ITT: Math question (that im too lazy to solve)

a country where half of its citizen don't even know what a toilet is can never call itself a superpower

>>133993631
people from mainland china dont know what toilets are either. yet china will surpass you in a few years

>>133993466
Probably never. It is, however, already a regional power and an increasingly important world player. It will probably peak out at number 3 over the next century.

>>133993466
India already is a superpower.

>>133993466
Undefined, you haven't stated what level makes a country a superpower, only that the US is one.

>>133993466
India exports labor. They do the same thing that Mexico (Mexicans) do. Work here, send money there. If USA falls, India will perish.

>>133993771
You're missing the point...

File: 1482261935367.png (248KB, 902x283px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 902x283px

You have to divide by the hypotenuse of the poo, OP.

Like 300 years

>>133993466
super power is a cold war meme, stop it

there are only two kinds of countries in this world, pro white, and pro shitskins.

Which one is yours?

File: Screenshot_2017-07-17-16-07-18.png (641KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

641KB, 1080x1920px

75 years

>>133993771
This is my favorite meme. I've only seen it spouted by people who've never been to China

>>133993466
You can't really use the relative growths as a metric to compare how nations are developing. Imagine that all you're worth were 1 dollar, but now someone gives you another dollar. The absolute growth is tiny, almost insignificant, but your gdp has just grown 100 %. It's easy to get dramatic relative growths if you're poor, but it gets far harder as you get richer. Indias growth will slow down eventually.

>>133995177
This. Retards can't grasp the fact that India is a total shithole.

>>133994867
ah good. ill be dead by then
>>133994994
the big cities are better places to live than europe or america.
t. has been to shanghai 4 times about to go for the fifth time

File: The world 2050 PwC.png (82KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1280x720px

>>133993466
Here are the PricewaterhouseCoopers projections.
Also India's GDP in terms of Purchasing power is actually $7,153 (PPP est; 2017) & their GDp growth is actually 7.1% (2017)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_India

So the Answer is India will be a bigger economy then US around 2035.

>>133994867
>assuming growth rates will function exponentially at the same rate forever

>>133994867
What's the equation?

File: world-in-2050-image3.png (36KB, 487x594px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 487x594px

>>133994867
>>133993466

(OP) uses wrong Data. & India's GDP growth is actually 7.1% (2017)
India's GDP in terms of Purchasing power is actually $7,153 (PPP est; 2017)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_India

Here are the PwC projections for 2050.
India will be a bigger economy then US and EU by 2050 with a 15% share of the world GDP. China will be number 1 with 20% share. US will be 12% and EU will be 9%.

>>133993631
A great deal of americans can't differenciate between a mart and a toilet to be fair

>>133995412
And by the "big cities" you mean only Shanghai and Hong Kong? Because I'm gonna assume from your ignorant opinion haven't been to any others like Nanjing or Chongqing. They're fucking dumps, and the vast majority live in India tier squalor. China has come a ways, but people are starting to get fed up with the Party now as economic growth slows down and the tenuous social contract between the people and government weakens. Deng Xiaoping was one of the smartest Chinese leaders simply because he didn't drink the Koolaid and overestimate his people.

>>133996644
No need to be a butthurt Euro

File: CaptureSFO.jpg (116KB, 660x832px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 660x832px

>>133996936
I am not sure that he is just butthurt. US has designated Shitting streets too.
The only difference is that they issue proper maps of shitting streets.

>>133997158
California isn't part of America

>>133995966
ax^t - by^t = 0
t log x - t log y + log a - log b = 0
t = (log b - log a) / (log x - log y)
= (log 1861.5 - log 52194.5) / (log 1.015 - log 1.061) = 75.21 y

File: MiamiCapture.jpg (139KB, 1141x816px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1141x816px

>>133997253
How about Florida?

>superpower
More like pooperpower

>>133997313
(OP) is using wrong Data. India's GDP growth is actually 7.1% (2017) & India's GDP in terms of Purchasing power is actually $7,153 (PPP est; 2017)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_India

>>133997792
37 years with your values.

