Colonising Mars

>>133902333
He grew up in south africa, so I'm pretty sure thats a yes.

>>133902432
Indeed but I reckon it's what all his fans are thinking too, subconsciously

It's just the latest case of white flight

Interplanetary white flight

File: P05-Teach-On-Mars-NASA-Recruitment-Poster-600x.jpg (318KB, 600x960px)

318KB, 600x960px

>>133902333
op, please. Do you even have to ask?

File: P04-Surveyors-Wanted-NASA-Recruitment-Poster-600x.jpg (364KB, 600x960px)

364KB, 600x960px

>>133902333
No gravity is basically like swimming, and we know who can't swim for shit.

It will take more than 10,000 years to terraform Mars using technology that doesn't exist. There isn't any way to increase its weak magnetosphere either.

>>133902333
Since we either:
>die eventually
>learn to find a way out of here before we die eventually

a lot of people are interested in making the latter happen
If you want to escape niggers move to a gated community in a smallish midwestern city

Only flat planets can sustain life.

>>133902779
you're an idiot. the gravity is most of why we are interested in Mars.

File: P01-Explorers-Wanted-NASA-Recruitment-Poster-600x.jpg (443KB, 600x960px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 600x960px

>>133902333
I think they'll make our life down here more and more miserable, until there are plenty of volunteers for Mars suicide missions. Would you already apply today, /pol/?

File: qmag.jpg (29KB, 853x480px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 853x480px

>>133902333
>not just sending the blacks to Mars and staying on Earth

File: P06-Technicians-Wanted-NASA-Recruitment-Poster-600x.jpg (335KB, 600x960px)

335KB, 600x960px

>>133902898
But it's a long way to Mars, you know, burger?

>>133902333
We want to colonize mars because that's what it means to be human. The drive to explore the unknown is embedded in us from the time when we had to scout the outsides of our camps for threats and sources of food.

File: P02-Work-The-Night-Shift-NASA-Recruitment-Poster-600x.jpg (309KB, 600x960px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 600x960px

>>133902898
And a space ship is basically a slave boat in the wide ocean. I doubt they'll like this.

>>133902333
Elon wants to get away from vile teenage scum like you, op. Just kill yourself already.

File: space actors.webm (342KB, 720x576px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 720x576px

>current year, still believing in the jewish (((space))) meme

File: Mars.jpg (26KB, 460x287px)

26KB, 460x287px

>>133902333
In the event of space travel, colonization, and human endeavors into our solar system and beyond it will be a leftist world that dominates the political sphere from there on out. Prove me wrong seriously.
Everytime i think of what a political world would be in a space faring age i think of leftist and expanded lgbtqtip universe where it never ends. Anything resembling so much as a viewpoint leaning right would be squashed. Honestly i just can't see a future in a space world with anything even right centrist leaning; does anyone have something to prove me wrong i want to be wrong i really do but every time i think of it all i see is a thousand years of darkness in leftist hell hole universe :*(

>>133902333
Well digits show whats a strong reason
But also, the US has already been to mars, pillaged all its worth pillaging, and then recently in the obama admin they gave the greenlight for private sector to go there

>>133902993
yeah mars... that's what we will say. not at all being shot into the sun.

>>133902333
Escaping the niggers has always been the motivation for exploration and genocidal colonization... Even the first niggers that left africa that led to the white races were trying to escape the niggers.

>>133902608
Imagine, a world of whites only.

To even farm on Mars will require importing soil from Earth. The amount of soil to grow enough food to support even one person is ludicrous, and guess what all attempts at making a colony-scale self sustaining biosphere have to the current date FAILED

File: 1-nasaproposes.jpg (27KB, 634x469px)

27KB, 634x469px

>>133902836
*blocks your solar wind*

>>133902333
yes.

i don't think there's any question about it.

>>133902836
You don't have to increase its magnetosphere to deflect solar radiation, just put a giant radial filter out in a lagrange point between mars and the sun that reflects the harmful shit and lets enough uv, white light through to grow shit. Easily done, mars will just be in the 'shadow' of the filter.

>>133902836
Can someone explain what this tard is trying to say?

