I've got a question for people who believe 9/11 was an inside

File: 1499995997162.jpg (17KB, 439x411px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 439x411px

>>133672085
It's just too easy isn't it Mr Schnitzel face snow monkey

Because controlled demolitions take months of preparation and planning. No one would believe terrorists had such easy access to the buildings.
Wtc7 was a controlled demolition. 9/11 was a CIA / Mossad false flag.

>>133672085

because it's more dramatic

>>133672085

here's a question for you: if they were terrorists, why didn't they just plant bombs?

>>133672085

and why would they fly into the top of the tower, instead of lower, where you'd arguably kill more people?

>>133672541
>>133672585
>>133672693
morons

>>133672085
because the TSA couldn't have been invented without pretending there were planes.

File: 1455042646253.jpg (404KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 1920x1080px

>>133672541
I see, that makes sense. I feel kinda dumb now.

>>133672839
The game is nearly up mate.
http://www.wtc7evaluation.org/

>>133672541
>Because controlled demolitions take months of preparation and planning.

Which is precisely why it would be impossible for the illuminati to rig the towers to blow up. Somebody would notice them setting up the bombs, which would involve them working at nights when the building was empty for months.

>>133672836
In a plane even 1000 feet seems a lot lower than it is. You can't really see under the plane so I guess it was pretty stressful trying to hit a tower at 500 mph

>>133672085
If you want to enact all kind of intelligence, the more symbolic and emotional, the better. Planes flying into the tower and then eplosions is just more graphic than demolitions only.

In truth though it's just americans not wanting to see there's something out of their control. If someone managed to harm america... it just has to be other americans.

>>133673074
Check again.
http://aneta.org/911experiments_com/AceElevator/

>>133672085

isn't there also evidence of insider trading in the few days preceding the event?

>>133673269
Massive amounts. Look into who owned the buildings and who profited from 9/11 and the subsequent wars.

>>133673362

it's depressing that so few people care to look into it.

>>133673194
>In truth though it's just americans not wanting to see there's something out of their control. If someone managed to harm america... it just has to be other americans.

I'm undecided on this, I can see both sides. It's possible that sandniggers just felt like flying some planes into buildings, but a lot of parties immensely profited from 9/11 so there's definitely a motive for an inside job.

File: 12733551_1598909750331544_882633060056595690_n.jpg (146KB, 960x677px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 960x677px

>>133672085
The buildings were rigged with thermite in the elevator shafts just weeks prior, after (((Larry Silverstein))) took ownership, whom then placed a massive insurance claim against the towers for terror attacks.

Whether or not the US government was directly in control, or knew about it and let it happen (ala Pear Harbor), that is another discussion.

>>133673573
Wtc7 either defied Newtons laws on 9/11 during its 2.25 period of near symmetrical collapse at gravitational acceleration. Or it was a controlled demolition.

the insider trading is clearly the best evidence. it would be enough to convince anyone. practically indisputable.

File: 1488758401013.jpg (40KB, 475x701px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 475x701px

>>133673765
The high-jacked aircraft were the match to the thermite. There is plenty of video and audio evidence proving detonations throughout the building.

Then again... what happened to World Trade 7???

>>133673765

Your "thermite" was nothing more than molten glass and aluminum with burning embers for color. Thermite can't cut side to side. You put it on top of something and it cuts downwards due to gravity.

File: 1458712822505.png (880KB, 1421x682px) Image search: [Google]

880KB, 1421x682px

>>133674006
- A molten substance flowing from the building. GLOWING in daylight.
- Eyewitness and video of pools, of a molten substance at the bottom of the craters.
- NIST satellite heat maps of the craters, registering at upwards of 2000f.
- Smoke billowing for over a MONTH (did you forget?)

At this point, anyone whom believes the official narrative is just being indignant.

OK, I'll give you the quick rundown on 9/11

1. It was controlled demolition. Buildings hit by planes do not simply fall in on themselves. In fact, if you review footage of other buildings that are subject to controlled demolition, you will see they fall in exactly the same way.

2. More proof? Thermite was found in the ruins of the twin towers, and was not accounted for in the official explanation.
Cont

Where did all the debris go? Look at controlled demolitions and how high the debris stacks up. Even thermite wouldn't turn the towers into dust like they did. Has to be space based/Tesla tho weapon. The antennas on top turn to dust and disappears in thin air.
How did the wing tips cut perfect outline through the steel of the tower? Come on

>>133674324
>>133674421

this is weak.

INSIDER TRADING.

