https://archive.fo/263ZO
BAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>a public intellectual.
>Twitter initially became a haven for me
Christ...
>>133672819
>public
>intellectual
Intelligent people know enough not to speak out
probably exactly why trump did it you dummy
tfw to intel to git bocked by rump
Why don't they just sign out and go to his page?
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEE I HAVE THE RIGHT TO POST OBNOXIOUS STUFF ON TWITTER
>Rebecca Buckwalter-Poza
>career
>>133672819
>log out
>make new account
wow, your career is ruined
>>133672819
who is it so we can post their public info so we can approach them with new career opportunities to help them.
Social media experts are cancer. Its pretty funny that they created a job like this for people. If my job was to attack Trump each time he posted I would kill myself and I suggest you do the same if you fall into this category.
>>133672819
>he harmed me professionally.
> potential employers
Charlie Gard has more brain activity than this fruitcake
>Twitter also brought me to where I am today: Pursuing a lawsuit with others against President Trump for his decision to block us on Twitter. It
>>133672819
Good.
>be me
>identify potential b8 thread
>don my alter ego(name related)
>mouse over OPs ID.
>one post by this user
>MFW
>>133672819
someone should tell him it's possible to make another account
>>133672819
>uses twitter to harass and cajole powerful people
>gets buttblasted when they get blocked
>has no self-awareness
are these people retarded? yes they are.
Leftists are so stupid they don't know how to logoff to view tweets if your blocked.
That's quite the legal analyst.
>be shitposter
>shitpost
>cost a fag his career
sweet
>>133672819
Time for a new career you dumb bitch
Captcha: goldstein success (oy vey!)
food for thought: the twitter guy is bootyblasted because he likely put a shitload of time into "Creating" his twitter handle. We're probably talking thousands of posts, retweets, etc...
Well, no he's at an impasse. He can create a new handle and start over, or never be publicly broadcasted on trump's twitter. He honestly cares a shitload about being on trump's twitter feed. Thats what this man is feeling
>>133674272
They can't be serious
Trump should unblock and block them once a day for a week.
>>133675372
hire an illegal from a sanctuary city to do it. then when the joke gets old, deport his ass
>>133672819
https://www.americanprogress.org/about/staff/buckwalterpoza-rebecca/bio/
She spent all that time and money going to Harvard just to sit on Twitter all day and troll the POTUS.
>>133675494
Run them through an archive
https://archive.is/B84kW
>>133673952
They're legally not allowed to do that to be fair.
>>133672819
Twitter needs to fucking go
>>133675541
Thank you based Norway
>>133672819
fucking faggot
I'm crying so hard for you
>>133672819
>Twitter magically bans you off the internet
>>133672819
Keep it up, Don
>>133675754
calm your goats, achmed. thats literally the solution. however, this means the writer guy cannot *post on trump's twitter. he can report on it all he wants, trump didnt block wahtever sorry excuse of a news organization he works for
Her Twitter.
https://twitter.com/rpbp
>>133675545
What? Why not?
>>133676126
holy shit why do you even make a buttblasted reply to make you look even more retarded? he is complaining about the prime media space he is losing to get free traffic
>>133676454
free speech means u r not free from consequence ...
https://twitter.com/rpbp/status/885944856832507904
Apparently, she is joining a lawsuit of others that were blocked by Trump.
>>133676354
Her job isn't "seeing what trump tweets", it's commenting/retweeting/commenting on trump's tweets. Her real-life identity must be associated with this for the sake of her job. Failing to do so can easily qualify as shilling or collusion depending on the nature of the action. Moreover, no employer in the world will risk backing up someone who does that. All companies require real-life identity and full affiliation disclosure for social media websites.
>>133672819
https://archive.fo/263ZO
Why not archive?
>>133677118
also she wouldnt be able to get a checkmark and force her tweets up the thread.
>>133677503
Yes, that is also correct.
>>133672819
>>133672819
>I didn’t think being blocked on Twitter was a big deal at first. It’s just a button you can click, a way to mute an ex or tune out trolls’ attacks.
Tuning out troll attacks is why she was blocked though
>>133677348
nice one
>>133677118
im sure the type of companies that would hire a 'public intellectual career tweeter' really dont give a shit about social media shilling with secondary accounts
>>133672819
Man, seeing how much she thinks it hurts her career would give me a raging boner if I were Trump. He should engage in a 'leftist scum blocking rampage' against all the goychecked twitter followers.