>>133902333
Why should we flee and leave the Earth to niggers? Send them and all the other shitskins and mudslimes to Mars. Let them build their ideal society free from dependence on western civilization and see how far they get.

>>133903809
In simple terms there is a force field around earth that protects from radiation. Mars doesn't have one it lost that many many years ago.

>>133902993
There was a Bradbury story about that.
Or if not him, another early sci-fi writer story about it.
All blacks go to Mars

The story is about a white astronaut landing and how they want to lynch him

>>133902993
>>133903573
Send the niggers and muzzies to Mars, after a decade they and their offspring will be too weakened by Mars' low gravity to ever turn to earth. They can be a curiosity to watch from afar by space tourists.

Use a few hundred nukes to blow off Venus' excess atmosphere and terraform it into a comfy white ethnoplanet.

>>133904013
Wrongish.
A thickish atmosphere would stop more than enough radiation to make the surface viable.
I mean, on Earth, the magnetic field goes away every few thousand years as the poles reverse.

It's the thick matter of the atmosphere that stops dangerous shit.

Mars' problem is that it is too cold. There's lots of CO2 in the caps.
Gotta melt it.
The solution is to slam it with a few comet cores full of volatiles.
Maybe a few nukes, why not.
Gotta add heat to the system.

Add a mirror system at the Martian L1 and you're good to go.

The lack of a magnetic field for Mars is a minor problem.
Yeah, in a million years the thick atmosphere that humans like will blow away.
But man that's so far away it doesn't matter.

Mars needs heat and maybe some more volatiles. Enter comets and mirrors.

I've yet to hear one legitimate idea for how we terraform a fucking planet before we learn how to remove carbon dioxide from our atmosphere. Leftists will defend this.

>>133904693
Oh we can.
It's just expensive.
And no one wants to pony up yet.

There's even a cheap route with iron seeding, but no one wants to take that potentially apocalyptic step yet.

We know how, but we don't want to do it yet.

File: 9781477681596-us-300.jpg (31KB, 300x479px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x479px

>>133902333
Book related

>>133904599
>t. flaming faggot who had no comprehension to the sheer magnitudes of energy required
Try 1,000,000,000×all nukes ever made

>>133904599
i can always rely on autism never stop disappointing pol

>>133904798
Better book
Red Mars by Robinson
GOAT Mars colonization book imo

>>133904788
My God you love cock more than i thought possible.

File: Kiss(You).gif (759KB, 426x296px) Image search: [Google]

759KB, 426x296px

>>133904693
Plant life trees large amounts of algae!

>tfw born too early to enjoy chicks with three boobs

>>133903926
Because we white men are the only ones that fucking CAN do this right. We shall have to leave this world one day, therefore we must present the Universe with the best of our species. Putting retards and shitskins before the universe wont do anything but result in dead shitskins and retards, and we can do that with bullets for WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY cheaper.

>>133904876
Mars is at the fringes of the habitable zone.
The problem is that it doesn't have enough atmosphere to retain the sun's heat.
We don't need to warm the atmosphere on its own.
The sun will do it.
We just need the atmosphere in the first place.

A few nukes vaporizing the poles will help a great deal

>>133904974
What's your reckoning, bud?

Nothing I said was factually incorrect.

File: dafgjh84-3.png (89KB, 439x544px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 439x544px

>>133904994
>tfw born just right to enjoy chicks with nice penis

>>133904599
>CO2 causes warming
Nice try, liberal faggot

File: 1491446213703.png (54KB, 625x626px)

54KB, 625x626px

>>133905048
kek had me going for sec but jokes up :)

File: fuck those niggers we're out.jpg (526KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

526KB, 1920x1200px

>>133902333
>Implying it didn't already hapened with the original egyptians.

>>133903361
How do you enforce laws or collect taxes from light years away?
Far future is ancap.

>>133902333
what if the plan is actually to send all the niggers to mars and leave them there.

Why should the browns have the best planet while we cling to life trying to make a dead rock habitable?

>>133905048
Do a simple heat transfer calculation to the amount of energy required to change the phase of that CO2. I'll wait.

Oh that's right youre a larping faggot that knows nothing about science.