File: 1499473267299.png (674KB, 562x842px) Image search: [Google]

674KB, 562x842px

>>133674421
Hell, World Trade 7 wasn't even accounted for.

It's a MASSIVE fucking hole in the story.

>>133673573
Yeah but since all the intelligence, military parties aren't stupid it might just have been an accident, and they then went ahead to exploit it for what it's worth. Even if you didn't do it, no reason to let this chance pass.

>>133674324

Unfortunately there aren't many links to sites debunking these conspiracies anymore because few people actually believe them now and skeptics have better things to do. If the Bilderbergers are powerful enough to fake 9/11, then why couldn't they rig the elections to make Trump lose? I mean compared to faking 9/11, changing the data from voting machines should be pretty easy.

>>133674421
2 cont. additionally, many eyetwitnesses reported hearing loud bangs during the incident. This would be the thermite "bombs" exploding. Lots of thermite was found at scene, but not even discussed by NIST.

3. Squibs were clearly visible. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gKv-6bivqo

4. The whole Silverstein fiasco, I'm sure most of you already know. Immediately after inking the deal (few months), this happens. He and his whole family just happened to be late to work that day, meetings canceled, etc. He got billions from the incident from insurance.
Cont

File: 1470284116278.jpg (194KB, 1024x673px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1024x673px

>>133674637
One more piece to the obvious hoax.

Tell me: Does The Pentagon have an air defense system?

Some may not know, but that very spot where the plane hit The Pentagon, it had just been renovated. Why also is there no footage of this plane?

>>133674711
...reveal your flag, (((NIGGER))).

>>133672085

Not a question for me. I believe jet fuel and combustibles and the high winds at those altitudes made those floors a natural blast furnace.

>>133674929

It should be pretty obvious where I live if I have a confederate flag.

>>133674971
Watch the videos, then watch any plane crash.

Most of the fuel was spent in the initial blast. The rest were pretty much class-A fires. There are videos of people standing in the aircraft holes; wasn't as hot as you think. Moreover, a smokey fire, is a starved fire.

>>133675046
Poor bait, and ridiculously fallacious.

>>133674871

i'm fully convinced that all the pedantic "freefall speed", "thermite", "size of a missile" arguments are just disinfo to confuse normies and paint conspiracy theorists as nutjobs. maybe they're true, but they are too difficult for people to understand.

if we say 9/11 was an inside job, aren't we covering up for the saudis?

>>133675260

Lol, right. You still haven't explained why if the globalists have enough power to fake 9/11, why they couldn't even stop Trump from getting elected.

>>133672085
What plane flew into building 7?

>>133675462
Your flag level is not high enough to warrant a response.

>>133675684
debris

>>133675684
Silverstein Airlines

>>133675749

This better?

>>133672693
They already tried that and it didn't work.

>>133675856
Oh hey, you again.

>>133674868
5. Marvin Bush's security company, Securacom (now Stratestec) was employed by the Twin Towers, American Airlines, United, Dulles International Airport (where flights took off from) AND the only company that mass produced thermite at the time (can't remember name)

6. Eyewitnesses have reported that in the weeks leading up to 9/11, roads around WTC would be jam-packed with trucks carrying unknown substances that were being let into WTC. Thermite? I think so. Their activities only took place in the dead of night, and these trucks kept coming every night for weeks on end until a few days before 9/11.

6. Cover up: Right after 9/11, in an act that was later deemed to be illegal, trucks came in and cleared up the rubble before an investigation could take place. Within a couple of weeks, all the rubble from the towers and with them the traces of thermite were gone.

>>133672085
gay

>>133675684

It was flaming debris that set the building on fire. Building 7's design was centered heavily around a central support column. The heat from the fire caused it to weaken and that brought the entire building down. It probably wasn't the best design choice since a fire took it down.

File: tumblr_inline_of64wda40d1rom0uq_500.png (239KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 500x281px

>>133676154

File: p055vxpw.jpg (57KB, 720x405px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 720x405px

>>133676154
If just fire can bring down a building then why did this English apartment building not collapse in on itself?

File: images.jpg (10KB, 208x243px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 208x243px

>>133676154
This one is better.

File: wtc7standingsmoke.jpg (254KB, 640x444px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 640x444px

>>133676420
Here's a closer angle, later.

File: 1484499673532.png (520KB, 683x800px) Image search: [Google]

520KB, 683x800px

>>133672085
>All the world’s a stage,
>And all the men and women merely players;
>They have their exits and their entrances,
>And one man in his time plays many parts,

Shakespeare was trying to tell you something with this passage. Its not just true for one level of analysis but all levels. Those in the occult that control our world manage it like any other production. 9/11 was part magic ritual, part hollywood movie, and part pysop.