I love how so many people made a name for themselves competing to be the snarkiest, most sarcastic, most 'cutting' response to Trump's tweets - yet Trump only had to ignore them to completely DEVASTATE them. They spent so much time acting all aloof and clever, but the instant they lose their lifeline to notoriety, they turned into quivery wrecks.
At the end of the day, I think this is how 90% of the vocal anti-Trump people are. They're actually dependent on Trump for some sense of identity or purpose.
They were trolls making money off the exposure.
Fuck them.
A troll does it for the response, not the money and fame.
What happened to the "Umm sweetie" girl?
>>133678476
she got blocked. Bess Kalb
>>133677991
Believe me they care a shitload. Failure to comply is ground for immediate termination and possible legal sanctions. It's really bad. And every company out there is hiring total retards to fit quotas as well. They do it because, it turns out, the opportunity cost of ignoring a potential PR fallout from being called sexist or racist (doesn't matter if the claim is even true or founded on anything, by the way, just someone saying it is enough) is extremely high. I believe kik is the example they like to use when explaining why that would be true. Not that I think it's an example of anything, though.
>>133678615
I'm gonna miss her.
>>133678476
>>133672819
>public intellectual
>>133672819
I kind of agree about Trump blocking people. not because I care about these peoples opinions or careers but because it's so damned childish for the POTUS to be blocking people on Twitter. He's very insecure and it's insane because he's the most powerful man in the world.
>>133678476
Blocked months ago.
Tried to pull some "lol I'm not even mad" bullshit before having a breakdown. Utterly bootyblasted.
>>133675545
>legally
leaf education everybody
Lmao how could you be so buttblasted that someone blocked you. Anyone who works with social media for a living needs a real job.
>blockings only for an ex or trolls
Did she ever consider her actions may be construed as trolling?
>>133678476
She's suing Trump, along with many others.
She's not taking the breakup well.
>>133679063
its his personal twitter you dumb kike.
he hasnt blocked anyone on the potus account.
>>133672819
>Trump blocked me on twitter
So log out? Make a new read-only account and follow him that way? How are normies this devastatingly stupid?
>>133679063
You can let your enemies toy with you, trample you, influence the people by mocking you and playing propaganda, or you can put your boot down. He already kicks people on the ground, which is why they've been relying on twitter "more". I agree it should go much further but his actions aren't wrong at all. You should know by now how impressionable the people are. Playing the good guy doesn't gain you enough followers. You have to rule the other side through fear.
Then make another twitter account and use that to follow him? Seriously, why do people act like this is the end of the world. Have they never ban evaded before?
>>133672819
>not being able to post on Donald Trump's twitter is ruining my career.
Why doesn't this make sense to me.
am I old or something?
>>133679317
You don't even need the new account you can see his tweets when not logged in. Just have trump open in a private tab
>>133679592
Its like the kid who gets banned on a forum for having a rant about niggers, then cries to the admins and makes threads with new accounts demanding his old account be unlocked
>intellectual
word lost its meaning long ago
>>133673952
But then they wouldn't be verified!
>Twitter also brought me to where I am today: Pursuing a lawsuit with others against President Trump for his decision to block us on Twitter. It was because I tweeted about being blocked that I eventually connected with the Knight First Amendment Institute and became involved in the legal effort.
>>133672819
The fucking state of 'journalism' today is just so fucking atrocious.
>>133672819
>https://archive.fo/263ZO
she even admits shes a fucking troll and still does not understand why she got blocked
and she has the gall to call herself an intellectual
I could have sworn this was fake, satire, edited archive link but no its fucking real and fucking ridiculous. Jesus how low the mighty have fallen.
>>133672819
Jesus fucking Christ, these people...
>>133679592
She wants to be in the lawsuit so she has to pretend to be devastated. Trump's lawyers gonna tear these bitches up.
>>133680842
beat me to it
>>133672819
>How I respond to being excluded from the president’s Twitter may be more important than anything I’ve ever said on Twitter.
It's sickening just how profoundly conceited these people are.
>>133672819
If your "career" amounts to basically just trolling the President on twitter, you deserve to lose your job.