>>133905084
Yes you did say something factually innaccurate. The problem is the lack of magnetosphere first and foremost, not producing some shitty CO2 atmosphere that will just be blown away by solar wind.

Suck dick more.

>>133905188
Finally someone who isn't an autist lapper. But how so what's to say it won't even become more far left, more freedom from the homeworld, more laws to make it more ((Tolerant)) for different people of different races assuming based on merit. But still i can't even see that i just see a sjw light society. What other theory do you have that would say it would be ancap or even ancap light?

>>133902333
>boast about pulling a rocket out of your ass that has twice the lifting capacity of the world's best rocket made by decades of the world's best engineers

>push back the launch date for 5 years.

Nobody is ever going to mars, give it up, blue pilled shills.

>>133905345
Dude anyone that has basics of astronomy can see its b8 maybe even amazing b8. But it's still b8 just don't give him yous.

>>133903624

When humanity masters space travel, you will have a far greater genetic then on earth due to the length of time it takes to travel between them. Human colonized worlds will probably be unable to even breed with other colonized worlds eventually.

>>133905345
Inb4:

>we'll just magic something up. you sound like the luddides who thought x was impossible lol retard I am so much smarter than you he he ha ha.

File: IMG_2442.jpg (10KB, 300x144px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 300x144px

>>133902333
The Ultimate White-Flight.

>>133905345
You realize that a thickening atmosphere is a positive feedback event, right?
You don't need to nuke every single ounce of solid CO2 to make a difference.
Especially if you use comet cores to do the rest of the work.

And also
>talks shit about knowing science
>thinks lack of magnetosphere is a problem

You stupid American pavement ape, look at the rate of atmosphere ablation.
We're dealing with a tangible loss over the course of millennia.
Who gives a shit if in 10,000 years the atmosphere is shaved down to a dangerous level?

>>133905580
Humanity did master space travel.

Mastery just did not end up looking like it did in the poorly thought out stories of science fiction writers half a century ago.

>>133905620
But I just said everything that needs to happen
Nothing I said was magic

>>133905771

How many nukes, and how much does each nuke weigh?

Give me a ballpark for the total number of launches, the total amount of nuclear material you propose to launch from the earth and hope none fail.

>>133905188
I can actually give you that on the economic side of that yea it would actually ironically be more free market in space than on the homeworld with no initial regulations. But even in the very long term we know that would change. So i just can't help and see it very bleak for humanity but one thing it would take possibly hundreds of years to reign in the bureaucracy of the space age. But again we'd think of the U.S in its early stages; very free from old world european influence, people are unregulated becomes so wealthy and powerful that it ends up becoming what it fought to get away from a taxed to death nation with laws and regulations when you look at make no fucking sense. So i honestly can't help but think annon the space faring age is more lefty bs. But you do have a point in the initial stages it would be more economically free than on this planet.

>>133905457
Wtf does space exploration have to do with the bluepill? Unless you are actually retarded and believe its redpilled to be dumb enough to think space is a no go. This kind of shit is never rushed. It takes time, planning, more planning, more time, and then execution. You rush this shit and people die pointless deaths.

>>133902333
And escape the Muslims. There was a fatwa issued banning Muslims from living in space.

File: glasses.jpg (182KB, 1280x982px)

182KB, 1280x982px

>>133902333
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001900760001-9.pdf

well

>>133905900
>have to pay for the air you breathe
>"free market"

Pick one.

>>133905971
Space exploration is a blue pilled escapism fantasy.

Mars is a dead planet. The electromagnetic shield isn't strong enough to retain what atmosphere it still has. The atmosphere is not being replenished since there's no vulcanism. It is, essentially, a giant asteroid. It would require Nazi Bell levels of local space engineering to do anything even approaching geo-engineering. Plus all those house sized boulders littering the southern hemisphere. I see no real benefits to even visiting that rock. I'm likely missing something; I just don't see the point as of this moment.

>>133906125
You sound more reasonable but i do believe its possible. But launching muh nukes or comet cores is bs b8. And you sound more on point with geoengineering that's what most people tend to lean to. This guy gets it but it would take massive investment and years to accomplish.

>>133905872
Why?
Are you supposing that there is only a limit number of launches possible?

I'm saying that the limit is will and if people want it enough, it can happen.

