px

>>134210120

The man is holding a beam of wood over his head, to place on his metaphorical house. It's quite heavy. He passes it to a woman, and takes the 2nd half of the day off.
'I did half the first half of the day and now she'll do half a day! This will make everything so much easier for me.'
But no, the woman drops the beam. She can't hold onto it for more than 30 seconds, let alone haul it into place. The progress of the house will stop dead until the man returns the next day.

This the failure of modern men. They have been sold a fantasy, a world where women are going to swoop down like angels and haul their bricks for them. Men who pretend that women are as capable as men are seeking a shrug off their own responsibilities.

>>134211834

>and most certainly not enough to the point where it should not be mocked on /pol/

But it's been mocked on /pol/ every hour for years.

>>134211608
I am sensing there projection inception goes deeper. I bet you pathetically found your wife online and still porn a lot. it's okay I will keep your secret.

>say something that, while true, will cause all the forever alone spergs in denial to suffer meltdowns because they feel slighted if a female says it instead of a leaf or larp flag poster
>receive many (you)'s

Nice job OP

>>134211834
Define mind neutering because from what I see these are smart boys and actually seek to learn new things all the time. Some of these guys have read a ton of book probably more than me and that's saying something because I read a lot. Just because they don't fit in your box doesn't mean they are some how wrong. When they are ready they will put their key board down and find a woman (((sweetie)))

>>134193479
>Secondly, please admit you have a psychotic violence problem. 99.9% of violent crimes are committed by your kind. Get ahold of yourselves, stop blaming women for your fragile ego problems.

I agreed with you up until here. I've never committed a violent crime and I'm fucking sick of being treated like I'm a pitbull.

Nah, I know it's a mixture that I socially isolate myself from most people because I have a hard time talking to strangers.

Along with that fact that most women today are more autistic than I am.

>>134211834
>I agree this generation has been shat
>but that doesn't mean we should stop shitting on them, they need to be mocked!

Fuck off. Fedora wearing basement dwelling fat ass neckbeard beta numales have been the topic of judgemental discussion and hate for a decade now on 4chan and the internet.

For decades nerdy males were made fun of for being smart and into science and technology, instead of being dumb buff brutes who abuse women, like girls apparently like.

We ALL know about the stereotypes of women ordering dumb buff chads to any other type of guy. Men are cucks and losers on women's whim because you control sex. Women are the gatekeepers who decide if anyone gets to fuck or not, unless they get raped, women have full sexual control.

>>134212719

Yeah. OP is either baiting us all or they are unaware of how much "fedora neckbeard" guys are constantly made fun of on the internet. It's so cruel. It's usually from feminists who say they want to "end gender roles" yet they bully these guys for not being alpha 10/10 young Chads with traditional families.

>>134212457

The issue between you and the other poster is an age difference mainly. I don't think young guys are perfect at all, we have a lot of flaws, but yes we have been shit on a lot and that's why so many opt out.

>>134193479
Have u never encountered the threads about male axons taking about the problems /pol males have

>>134212719
"stop making fun of me! I see it enough! There's nothing we can do!"

hahahahahaha

>>134202370
To be fair no one should have the right to vote

>>134193479
We have numale hate threads bi-daily you dumb roastie

>>134193479

>violence problem

Since the dawn of man, men have fantasized and enjoyed violence. It is simply human nature, it is not psychotic nor is it a fucking problem as long as it's not used in a niggerly manner.

>>134211132
>No group of men has ever so much as given birth either.
I said this, you even quoted me. That's integral to my whole point.

>>134211197
And some men raise kids single handed. Doesn't mean they can get pregnant. There is no single house built by women. Even if you don't count all the component materials and tools created by male manufacturing and engineering that took thousand of years to develop. Just go buy all the materials and build the house. Still too much.

You FUCKING RETARDS are proving /pol/ right. If someone said 'No man has ever given birth' it stands as a fact and no one gets annoyed. If you point out the achievements of men people can't hack it, freak out and say 'Don't talk out your ass boo hoo women are so great'. You are proving me right.

>>134213034
Okay this whole obsession you neckbeard betas have with Chad's and alpha's is gotten out of hand. Women don't care about looks that much or having a dumbass alpha by their side. I think you have watched too many disney movies.

>>134213431
Proper women no, but a significant portion do.

>>134213280
Not written be a girl though. Suddenly, the sizzle of the trolling becomes more real, doesn't it? And not just some beta to beta conversation to blow of your frustrations

>>134213431

But I've seen it over and over in real life. The internet is full of people like you who live in a fantasy world and deny the Chad thing, but then you rub it in the faces of the fedora neckbeard guys and you expect nobody not to notice your cognitive dissonance.

Face it, this whole thread exists because you're upset no guys ask you out on dates. Are you close to the wall?

>>134213431
shut up you fucking whore

>>134204222
Que que que? Dude if my sheila denies me sex I just jack off to hentai. If some rando girl doesn't feel like opening her legs for me I just go to a whore house. I don't see the need to lash out and just rape a bitch.

