Sex Robots

Further population reduction.

>>133891299
Further white population reduction. Get with the fucking program.

They're trying to help you get laid, stupid .

Not everything is the fucking Jews you paranoid schizophrenic. Sex feels good, whether or not you admit to the idea it's degenerate or not. Technology advances, betas in science make a robot to fuck them since girls either won't, or the robot is easier. Capitalism reminds them it's great money which gets them more things. Do sex robots have negative implications as well? Yes of course, but sometimes you shoot yourself in the foot. Fucking christ, you're paranoid.

>>133891299
>jews
>implying it isn't simple economics of supply and demand
there are thousands of rich stem autists clammering for realistic sex dolls

Maybe they want to cater to MGTOW men who need something to bang that isn't a real woman

>>133891299
They've created the problem, now they'll see you the solution. I'm no stormfag, but replace DAH JEWS with the neoliberal hyper-capitalist elite and I can agree with a lot of their crap desu.

Everything must be commodified and lead to profits. Capitalism must absorb every other institutions.

Women will naturally flock to the alphas and share them if society encourages it. And it is mathematically possible if casual sex/relationships are favored over long-lasting, more meaningful relationships (and those also became much less stable and demanding on men). Now technology (dating sites, tinder) enables it like never before.

Society is hyper-sexualized, but sex-less for more and more betas not able or no longer motivated to cope with the intense competition. So now sex can become a product. It is foolish not to let something in such high demand not become commodified. More taxable profits can be made for yet another human activity.

If there is demand for porn, there is demand for sex bots. The two aren't very different.

>>133891299
Who is Kalergi? They have a problem though as the hysteric left they have created and funded will oppose them massively, but they will push through. Tremendous gains will be seen in the decrease of white people. Then we push a small war between Islam and you people. At last, finally, in all it´s glory, our philosopher-kings will take their seat upon the top of our empire as envisioned by Coudenhoove-Kalergi, that wise prophet.

>>133891980
>>133892315
>not fucking biocunts=not breeding
You have no vision.
Imagine it, a future wherein living human females have been eliminated and there are only men. Reproduction is done with machines and so is sex.

Depopulation. Obviously dumbass.

>>133897346
>Imagine it, a future wherein living human females have been eliminated and there are only men. Reproduction is done with machines and so is sex.
You're just like those "kill all men" feminist retards.
I like women, I don't want them gone. Our differences should complement each others. It can make our lives better. Children need their mothers too.
But at the same time there's no denying that women are a problem in the current state of things.
Just like men could be a problem too. Men can be absolute savages if untamed. But men are very much under control as it is.

>>133897717
>Children need their mothers
They really don't. Statistically there's hardly any negatice effects of a child being raised without a mother. And women are the majority of child abusers. And besides the robots will mother the childs.
>>133897601
Again, not having sex with biocunts=/=not breeding. We can use machines to reproduce. We don't need females.

File: 1482904755479.gif (128KB, 728x426px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 728x426px

>>133898100
>Statistically there's hardly any negatice effects of a child being raised without a mother.
Well, it's not supposed to be like that. Things are fucked up.
>And women are the majority of child abusers.
Partly because they are more exposed to children. Partly because things are fucked up.
>And besides the robots will mother the childs.
This will be peek autism kek..

File: fuck women.jpg (93KB, 512x768px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 512x768px

>>133891299
maybe because fuck women. thats why

>>133899095
Maybe sexbots should have a "you must be THIS tall to ride" as a bullshit safety requirement just to mess with manlets hahaHAHAHH...
>tfw when I'm a manlet