Compare the budget of the US military to NASA.
I mean shit, look the at the old F-104.
The Starfighter was a suborbital spacecraft forced into a military role.

The issue is budget and desire.
If you want to send 1000 nukes into Martian intersection, we can. We have the technology. We're not going to run out of plutonium trying.

Likewise, if we want to send a mirror to change a Martian trojan to strike the planet, we can.

It's about the willingness to do it. Not the technology.
Obviously, it'd get better if we kept trying
But even now we can do it.

I mean shit, we landed people on the moon over 40 years ago. With computers equivalent to a fucking TI-83.

>>133905620
Literally this is the arguments leftists always use. I didn't want to hate them but they really still can't wrap their heads in how fundamental the conservation of mass an energy is to physics. They all think we'll magically get some plot device item from movies that will solve this problem. Its bizarre.

>>133905726
>You realize that a thickening atmosphere is a positive feedback event, right?
It absolutely fucking isn't you goddamn liar. How the fuck does melting a solid magically create more energy to melt more of it?

>You don't need to nuke every single ounce of solid CO2 to make a difference.
And what difference are you trying to make? You don't follow through with the mechanics of your ideas.

>Especially if you use comet cores to do the rest of the work
Holy shit stop smoking weed and reading fringe science, faggot.

>talks shit about knowing science
>thinks lack of magnetosphere is a problem
>You stupid American pavement ape, look at the rate of atmosphere ablation.
>We're dealing with a tangible loss over the course of millennia.
>Who gives a shit if in 10,000 years the atmosphere is shaved down to a dangerous level?
Because we'll still be dead from the radiation :D also, assmad much?

>>133906093
>Space exploration is a blue pilled escapism fantasy.
Says who exactly? It seems more like you pushing ideas that you don't see fit your world view as being "xpilled" to avoid taking responsibility for a dumb opinion.

>>133906338
kek Comet core i've never once heard anyone say that. Literally that's something you'd think someone on meth or weed would say.

M A G N E T O S P H E R E

>>133906338
You must be baiting.
No one can be this stupid.

Yes, thickening atmosphere is a positive feedback loop.
It's not about "creating more energy" it's about RETAINING IT
You moron. If you want to collect more water, then spending money on a bigger bucket helps you do that. You're not creating more water. Moron.

>dead from radiation
The initial colonial buildings will need to be underground, yes, but as you thicken the atmosphere, the need will go away.
The reason why we don't receive much solar/interstellar radiation on Earth isn't because of the magnetic field. It's because of the atmosphere.
Gamma rays are not affected by magnetic fields. You ever see a magnet bend light?

>>133906532
Meme.
Do some research first.

The atmosphere stops gamma radiation. We don't need more to be save.
The magnetosphere stops atmosphere ablation.
Which is measured in percentages over millennia.

If we can thicken up the Martian atmosphere by heating the polar caps or adding more volatiles via comets, then radiation is a non-factor.

And even if we accomplish neither, a buried colony is superior to any other type of colony.
Better than a space colony.

>>133902432
>grew up in south africa
>got "bullied"
>was thrown down flight of stairs and knocked unconscious at one point
>got the fuck out of the country as soon as he could and came to the US

he got the redpill much earlier than most of /pol/
he's just the best in the world at hiding his power level

>>133904599

>Yeah, in a million years the thick atmosphere that humans like will blow away.

You have not even done the simplest back of the napkin calculations. The amount of material the solar wind will blow away is an exponential function you faggot. The denser the atmosphere becomes the more of it will blow away in the same amount of time unless you have another variable to keep the gases in place. faggot.

File: 1499491801715.jpg (7KB, 179x180px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 179x180px

>>133906714
>Not because of the magnetic field.

Now i've seen everything. Was a good thread until b8 showed up.

>>133906330

>Are you supposing that there is only a limit number of launches possible?
Yes because statistically, ONE launch will fail after a thousand and just imagine how horribly apocalyptic a nuke exploding in our atmosphere would be? We're talking nuclear fallout all over the place.

>I'm saying that the limit is will and if people want it enough, it can happen.
All we need is to BELIEVE :D

>Compare the budget of the US military to NASA.
NASA is really just military research larping as manifest destiny

>The issue is budget and desire.
No the issue is lack of infinite energy and infinite resources, money is a middle man to resources and doesn't create energy.

