Edition: The Mad Baron
This is a thread for the discussion of Monarchism, Culture and Traditionalism.
Resources:
https://pastebin.com/LyfpyJPt
Q/A:
Q: Why do you support a dead ideology?
A: Ideologies do not die, they are merely abandoned by the ignorant masses.
Q: So you support North Korea then?
A: No, North Korea is a Communist Dictatorship - and goes against many values of Monarchism such as the strong connections to Tradition and Culture which the North Koreans have replaced with a mindless cult.
Q: Wouldn't Hereditary Succession allow madmen to get in power simply by birth?
A: No, the Rightful heir would by default be tutored and educated from birth to rule as a proper and efficient leader. In this way a Monarchy allows a much more smoother transition of power and long-term stability than democracy or a dictatorship.
Q: So you support tyranny and the loss of people's rights?
A: This varies from monarchist to monarchist; Absolutists often do but Constitutionalists and Enlightened Absolutists often oppose it.
Social Media:
Curious about being a Monarchist or our Beliefs?
Join our discord.
Discord code: dKXSSxF
i hate g*rmans so much
>>133629138
Bumped for morality
To clarify about the third Q, monarchists do not support Tyranny but some support restrictions on civil/political rights.
>>133629310
>but some support restrictions on civil/political rights.
The only issue most people have with that is they don't like people admitting it. Like, even Tea Party supporters are okay with it if you don't call it that.
>>133629294
>tfw society will never be created in peters image
we are cursed to a death of neo-pagan faggotry and skimmed milk ;^(
In France some people make a distinction between monarchists and royalists.
A monarchist wants one (and only one) man making decisions.
A royalist wants a royal dynasty to rule.
obviously those two things don't completely overlap.
Do you do the same distinction?
>>133629713
I'd say that the first describes an absolute monarchist and the second describes some other form, which we do distinguish between on our discord
>>133629138
Absolute monarchism or bust. Any division of sovereignty will eventually produce democracy.
That being said, due to the economic calculation problem and other issues with central planning, the state should cultivate a market economy. Consumerism is a result of central banking and democracy anyway.
A strong state with autonomy for those subjects who have discipline. No need for enlightenment technocratic bullshit.
>>133630693
>deus vult flag
>valid opinions
>>133629294
>>133630807
Nobody cares, /int/ faggot
>>133629875
Thanks for the clarification
>>133630904
Republican government in the classic sense is just a scam to skim money from the relationship between landlord and tenant.
What does secular government do that a landlord cannot do?
>>133629562
Woah. I don't want the state to stick their nose where it don't belong but at the same time degeneracy should be suppressed. Am I a monarchist?
>>133633153
Do you also believe that the person with the most invested in the state should be the one in charge? And that said person should be trained from birth for the task?
If so, yes.
>>133633153
You sound like a Monarchist, perhaps you should join the discord. We've got plenty of people with this type of mindset, and others.
>>133633001