>>133672819
Anyone can go to Trump's twitter page. Just "log out" of your account and you are no longer blocked. You can see everything...just dont log in.
WTF are these lunatics talking about?
>>133680999
Well she's not wrong, but not for the reason she thinks.
Wait why are they suing? For what?
>>133672819
WATCH OUT LADIES AND/OR GENTLEMEN, SHE'S SINGLE!
http://archive.is/wnuw6
>>133677118
>be Shlomo Shekelstein
>get my @shlomoshekelstein account blocked by @twoscooptrump
>create @shlomoshekelstein1
>oy vey!
>>133681838
>get fired and go to jail
gratz
>>133672819
How will the jannies deal with the loss of their income after the 28th Amendment is passed to protect shiposter rights?
>>133673110
she actually believes she's an intellectual because of her leftist beliefs
>>133672819
>Tweeting Trump is literally a career for leftists
Imagine living life as one of these empty shells
>>133681797
>http://archive.is/wnuw6
That is a 29yo? Add mental illness to the list and no wonder she's single.
>>133680842
>Queer feminist legal analyst
I can't decide on the most pathetic aspect of this wench
>>133682000
You can't go to jail for that.
>>133681797
>wanting to date a jew.
>>133682570
Not for it inherently, but with improper identity management and leftardposting, you sure can.
>>133672819
talk shit get hit bitch
If they can sue for getting blocked by a government employee than anyone can.
>>133673984
https://twitter.com/rpbp
>>133674776
You don't have to log off just open new private window. Is she using ie4?
>Gone now is my ability to participate in the timeliest and most robust conversations around law, policy, and politics
>It never occurred to me that I’d end up in court.
>>133672819
What reason is there that she can't make a new twitter account?
>>133681328
But then they can't respond directly with their goychecked accounts to make normies fall in line.
>>133682679
Since when is trolling with a different id a crime?
It's not like she's impersonating a law enforcement officer or government employee. Last I checked the dumb bitch did have a 1st amendment and saying your name is whatever to who ever is not a crime, at least not on social media.
By all means if I'm missing something here please explain.
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/12/weird-media-ecosystem/510911/
>>133672819
How many people have had their accounts shadowbanned and suspended?
But she thinks she can sue the President for using a literal feature on that website?
Nigger, learn to b&evade like everyone the fuck else.
>>133675190
>https://archive.fo/263ZO
and therein lies the crux of it
its not all about her tweets, replies etc that are gaining her fame (and job prospects) since trump is not preventing her from tweeting
he is preventing her from riding along on his coattails
but what the don should do is simple:
Create three twitter handles
one is for all tweets, replies etc, 100% public, no one is blocked
two is his personal ahndle, he can do whatever he wants
three is President of USA handle
no one can reply to any of his tweets, simply public information from president
while all the "not my president people will obviously flock to number one
trump followers will go to number two
and anyone else can read 3
just an idea
or
he could just keep blocking lefty retards that spam his feed ... good luck with your lawsuit
>>133672819
MSM btfo
>>133683629
He already has @POTUS
>>133678262
so true
>>133683412
If affiliation is not set correctly and she links to a trump tweet + an article the company she works for has about that topic, it is shilling. Depending on the exact nature of the shilling, it can constitute various crimes, including fraud.
>>133672819
>harass someone via social media
>sue them when they block you
WTF? Should have thought about that when you decided to be a professional troll.
>>133677118
No they don't. I have never worked at a company that required any kind of social media "declaration" though I've only started using the shit again (first time since 2011) to promote my new business.
Too busy living to let all the niggers know what the fuck I'm up to. If I need to brag about something, I come on 4chan where I'm anonymous.
>my career was leeching off other people's successes
Let me guess. Female or Jew?
>>133684089
I'm going to have to agree to disagree with you on this one anon, but thanks for keeping it civil and trying to explain it.
>>133683799
didnt know that
the feed I see is always spammed full of snarky lefties comments
I dont even bother to open it anymore
its really kind of annoying, because there are people like me who wouldn't mind to see what people think, and even reasonable debate
but its not like that, its just jammed full of losers spewing verbal diarhea
I hope that his lawsuit defence to
we should get a petition going for people who want president trump to ban more trolls from his feed, since they are actively doing a public "diservice" by silencing honest/reasonable debate
start a hashtag "nomoretrumptrolls" or soemthing
I would but I only read twitter, never post
>>133676454
what do you mean?