>>133996496
The smartest poos run away to be stupid code monkey and the smartest chinese run away to canada australia and usa because china is shit.
If you're at the bottom growth means absolut nothing if everyone has european living standards while still having such a big growth then ok butbthat will never happen

File: Pic-07172017-001.jpg (281KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 1600x1200px

>>133993466
This is a basic exponential growth problem. We want to find out what year India will be equal to America in terms of GDP.
Assumptions made: Growth rate will hold and OP is not a lying faggot about the gdp numbers.

File: seashells.450.png (29KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 450x450px

>>133993771
They do know what a toilet is, they just don't know how to use it properly
t. been to public toilets in China. Ain't pretty.

File: 1497931673326.jpg (188KB, 736x1106px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 736x1106px

>>133993631
India has a lot more than you think. Like this over a 1000 years old temple.

>>133994488
kek and checked

>>133993466
You can't project growth indefinitely like that. Money can grow itself exponentially because investments can make money endlessly. GDP can't grow exponentially because the population can't exponentially get more efficient.

Put another way, the USA's GDP per capita is ~55k. India's is ~5k. 1.5% growth on 55k is $825, 6.1% growth on 5k is $305. People in the US are actually getting more wealthy faster than people in India, almost 3x as quickly.

File: jjkj.jpg (277KB, 1559x851px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 1559x851px

>>133997977
IMF projections are for faster growth in coming years for India. It is expected to be 7.7% for 2017-2018
https://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2017/05/09/imf-update-on-indias-gdp-growth-prediction-7-2-this-fiscal-7-7-in-2018-2019/#28777dca186d
Plus US is not going to Grow at 1.5% consistently.

File: Top_five_largest_economies_in_2050.jpg (71KB, 1355x602px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1355x602px

yes, but that doesn't mean their standard of living will be like the US.

>>133999078
Archive shills
https://archive.is/zDanE

>>133998536
But does it have a toilet?

>>133993466
This is a trick question right? The answer is obviously never.

File: 1500252903032.jpg (236KB, 1080x1255px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 1080x1255px

>>133995966
t. math illiterate

Wow pol really cares about India. More than Indians do lol.

Reminder, due to advances in robotics and ai growth will accelerate.

in 0 it took 1000 years to double the GDP
in 1000 it took 300 years to double the GDP
in 1500 it took 150 years to double the GDP
in 1850 it took 70 years to double the GDP
today it takes 30 years to double the GDP
in the not too distant future it will take just one year to double the GDP

File: 1499317530931.png (72KB, 820x658px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 820x658px

>>133997992
Except that it is not true. Majority of India's smart people either stay in India or just spend a few years outside India. Americans just say it because it makes them feel better about losing so many jobs to the Indian workers & so much to the Indian kids in Academics competitions. Plus India has 1325 million people. And Indians living in the US is just about 4 million. Its just about 0.33% of Indian population. And not all are coders.
Also according to Pricewaterhousecooper, with the current trends India will overtake the US some time around 2035.

File: laughing_at_maymays.gif (569KB, 500x376px) Image search: [Google]

569KB, 500x376px

>>133999600

hahaha that fucking picture lmao

You need Macroeconomics, not just math. You must take into account the expected growth rates for the future, which decreases as the economy developes, as well as several other factors lile unemployment, risk, population growth, etc.
If I had access to Matlab at home Id try to make a guess using World Bank Data but that would also take all night.

>>133999600
Never

>>133998435
OP did actually give you wrong data.
>>133996496

>>134000301
It's safe to say if that ever even happens, we'll all be dead by then. Plus living standards are never going to be anywhere close so the numbers are pointless.

>>134000301
Climate change.

Himalayas dry up.
No more water for Pajeet.
Ground dries up.
No more food for Pajeet.
Sea rises.
No more coastal city for Pajeet.
Pajeet moves to Hans, Pierre and Blyat.

>>133996496
>India will be a bigger economy then US and EU by 2050 with a 15% share of the world GDP
But this assumes that India's growth rate won't decrease. It's economy is still in its early stages, of course it has massive growth.