File: cut2.jpg (64KB, 593x473px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 593x473px

>>133676564
Here's a melted, drippy column.

>>133676420
Oh debris hits one side of building but it collapses perfectly in on itself.
>What is physics

File: wtc7.jpg (55KB, 792x434px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 792x434px

>>133676231
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/

>>133676352

There have been about 30 skyscrapers since 1970 that have been brought down by fires. I saw somebody posted a pdf on /b/ once with links to articles about every single one. I don't have it, though. 9/11 conspiracies aren't mainstream anymore, so people don't bother trying to debunk them.

File: thermite_melt.gif (100KB, 346x353px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 346x353px

>>133676706
...and this one is from 9/11.

>>133672085
They already tried that once

Also more shock and awe to scare people with

>>133672850
yup

>>133676633
i sincerely dislike being lied to.

File: moltensteelcollage.jpg (30KB, 400x324px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 400x324px

>>133676797
Lots of molten steel.

>>133676725

It fell because the fire weakened a central support column. Steel loses its strength as it heats up. That was what brought the building down.

>>133672085
So you can increase AIR TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS numbnuts.

>>133676706
All columns would have to fail at the exact same moment for it to collapse like it did. If one column was a Milla second off it would fall to one side

>>133674711
I read an article where it stated something like 40% of Americans believed the us government had something to do with it and something like 65% of non American people believe it as well.

Just because you don't believe it or people in your area don't, doesn't mean many do.

File: Global Guardian '01.jpg (59KB, 520x400px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 520x400px

>>133672085

>>133676991

Blurry photos don't prove anything.

>>133677045

Yeah, that was a long time ago. Even the creator of Loose Change doesn't believe it anymore.

>>133677010
With perfect cuts in major columns? With molten steel? Most of the fuel spent in the initial crash? Evidence of explosions including general overpressure?

Take the pill...

>>133676352
it wasn't hit by an airplane filled with jet fuel you retard

>>133672085
That's not a good question. "What was the invasion of Iraq true purpose?" is a better one.

>>133677026
>Floor 13 collapsed, beginning a cascade of floor failures to Floor 5. Column 79, no longer supported by a girder, buckled, triggering a rapid succession of structural failures that moved from east to west. All 23 central columns, followed by the exterior columns, failed in what's known as a "progressive collapse"--that is, local damage that spreads from one structural element to another, eventually resulting in the collapse of the entire structure.

domino effect

>>133672850
It's this. This this this. This is the one guys.

>>133672541
FBI report - Israelis caught with bombs on 9/11
>http://www.scribd.com/collections/4010452/9-11-The-Dancing-Israelis-FBI-report

>>133677026
Free-fall speeds.

>>133677218

And what cut those columns? Your gravity defying thermite that cuts side to side? Lol.

File: 1487036252957.jpg (24KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 320x320px

>>133677045

won't it be glorious when it hits critical mass and people raise hell?

Bush didn't do 9/11.

Bill Clinton did. This was all a plan designed to set Hillary up for the White House in 2008, by handing Bush a second term off of a rally around the flag effect (thus ensuring the Republicans oversaw the economic collapse Clinton set into motion through economic deregulation).

>>133677228
Multiple video angles, and too much evidence for it not to be aircraft.

CG wasn't nearly that good back then, let alone LIVE on TV.

>>133677181
>Even the creator of Loose Change doesn't believe it anymore.

i'm sure he was told not to believe it in no uncertain terms.

>>133672085
It allowed for the creation of a high surveillance state.

Everything transportation wise changed after 9/11. The Bush -> Obama movement was planned.

John Mccain tossed his win in the trash. He made a joke of his candidacy by taking Palin as the VP pick. He could have won but purposely fucked it up to get Obama in the white house.

Clinton was next in line to start the globalism spread and begin disarming and enforcing more control over the US/European people. The goal was to end Russia and it's allies.

I would assume the step after that would be to rip open borders to raise the poverty by destroying the housing market and the economy and eventually establishing a global currency thus hurting the United States and allowing for a stream of taxes.

>>133672085
there are so many things americans believe which your can't get... just stop trying.

File: 1498599216195.jpg (36KB, 600x657px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 600x657px

>>133677010

>>133677255
why did they want to bring down saddam

>>133677412
Maybe it was their passports that survived the crash and fire. Or maybe it was when they found the high-jackers safe and sound, on the other side of the world.