>>133684399
you're in luck, Both
>>133682810
>poz
>>133675952
Donald trump has a currency now are we doing rare Donald trumps??????
>>133684356
>I've never worked for any company
OK kid
>>133684510
EVERY
FUCKING
TIME
and they wonder why thier is a resurgence of nazis who openly want to gas the kikes
>>133678635
What happened with kik?
>>133676454
>not even journalism, just advertising concerns
Then he has zero grounds for his case. Who gives a shit
>>133684904
They had bad PR because they allowed anonymous posting and people were said to be using it for posting illegal shit such as with regard to cp or drugs.
See articles such as https://archive.is/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3428605/Girl-13-murdered-met-Virginia-Tech-student-Kik-anonymous-messaging-app-bane-law-enforcement.html for example.
>>133674661
>Be shill for some jew banker corp
>Reply with something that makes no sense
>Realize your a peice of shit and are guilty of treason
>Suck on a shotgun barrell in 2 years
You
>>133685123
To add, this resulted in them having much trouble finding funding and it took them years to undo the damage apparently.
>>133679063
I kind of hate you and agree you should be pubished
Is there any current legal substantiation that can be used to support their case in court? I mean Twitter is private fucking company and there's no legal reason to keep people interacting on a private platform, is there?
>year 2021
>sue elected representatives for not letting journalists into their house at 3 A.M. after they tweet about something
>I KNOW YOURE AWAKE IN THERE CONGRESSMAN, LET US IN OR WE'LL CALL THE COPS
>>133684495
>Trump says something
>You call him a retard
>Liberals start reading your shit cause you clearly know what the right side of history is
>Trump blocks you
>Liberals stop paying attention to you since Trump ain't reading your shit no more
>Cry on Twitter about how Trump ruined your career
>>133672819
>How I respond to being excluded from the president’s Twitter may be more important than anything I’ve ever said on Twitter
This is true tho
>>133684560
Sorry but not every company cares about what you do on the internet. I used to make $40hr+ doing construction work and you could have called everyone a nigger on social media as long as you showed up to work the next morning and did your job well.
Maybe your special snowflake silicon valley tech and marketing companies want to know your online life's story, but most people do not give a fuck.
>>133672819
>After Trump blocked me, I found out I wasn't important. I was just a parasite.
>>133685481
Was that before y2k? Even every single 2-people startup have these rules in place nowadays, let alone meaningful companies.
>>133680950
> poz
is the really?
It's funny - half the leftist pseudo-intellectuals on Twitter brag about having massive blocklists; some of which are even generated by third parties.
>>133675545
>so why are you in jail?
>I created a second twitter account
Shut the fuck up you dumbass
>>133685930
Not an argument.
>>133680950
Wow, that pinned tweet at the top.
She's proud she wrong that.
So this... is the power of intellectuals.
>>133685453
I see thank you
>class action moves forward
>lawsuit succeeds
>judges declare tools to block harassers/trolls are unconstitutional
Holy fuck, they have NO IDEA what they're unleashing.
>japmoot tries to hit me with the b& hammer
NOT SO FAST ! You're trampling on >muh rights!
>Look at the accounts of a bunch of these faggots who think they can sue
>See the last thing they posted before getting blocked
>It's either MUH RUSSIA, some pathetic attempt at an insult that only a child would think is a sick burn, or just straight-up harassment
You know what? I kind of wish it actually did see the light of day in court, just so a compilation of this shit could be used as Exhibit A.
Pic unrelated.
It seems to me that if your career depended on being able to read someone tweets, then you'd have shown more tact in sending messages to said person.
>>133685666
No, that was 2015.
And no, companies don't have these policies. Even the ones that do, they aren't enforced except for the very top of the line people, and those people generally refrain from social media use anyway.
At another former job I used to supervise about 40 niggers. If we had fired employees for what they said on Facebook or Twitter, I'd have to train 40 new niggers weekly. Training new employees is almost always more costly than 99% of anything an employee says on social media. You're talking potentially 5-10k+ per employee in time/wages/salary/equipment to get them trained versus a social media policy that might make a few liberals feel better. It's easy math.