>>133998435
>hi /pol/!
go hang yourself

>>134000198
>Americans just say it because it makes them feel better about losing so many jobs to the Indian workers & so much to the Indian kids in Academics competitions
Poo detected
Also it says right in there that the results are dubious.

>>134000301
Professionals have already done that.
See----->>>133995413 & >>133996496

>>133993466
It's a poorly worded question, but they're asking you to solve

Current+growth*years=current+growth*years

The answer you should turn in though is "not before they stop shitting in the street"

>>134000301
This right here
>>134000640
Your biggest challenge is going to be organization and infrastructure imo

Doesn't help that so many of your countrymen run away from home, do nothing to help, and then brag about your future from across the ocean like this guy >>134000198

>>134000817
This is an estimate done by Pricewaterhousecooper. They consider all possible factors. Its one of the best accounting firm.

>>134001404
It doesn't matter. Estimate like that one are put out all the time, for both China and India. You often see articles debunking them
They don't even account for economic changes, much like great social changes like automization

>>133993466
>(((gdp)))

File: Ethnic groups in US by household income.jpg (56KB, 298x550px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 298x550px

>>134000937
I never was trying to hide my identity Mr. Shart in the Mart.
And it doesn't say results are dubious. It says that data set was small but the result are consistent with the achievement levels of Indian Americans. You know like highest average family Income of any ethnic group in the US.

>>134001836
>And it doesn't say results are dubious.
It says to take it with a grain of salt.
>You know like highest average family Income of any ethnic group in the US.
Another worthless source- the chart would have to be per person, not per household. As it is, it might be just an indication that Indians have big families and tend to live together.

>>133993466
Isn't that gdp per capita? Total gdp is how you determine superpower status and India is in 7th place.

>>133999972
Your diapora has to go bak.

>>134001561
>automization
Okay Cetus....Whatever you say. The accounting firms are all wrong. But your hillbilly instincts are right. Got it.

-20 points for not using units.

1861.5 whats?

>>134002262
https://www.forbes.com/2010/03/18/china-growth-debt-currency-yuan-climate-markets-economy-myths.html
Here you go. Your average iq is somehwere in the 80s, so take your time.

Once the US has Space Marines nothing else will matter.

Lord Emperor Trump will vanquish the heretics.

>>133996496
Good analyis, but what does it mean really. Will they be able to drink water out of a tap? Drive on roads that are well paved and traffic laws are obeyed? A culture that is not mired by tribalism and superstition? Doesn't matter what GDP they have if the quality of life sucks.

>>134001836
There is so few Indian American's and the only ones that get here are rich and have degrees.

Those numbers are accurate in terms of averages by ancestry but if you looked at numbers it would be a different image.

File: CzAYZadXEAAB7vF (1).jpg (221KB, 1200x825px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1200x825px

>>134002052
You keep missing the fact that it says that the IQ results are consistent with the achievement levels. And income is just one of them.
Plus the data in the table is from US census. Plus there is no proof to what you said about average family size. Many Indian families in the US are actually just single men or women because the rest of the family is in India or something. You just keep making excuses for the fact that on level playing field whites get thoroughly defeated by Indians. Like in every STEM competition. Here are the winners of Siemens competition.
8 Indians
7 Chinese
3 Whites
1 Japanese.
Individual Category.
1st Prize - Vineet Edupuganti the $100,000 winner.
https://twitter.com/sfoundation/status/806181975568646144
2nd Prize - Manan Shah the $50,000 winner.
https://twitter.com/sfoundation/status/806181774518788096
4th Prateek Kalakuntla the $30,000 winner.
https://twitter.com/sfoundation/status/806181390253518848
5th Pranav Sivakumar the $20,000 winner.
https://twitter.com/sfoundation/status/806181190696894464

Group Category.
1st Prize - Adhya and Shriya Beesam- the $100,000 winners.
https://twitter.com/sfoundation/status/806180781777358848
2nd Prize - Nikhil Cheerla & Anika Cheerla the $50,000 winners.
https://twitter.com/sfoundation/status/806180781777358848

File: incomecapitaethnicgroupsUSA.png (111KB, 597x2608px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 597x2608px

>>134001836
>highest average family Income
Then maybe stop living 10 poos in a single house? Per capita is where it's at.