>>133677266
Domino effect would not fall at free fall speed...each floor would slow down structure above.

Also it still doesn't address the reinforced concrete and steel superstructure that formed the core and housed the elevators.

Fucking duuuuh. Doesn't take an engineer to figure this out, but then again i am one

>>133677655

so what exactly was accomplished with this surveillance, where is the profit for the schemers?

>The goal was to end Russia and it's allies.
huh?? where is the connection? USA is always against russia because they're quite strong militarily

>>133677683
Just as Germans believe islam is compatible with the west. Did you guys outlaw trucks yet?

>>133677181
What makes you think most people have changed their minds about it?

File: 12361.png (349KB, 469x352px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 469x352px

>>133677804
>each floor would slow down structure above.

controlled demolitions work the same way, they don't blow up every floor at the same time, they just damage critical parts and the building comes down

>>133672085
The drama and the trauma of the visuals make you suspend disbelief and sense as you go into fight/flight response. Ask anyone with PTSD why they act irrational when they're triggered.

>>133677655
McCain was never going to win...

9/11 was a pretext to war, and the Patriot Act. Although, it's just general globalism. 'One hemispheric world' as Hillary said.

They wanted to crash the US economy and create the North American Union. A three state country consisting of Canada, The United States, and Mexico.
- No more constitution.
- No more bill of rights.
- No more guns.
- No more dollar.

Instead we get the 'Amaro'. YAY, we can be like Europe!! Fuck you.

>>133678281
You realize you've just described the events of 911, right? Maybe look up the reports of eyewitnesses who experienced and heard explosions at the bases of the towers

>>133672541
So now it wasn't a demolition but it's true they flew planes into it?
I don't get it.
First you guys say it was the gubmint who planted bombs and some termite "cuz jet fuel doesn't melts steel beams!" But now "the gubmint didnt plant bombs as it would take too long, they actually used the planes"

How des that works?

>>133677775
Same reason they brought down Gaddafi; same reason they want to bring down Assad.

They don't want to be part of the (((banking))) system.

>>133678584

Read
>>133673765
>>133673985

File: Before_the_fire_trucks_arrive.jpg (39KB, 654x420px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 654x420px

>>133672085
>just pretend that muslim terrorists planted bombs
-the tower were patrolled by bomb-sniffing dogs (but only until a week before 9/11)
-BTW It takes weeks to setup a controlled demolition
-"they" needed to destroy WTC7 which housed orignals documents concerning the Enron and Worldcom scandals
-"they" needed to stop the investigation of the missing 2 trillion dollars in the Pentagon, which were the only people killed in that building.

Bamp

>>133672085
>Why fly planes into the buildings when you can just pretend that muslim terrorists planted bombs? I don't get it
In 1993 they exploded a truck bomb under one tower, it did jack shit. So the next time they used planes knowing they would need a pretty go show to convince the public it was camel-jockies that could level the entire complex

>>133678554
>You realize you've just described the events of 911, right?
yes, they are indistuingishable. The collapse through fire looks like a demolition. Hence the confusion and suspicion

>Maybe look up the reports of eyewitnesses who experienced and heard explosions at the bases of the towers
when the building starts cracking and breaking there will be sounds like this. the reason it sounds like it comes from the ground can be echoes, as well as the fact that the sounds were load and people were on the ground, so they assusme the source must have been close.

>>133678741
Why can't they both be right?

>>133677775
Why did they let him in place since 1990 if democracy was so important? And why did they destroy a secular state if they were fighting against religious terrorism?

Perhaps Saddam the 'Stache had the idea to sell his oil in an other currency than the failing dollar?
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2003/feb/16/iraq.theeuro

>>133673765
>Whether or not the US government was directly in control, or knew about it and let it happen (ala Pear Harbor), that is another discussion.

I think it's safe to assume the government is incompetent and doesn't get anything done, so they were just too dumb to stop it or even comprehend it while it was happening.

>>133679045
Don't give them traffic
https://archive.is/j3y8B

>>133672085
Airplanes flying into the Twin Towers and taking them down was a more memorable and even majestic visual, the idea was to create the biggest visual experience that would be forever implanted into everyone's mind.

