Why is Chomsky so based /pol/?

>>133549491
His voice sounds like a wood chipper though, and his way of speaking is too verbose. Just can't stand listening to him.

>>133549491
>>Libertarian Socialist
I hate both you and him so very much.

t. Left libertarian

PS: socialism is always authoritarian no backsies, just because he's less authoritarian than.. say... Antifa, doesn't mean he's not above the centre point of the spectrum. I still consider him an authoritarian.

>>133549491
>>BTFO Molymeme
When was this?

He never got a clue regarding politics, and dont even think about asking his opinion regarding international politics. Always a miss.

>libertarian socialist


heres the thing guy, you can't just be "socially libertarian" but "economically socialist" because that's just fucking socialist, and the diametric opposite of "libertarian"

>>133549491
Chomsky is a retard. Seriously, actually listen to the guy. He might be a great linguist, I have no idea, but he's a retard in regards to politics. All he does is paraphrase obscure sources. He's completely unable to deal with abstract concepts. He's a fucking nigger retard.

>>133549491
>wow what a resume
>also completely irrelevant

>>133550221
Molyneux interviewed him and let him speak. They didn't even argue. But you could tell at some points Molyneux disagreed but wanted to let people hear the good things Chomsky had to say. If its not an argument he can't be BTFO. You'll also notice in the comments all the Antifa types saying Chomsky BTFO Molyneux even though it wasn't an argument and Molyneux brought him on because they agree on a lot.

Shortly after this interview Molyneux became far more confrontational and started saying that allying with leftists doesn't work because they backstab their allies. He made lots of quotes on how Rothbard tried to ally with leftists but thought it was futile. This post is literally why no one trusts or ever works with these fags. Watch the youtube interview between the two and you will watch Molyneux praise Chomsky and his leftist degenerate following believes the two are somehow arguing.

>>133549491
hasnt read a single wikileak and it shows
anti israel in name only

>>133549491
You realize they never argued. Molyneux brought him on and praised him and you say he was BTFO. My God you lefties fail so hard the only "victories" you have are things that never happened. Please explain to me how he can BTFO out someone when there never was an argument.

>>133550575
Exactly. His understanding of economics is legitimately borderline retarded (as expected for a leftie).

>>133550575
He's great on foreign policy and the stupidity of American interventionism. Just bad on economics.