Btw how come shitskins can only become successful living in the West but are backward retards in their homeland? It's almost like your success depends on being parasites of white people, and like any parasite the more concentration of your kind the worse off is the host. That's why India which is full of poos is a shithole.

File: Nordic kike.jpg (32KB, 415x478px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 415x478px

>>133993466
Stop posting this guy. He's a jew.

>>133993466
>in what year will india be a superpower
when they have loo

File: DrCuddy.jpg (61KB, 825x361px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 825x361px

>>134001836

>Medical doctors pulling up average by quite a lot
>MDs now spend as little time as possible with you because they get a max of 15 minutes with each patient and want as much as possible of that to roll over to the next patient for safety

So, which will happen first automation replacement or end of traditional doctor wage structure? Once it's all pajeets and slants they'll just tell the unions to fuck off and doctors will make 50k a year.

>>134003157
yet he looks whiter than all of /pol/! BTFO!!!

>>134003095
Those names...these are not even indian americans but indian imports straight from India. Same goes for the chinese. You're comparing a pool of 200 million american whites to 1300 million poos and 1400 chinese.

File: GDP_per_capita_of_India_(1820_to_present).png (1MB, 728x402px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 728x402px

>>134003126
Per Capita is also problematic because the fertility rate of these Europeans is low in the US. So they have fewer kids to divide up the income when you are counting per capita. Meanwhile Indians are more often married in stable marriages and have 2-3 kids.
So if you compare an average worker to worker basis, Indian will come out higher.
India was held back for a long time by you pigskin from UK. India's economy gre at less than 1% per annum for 150 years when the British pigs were in India. Since they left it has grown at an average of 6-7% per year. Just wait and we will leave you pigs behind.

>>134003126
Idiot. The reason Indians succeed in other countries and not their own is because the ones who manage to get out are the smartest of the lot and know that there's no future for them in India. You think the 100 IQ pajeets (which represents the vast majority of Indians) will ever get out of this shithole? Hell I have an IQ of 142 (behavioural psychological test) and got a scholarship in London, but my parents are too poor to afford the other expenses.

>>134003095
>the fact that it says that the IQ results are consistent with the achievement levels
That's not scientific
>Plus the data in the table is from US census
Yes, it is. But the poor interpretation of it is from your iq 80 brain
>Many Indian families in the US are actually just single men or women because the rest of the family is in India or something
Mere hearsay, and worth nothing.
>Like in every STEM competition
Great work on that, but where are your nobels? There are billions of you.

File: Intel Science Talent Search 2016 Winner Photo 3 15 16.jpg (2MB, 3600x2400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3600x2400px

>>134004177
> where are your nobels?
When UK left India, 90% of Indians were illiterate. keep so under a deliberate policy by the British, inspired by the US policy that made it illegal to educate the slaves. US reached almost full literacy in late 1800s.
This was the biggest blow of the British colonization to Indians. Now the literacy rate is about 75% and the illiterate people are the older generation that could not be taught in the decades right after independence due to the lack of schools, teachers, money and the sheer size of illiteracy.
You guys had a big head start. Just wait a few more years and India is going to catch up.
Here are the 3 first prize winners of the last years Intel STEM prize. Also known as the Junior Nobel.
2 Indian
1 White.

>>133997599
Checked, never fails to get a laugh

>>134005340
>Here are the 3 first prize winners of the last years Intel STEM prize. Also known as the Junior Nobel.
>2 Indian
>1 White.
Why should it prevent nobels, but not junior nobels? You're just making excuses.
>duh big bad brits ruined everythin!!!!1111
Even pakistan has a higher nobel rate than you do.

>>134004067
Indian in the US have the same name as those in India. And these are Indian Americans only. Kids from India are not competing in these competitions. US schools have to sponsor the Kids. Its 330 million other Americans vs 4 million Indian Americans.
Stop making excuses.