>On the days leading up to 9/11, two airlines saw a rise in their put to call ratio. These two airlines were United Airlines and American Airlines, the two airlines whose planes were hijacked on 9/11. Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 "put" option contracts in UAL versus 396 call options. On September 10, more trading in Chicago saw the purchase of 4,516 put options in American Airlines, the other airline involved in the hijackings. This compares with a mere 748 call options in American purchased that day. No other airline companies saw anomalies in their put to call ratio in the days leading up to the attacks.[65] American Airlines however, had just released a major warning about possible losses.[66]

>Insurance companies saw anomalous trading activities as well. Citigroup Inc., which has estimated that its Travelers Insurance unit may pay $500 million in claims from the World Trade Center attack, had about 45 times the normal volume during three trading days before the attack for options that profit if the stock falls below $40. Citigroup shares fell $1.25 in late trading to $38.09. Morgan Stanley, which occupied 22 floors at the World Trade Center, experienced bigger-than-normal pre-attack trading of options that profit when stock prices fall. Other companies that were directly affected by the tragedy had similar jumps.[67]

>Raytheon, a defense contractor, had an anomalously high number of call options trading on September 10. A Raytheon option that makes money if shares are more than $25 each had 232 options contracts traded on the day before the attacks, almost six times the total number of trades that had occurred before that day.


all on wikipedia.

>>133677106
they prove jet fuel didn't "weaken" the steel beams - something melted them

>>133672085

The planes werre a diversion. If you understand that then you know what happened.

>>133679100
That's possible, but the military isn't.

How did an airliner penetrate the most heavily controlled airspace in the world?

Kikes love theater.

>>133672085
>not understanding false flag attacks

File: 1480008316683.jpg (32KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 500x375px

>>133679154
I've always seen that quoted, but never seen a chart.

>>133672085
>Why fly planes into the buildings when you can just pretend that muslim terrorists planted bombs? I don't get it.
Because it would be impossible to plant enough bombs to bring the building down, without being detected. Nigga, 3 buildings pulverized to dust in less than a day, all on their own foot print, in a controlled demolition fashion, and you expect people to not be suspicious? All while the official story being full of holes and completely debunked by engineers and archietects? KYS

>>133672541
Why didn't they just pour jet fuel on the steel beams and light it?

>>133673194
or, you know, ISRAEL

>>133679475

follow the citations.

>>133674006
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmA59hQnoOU

You are wrong, ignorant, lazy, and stupid.

>>133679520
The Day of the Rake, has been postponed.

>>133679475

and in fact i don't ever remember seeing it quoted. most people drone on about freefall speeds and thermite.

File: IMG_2963.jpg (232KB, 829x1024px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 829x1024px

>>133672850
Tru

>>133679721
I've looked pretty far down that hole. I lived in the DC Metro area at the time, and it was always a curiosity.

>>133679300
they might have blocked themselves with "one life is one too many!!" and responsibility problems

I agree though, the military is a web of intrigue, it is the opposite of transparent. And they're willing to make a sacrifice for strategical benefits.

>>133673194
Exactly this. People see planes and immediately refuse that anything other than a jetliner would be the cause of the collapse because of "well duh a jetliner argument". Fact is, all jet fuel evaporated in the main explosions and the planes were smoke and mirrors for the actual demolition job that went on in the background behind all the chaos and panic. Perfect illusions and also a great excuse to scare everyone with the idea that terror now comes in planes too. Be afraid and give up your security and we will protect you. That's what those olanes were there for too.

>>133672085
Don't know if this http://archive.is/Kf9sf is relevant but figured I would share

>>133679884
There's much more to this story than we know.

>>133672085
they got carried away and decided to make Die Hard

>>133679995
Patriot Act.

Kek doesn't lie.

>>133679865

you're right though. i've seen plenty of

>>133676991
>>133676797
>>133676706
>>133676231
>>133676420
>>133676564

which mean very little to the average joe.

but never

>On the days leading up to 9/11, two airlines saw a rise in their put to call ratio. These two airlines were United Airlines and American Airlines, the two airlines whose planes were hijacked on 9/11. Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 "put" option contracts in UAL versus 396 call options. On September 10, more trading in Chicago saw the purchase of 4,516 put options in American Airlines, the other airline involved in the hijackings. This compares with a mere 748 call options in American purchased that day. No other airline companies saw anomalies in their put to call ratio in the days leading up to the attacks.[65] American Airlines however, had just released a major warning about possible losses.[66]

>Insurance companies saw anomalous trading activities as well. Citigroup Inc., which has estimated that its Travelers Insurance unit may pay $500 million in claims from the World Trade Center attack, had about 45 times the normal volume during three trading days before the attack for options that profit if the stock falls below $40. Citigroup shares fell $1.25 in late trading to $38.09. Morgan Stanley, which occupied 22 floors at the World Trade Center, experienced bigger-than-normal pre-attack trading of options that profit when stock prices fall. Other companies that were directly affected by the tragedy had similar jumps.[67]

>Raytheon, a defense contractor, had an anomalously high number of call options trading on September 10. A Raytheon option that makes money if shares are more than $25 each had 232 options contracts traded on the day before the attacks, almost six times the total number of trades that had occurred before that day.

pretty amazing that it's even on wikipedia.