>If you want to send 1000 nukes into Martian intersection, we can. We have the technology. We're not going to run out of plutonium trying.
You need a fuckton more than a 1000 to make a dent

>Likewise, if we want to send a mirror to change a Martian trojan to strike the planet, we can.
What?
>It's about the willingness to do it. Not the technology.
Muh belief will change the laws of physics

>I mean shit, we landed people on the moon over 40 years ago. With computers equivalent to a fucking TI-83.
Muh computational power of a CPU (which has always been a manufacturing issue) is somehow related to this

>>133906947
You do know that /pol/ has IDs right?
We can see that you've been shitting on every single positive idea here. Regardless of the scope, as soon as someone says "Space" you say "Stop"

That makes you sound like a shill.

>>133906924
I have in fact done those calculations.
We're dealing with millennia in a time frame.

Go do them yourself.
See what the results turn up.

>>133906076
>https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001900760001-9.pdf
That's some Joseph P. Farrell levels of freaky-deaky.

File: 1494315335380.png (66KB, 625x626px)

66KB, 625x626px

>>133907116
You don't even know what the fuck you're talking about; comet cores, nukes? Where the fuck are you from? Holy shit only on pol.

>>133905672
mars is unreachable, earth is flat, colonization to mars is a psi-op to kill white people.

File: 1485395141552.jpg (123KB, 533x666px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 533x666px

>>133907116
Fuck dude even the most brainlet idiot can realize huh maybe nuking the polar ice caps and causing massive amounts of radiation isn't the best idea. You're funny dough.

>>133907048
I keep on correct you and you keep on acting like you actually have something legitimate to say.

For everyone else reading, let's take a moment to laugh at him.
He thinks that if a nuke explodes, it detonates. Laugh and feel glad you're not so stupid.
A nuclear bomb is like an old Swiss clock. It takes very precise actions to activate.

If you blow up a nuke, it does not detonate. It just falls apart . You can move a clock hand by setting C4 to the mechanism and expect to work.

Sure, you're gonna contaminate the launch pad. But nothing more. It won't go "all over the place".

I mean, nuclear devices have exploded before.
What do you think powers space probes?
Hate?

>>133902333

>wanting to colonize somewhere that was already colonized and nuked into oblivion

but why?

>>133906328
Launching nukes would do nothing. That's just physical perturbation. It wouldn't help get the electromagnetic shield going. It's all about the electromagnetic shield. The only reason we're alive is because our shield is active and reduces the amount of atmosphere stripped off in space. What little of our atmosphere is stripped off is replenished by our volcanoes. It's a very delicate balance. There is no such balance on Mars. Hitting it with anything is like hitting a rock and expecting it to spontaneously come alive.

It would only be worth it if we could use the raw materials ON MARS to keep people alive. Otherwise we're importing Earth's biosphere onto Mars and that just won't work since Mars will just destroy everything we cart over.

Not that I'm trained in any of this. Just thought experiments I've conducted on my own.

>>133906382
>Says who exactly?

Are you refuging in argument from authority because you lack the IQ to understand rocket science and instead place your faith on ad-funded pop-science articles that conspicuously tell you everything you want to hear?

>>133902333
i don't think i have meet a single nigger that was interested in mars any more than a astrological sign. sadly, its similar with females.

i think its only white guys that want to grow the human race tbqh.

>>133907424
I guess the world was destroyed because of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, right?

And all those tests in the 50s and 60s.
Well, we're all dead, aren't we?

>>133902333
Musk obviously wants to live in Neo Venezia.

File: 460608-diplomaticvictory[1].jpg (124KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 800x600px

>>133902333
I want pic related to happen including the worms.

Although space stations are a million times smarter. "Mars" is a good sales story for retards.

>Main asteroid belt: The majority of known asteroids orbit within the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, generally with not very elongated orbits. The belt is estimated to contain between 1.1 and 1.9 million asteroids larger than 1 kilometer (0.6 mile) in diameter, and millions of smaller ones.