>>134005782
>Why should it prevent nobels, but not junior nobels? You're just making excuses

Because the older generation in India wasn't even educated. they had no access to education. The younger kids are getting more and better education. And the average age of a Nobel prize winner is what? 60ish
India doesn't have enough literate people in that generation. Thanks to the Britshits who spent nothing on education in India while extracting exorbitant taxes.
Also, Nobel prize is not some fairly awarded prize. Gandhi never got it, meanwhile Obama got one for doing nothing at all.

Pakistan has had just 2 Nobel prize winners. Both were disowned by pakistan. Only one was a scientist. The other is the teenager who got shot in the head.

For India the total recipients are 12 Indians (5 Indian citizens and 7 of Indian origin or residency).

So given all these factors, I am not really sure what significance your rate of Nobel prizes has.

>>133993466
Once they stop dedicating their streets for shitting (never)

>>134004074
What a load of crap. First of all per capita income is much more accurate than household income which depends heavily on the number of individuals in a home.
Second you're making this up about indians having more kids (in fact asians have a lower fertility than whites but I don't know about indians in particular and neither you do).
Third indians have a bigger % of its population in the working age (16-65 yo) group while whites are much more likely to be old thus retired thus no earnings.
4 whites are also much more likely to live in rural areas and low income states while indians immigrate specifically to urban areas of high income states. Even a job flipping burgers at mcdonalds in NYC pays more than the same job in WV. I bet if you compare the earnings of whites living in the same areas as indians, whites would have a higher income, but there is no data for that unfortunately.
6 Whites in the US represent the average of their countries of origin while indians are very selected for IQ.
7 Stop making excuses about muh colonialism, that's the same retarded argument niggers use. If you fail among your own but succeed living among whites it's not because of your own merit but because you take advantage of everything whites have build.
>>134005893
The majority of indians in the US are foreign born, so yes they're imports from the better India has to offer. Maybe some kids in that competition are american born, but their parents sure aren't.
If you're so good go back to India and tell me the same about muh income from there. And don't forget to take all your countrymen with you.

>>134004117
Your problem is that you think like a high iq person so you want to make things the right way. You could come illegally, cry racism when busted and you'd be given nationality for free plus many other handouts. At least it works for mexicans.

>>133993771
Yeah. Just like Japan was going to surpass the US in the 80s

>>134005893

Get out of my country.

>>134008528
>>134008528
>Third Indians have a bigger % of its population in the working age (16-65 yo) group while whites are much more likely to be old thus retired thus no earnings.
You are just comparing a few white immigrants from eastern Europe and UK etc and projecting it on all whites.
These people in the table are the recent white immigrants, not the whole white population. It says 1.3 million British. You know that the size of overall British background population in the US is like 35 million.
These people you are comparing are the same kind of young immigrants, not the whole fucking white population.
You make too many shitty mistakes. i am done wasting my time on someone who can't analyse things right and makes BS excuses.

>>134008623
You go back to Europe. I am an American Citizen.
Europe for Europeans remember.

File: 1499846321383.png (314KB, 480x662px) Image search: [Google]

314KB, 480x662px

>>133993466
OP is a faggot AND a brainlet.

>>134009501
Nope. British american is how they choose to identify, they could be indeed recent immigrants from the UK or colonial americans. Anyway 1,3 million brits in the USA out of UK's 60 million total population is much more representative of its natives than 3,5 million indians out of 1300 in India. They should revoke your H1B visa you're obviously a fraud you fail at basic math.

>>134010344
I am a US citizen. So H-1b has no effect on me.
Plus US congress will never revoke them. There is like 2 member senate Republican majority. And half of those Republicans are actually for expanding the H-1bs. So dream on. It is not happening in at least next 10 years.
Senate just forced Trump admin to give out 15K extra H-2b visas.
You know I voted for Trump. So did many in my family and friends circle. So that he could get rid of kebabs and illegals. But then all you white fucks chimped out on Indians.
Now you fucks have lost all support among the Indian American community of over 4 million.
And for what? Nothing on H-1b visas is going to pass, but Trump is definitely going to lose over a million votes.
I am voting for democrats from now on. Let them flood the US with who they want. You motherfuckers are to dumb to not attack your own supporters.