>>133676154
>American engineering

File: regime4.jpg (57KB, 590x378px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 590x378px

>>133672085
Why...

>Segment a group of employees (perhaps they knew about their boss cheating).
>Gas Segmented employees (goodbye evidence).
>Collect secret insurance bailout (9/11 was over leveraged and wrecked our economy in reality).
>Insurance Companies now too big too fail and believe they are James Bond (in terms of ignoring your privacy).

Have Fun!

>>133680243
I just think that, that is the most appealing, and obviously damning information to make a person question the false consciousness..

>>133680119
we have a winner

File: plane.webm (3MB, 712x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 712x480px

>>133672085
Because if people looked into something that close to the truth people would easily be able to figure out it was mossad who did it considering they planted the actual bombs etc

the planes are most likely CGI btw

>>133672085
The real question is this.

Why are you expecting mentally retarded 9/11 truthers to make a rational case for their belief in one of the most irrational explanations that exist on what happened on 9/11

>>133673546
That's how an effective conspiracy works. Makes you look like a lunatic for questioning anything.

>>133673074
people thought they were working on some lame art project

how often have not someone done something in a building you worked at without you running to the police about it? Pretty much every single month unless you never leave your basement.

if some official says they have a reason to be there then everyone will stop caring and focus on their own shit, as always

>>133680668


well it's a piss-poor cover up. pretty sure i could convince anyone if i tried.

File: 1499030643278.png (239KB, 416x500px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 416x500px

>>133680601
I've seen that, and it's somewhat convincing, but people on the ground recorded, at least the second event. Too much evidence.

>>133672850
Red pilled motherfucker, this guy.

>>133672085
Great, a 9/11 thread. I've also been meaning to ask the people who believe 9/11 was an inside job something, but I felt like it was not worth a whole thread. Do you people really think 9/11 was an inside job?

>>133680881

you a bot or something? watch those commas

>>133676154
not even a house of cards or a bonfire is built with such weak structure, get real

>>133680601
>can automatically track the towers to mask the plane
>can't automatically track the towers to stop displaying the plane
This is why nobody takes your lot seriously. You have no fucking clue what you're saying. Every time you post (((evidence))) that you're """right""", you instead show hard evidence that you are completely wrong. Then you act smug and call everyone who doesn't agree a shill. "oh I'm so enlightened because 2+2=5 look at me WEEE". Kill yourselves. You're the reason real conspiracies are being hidden and will never be revealed.

File: 1488099304180.webm (425KB, 920x615px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 920x615px

>>133681032

File: 1476737210543.jpg (57KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 612x612px

>>133673985
>what happened to World Trade 7???
"Pull it."

File: 1499994783082.gif (2MB, 245x207px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 245x207px

>>133680798
>how often have not someone done something in a building

Holy shit dude, what??

File: 1498871306968.jpg (48KB, 356x600px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 356x600px

>>133680901
>>Shows up late.
>>Didn't read anything.

>>133672085
Watch the lone gunman pilot episode, realize it was on March 4th 2001.
Shit bricks

File: world_trade_center_7_WTC7_911_meme_BBC.jpg (47KB, 712x532px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 712x532px

>>133677010
What a dumbass, get and education you cuck.

>>133680901
We don't think it was, we know it was. Haven't you learned not to trust your rulers?

Pol is always right

>>133681000
Geeze, try some grammar.

File: 38d.jpg (155KB, 400x505px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 400x505px

>>133677412
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g

>>133681128
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lone_Gunmen

>>133681205
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALq3ewgaKE0

>>133672085
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l47D5ISemds&t=5s

>>133678839
No, it does not "look like" a demolition, it IS a demolition.

You are stupid if you look at something that is identical but somehow reach a different conclusion because of reasons and rationalizations. Do yourself a favor and think

its common knowledge that this was a inside job at this point, if you ask people below 30 the majority believe it was set up

>>133672839
Good argument

>>133680901
Almost definitely the CIA. Look at the deathbed confessions of ex-cia who were involved on building 7. Look at the engineering and scientific independent experiments and investigations. And finally FOLLOW THE MONEY look into who PROFITED by 9/11, both from the collapse of the building, the increased defense spending, and the oil/resource plays in the middle east.