>[O'neill] claims that colonies built with the natural resources of the asteroid belt alone, including limitless space-based solar power, could eventually support a vast civilization of "several tens of quadrillion (1016)s of people".

>>133907495
Lol you picked my dumbest argument and only attacked that one. You wrote all that and only addressed one of my statements? Go back to your fantasy books, Mars will never be inhabited. Focus on Earth and sort yourself.

>>133907612
Exactly why is this so fucking hard to understand. Jesus the only other person on here that gets it. Personally i believe in geoengineering but again you'd need a massive invst. A plethora of years to even get it going. But yes lets just launch nukes for the hell of it cause hey at least it'd be a hell of a fireworks show.

>>133902333
No. Wasted trips.

File: Tysononspace.jpg (25KB, 500x322px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x322px

>>133907495
>misunderstand point about Rockets Exploiding and taking their payloads with them
>make big spergy rant about how smart you are
Typical blue pilled delusional space enthusiast.

If the rocket carrying the nuke explodes, you get a few kg of highly enriched uranium spreading into the upper atmosphere and trade winds and you can expect a noticeable uptick in cancer rates and people calling for the deaths of those involved and the immediate termination of that crazy scheme.

>>133907705
Be honest dude what are you smoking?

>>133906714
>You ever see a magnet bend light?

Are you fucking stupid? MASS bends light, it can be a magnet or a ball of feathers.

>>133905383
>someone who isn't an autist
b-but I...

Meritocracy gives best chance for new colonies. Affirmative action degenerate colonists will die out.
Fuel, water, air, living space are all limited in deep space so no one will be giving anyone else free rides.
Border security - the genetically engineered bacteria we eventually terraform Mars with or any alien life forms will have to be kept away from Earth so biocontainment will be a huge issue. Also all ships are airtight with no way to sneak on or off.
Weapons would work really well against spaceships, a few little holes in the hull are a huge problem. Easy to defend territory.
It'd probably be a bit sjwish because you have to live in a tiny tin can with that gay guy for 3 years so tolerance will have to be high but overall it'd be ancap.

>>133907965
A mass of a star compressed to smaller than the earth.

Are you really so disconnected from reality that you think we can do that with a technology?

>>133907842
I picked your smartest argument.
The fact that you think it's your dumbest says everything.
I let my statements stand on their own.

Earth should be first, but "eggs in one basket" is a powerful argument.

>>133907196

>I have in fact done those calculations.
We're dealing with millennia in a time frame.

I thought it was a

>>133904599
>a million years

:^)

you are either completely full of shit or out of your depth. I looked at some of your other posts.

>The solution is to slam it with a few comet cores full of volatiles.

how, with magic?

>Maybe a few nukes, why not.
????? To slam comets into mars or just to nuke mars?

>Add a mirror system at the Martian L1 and you're good to go.

how, with magic? how will you maintain it?

In addition to your magical thinking, you simply have a poor grasp of physics. The quantities of energy that would be involved are just not possible right now. Humans do not produce enough energy nor do we have a way to transport it within a time scale to come close to this. Assuming that all governments somehow decided to turn all energy production in the world towards terraforming mars we couldn't do it. Are you on drugs?

>>133907930
What is Starfish Prime?

>>133908213
inb4 "that's what they told the wright brothers looololololoolllloll"

>>133907965
Uh, what?
Do you think the Earth bends light to a significant degree?

>>133908213
No with rockets.
Why is it impossible?
Why can't we use rockets to move things in space?

That's the bottom line to anything you have to say.
Why can't we use rockets to move things in space?

>>133908190
By dumbest i mean the only one i heard from someone else and did no research on.
Also you have to attack all of my arguments not just one. This website is for adults :D

>>133908287
250 miles is the same altitude the ISS orbits at. Thermosphere i think. would you be surprised to know there's not much wind in low earth orbit?

Try again, timmy.

>>133908134
Sure that's maybe best case senario where do you go from there then? say 500 years down the line when the terraforming is done? Would it be just an earth 2.0 important questions for the future but with no clear answer but seemingly a leftist society. For instance how would it lean to the right in a space faring age? And if so wouldn't be so in the begging ages then as you progress to a more easy going society you get what we got now?

