Yup.

>Bernouts
>knowing what they're doing

File: russian.png (66KB, 1414x1096px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1414x1096px

>>133715234
kek

>implying there was ever a single good american president

toppest of all keks

>>133715234
They don't like that you voted for a celebrity instead of voting for who the celebrities told you to.

>>133715234
Wasn't Reagan an objectively good President?

He did win in one of the biggest landslides ever in 1984.
He did so well he gifted a landslide to Busr Sr as well in 1988.

>>133716171

the only thing reagen did was increasing the government in every aspect possible

>>133716171
>Gave amnesty to millions of illegals
>Set up for future legislation of strict gun control
Yeah he was a good goy

>>133716780


1/2

"In 1980, Jimmy Caner's last year as president, the federal government spent a whopping 27.9% of "national income" (an obnoxious term for the private wealth produced by the American people). Reagan assaulted the free-spending Carter administration throughout his campaign in 1980. So how did the Reagan administration do? At the end of the first quarter of 1988, federal spending accounted for 28.7% of "national income."

Even Ford and Carter did a better job at cutting government. Their combined presidential terms account for an increase of 1.4%—compared with Reagan's 3%—in the government's take of "national income." And in nominal terms, there has been a 60% increase in government spending, thanks mainly to Reagan's requested budgets, which were only marginally smaller than the spending Congress voted.

The budget for the Department of Education, which candidate Reagan promised to abolish along with the Department of Energy, has more than doubled to $22.7 billion, Social Security spending has risen from $179 billion in 1981 to $269 billion in 1986. The price of farm programs went from $21.4 billion in 1981 to $51.4 billion in 1987, a 140% increase. And this doesn't count the recently signed $4 billion "drought-relief" measure. Medicare spending in 1981 was $43.5 billion; in 1987 it hit $80 billion. Federal entitlements cost $197.1 billion in 1981—and $477 billion in 1987. "

>>133716848

2/2

"Foreign aid has also risen, from $10 billion to $22 billion. Every year, Reagan asked for more foreign-aid money than the Congress was willing to spend. He also pushed through Congress an $8.4 billion increase in the U.S. "contribution" to the International Monetary Fund.

His budget cuts were actually cuts in projected spending, not absolute cuts in current spending levels. As Reagan put it, "We're not attempting to cut either spending or taxing levels below that which we presently have."

The result has been unprecedented government debt. Reagan has tripled the Gross Federal Debt, from $900 billion to $2.7 trillion. Ford and Carter in their combined terms could only double it. It took 31 years to accomplish the first postwar debt tripling, yet Reagan did it in eight."


he a good boy

>>133716848
He was also an anti DUDE WEED shill

>>133715234
>1 post by this ID
Also don't forget to sage this low effort slide thread

File: ttdn.jpg (491KB, 1736x918px) Image search: [Google]

491KB, 1736x918px

Yup.

>>133715234
Who is Al Franken