>>133681228

very funny.

>>133681065
WTF bro. How do you have the original pre-doctored footage? WTF BRO WTF

>>133681205
>Salomon Brother building has also collapsed
>Salomon Brother

>>133681024
You are a moron, that is the original clip, go find the one where the plane have not been "removed" and you will fail.

Besides, there are no videos that actually look convincing if you compare them to any other plane crash, and you looked at this one little detail and had problems rationalizing, think what happens if you actually spend some effort looking into it?
>>133680881
Too much evidence? Have you fallen victim to the meme? One of the problems since day one have been the lack of video. Especially when it comes to different angles, the videos that do show different angles does not add up properly, as in, it looks like a lazy mistake in a hollywood blockbuster.

>>133672085
Came here for hilarious 9/11 memes. Left disappointed.

Instead, I'll add my 2 cents. Those building were made to withstand a hit from an airplane 2 or 3 classes larger. There's absolutely no reason why something that small should have been able to devastate the structural integrity of those buildings by as much as they did.

>>133681723
Thanks for demonstrating the height of your intellect. Even someone with glassbones syndrome wouldn't get hurt falling from up there.

>>133673985
(((Lucky Larry))) "pulled it." Boy, did he make a killing off of 9/11. Just a pure (((coincidence))) though.

>>133681088
>hey anon, these assholes are gonna do some art project, don't mind them
>ok!

That is gonna be the end of anyone looking into what strangers are doing in your office building.

Strangers come and go in buildings all the time to fix, change, move, prepare etc

in all office buildings there are all kinds of people doing all kinds of shit you don't have anything to do with so it is very easy for a agency like mossad to get access

>>133676154
>The heat from the fire caused it to weaken and that brought the entire building down

Isn't it weird, that in the history of the entire world, that WTC7 is the only skyscraper or high rise building to collapse due to fire damage alone?

Hell, the building after the bomb in Oklahoma City was still standing.

Still, just a coincidence, right?

>>133681205
Greenscreen fuck up. They likely used older footage behind the narrator who was not actually in NY or some shit. Likely as they would have been panicked and rushing to get out the scoop. As for any CGI videos out there: Some people who wanted to sell first hand account videos to a media rushing to get the scoop may have fabricated eye candy for the news and $. People died on 9/11 but we are missing a lot of truth.

>>133681779
>>133681887

It happened by coincidence, TWICE that day.

>>133681850
People will see me providing arguments and actual things to research or look into and then they will look at you and see a moron who had to resort to petty insults, thanks for helping my cause

File: post.png (221KB, 304x697px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 304x697px

>>133677010

File: eb6.jpg (46KB, 600x689px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 600x689px

>>133682084
Kek

>>133673985
Building seven was taken down because that's were the whole operation was run out of. There were secret subway lines running to it and everything under the guise of maintenance tunnels. All of the physical trails of corrupt elements within our government involvement were in this building. This is also why the evidence of "the plane" at the Pentagon was buried under many feet of dirt

>>133682504
>evidence
>pentagon

Those don't belong in the same sentence.

>>133681065
WTF

File: 1492068447371.gif (3MB, 336x335px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 336x335px

>>133681779
Here you go, froggy

>>133681065
dafuq is this?

File: tinfoilhat.jpg (414KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

414KB, 1024x768px

Here's the final DEBUNKING of 9/11 conspiracies:

1)if you believe in 9/11 conspiratard stuff you=twoofer
2)if you=twoofer then we make fun of you, and people think you=crazy nutjob
3)9/11 therefore was NOT and inside job

>>133682687
Oh my god that's the funniest shit I've seen in awhile anon. Many thanks.

>>133675684
A controlled demolition to cover all physical trace of the operation. Building 7 was were the corrupt criminals in our government at the time ran the whole thing.

>>133672839

>brit who probobaly likes to LARP like he is some kind of university professor super intellectual atheist

wait thats all brits

>>133681978
This. I manage two skyscrapers. We've got engineers and contractors and technicians I'm and out every day. Unless you're really, really on point with supervision of everything (99% arent) then it's pretty easy for someone dressed as a janitor or engineer to fuck some shit up.