>>134009501
>>134010344
I just checked the census.gov website.
Asian Indian alone: native (1,014,708), foreign born (2,476,344).
British: native (1,109,472), foreign born (217,488).
It looks like you were wrong. Not only brits are much less likely to be recent immigrants but they're also much less selected, unlike indians.

>>133993631
shart in mart

>>133993466
If India's rate of growth is constant with the USA never increasing or decreasing then it takes around 451 years for India to be a superpower.

>>134012370
Oops, that didn't include the current GDP. The real answer is around 435 years to match America's current GDP assuming their growth is constant.

File: Britshits.jpg (50KB, 279x498px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 279x498px

>>134011784
There are 40.2 million self reporting British Americans. Some estimates suggest that they are up to 72 million in the US.
I am not really sure what you are complaining about.
Of course fewer British immigrate to the US these days because it is a level playing field for everyone now. Other immigrants just beat them out. They had racist advantages till 1965 officially and up to 80s unofficially. But now they are just like others.
They still have the advantage of visa free travel to the US which most other immigrants do not have.
Anyway. It doesn't prove any of the points that you were making earlier.
British immigrants recent or 2nd generation tend to marry late in life and have fewer kids. Indians get setup for marriage by the time they are 25 and start having kids from then on.
So your per capital comparison is bogus without knowing the family size, number of kids etc.
Also most Indian immigration is family chain migration. h-1bs have to go back. Only 10,000 get visa each year from every country. So Chinese get the same number of H-1b based green cards as do Indians as do British. Its called country quota on green cards through h-1b.

>>134011616
>I WUZ HIGH IQ I WUZ EDUCATED I WUZ AMERICAN CITIZEN I VOTZ TRUMP PLS LET ME STAY DONT DEPORT ME PLZZ
You're pathetic pajeet, only whites can be american. Don't worry your time will come.

Btw I'm lurking more the census website. About income (Mean earnings (dollars) for full-time, year-round workers):
Indians: male 105,004, female 75,337.
Taiwanese: male 106,206, female 78,803.
Syrian (top kek): male 109,784, female 61,656.
Australian: male 119,871, female 69,604.
British: male 100,137, female 67,032.
Israeli: male 109,063, female 68,283.
Latvian: male 110,625, female 71,131.
Russian: male 112,810, female 70,232.

These are just some examples. It seems that you were wrong again and per capita income was more accurate than household income.

>>134013026
You're making excuses pajeet and changing the subject, your original argument was that british americans were recent immigrants from the UK thus very selected and the reason they had a higher per capita income than indians.
I proved you wrong with official stats showing british americans and more native while indians are more recent immigrants, as well as demostrating based on the population of the country of origin that indians are much more selected than brits.
You can check other examples here >>134013257. All of those populations are also less selected than indians yet earn the same or more.

I will leave this discussion here. You lied since the beggining and when I provided facts which indicated otherwise you try to change the premise. That's low even for a shitkin.

>>133993631
s h a r t i n m a r t
h
a
r
t

i
n

m
a
r
t

>>133994488

>those fucking digits

also, this guys isn't very happy with the idea

>>134013257
>I Wuz Shart In The Mart ; Only Whitey Can Be AmeriFat; I Wuz Making 5K More Then U

You idiot. If you average men and women of each ethnicity, there is hardly any real difference.
Plus I am sure that among Indians there are many sub groups that make much more then others.
Your data proves my point actually. To match the Indian tier income, you have to select only the highest income white groups. Overall whits are shit.
Now next time Dems are going to win and bring in more and more immigrants.
Trump was your last chance to fix the Muzzie threat and control illegals. But because of your dumbness, you whites blew it.

File: image.jpg (240KB, 714x621px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 714x621px

>>133993466
India is already a pooperpower

>>133995413

>constant growth for 10+ years

this never happens.

>>134000198

american poo detected

>>134013026
I forgot to say you're talking crap again. As I said indian american population is younger and a higher % of them are working age. You don't know if they have more kids or not so don't go this way, what we can be certain is that whites are older and old people who don't work don't have an income.
Anyway forget about kids which are irrelevant and focus on the mean earnings (dollars) for full-time workers which I posted above.
Lastly always remember America is a white country founded by white people for white people. You don't belong here and neither deserve to live here.

