Support Net neutrality!

>>133627455
nigger

>>133627455
Bump

>>133627455
Bump

Net neutrality struck down
Wat do?

>>133629523
Fight back bro
We need net neutrality so that the internet isn't censored up the ass

https://www.battleforthenet.com

>>133627455
Keep bumping!

>>133627455
Bump bump

Trump returned us to the way the internet's always been for 3 decades, the horror!

File: after.png (143KB, 1000x521px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 1000x521px

>>133627455
Dong forget to buy the big scoop goys!

>>133627455
Bump

Use a vpn in that case.

>>133627455
Bump for the internet. Bump against the (((ISPs))).

>>133627455

>go to the website!
https://www.battleforthenet.com

>>133627455
ATT supports it, so everyone can discard your opinions.

No.
Why?
OP is a faggot, obviously, look at the pic he chose

>>133627455

Bumps rolling

File: 1499909834479.png (253KB, 578x471px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 578x471px

>>133627455
>Comcast, Verizon and AT&T want to end net neutrality so they can charge extra fees
There is nothing stopping them from raising the price across the board right now.

>>133633095
Who cares! This is about Net neutrality motherfucker! You know, the thing that 4chan is based on?!?!

>dumbass

>>133627455
I'm bumping for the internet!

>>133627455
Bump for one and bump for all!

>>133627455
Read section 223 you fucking mong

>fags like OP don't even understand net neutrality

File: 1485979802437.png (92KB, 252x254px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 252x254px

>>133633438
>being this engaged

>>133627455
Your statement is false, Comcast supports NN, just not title 2, they have been the only SIP to directly support NN legislation/rule making. http://corporate.comcast.com/comcast-voices/comcast-supports-net-neutrality-and-reversal-of-title-ii-classification-title-ii-is-not-net-neutrality

>>133635116
I'm in support of Net neutrality.....dude?!?!
Anti censorship and such ?!?!

>>133627455
hey, styx!

>>133635569
It was copy pasted from https://www.battleforthenet.com
So its not exactly my statement.....

>>133635606
What does censorship have to do with net neutrality? Was 4chan censored back in its early years before NN legislation was passed? Oh lord of course you have no idea because you're some newfag moron.

>>133627455
Gotta give another bump

>>133627455
Giving a bump!

>>133627455
I bump way more than I should..... Fuck it..... BUMP!!!!!

>Comcast supports NN
>Jewbook supports it
>Jewflix supports it
>Soros supports it
>Reddit supports it
>Jewtube supports it
>Obama supports it
>Jewgle supports it
>Average peon, who can't even explain what NN is or why the ISPs are against it, supports it

No, fuck off.

>the anti NN thread is full of genuine posts telling the shill to fuck off
>this thread has half the IPs as it does posts and its all vapid shit
LOL!

>>133641698
a nice flag

>>133627455
nice data mining

>>133627455
Take Zuckerberg dick off of your mouth, socialist nigger.

Net Neutrality is """benevolent government overwatch""" of the internet; and only Reddit non-geek cucks think it makes them sound "geeky" to support it.

>>133627455
Bump.
Petition!
Fight!

File: 1458181238535.jpg (84KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 512x512px

>>133627455
>control what we see & do online
doesn't the government and the internet already do this, they pretty much log everything that you do already so what's wrong with giving them more power?
The people have already bent the knee but NOW it's a concern, it was a problem a long time ago but now you complain.

pathetic
I hope they gain complete control and everyone loses everything they enjoy doing on the internet for letting them come this far

>>133641920
But I do support it though?.....

>>133627455
> First page of your shit website
> John Oliver and Bernie Sanders pleading for Net Neutrality. What's not to love ?!

I love how it mention BIG CORPORATIONS like Comcast without disclosing the pro-NetNeutrality effort is itself sponsored by Facebook, Google and Twitter

>>133642147
Wow, please go back to plebbit

>>133627455
>>133628041
>>133628537
>>133630325
>>133632026
>>133633185
Hey newfag. You cannot bump your own posts. Also you are a retard and clearly misinformed

File: nonono.gif (121KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 300x168px

>>133627455
>LET'S PUT THE GOVERNMENT IN CHARGE OF THE INTERNET

no

I'm sorry everyone! I didn't make it clear that I DO support net neutrality..... Sorry for the confusion..... I didn't make it clear when I first made the thread, sorry! I'm PRO NET NEUTRALITY!!!!!

Now let's go fight to help the internet!

>>133642583
>>133642458
>>133642301

Please read
>>133642875

IM PRO NET NEUTRALITY!!!!!

wow that shitty thread is still up. So there are currently entities using resources to shill on /pol/. Do you really think the muaahhltright is still here? You won the ocean of piss, the scapegoat, have fun with it. When we need it we will be back

Reminder to always do the opposite of what (((google))) and (((facebook))) say.

>>133643361

This >>133642875

>>133643465

This >>133642875

>>133627455
>Believing the liberal agenda

Only communists who want everything for free care for Net Neutrality, capitalism is a foundation of the United States of America and companies should be free to make use of their right to earn money.

>>133643689
Ending net neutrality will hurt smaller companys though..... Ending it would cause more harm to capitalism than it would good.....

>>133627455
Net neutrality warriors are retards wth a complete lack of understanding of basic legal principles. Abuse of dominant market positions and horizontal agreements already covered by antitrust laws. 2007 rulings already established the illegality of slowdown/blocking of specific services or sites. The FTC was already an effective enforcement mechanism. Supporterd think NN prevents tiered systems of data speed. Have you ever actually looked at service options? Every carrier in the US offers different packages based on speed, which allows people to pay less for slow speeds, would you really rather have 1 high speed option only with exorbitant costs? What do supporters actually expect will happen if FCC title 2 oversight will be rolled back?

>>133645545
hey ho Nigger, haven't you gotten the memo? /pol/ is kill. Let stormfags and libtardians have the place again. Well you can stay, but you will not be paid for posting any more. And yes, Net Neutrality is just a way for big players to grow their revenue where a state system can break their monopolies.
>ib4 shill unironically replying to this post along the line. Customer has to pay, they will censor...
Who are you trying to convince? Yourself?

>>133646409
Tfw cuckchan has become unbearable but infinitychan still lacks in user numbers so no decent discussion possible

>>133644005
What smaller companies? and even if there are these small companies, they're protected by AT laws if they provide decent competition

So can someone explain to me the argurement against it?

>>133647429
That it already exists and the net neutrality meme is just a means for government expansion. FCC are a bunch of power hungry kikes, they don't need more power

>>133633095
>OP is a faggot
fuck off to le /b/