File: 1499642125402.jpg (462KB, 1900x1371px) Image search: [Google]

462KB, 1900x1371px

>>133674711
vnice question, day of the election first thing I thougth was
> so the elections aren't rigged?
conspiracy answer: because they wanted him to win

>>133676154
Building seven and Flight 93 are the keys to the whole mystery, aren't they?

File: 83f.jpg (105KB, 611x924px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 611x924px

>>133672085
There's no possible way that 9/11 could have been an inside job... I mean, the planes come from the outside.

>>133672085
Really don't understand why people didn't jump off with a table under them then at the end jump off that's what I woulda done :)

File: IMG_2918.jpg (43KB, 593x600px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 593x600px

>>133672085

Because they saw Loose Change, which never identified the power structure responsible for allowing it to happen.

9/11 happened because the CIA allowed it to. Bush was on a need to know basis and I believe Cheney was too, but only at arms length to the point of going to war in Iraq.

It's the Deep State and it's an insidious network of the worst people ruining America.

>>133676770
Every single one had their skeletal structure still intact tho.

Fires will never burn hot enough to weaken structural grade steel.

I tend to believe the hypothesis that United 93 was originally scheduled to slam into WTC 7, thus making the detonation less obvious like it's two bigger brothers.

Obviously something went wrong with United 93, and so (((they))) had to improvise. What went wrong with 93? Who knows? I don't believe it crashed into that field and atomized though, that's for sure.

>>133674871

Fun fact about the Pentagon, one of the anchors who was there when it was attacked reported live just after it happened that both he and the employees who were around him were certain it was a missile impact.

File: pol always right.jpg (99KB, 890x876px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 890x876px

What is up with all the obvious redditors in this thread? Jesus Christ, just look at all the reddit spacing, it's like we're being brigaded. Did something happen over there? Because this is getting kind of annoying. Old /pol/ has no doubts whatsoever that 9/11 was an inside job. Look up James Corbett's exposé on the missing trillions of dollars. Look up fucking Ryan Dawson's War By Deception where he will factually walk you through all the fucking documents and will assert what the political will was in regards to a "new Pearl Harbor".

You don't need to postulate about how the fuck they rigged the buildings with bombs, that is absolutely unnecessary and a distraction. This most certainly was an inside job or at the very least was allowed to happen.

>>133683357

It doesn't need to.

>jet plane flying into office building and exploding from the inside, lighting an office building on fire over multiple floors

Physics and warping did the rest. WTC2 fell lopsided, which IS NOT a controlled demolition. You had more weight sagging toward the bottom. That's why WTC1 stayed up for as long as it did.

File: Tetristowers.gif (59KB, 233x465px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 233x465px

>>133682888
Nice trips.

>>133683736
I'm sorry sir but 13 damaged floors falling on 97 structurally sound floors a collapse does not make.

And again, explosion was a shock wave of irrelevant force and a jet fuel burn that burned up within seconds.

>>133684001
Even having 13 damage floors to begin with should raise all sorts of flags but I still say that arguing how they did it or how it happen completely irrelevant. Just pointing out the (((coincidences))) should me more than fucking enough for anyone with a functioning brain.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgrunnLcG9Q

>>133684001

13 weakened floors holding half the building up?

>>133684500
No the 13 damaged floors were from the impact floor up to the top. The 97 structurally sound floors were holding up the building

File: addtext_com_MDAyNDI4MjQ1NTA1.png (100KB, 547x402px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 547x402px

my cock in your mom was an indide job as i fisted your sister

>>133672085
the same reason a magician does a routine of pizzazz and smoke while he does the trick. keeps the audience focused on the diversion and makes it harder to see the truth.

File: 1484433542635m.jpg (86KB, 290x1024px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 290x1024px

>>133672085
See attached file.

>>133683736
>Speaking of physics without knowing jack shit about it
Flag checks out.

>>133677019
i was spaghetting

I mean honestly, who fucking cares? The important thing, is that the event probably killed liberals more than anyone who matters.

>>133684682

Yeah and all it took was one floor to buckle.

>>133685619
Old lucky Larry.

>>133685965
Go fuck yourself, dimwit. Nothing good came out of 9/11, just evil war and senseless imperialism.

>>133686504
Why are you even here, anon? It is abundantly clear that you're not from around these parts. And shilling your silly jenga logic doesn't convince anyone.

>>133679045
they attacked afganistan first. This was three years late under the bullshit of WoMD; nothing related to terrorism, wasnt it?

>>133681228
lol you bot

>>133672085
Cause Marvin Bush ran security at airports, made a quick idiot dollar. In the long run, it fucked up the narrative. Hang em high.