File: image.jpg (46KB, 694x535px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 694x535px

>>133902886
Remember when ketchup Kerry was in antartica while trump was inaugurated in jan? There is so much more land that we are not privy to and its not on balls in the sky. Gravity!? Start by throwing away the blue pills. It doesnt work anymore.

>>133908464
Your other arguments were "Lol, no one wants to spend money on that, so it's IMPOSSIBLE"

If I were you, I wouldn't draw attention to that.

Bye now, you're clearly just trying to troll

>>133902333
>ice free poles on fucking Mars

I'm triggered

>>133908356
Ir does.

>>133908539
There actually is. Enough to make the ISS apply thrust every so often to maintain station.

If the ISS, made for steel and lighter materials, need to push itself constantly out of falling to Earth, what would plutonium and uranium, and other particles need to do to escape?

If they're heavy enough to be radioactive, they're heavy enough to fall to Earth.

File: 1491298845630.gif (54KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 625x626px

>>133908744
Ok goodbye dumbass. Fuck stoned off your ass. Dude get off the weed, meth or whatever the fuck it is. But i'll just assume this is 4chan baiting and larping.

>>133908812
>to a SIGNIFICANT degree

It does, you're right.
But not enough to force Gamma rays to avoid the surface.

>>133908744

>Your other arguments were "Lol, no one wants to spend money on that, so it's IMPOSSIBLE"
No, I literally said the problem is of resources. If you were God of this Earth and ordered our entire planet to focus on Mars and Mars alone we still wouldn't have enough.

>If I were you, I wouldn't draw attention to that.
I want to draw attention to it because of how stupid you'll look from your lack of reading comprehension.

>Bye now, you're clearly just trying to troll
Nah dawg unfortunately for (you) I just really don't like dumbasses like you talking about shit they don't understand

>>133908952
>But not enough to force Gamma rays to avoid the surface.
Correct. That's why I never made such a statement.

>>133902432
Can confirm. Mars is just a staging point. Elon realises you can never be far enough from niggers. Elon has seen what Africa is like. His end goal is to have entire planets with just one race so that we can run an experiment and see how each race competes. The grand experiment will be Earth where multiculturalism will be tested to see the effects of the jewish weapon

>>133902333

No. They want to talk about colonizing Mars to get nerds to suck their tiny clits but will actually make no effort in doing so. Mostly because it's impracticable. Or at least in this life time it's impracticable. Hell. It's not even tangible.

>>133909170
But you replied to my refutation that it did, implying that you thought I was wrong.
We both agree.

It's not the magnetosphere that makes the surface of Earth safe from radiation, but the atmosphere

>>133908893
>There actually is. Enough to make the ISS apply thrust every so often to maintain station.
Yes but even the interstellar medium will do that over enough time.

>what would plutonium and uranium, and other particles need to do to escape? If they're heavy enough to be radioactive, they're heavy enough to fall to Earth.

Their low cross sections would make it a close race between orbital decay and their own nuclear decay. If there's not enough air for temperature to be a thing, friction from interactions between particles is nearly zilch.

Elon Musk is a fraud that wants to rob tax dollars.

>>133909444
TRIPS of truth. Musk is a parasite just like (((them)))

File: 517890main_Earth-Magnetosphere.jpg (325KB, 800x509px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 800x509px

>>133909385
It's both, actually, but you cannot argue that the magnetosphere does not do the bulk of the protective work. If all this shit hit us the atmosphere would puff up too thin to breath, not to mention the fucking heat.

>>133902993
That's how they become giant cockroaches with superhuman strength and invade us again.

>>133909385
>It's not the magnetosphere that makes the surface of Earth safe from radiation, but the atmosphere
Both do. Together.

>>133909605
Right on point. Some people in this thread are a little too stoned or retarded to understand this.

File: image.jpg (65KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 500x375px

>>133908287
you mean chocolate Starfish! This sums it up because its all bullsht. Green screen ISS haispray wire harness actors. They are in Az or Cali the whole time , not above us! Start thinking for yourself and stop swallowing bad pills. You know what color that is faggots.

>>133905457
You 3000 years ago:

Psh, some faggot is building a chariot with no wheels to go across the poison water, sails are a meme

>>133909400
>Yes but even the interstellar medium will do that over enough time.
Not remotely comparable to the low level that ISIS is flying at.