>and that's why so many of those startups go out of business, because they're more concerned with being "socially woke" than making profits.
>>133686096
This is why the lawsuit has no chance of winning.
>>133686174
>No, that was 2015.
Then you're completely and utterly full of shit, kid. Don't drop out of highschool just yet.
It doesn't really matter what these people think.
Faceberg/Twitter are not places where you have the right to "Free Speech" as granted by the First Amendment. They are private communications tools which have Terms of Service and restrictions on Free Speech.
The only way their cases could hold water is if these platforms themselves did not provide the ability to block or mute users, and at the same time ban and remove users posting content the Terms of Service deems inappropriate or offensive.
>>133673767
Its not about seeing his tweets, its about the circle jerk replies that they make
Does anyone really doubt Trump will be president until 2020. The liberals talking heads will understand where the money is and consciously or subconsciously they'll find a way to have Trump win.
When is Jules being blocked? I'm sick of his ugly beaner face.
>>133674004
>Social media experts are cancer. Its pretty funny that they created a job like this for people.
"Social media expert" isn't an actual job. It's for retards that you had to hire for whatever reason. It's like "art critic" or "food critic". Who gives a flying shit?
>>133672819
>How I respond to being excluded from the president’s Twitter may be more important than anything I’ve ever said on Twitter.
This whole thing is so stupid it feels like copypasta
>>133674107
underrated
>>133672819
Freedom of speech, not freedom from consequences.
>>133683144
She's verified of course.
>>133684459
>start a hashtag "nomoretrumptrolls" or soemthing
Twitter throttles pro-Trump hashtags.
>>133672819
>>133678730
>>133678476
>>133685967
Ok leaf, how about ONE reason someone would get in legal trouble for making another account.
>>133687887
How about you read the thread?
>>133686238
>thinks you can be convicted of a crime for making a new twatter accout
>accuses others of being utterly full of shit
>public intellectuals
>>133682615
>https://archive.fo/263ZO
I went out on a date with a Jew once. Didn't know she was a Jew at the time. She was really nice and smart.
>>133673952
This a good anime? Whats it about?
>>133688019
You implied that making a second account would result in someone going to jail, then you scrambled backwards and created a rube (((goldberg)))esque scenario that wouldnt even result in civil action.
Bottom line, you have no clue what you're talking about.
>>133688552
>>133688118
Samefag or are there really 2 sub-20 IQ shills in the same thread? You decide.
>>133688604
no i think it's just the one of you
>>133672819
Sucks to be her. I don't have that problem...he likes me :^)
>>133673767
because they literally get paid to troll Trump's twitter.
that's why it ruins their career when he blocks them. They're now out of a job.
>>133675372
I've actually done this to psycho bitches.
>>133679899
literally me, can't even post on Breitbart about the jews anymore :^(
OK, go to her twitter account, get blocked by her, go fund me page to sue her
>>133683559
I can't ban evade because I have a static IP
>>133672819
If your job can be destroyed by someone blocking your tweets, you really need to question the importance of your career.
>>133672819
>Trump blocked me on twitter and it's costing me my career
Despite what CTR and Shareblue would have you believe shitposting is not a real job.
>>133678262
Underated
>>133688538
What a coincidence. I know a user here that is nice and smart that one of /pol/ users can get behind.
>>133677118
Any job that requires full social media disclosure is not worth having
>>133689202
Twitter account bans, not ip bans.
>>133675190
You given how many annoying shits tweet Trump every day I can only imagine what kind of obnoxious crap this guy was spewing to be worth a block.
>>133678262
Um sweetie, I'm doing just fine averaging 5 retweets instead of the 5000 I used to get. My career is definitely not ruined.
>>133678262
imagine what happens when all of our network devices get turned off, permanently
>>133683629
Twitter is a privately owned company. Provided you are complying with the ToS, Trump has license to do whatever he pleases with his account. Just as this buttblasted "reporter" had license to make a career out of the social media platform.
>>133672819
>Tfw blocked by Trump for being too good of a public intellectual
>>133673755
>claims to be smart
>can't tell us "too" and "to" correctly
BREAKING
White House logs show the alleged ex Russian counter intelligence specialist Rinat Akmetshin spending 13 hours at White House before he met Trump Jr !,
http://white-house-logs.insidegov.com/l/73080195/Rinat-Akhmetshin#Details%20of%20Visit&s=3bvMZx
>>133672819
Retarded burger hahaha
>>133690245
LEAVE.