>>134003095

this pic is the first time I saw a tall poo.

File: monk+thief.jpg (22KB, 350x263px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 350x263px

We gonna eat like KANGZ now Pajeet!

>>134004074

>started using "UK is keeping the indian men down" argument

you lost it, poo

File: 1472319828427.jpg (3MB, 3240x3576px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3240x3576px

>>134013838
First off your first data set for British showing higher income then Indians ------->>134003126
contradicts your second data set that shows lesser income for British then Indians ------->>134013257

And its significant difference showing Indian make more by 5k for men and 7k for women.

Secondly, your data sets are not internally consistent, proving that they are full of shit, just like you.

Thirdly. India has a large population 25 % that is uneducated. Another large percentage is not educated much and so on. Plus your selectivity being higher for Indians immigrants than say Chinese is BS. Chinese get more overall visas including student and family reunification.
They have higher literacy by far.

Overall you are Sharting in the thread. So I am done with you Mart Sharter.

>>134003126

How are east european americans so rich if their countries are such a mess?

>Latvia
>Russia
>Lithuania
>Slovenia

in the top 10

>Czechoslovakia
>Slovakia
>Croatia
>Hungary
>Romania

in the top 20.

File: GDP World.gif (42KB, 595x495px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 595x495px

>>134015130
Except for it is true in case of India. India's growth was less then 1% for 150 years of British despotism. And since they left, India has become a $9.49 trillion (PPP; 2017) economy. Per capita GDP has also grown at 6-7% yearly since the British leaches left.
You have to remember that India was a bigger economy when the britshits showed up in India. India was not Africa. Not everyone who isn't white is the same.
What may or may not be true for Africans is not necessarily true for India.
You take the worse examples from Africa and then project it on everyone non-white. Well...thats why your arguments are Shart tier.

>>133997158
high density of shit in streets exakt area where there is the highest density if chinese
>like potery

>>134015279

India has 82 average IQ, absolute low. This is the IQ you would expect from people who dwell in their own poo and drink cow urine.

File: 1497045002827.jpg (87KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 960x1280px

>>134016385
San Francisco's homeless Street sharting bums are white drug addicted pigskins. There are also some blacks and Latinos.
Never seen a chinese homeless there.
Its Pigskins all the way.

>>134016179

you're right, things clearly got better as the brits left. Still poo tho.

File: zika-ground-zero-waiting-room.jpg (110KB, 620x396px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 620x396px

>>134016454
And you Zika niggers are the Geniuses. Retarded Fucking Monkeys.

>>134016723

"pigskin"

you mean the people who conquered you for decades and made your people no much more than nigger slaves? You low IQ small dick indians should not pick this fight.

File: blackhuehue.jpg (53KB, 576x960px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 576x960px

>>134016805
Fuck off you zika infected Monkey.

File: delicia3.png (6KB, 242x208px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 242x208px

>>134016888

we eat "sopa de macaco" and we're still more intelligent than indians. Stay mad, dumb poo.

What you are asking is to find a value of n where 1861.5 * 1.061^n = 52194.5 * 1.015^n. Plugging this into Wolfram Alpha, we find a solution of 75.211. At this many years, the GDP of both countries will be equal. Following this many years, the GDP of India will be higher.

But this assumes absolutely no changes in both countries' growth rates within 75 years. 75 years ago, we were in the middle of World War 2. Lots of things can happen within such a time span.

File: delicia2.png (7KB, 282x179px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 282x179px

>>134019510

Yes, that's the answer. Sadly it has no meaning in the real world since there's never been a GDP growth constant for this much time. I think that, like most things in nature, this curve will normalize in some years(I'll bet 10).

>>134016723
>swedish
>white
???

>>134000198
Dude. Indians desperately try to escape that shit hole. In the 50s hundreds of thousands of Indians came to the UK to get away from the shit country. My entire family came from India except my generation who were born here. I know Indian relatives who constantly try to get citizenship here.

India will be a shit hole for a long time.

File: evry.gif (3MB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 800x450px

>>134023118
Whatever Poo Mohammed. How about go shit on your Quran.