>>134213650
I got asked out by a black guy last week. This is the sad truth.

>>134193479
Nice picture.
>haha look at this loser beta male enjoying activities instead of worshiping a roastie and burning all of his money just to feed and clothe the whore.

File: 1499182194969.jpg (56KB, 583x435px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 583x435px

>>134212237
Literally only old people date online and only atheists, mudslimes, and jews watch the naked jew

>>134213431
The biggest difference between men and women in the current year is that men readily admit their perceived flaws while women try to pretend they're saints, which is utterly aggravating.

>>134213034
There is no reason to be perfect. Forcing a young person into marriage, kids, a serious job will lead to failure. Go to school, college or trade. Learn about how the world works, drink, party, have fun. When you have all these life experiences then settle down with a great job and wife, kids and your life will be better for it. That is my advise for /pol/. I did twelve years in the military, went to college and had a lot of fun. Now raising my 3 kids in the country and am a better person for it. Keep you head up /pol/

Boast noods

>>134213796

I almost feel bad for you but I won't. Shaming young men on /pol/ won't make cute young white guys ask you out on dates. Please go away now.

>>134213849
It was a way to visually draw you in and anger you. I play video games. I like them.

Next!

>>134213585
>moving the goal posts
And how do you know? it's anonymous, it could very well be a girl posting it.

File: Pathetic..jpg (22KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 480x360px

>>134193479
Go gas yourself

>>134214014
What games do you play?

>>134214006
"Shaming"

HAHA. You sweet, sweet maple leaf.

>>134193479
ITT: mongrels and roasties

>>134213086
Except no one said that. You're moving goalposts. The argument was that females get more shit than males here. My argument blows that out of the water.

If you're a female, right now all you're doing is acting like the kind of bitch that drives the males here to hate you more.

>>134214096
Call of duty and nfl2k17

>>134214163

But it is shaming. The first step to resisting and defeating shaming is recognizing when it happens. Please, go away and go be a gurrrrrrl gamer or something.

>>134193479
how has your sex anything to do with anything in your OP? You just stated it to get replies...
We are not new to such shenanigans, therefor we made a rule about it.
>tits or gtfo
The choice is yours.

>>134193479
>femanon here
>doesn't post tits
Pottery

>>134206929
Fuck off you retarded bitch.

>>134197262
What do you intend to tell us by sharing that journal article? That men underestimate women, causing low self-esteem in women that makes them fail college classes?
??
So every failure of women is the cause of some guy who lowered a self-esteem??
????
Seriously how is that science?

File: bigred.jpg (23KB, 550x309px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 550x309px

Stop replying to it, you fucks. OP is a feminist. It has no interest in what you have to say. It is only here to stroke it's ego and brag to it's friends that it was a brave little comrade in the fight against patriarchy.

>>134212457
Thank you for an engaging question. I define mind neutering as men (and women for that matter) who get all their opinions from TV and social media. This is expressed with males in a variety of ways. Here are two common ones you see everywhere.
1) The classic beta-nu-male-fedora archetype
2) Men who are glued to their cell phones for porn and dating apps. Could be a chad. Could be an alpha.

>>134193479
TITS OR GTFO OTHERWISE SAGE AND KYS ROASTIE WHORE BITCH

>>134214761
Def not a feminist. They can all die. Same with jews.

File: 1500125092010.jpg (328KB, 2142x864px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 2142x864px

Hello guys.
I'm a femanon.
I found your secret little 4chan-club.
Give me attention

>>134214801
I will never post my sexually pleasing milk sacks online. Would you accept a photo of a hand?

>>134195117
I'm a woman and I don't speak/type like a dumb roastie either. I believe OP is female.

>>134195600
>>134197262
>>134197661
>>134195600
>>134197262
>>134199776

You're wrong and you're a gay faggot. Men have been fucking shit-blasted on /pol/ for years. Take the dildo out of your loose ass. The only reason you say men aren't criticized on here is because you want to maintain your jew-inspired gay fantasy that women are oppressed and men are all kangz. Go back to Neogaf.

File: 1495408963912.jpg (73KB, 600x700px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 600x700px

>>134214880
Bullshit. You have all the signatures of a feminist postmodernist bullshit artist. Talking about "toxic" culture, thinking in terms of collectivism, patronizing or browbeating whoever you happen to be talking to, etc. You've, at the very least, had some feminist indoctrination.

>>134215196
It isn't about speaking like a dumb roastie, it's simply how most women communicate although it's far easier to tell when they are trying to be insulting..

>>134215000
n-no post your foot, nails painted plz

>>134193479
did this whore post her tits yet or are you all a bunch of faggots for replying to this shit thread?

