Realistically what are the chances that we all get fucked by North Korea /pol/?
slim to none
>>134169979
As long as NK bombs the shit out of the west coast and that's it, I have no problem.
>>134169979
About the same chance as you getting laid
0.
getting fucked by Nk's daddy?
maybe.
China
>>134169979
If by fucked you mean literally fucked, I'd say there is a small chance all of us may experience sexual intercourse with North koreans. It all depends on their stamina, penis sizes, if their women also pitch in and on many North Koreans there really is. My preliminary calculations roughly states that each North Koreans needs to fuck 292 people each to stasify the entire human population.
>>134169979
>you will never cuddle back to sleep with a genuine 10/10 qt3.14 on an early saturday morning knowing you have the full weekend ahead
Just absolutely fucking me now my dead senpai famalamalam piss cum sticks
>>134170425
i'm on the west coast, I wont even be incinerated like everyone in Washington. Instead just slowly and painfully burn to death.
my country didn't piss off NK, help.
>>134169979
Here's what could happen:
>Trump mistakenly trusts China enough to let them access the US telecommunications network near the nuclear football, while that object is being photographed via smartphone.
>Chinese military spooks use that call data to interpolate a US defense satellite trajectory.
>North Korea somehow acquires that information from China.
>The North Koreans detonate the betavoltaic batteries in their satellite while it travels in close proximity to the US defense satellites.
>Resultant EMP wave crashes US satellite over the Yellowstone caldera, and triggers a volcanic eruption.
>CIS countries allege that US corruption caused the military to make such a terrible mistake.
>The NATO axis is crippled by US crop failures and economic woes during crisis response.
>>134169979
It depends on how badly it goes down. The only place really in danger of physical annihilation is Seoul which would be catastrophic. The effect on the West felt will primarily be economic as we share the burden with the international community confronting the resulting humanitarian crisis.
The worst case scenario is if China or the US use the collapse as a way to capitalise in the trade war, which will certainly escalate things, especially if refugees are weaponised towards them.
The most likely scenario though is under threat of annihilation and fearing for their lives a coup is staged by insiders of the regime who kill Kim and open the country for reform.
People act like the population are so headfucked from decades of propaganda it will be impossible to get them to accept the change but after researching for a while I've found the most accurate analogy for the DPRK is a hostage situation.
When the regime collapses if they are brought the food, electricity, warmth and security they never had before they will very quickly switch their loyalties. Will be a very difficult transition to manage but they are a high IQ population who will be more cooperative once Kim is dead than most people think.
If you don't live in Seoul, then 0 is an overstatement.
>>134169979
None
Best korea likes us