Why didn't mongols take over sweden or Finland? Why did they stop? Did someone beat them or something?
aren't the finnish part mongrel or something?
people here joke that they look more like asians than europeans
>>133808720
joke is the right word here. No one with brain things they are.
>>133808588
There was nothing of value there
>>133808588
Conquest is far easier than ruling. They were very bad rulers, but great at conquest.
>>133808861
Forest,lakes etc were not valuable?
>>133808861
minerals, oil, fresh water... I think mongols just didn't dare to attack the nordic counties
>>133808588
Finns were feared by Vikings at that time. NO doubt Mongols wanted nothing to do with them.
>>133808861
it was considered more rich than east eurpean
>>133808588
By the time they could reach Hungary/Eastern Europe the mongals wee stretched too thin.
If Temujin didn't die, you would be seeing a lot more Asian features in the fins/Russians
>>133808588
Their Khan died so they had to elect a new one and they ended up separating the empire.
>>133808588
>why not invade derpaderp?
hard to fight in swampy forest on horseback
>>133810795
why didn't they invade to southern europe then?
>>133810795
This.
Eliminates the advantages of full horseback combat.
They were able to easily take over Persia due to many things, but the terrain lended itself to horseback riders
>>133808588
a number of factors, From poor administrators, The khan died, the armies were stretched to thin because they had to hold the territory, and I think the plagues hurt their economy as well(?). also, I've read some things that said western europe had a fair amount of warning that massive invasions were coming, so a charlemagne-esq united Europe was a possibility, and that would be the most formidable threat the mongols had faced, or would face honestly.
>>133808785
haha yeah,,, totally
the great khan died and infighting ensued, thats the reason they never made it really into europe.