File: Women.jpg (62KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 850x400px

>>134199516
Compassion is what destroyed the west. We acquired such affluence, that we stopped caring about ourselves and started projecting care to those less fortunate both around the world and within our own nation (minorities). This is bad because ultimately, the races in the world are VASTLY different in their capabilities in the modern world where IQ and industriousness are heavily emphasized. You know who gets fooled by their compassion harder than anyone? Women. This is why it was a mistake for women to be allowed to vote. It is natural that you are compassionate. You are wired to be mothers, the ultimate caring being of any species. This emotion is so strong in women that the majority cannot overcome it with their intellect and vote for the long-term interest of their country, you are literally blinded by compassion. Additionally, women make poor leaders due to the distribution of IQ, the average between men and women of every race is the same, but women are more concentrated in the center, hence less female retards, and less female geniuses. The problem is, great people make great leaders, and there are many more great men around than there are great women.

>>134211228
desu some men are to blame as well.
Bitches will be bitches, but they're not that many.
Culture pushes women to go the way of the slut. Hookup with others, have fun, you'll be fine and it's what you have to do! Do they see the wrong in that? No.
Instead they find that there's a relatively small percentage of men who treats them like fuckmeat and they end up being neurotic and broken, used and bitter towards all men because why the fuck aren't they living the life they were promised?
They're easily tempted and dragged into it. They're told it's the holy grial and they're dumb if they don't pursue it. They feel like it's how life should be lived in the end and if you don't agree then "you just hate you can't get laid xD".
But then they reach their 30's and they freak up because they have no husband or children, and get desperate, to the point where they marry any loser, jerk or someone they don't really love. And at this point they don't care if they fuck shit up. Many stop caring after a few relationships.

I don't think there's anyone to blame here but ourselves. We slowly provoked the collapse by mocking out past traditions without stopping to think "why the fuck did they do that?" People tend to forget that 100 or 1000 years ago people were just as smart as they are today. And they built shit the way they did for a reason.

>>134214766
I'll address your porn point first.... Grow up who cares if they watch porn. Big deal, grow some self esteem. My husband is deployed for up to 9 months at a time, he has porn. Big deal. It doesn't and shouldn't hurt my feelings one tiny bit. It doesn't stop him from being responsible or loving me. Dating app? Thought you wanted /pol/ to find a women? Who cares how they do it.

>>134193479

>ask a girl out
>pulling this card

I did many a times, either i get rejected or after one date i find out she's as dumb as a bag of bricks

File: 6357162634420530891709066346_Unknown.jpg (4KB, 292x173px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 292x173px

>>134206929

>>134215888
>>134215908

That is perhaps the biggest irony of this all. "Real men" create and uphold civilization, and give us all these comforts, then the decadence sets in, and these "real men" disappear. Civilization is not something to be taken lightly as we have done in the west.

File: 1475965735112.jpg (568KB, 800x1915px) Image search: [Google]

568KB, 800x1915px

>>134193479
>words

Whatever, vaginal Jew.

men as a whole are great with outliers
women as a whole are terrible with outliers
no hypocrisy in identifying this

>>134216454
That's the thing.
Look at the American Constitution. I'm not even American but it's a fucking masterpiece. It was crafted in such a way that it was protected against most of the issues it has today. Yet it took less than 200 years to learn to subvert it.

It only takes one generation of smart people who act to fix things. Then depending on how well they did it can last more or less, but it always falls. That's why Capitalism works but doesn't, really. Devolution is one hell of a problem.

File: A6J9p1j.jpg (87KB, 788x960px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 788x960px

>>134216566

>>134197262
You type like a delusional retarded. Holy fuck, check your garbage for grammar and/or spelling before you slam a pack of tampons onto the send button. Whatever point you're trying to make is invalidated by how retarded and angry you come off as.

>>134216924

It's just an overly-opionated queer. A lot of them are on this board right now. They are living proof of the decadence and degeneracy that has gripped the west.

>>134215908
True both sides made mistakes. It makes me sad that my side actually fought to be sluts. Birth control, abortions... Makes me ill. Can a get a redo?

>>134193479
Fuck these guys I'll protect you. I'll be your knight in shining armor.

>>134213585
>written be a girl
>>134213585
>Suddenly, the sizzle of the trolling becomes more real

lesson to all men here. chicks love low blows that sting.She wants women to write dissertations on evil men just because she thinks it would sting more to hear it from a woman. its not all evil tho. they are trying to test you and make you stronger.

>>134216856
You can say this about all political systems. Any political system will work if everything goes according to plan. It's the chaotic quirks that arise out of humanity that cause things to break down. This is why we have the ability to amend the constitution, it IS a "living document", even though that phrase has be used by faggots to push agendas that clearly don't follow the spirit of the constitution.

At the end of the day, every generation has to ensure the upkeep and regulation of their nation's policies. This is why education and fostering wisdom is important (and therefore can't be trusted to the government to regulate).

>>134217543

Well, it is good that women slowly realize that being a slut or a whore has no redeeming value, but it's really, really bad right now. That's one thing OP is right about, porn is a problem. Slut culture is disgusting and western civilization embraces it far too much. We haven't even begun to cure ourselves of it yet.