NOW.
>>133690612
fuck off newfag
if you can't understand english you can't participate on the board
>>133675541
Why is it always fucking norway that archives shit
>but I am proud to stand up for the right to free speech
leftists are so self-important that they think freedom of speech means everyone HAS to listen to them
>>133672819
FINALLY A HERO TO AVENGE ME THIS GRAVE INJUSTICE
>>133685144
ur a fag
>>133689687
>no job is worth having
OK kid
>create and participate in blocklists
>"heh are you jerks mad?"
>talk shit to trump
>get blocked by trump
>"what the fuck? you're not allowed to block me! REEEEEEEEEE!"
There it is again...the one genius insight in a sea of shitposts, the gold nugget amidst the chaff, the reason I keep coming back to /pol/ again and again and again.
Thank you anon.
>>133690245
>fallin for cheap bate
>>133675541
27s
>>133688968
Where can I sign up to get paid to troll? I could be a billionaire.
>>133685144
wanna know how i know you're a newfag?
>>133679711
I hope a lawyer points this out. The reason they are buttblasted is because of visibility and the ability to pick up new followers.
>>133695936
>mfw my ID
>>133680842
>Poz
what did she mean by this?
If your career depends on twitter and you don't know how to use private mode to get around blocks you fucking suck at your job.
I should make a book and shitpostingly advertise it on his twitter and the sweetie posters twitters to gain a following.
The only hard thing to do is write the book.
>>133688968
This, fucking CIA niggers.
>>133696072
>1 post by this ID
Literally there is a company called Shareblue which is hiring dipshit.
You're new though, aren't you? Or do we all know you well?
>>133674661
that's not pepe, redditor
>>133676338
i was initially surprised to see her bio didn't mention her most noteworthy quality but she seems to have made it the entire banner thing
>>133672819
Doesn't trump use @realDonaldTrump instead of @POTUS specifically to circumvent the legal bullshit associated with the POTUS account?
>>133673193
This. So-called """""intellectuals""""" are like empty cans. They make a lot of noise, but there's nothing inside. Best to crush them cans and discard them, then find ones that got something good inside of them.
>>133672819
> hyphenated surname
>>133673110
This is a rare occasion where the first post is truly the best post. Thanks for the hilariously depressing summary. To actually hear that Twitter, an application that intentionally truncates communication and lowers comprehension is a haven for intellectuals is horrifying to hear.
>>133672819
Hmmm. What if you posit to her that her lawsuit, if won, might set a precedent where so-called professional trolls would have to be unblocked by everyone else for blocking them not only violates the 1A of trolls but perhaps harm their livelihoods as well. Posit that by selfishly thinking about herself and her career, she jeopardizes the (mental) well-being of... say... women being harassed by trolls, stalkers, and others who are blocked by these women. Basically pit pro-block against anti-block. You know most blockers are SJWshits, who will fucking Internet-rape the hyphenbitch for selfishly putting herself and shekels first over the "muh feelz" degenerates.
>TL;DR: divide and conquer; manipulate both sides to destroy each other
>>133699467
doesn't work that way with all the liberal jewish activist judges, they don't want one law for all
>>133672819THATS IT
COUNT THE DAYS, DRUMPFTARDS
>>133682810
>government employee on a private account
this wasn't @potus it was @realdonald
First thing that popped into my mind is a dialogue between an RAF pilot and a Luftwaffe pilot.
>be a good sort and stop shooting back, Jerry, or I'll never get that promotion!
>>133679063
He's not blocking them from POTUS, but from his personal twitter.
>>133672819
>https://archive.fo/263ZO
Why do Cypriots want to put Norwegians out of work?
>>133680950
>5,000 followers
>with 36,000 tweets
That's appalling.
"Public Intellectual"
>>133685365
There's no legal argument for unbanning simply because Trump's tweets ARE still visible if you log out, and nothing prevents someone from making a fresh Twitter account to reply. Not to mention that this is Trump's private twitter account and not his official government account.
This argument that these media hacks are pursuing is a can of worms that they really don't want to open, because the logical argument that follows is that media orgs need to offer unfiltered comment sections on all of their articles, since that's essentially what they're demanding of Trump.