I can't quite find the numbers for density in the mesopause, where the ISS flies, but it's certainly very much denser than the interstellar medium.
We have atmospheric phenomenon that appear at that height. Like sprites.


They'd still fall though
400 km is not that far.
If they'd decay out in 400k vertical space, they'd decay out 400k in horizontal space.

Fallout isn't really that much of a thing now.

File: [Pyramid].jpg (124KB, 1024x819px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1024x819px

>>133902333

Earth itself was a Joint Colonization(Blacks = Africa, Whites = Europe, Asians = Asia), so it would be fitting & ironic to see Humanity re-colonize the Planets they left. All those Craters you see on the Planets/Moons were from Weapons Systems during the War/Conflict.

[KB Thread Archives: http://archive.4plebs.org/_/search/subject/knowledge%20bomb/username/anonymous5/tripcode/%21%219O2tecpDHQ6/]

BBP's(Black Budget Programs) have secret Space programs & an offshoot of Geo-Engineering is Terra-forming.

>>133907196

No you haven't you've read KSR is all.

Here's a better question for the thread: How far into the colonization of Mars will Elon Musk get before everyone realizes that Kim Stanley Robinson is an English professor?

>>133909605
>>133909803
Of course it's both.
The magnetic field stops alpha and beta radiations.
That's totally true.

But once again, if you looked at the parent posts, you'd see that I was talking about gamma.
Gamma radiation is not affected by the magnetosphere at all.

Alpha and beta radiation is what strips away the atmosphere. But in very long term time frames.

We're talking about artificially bulking about the Martian atmosphere to make it safer.
If that happens, then yes, the Martian surface would be safe for hundreds of years.

File: 1494296877574.jpg (67KB, 500x491px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 500x491px

>>133910128
Dumbass Goodbye Goodbye!. Continues to larp here even though he has multiple people refuting him on his bs. Shouldn't you be helping to pay for those nukes, or what was it ((((comet cores))))).

>>133903808
>a giant radial filter in a Martian lagrangian point
>easily done

Nigger, please.

>>133908450

you are not grasping the vast difference of scale involved. I am not going to explain freshmen year of physics to you. you are an idiot. Learn how to calculate velocity. Learn how to calculate energy transfer in Joules. Learn how to calculate apsis. You have no fucking clue what you are talking about. Do you think that people are going to fly up in the air above the martian poles and hang a mirror that just floats above them which will cause lasers to melt all the ice? Do you think that we will spot "some quantity" (you haven't even figured that out yet) of comets at "some volume of mass" (you didn't even consider that) point to them with big rockets, then blast off and somehow get these comets to hit mars causing tress to pop up? Hey I have an idea, lets just fill up giant balloons with oxygen, put them in to one really really big rocket and crash it into mars! With nukes!

>>133906076
is this some hypnosis shit or what the fuck

>>133909912
>Not remotely comparable to the low level that ISIS is flying at.
Just pointing it out so you don't hide in it.

>I can't quite find the numbers for density in the mesopause, where the ISS flies
Mesopause? Wtf are you smoking? The ISS resides in the middle of the thermosphere.

>They'd still fall though
Not before 70&-90% of its mass had decayed though alpha emission.

Besides, nobody is talking about the third stage failing in orbit, they're talking about the damn thing exploding in the mesosphere or stratosphere, as rockets tend to do.

>>133910128
You're still launching nukes from earth to TMI. How many are we launching? a thousand? At what failure rate? 5%? The best we've been able to do so far is 11kt/kg. How big are the nukes?

You'll put thousands of kilos of uranium into the atmosphere. It's unavoidable.

>>133910887
Musk said he wanted to nuke mars.

Leaf doesn't understand how but assumes it must be true so we're watching him try to connect the dots, but he can't because the only thing Youtube University taught him was buzzwords.

Not going to happen.
I don't understand why people think that our capabilities are on some endless exponential growth.
The technological plateau is coming soon.

>>133911503
>I don't understand why people think that our capabilities are on some endless exponential growth.

The television tells them that before every commercial break.

Must be a (((coincidence))).