>Suing somebody for blocking you on twitter
New lows, every day.
>>133678262
Big if true.
Did you know that the first person to ever get blocked by Trump was Freddy Adu?
>>133690812
Probably the same reason the doomsday seed vault is located there.
>>133675494
And Yale, according to her bio, she's a lawyer.
>>133678262
Absolutely. Look at Stephen Colbert, was bout to get fired from the late show and replaced by James Corbin until he made his entire show about hating Trump. Not only that but Jon Stewart now has to show up as well from time to time to help hate on Trump to get viewers for Colbert now. His job is uniquely tied to Trump being President, which will be 4 years at the minimum but most likely 8 yeaes. Then he's back to nothing again. People are pinning their entire careers, self worth and livelihood to somebody that will only impact their life for a relatively short time when put into perspective.
>>133673193
Intelligent people would not label themselves as a 'public intellectual.'
>>133690812
Because he's based. He doesn't it because it's the right thing to do and what's more he does it without anyone knowing who is and doesn't expect monetary compensation. Conversely, if this was reddit he would have photos of himself posted and whatever the fuck those plebbitshekels are people get for being a "service".
It's what separates us from plebbit. We do what is morally right. Not whatever is (((flavour of the week))) right.
>>133685144
>>Reply with something that makes no sense
what? he made perfect sense you dumbo.
>>133703845
Cause they are stupid. Its funny how all these leftists call for is "less hate and tolerance" and still they build their lives around hatred ...
End them already
If anything, twitter has taught me that American Ivy League is no different from Serbian diploma mills when it comes to quality of output. In fact when you take out the drilled corporate lingo, I'd say American alumni are as incoherent as those graduating from any of Serbia's bottom of the barrel, cash-for-status "Universities".
That thing is a Harvard graduate btw.
>>133690579
How can zhe be retarded if they're a public intellectual? Checkmate loo
>>133675541
You are the real MVP.
>>133704438
he is like the batman of /pol/
Can't she just screenshot Trump's shitpost, and shitpost it through her account?
>>133675545
What legal institution is going to stop me from using twenty twitter accounts? Are you fucking stupid?
>>133672819
oh my god I can't stop laughing
this is better than stand up
>Gone now is my ability to participate in the timeliest and most robust conversations around law, policy, and politics on Twitter
They are messing with us right? Noone actually thinks that, r-right guys?
I hope that Trump loses in this case because banning and blocking people for writing stuff would be illegal. Trump would be the first true First Amendment president.
From a sane point of view :
>"Kudos for creativity to the new Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, which has alleged that the First Amendment bars President Donald Trump from blocking followers on hisTwitter account. Unfortunately, the law runs to the contrary. There’s no right to free speech on Twitter. The only rule is that Twitter Inc. gets to decide who speaks and listens -- which is its right under the First Amendment. If Twitter wants to block Trump, it can. If Trump wants to block followers, he can."
>"Twitter can establish any rules it wants in its private domain. That includes allowing users to block anyone they choose, for any reason. And it would allow Twitter to block Trump, too, if The company thought he wasn’t playing by its rules. "
>" Twitter can do all this not only because it’s private, but also because the company is itself speaking through its service. A judicial decision forcing Twitter to make Trump unblock followers would actually violate Twitter’s First Amendment rights."
>>133703908
>>>133673193
>Intelligent people would not label themselves as a 'public intellectual.'
This.
Only people who label themselves intellectuals are hipsters and posers.
>>133675545
What sort of retard are you .... oh a Canadian
>>133672819
lol
cry harder divorced kike. and you're lawsuit over it is going nowhere.
>>133708221
Look at the manly face.
>>133690761
>>133690245
I hope this is bait
>>133672819
Will archivebot ever archive an archive?
>>133673755
>>133690245
>>133690612
>>133695602
>>133708363
>>133673110
the only thing this should cost him is the price of one bullet, to put in his forehead. Its going to be fun when these faggots who sued gets shat on in court.
>>133702333
I don't have a twitter, is that a bad number?
>>133672819
Can you hear them? he violins playing your song. what a dick tip.
>>133702829
This is actually great for us, since it will essentially make these social media cuck platforms public domain and make it impossible to ban white nationalist like they have